RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be associated with greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and reduction in death or heart failure hospitalization compared with biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing BVP and LBBAP. METHODS: The I-CLAS study (International Collaborative LBBAP Study) included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent BVP or LBBAP for cardiac resynchronization therapy between January 2018 and June 2022 at 15 centers. We performed propensity score-matched analysis of LBBAP and BVP in a 1:1 ratio. We assessed the incidence of VT/VF and new-onset AF among patients with no history of AF. Time to sustained VT/VF and time to new-onset AF was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards survival model. RESULTS: Among 1778 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (BVP, 981; LBBAP, 797), there were 1414 propensity score-matched patients (propensity score-matched BVP, 707; propensity score-matched LBBAP, 707). The occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (4.2% versus 9.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.74]; P<0.001). The incidence of VT storm (>3 episodes in 24 hours) was also significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (0.8% versus 2.5%; P=0.013). Among 299 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (BVP, 111; LBBAP, 188), VT/VF occurred in 8 patients in the BVP group versus none in the LBBAP group (7.2% versus 0%; P<0.001). In 1194 patients with no history of VT/VF or antiarrhythmic therapy (BVP, 591; LBBAP, 603), the occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (3.2% versus 7.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26-0.81]; P=0.007). Among patients with no history of AF (n=890), the occurrence of new-onset AF >30 s was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (2.8% versus 6.6%; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16-0.73]; P=0.008). The incidence of AF lasting >24 hours was also significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (0.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP was associated with a lower incidence of sustained VT/VF and new-onset AF compared with BVP. This difference remained significant after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with BVP and LBBAP. Physiological resynchronization by LBBAP may be associated with lower risk of arrhythmias compared with BVP.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Taquicardia Ventricular , Humanos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Resultado del Tratamiento , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/etiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/epidemiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , ElectrocardiografíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Traditional atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation is reported as a binary outcome. However, a paradigm shift towards a more granular definition, considering arrhythmic or symptomatic burden, is emerging. We hypothesize that ablation reduces AF burden independently of conventional recurrence status in patients with persistent AF, correlating with symptom burden reduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients with persistent AF from the DECAAF II trial with pre-ablation follow-up were included. Patients recorded daily single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) strips, defining AF burden as the proportion of AF days among total submitted ECG days. The primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. The AF severity scale was administered pre-ablation and at 12 months post-ablation. At follow-up, 69 patients had atrial arrhythmia recurrence and 29 remained in sinus rhythm. These patients were categorized into a recurrence (n = 69) and a no-recurrence group (n = 29). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, but recurrence patients were older (P = 0.005), had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidaemia (P = 0.007), and had a larger left atrial (LA) volume (P = 0.01). There was a reduction in AF burden in the recurrence group when compared with their pre-ablation burden (65 vs. 15%, P < 0.0001). Utah Stage 4 fibrosis and diabetes predicted less improvement in AF burden. The symptom severity score at 12 months post-ablation was significantly reduced compared with the pre-ablation score in the recurrence group, and there was a significant correlation between the reduction in symptom severity score and the reduction in AF burden (R = 0.39, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation reduces AF burden, irrespective of arrhythmia recurrence post-procedure. There is a strong correlation between AF burden reduction and symptom improvement post-ablation. Notably, elevated LA fibrosis impedes AF burden decrease following catheter ablation.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Recurrencia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common occurrence after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and portends a poorer prognosis. The optimal strategy for managing NOAF in this population is uncertain. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized deidentified patient data from the TriNetX Research Network. Patients with TAVR and NOAF were stratified into a rhythm control cohort if they were treated with antiarrhythmics, received AF ablation, or underwent cardioversion within 1 year of AF diagnosis. A rate control cohort was similarly defined by the absence of rhythm control strategies and treatment with a beta blocker, calcium channel blocker, or digoxin. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were used to compare outcomes at 7 years of follow-up. RESULTS: We identified 569 patients in each cohort following propensity matching. At 7 years, the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and heart failure hospitalization was not significantly different between the rhythm and rate control cohorts (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.83-1.18). The individual components of the primary outcome in addition to all-cause hospitalization were also similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Similar outcomes were seen among patients receiving an early rhythm or rate control strategy to manage NOAF after TAVR. The attenuated benefits of an early rhythm control strategy observed in this setting may be due to the overall high burden of comorbidities and advanced age of these patients.
RESUMEN
An 82-year-old man with ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and Medtronic biventricular ICD presented with shortness of breath. His ECG is presented with shortness of breath. ECG shows atrial sensed, electronic ventricular pacing. At the end of each QRS complex there is another pacemaker stimulus. This represents typical case of cardiac contractility modulation therapy and not pacemaker malfunction.
Asunto(s)
Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMEN
The sinoatrial node (SAN) is the primary pacemaker of the heart. Normal SAN function is crucial in maintaining proper cardiac rhythm and contraction. Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is due to abnormalities within the SAN, which can affect the heartbeat frequency, regularity, and the propagation of electrical pulses through the cardiac conduction system. As a result, SND often increases the risk of cardiac arrhythmias. SND is most commonly seen as a disease of the elderly given the role of degenerative fibrosis as well as other age-dependent changes in its pathogenesis. Despite the prevalence of SND, current treatment is limited to pacemaker implantation, which is associated with substantial medical costs and complications. Emerging evidence has identified various genetic abnormalities that can cause SND, shedding light on the molecular underpinnings of SND. Identification of these molecular mechanisms and pathways implicated in the pathogenesis of SND is hoped to identify novel therapeutic targets for the development of more effective therapies for this disease. In this review article, we examine the anatomy of the SAN and the pathophysiology and epidemiology of SND. We then discuss in detail the most common genetic mutations correlated with SND and provide our perspectives on future research and therapeutic opportunities in this field.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Seno Enfermo , Nodo Sinoatrial , Humanos , Anciano , Síndrome del Seno Enfermo/genética , Nodo Sinoatrial/metabolismo , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Arritmias Cardíacas/metabolismo , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Conduction system pacing (CSP) is observed to produce greater improvements in echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters as compared to conventional biventricular pacing (BiVP). However, whether these surrogate endpoints directly translate to improvements in hard clinical outcomes such as death and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) with CSP remains uncertain as studies reporting these outcomes are scarce. The aim of this meta-analysis was to analyze the existing data to compare the clinical outcomes of CSP versus BiVP. METHODS: A systematic search of the Embase and PubMed database was performed for studies comparing CSP and BiVP for patients indicated to receive a CRT device. The coprimary endpoints were all-cause mortality and HFH. Other secondary outcomes included change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), change in NYHA class, and increase in NYHA class ≥1. A random-effects model was chosen a priori to analyze the composite effects given the anticipated heterogeneity of included trials. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies (4 randomized and 17 observational) were identified reporting either primary outcome and were included in the meta-analysis. In total 1960 patients were assigned to CSP and 2367 to BiVP. Median follow-up time was 10.1 months (ranging 2-33 months). CSP was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.83) and HFH (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.44-0.63). Mean improvement in LVEF was also greater with CSP (mean difference 4.26, 95% CI: 3.19-5.33). Reduction in NYHA class was significantly greater with CSP (mean difference -0.36, 95% CI: -0.49 to -0.22) and the number of patients with an increase in NYHA class ≥1 was significantly greater with CSP (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.70-2.40). CONCLUSIONS: CSP was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality and HFH when compared to conventional BiVP for CRT. Further large-scale randomized trials are needed to verify these observations.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/efectos adversos , Volumen Sistólico , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapiaRESUMEN
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are essential for the management of a variety of cardiac conditions, including tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias, and medically refractory heart failure (HF). Recent advancements in CIED technology have led to innovative solutions that overcome shortcomings associated with traditional devices or address unmet needs. Leadless pacemakers, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and extravascular ICDs eliminate lead-related complications common with conventional pacemakers or ICDs. Conduction system pacing (His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing) is a more physiologic method of pacing and avoids the deleterious consequences associated with long-term right ventricular pacing. For HF-related devices, cardiac contractility modulation is an emerging therapy that bridges a gap for many patients ineligible for cardiac resynchronization therapy and has been shown to improve HF symptoms and decrease hospitalizations and mortality in select patients. Implantable pulmonary artery pressure monitors help guide HF management and reduce hospitalizations. Lastly, new phrenic nerve stimulating devices are being utilized to treat central sleep apnea, a common comorbidity associated with HF. While further long-term studies are still underway for many of these new technologies, it is anticipated that these devices will become indispensable therapeutics in the expanding cardiovascular armamentarium.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Desfibriladores Implantables , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Electrónica , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in adults in the United States, yet the benefits of genetic testing are not universally accepted. METHODS: We developed the "HeartCare" panel of genes associated with CVD, evaluating high-penetrance Mendelian conditions, coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk, LPA gene polymorphisms, and specific pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants. We enrolled 709 individuals from cardiology clinics at Baylor College of Medicine, and samples were analyzed in a CAP/CLIA-certified laboratory. Results were returned to the ordering physician and uploaded to the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Notably, 32% of patients had a genetic finding with clinical management implications, even after excluding PGx results, including 9% who were molecularly diagnosed with a Mendelian condition. Among surveyed physicians, 84% reported medical management changes based on these results, including specialist referrals, cardiac tests, and medication changes. LPA polymorphisms and high polygenic risk of CAD were found in 20% and 9% of patients, respectively, leading to diet, lifestyle, and other changes. Warfarin and simvastatin pharmacogenetic variants were present in roughly half of the cohort. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of genetic information in routine cardiovascular health management and provide a roadmap for accompanying research.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/genética , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Farmacogenética/métodos , Pruebas de Farmacogenómica , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. In addition to traditional risk factors, it is increasingly recognized that a genetic component underlies atrial fibrillation development. This review aims to provide an overview of the genetic cause of atrial fibrillation and clinical applications, with a focus on recent developments. RECENT FINDINGS: Genome-wide association studies have now identified around 140 genetic loci associated with atrial fibrillation. Studies into the effects of several loci and their tentative gene targets have identified novel pathways associated with atrial fibrillation development. However, further validations of causality are still needed for many implicated genes. Genetic variants at identified loci also help predict individual atrial fibrillation risk and response to different therapies. SUMMARY: Continued advances in the field of genetics and molecular biology have led to significant insight into the genetic underpinnings of atrial fibrillation. Potential clinical applications of these studies include the identification of new therapeutic targets and development of genetic risk scores to optimize management of this common cardiac arrhythmia.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Fibrilación Atrial/genética , Sitios Genéticos , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIMS: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into routine care of atrial fibrillation (AF) enables direct integration of symptoms, function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) into practice. We report our initial experience with a system-wide PRO initiative among AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with AF in our practice undergo PRO assessment with the Toronto AF Severity Scale (AFSS), and generic PROs, prior to electrophysiology clinic visits. We describe the implementation, feasibility, and results of clinic-based, electronic AF PRO collection, and compare AF-specific and generic HRQoL assessments. From October 2016 to February 2019, 1586 unique AF patients initiated 2379 PRO assessments, 2145 of which had all PRO measures completed (90%). The median completion time for all PRO measures per visit was 7.3 min (1st, 3rd quartiles: 6, 10). Overall, 38% of patients were female (n = 589), mean age was 68 (SD 12) years, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.8 (SD 2.0). The mean AFSS symptom score was 8.6 (SD 6.6, 1st, 3rd quartiles: 3, 13), and the full range of values was observed (0, 35). Generic PROs of physical function, general health, and depression were impacted at the most severe quartiles of AF symptom score (P < 0.0001 for each vs. AFSS quartile). CONCLUSION: Routine clinic-based, PRO collection for AF is feasible in clinical practice and patient time investment was acceptable. Disease-specific AF PROs add value to generic HRQoL instruments. Further research into the relationship between PROs, heart rhythm, and AF burden, as well as PRO-guided management, is necessary to optimize PRO utilization.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Utah/epidemiología , Valina/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) fibrosis is thought to be a substrate for atrial fibrillation (AF) and can be quantified by late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). Fibrosis formation in LA is a dynamic process and may either progress or regress following AF ablation. We examined the impact of postablation progression in LA fibrosis on AF recurrence. METHODS: LA enhancement in LGE-MRI was quantified in 127 consecutive patients who underwent first time AF ablation. Serial LGE-MRIs were done prior to AF ablation, 3 months postablation and at least 12 months after second LGE-MRI. Transient postablation lesion (TL) was defined as atrial enhancement caused by ablation lesions that was detected on the first (3 month) but not on the second postablation LGE-MRI. New fibrosis (NF) was defined as atrial enhancement detected on the most recent LGE-MRI, at least 15 months after the ablation procedure. AF recurrence and its correlation with TL and NF was assessed in all patients during the follow-up period. RESULTS: An increase of 1% NF increased the chance of postablation AF recurrence by 3% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% CI 1-1.06, P = .05). TL had no significant impact on recurrence (P = .057). After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, HR increased as NF became greater. Greater volume of NF (≥21%) corresponded with lower arrhythmia-free survival (37% vs 62%, P = .01). CONCLUSION: NF formation postablation of AF is a novel marker of long-term procedural outcome. Extensive NF is associated with significantly higher risk of atrial arrhythmia recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fibrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Gadolinio , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The current evidence and guidelines for rhythm management of AF in HFrEF were examined. We propose updates of rhythm management (catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs) of AF in HFrEF incorporating this most uptodate evidence.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Ablación por Catéter/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Potenciales de Acción , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Consenso , Estado de Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recuperación de la Función , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Marcapaso Artificial , Humanos , Marcapaso Artificial/efectos adversos , Femenino , Electrocardiografía , AncianoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Adequate catheter/atrial tissue contact is critical for lesion formation during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) is a unique tool for the evaluation of lesion formation and detection of acute esophageal injury. METHODS: LGE-MRIs were obtained prior, within 24 hours of, and at 115 ± 62 days after first AF ablation in 36 patients. The Visitag module of CARTO3 was used to collect contact force (CF) and duration from a CF sensing ablation catheter for each registered ablation point. The minimum CF resulting in permanent lesions was determined. Esophageal enhancement detected by acute LGE-MRI was classified as mild, moderate, and severe. The CF resulting in esophageal enhancement was determined. RESULTS: A total of 4,642 registered ablation tags at 50 W power were analyzed. The mean RF duration (5.9 ± 3.7 vs. 5.6 ± 3.2 seconds, P < 0.05), CF (11.5 ± 5.6 vs. 10.9 ± 5.4 g, P < 0.001), and force time integral (FTI) (67.3 ± 54.5 vs. 62.2 ± 52.7 gs, P < 0.01) were significantly higher between ablation tags with and without associated LGE-MRI detected scar. The mean CF (15.7 ± 6.1 vs. 12.6 ± 5.9 g, P < 0.05, n = 17 patients) in areas of esophageal enhancement was greater than areas without. CONCLUSION: Left atrial short duration ablation lesions with a CF greater than 12 g are more likely to be associated with permanent lesion formation. Ablating on top of the esophagus, CF less than 15 g would help minimize esophageal wall injury.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Meglumina/análogos & derivados , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Heridas y Lesiones/prevención & control , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Cicatriz/diagnóstico por imagen , Cicatriz/etiología , Esófago/lesiones , Femenino , Fibrosis , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Meglumina/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas y Lesiones/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The cardiac conduction system (CCS) is crucial for maintaining adequate cardiac frequency at rest and modulation during exercise. Furthermore, the atrioventricular node and His-Purkinje system are essential for maintaining atrioventricular and interventricular synchrony and consequently maintaining an adequate cardiac output. AREAS COVERED: In this review article, we examine the anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the CCS. We then discuss in detail the most common genetic mutations and the molecular mechanisms of cardiac conduction disease (CCD) and provide our perspectives on future research and therapeutic opportunities in this field. EXPERT OPINION: Significant advancement has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of CCD, including the recognition of the heterogeneous signaling at the subcellular levels of sinoatrial node, the involvement of inflammatory and autoimmune mechanisms, and the potential impact of epigenetic regulations on CCD. However, the current treatment of CCD manifested as bradycardia still relies primarily on cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). On the other hand, an If specific inhibitor was developed to treat inappropriate sinus tachycardia and sinus tachycardia in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. More work is needed to translate current knowledge into pharmacologic or genetic interventions for the management of CCDs.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Humanos , Animales , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/terapia , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Epigénesis Genética , Nodo Sinoatrial/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The impact of socioeconomic status on the clinical outcomes of patients admitted to the hospital for atrial fibrillation (AF) is not well described. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between median neighborhood household income (mNHI) and clinical outcomes among patients admitted to the hospital for AF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed primary AF hospitalizations from the United States National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2020. The analyzed sample was divided into quartiles based on the mNHI in the zip code of the patient's residence. The lowest quartile was used as the reference category. Study outcomes included inpatient procedure utilization (ablation, cardioversion, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure), length of stay, cost, mortality, and disposition. Weighted multivariable logistic and linear regression, adjusting for multiple patient and hospital-level characteristics, was performed. RESULTS: Patients in the highest mNHI quartile had lower comorbidity burden, lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-0.87; P <.001), lower discharges to care facility (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.83-0.9; P <.001), shorter length of stay (adjusted mean difference -0.26; 95% CI -0.30 to -0.22; P <.001), higher procedure utilization, and higher health care costs ($12,124 vs $10,018) compared to the lowest mNHI quartile patients. CONCLUSION: We identified significantly higher in-hospital mortality and lower procedural/resource utilization in patients living in lower-income neighborhoods compared to higher-income neighborhoods. Further research is needed to better understand the drivers of these disparities and the strategies to improve health care disparities between socioeconomic groups.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Renta , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/economía , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano , Renta/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Características del Vecindario , Características de la ResidenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) has been associated with greater clinical improvement in women than men. Recently, left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been shown to be an alternative form of CRT. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate sex-specific outcomes for death and heart failure events in a large, international, multicenter, cohort of patients undergoing CRT with BVP or LBBAP. METHODS: In this international study of 1,778 patients (575 female and 1203 male), sex-specific survival analysis was performed to compare the effect of LBBAP-CRT relative to BVP-CRT on the combined endpoint of death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH), and secondary endpoints of HFH only, and death alone. RESULTS: Female patients were more likely to have nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block (LBBB) and less likely to have hypertension, diabetes, or coronary artery disease than were male patients. Overall, female patients had a better result with LBBAP compared with BVP than did male patients, with a significant 36% reduction in death or HFH (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.97; P = 0.03) and a significant 60% reduction in HFH alone (HR: 0.4; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.69, P < 0.01). Women had a greater reduction in death or HFH among those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR: 0.45 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.79; P < 0.01) and LBBB (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.87; P < 0.01). Sex-specific echocardiographic outcomes were better in women than in men. CONCLUSIONS: Women obtained significantly greater reductions in the combined endpoint of death or HFH (primarily driven by reduction in HFH) with LBBAP compared with BVP among patients requiring CRT than did men.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca , Cardiomiopatías , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia de Resincronización Cardíaca/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bloqueo de Rama , Cardiomiopatías/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients have a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the role of VT ablation in this population is not well-established. OBJECTIVES: This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to examine the impact of post-LVAD implant VT ablation on survival. METHODS: This retrospective study examined a cohort of patients that underwent LVAD implantation at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center and Texas Heart Institute between January 2011 and January 2021. All-cause estimated mortality was compared across LVAD recipients based on the incidence of VT, timing of VT onset, and the occurrence and timing of VT ablation utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Post-implant VT occurred in 53% of 575 LVAD recipients. Higher mortality was seen among patients with post-implant VT within a year of implantation (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.15-2.27]). Among this cohort, patients who were treated with a catheter ablation had superior survival compared with patients treated with medical therapy alone for the 45 months following VT onset (HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89]). Moreover, performance of an ablation in this population aligned mortality rates with those who did not experience post-implant VT (HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.71-1.98]). CONCLUSIONS: VT occurrence within 1 year of LVAD implantation was associated with worse survival. However, performance of VT ablation in this population was correlated with improved survival compared with medical management alone. Among patients with refractory VT, catheter ablation aligned survival with other LVAD participants without post-implant VT. Catheter ablation of VT is associated with improved survival in LVAD recipients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare VT ablation to medical management in LVAD recipients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is limited data comparing radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon (CB) ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), which tends to have higher recurrence rates following ablation compared to paroxysmal AF. METHODS: A systematic search of the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane database was performed for studies comparing RF vs CB ablation for persistent AF. An inverse-variance random-effects model was used to calculate the composite effects. RESULTS: One randomized and 9 observational studies were identified, with 1650 patients receiving CB and 1706 patients receiving RF ablation. Mean follow-up time ranged from 12 to 48 months. Freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia was similar with the two modalities (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.08, I2 0%). Total complications were similar in both groups (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.53, I2 0%) although rates of phrenic nerve palsy (PNP) were greater with CB (RR 4.13, 95% CI 1.49 to 11.46, I2 0%). Shorter procedure times were observed with CB (mean reduction 43.77 min, 95% CI 66.45 to 21.09 min, I2 96%) with no difference in fluoroscopy time (mean difference 0.82 min, 95% CI - 11.92 to 13.55 min, I2 100%). CONCLUSIONS: In persistent AF patients, CB ablation has similar efficacy and overall safety as compared to RF ablation. While CB is associated with significantly shorter procedure times, the improved procedural efficiency with CB is offset by increased rates of PNP and the potential need for touch-up RF ablation.