Effects of Smart Advanced Life Support protocol implementation including CPR coaching during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes before and after implementation of Smart Advanced Life Support (SALS) protocol incorporating changes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) assistance and coaching by physicians via real-time video calls. METHODS: A prospective before-and-after multi-regional observational study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018. In January 2016, emergency medical service (EMS) providers adopted an integrated CPR coaching by physicians via real-time video call via SALS to treat patients with OHCA focusing on high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Propensity score matching was performed to match patients. Patients' outcomes using conventional protocol were then compared with those of patients using the SALS protocol. RESULTS: Among 26,349 OHCA cases, 2351 patients and 7261 patients were enrolled during the pre-intervention and the post-intervention periods, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that SALS was independently associated with favorable neurological outcomes [odds ratio (OR): 2.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.62-2.99]. A total of 2096 patients were propensity score-matched and the two groups were well balanced. In the matched cohort, the use of SALS protocol was still associated with increased prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (OR: 3.83, 95% CI: 2.80-5.26), survival to discharge (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.20-2.34), and favorable neurological outcomes (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.19-2.82). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary SALS protocol for the resuscitation of patients with OHCA was associated with increased prehospital ROSC, survival to discharge, and good neurologic outcomes compared with traditional resuscitation protocol.

Survival and Rearrest in out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients with Prehospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation: A Prospective Multi-Regional Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the factors associated with rearrest after prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and examine the factors associated with survival despite rearrest. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multi-regional observational study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients between August 2015 and July 2016. Patients received prehospital advanced cardiovascular life support performed by emergency medical technicians (EMTs). EMTs were directly supervised by medical directors (physicians) via real-time smartphone video calls [Smart Advanced Life Support (SALS)]. The study participants were categorized into rearrest (+) and rearrest (-) groups depending on whether rearrest occurred after prehospital ROSC. After rearrest, patients were further classified as survivors or non-survivors at discharge. RESULTS: SALS was performed in 1,711 OHCA patients. Prehospital ROSC occurred in 345 patients (20.2%); of these patients, 189 (54.8%) experienced rearrest [rearrest (+) group] and 156 did not experience rearrest [rearrest (-) group]. Multivariate analysis showed that a longer interval from collapse to first prehospital ROSC was independently associated with rearrest [odds ratio (OR) 1.081; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.050-1.114]. The presence of an initial shockable rhythm was independently associated with survival after rearrest (OR 6.920; 95% CI 2.749-17.422). As a predictor of rearrest, the interval from collapse to first prehospital ROSC (cut-off: 24 min) had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 54% (AUC = 0.715 [95% CI 0.661-0.769]). CONCLUSIONS: A longer interval from collapse to first prehospital ROSC was associated with rearrest, and an initial shockable rhythm was associated with survival despite the occurrence of rearrest. Emergency medical service providers and physicians should be prepared to deal with rearrest when pulses are obtained late in the resuscitation.