Retrospective evaluation of fluid production at the time of thoracostomy tube removal following elective and emergency surgery in dogs (2010-2017): 185 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To report the rate of fluid production at the time of removal of thoracostomy tubes placed intraoperatively and to determine the association of this rate with specific patient factors, surgical factors, or clinical diagnosis. The secondary objective was to determine whether identification of pleural effusion within 2 weeks of thoracostomy tube removal was associated with the same variables. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. ANIMALS: One hundred eighty-five client-owned dogs with thoracostomy tubes placed intraoperatively between January 2010 and March 2017. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thoracostomy tubes were removed at a median fluid production of 0.09 mL/kg/h (range, 0-7.0 m L/kg/h). Median fluid production at the time of thoracostomy tube removal was significantly higher in dogs with preoperative pleural effusion compared to dogs without preoperative pleural effusion (0.21 vs 0.05 mL/kg/h; P = 0.0001) and in dogs that had a median sternotomy compared to dogs that had a lateral thoracotomy (0.14 vs 0.09 mL/kg/h; P = 0.04). Of the 169 dogs available for follow-up, 12 (7.1%) had pleural effusion within 2 weeks of removal of the thoracostomy tube. Detection of pleural effusion during the follow-up period was significantly associated with the presence of preoperative pleural effusion (P = 0.0019) and the diagnosis (P = 0.01). A greater proportion of dogs with a lung lobe torsion (4/9, 44.4%) and idiopathic chylothorax (2/7, 28.5%) had pleural effusion within 2 weeks compared to other diagnoses. Reintervention was performed in 4.7% of dogs. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracostomy tubes were removed at pleural fluid production rates that frequently exceeded current veterinary guidelines. However, the fluid production rate at the time of thoracostomy tube removal was not associated with the detection of pleural effusion within 2 weeks of thoracostomy tube removal, and the overall need for reintervention following thoracostomy tube removal was low (4.7%).

Ventilatory failure in a cat following radical chest wall resection for feline injection site sarcoma.

CASE SUMMARY: A 12-year-old spayed female domestic shorthair cat presented for chest wall resection and radiation therapy following incomplete surgical excision of a feline injection site sarcoma. A CT scan for surgical planning was performed under general anesthesia and showed extensive tumor infiltration of the soft tissues of the right thorax. The cat recovered uneventfully from this anesthetic event. Nineteen days later, the patient was reanesthetized for forequarter amputation plus radical chest wall resection, including ribs 3-8 and all associated soft tissues plus adjacent spinous processes. Postoperatively, the patient developed acute respiratory failure secondary to hypoventilation. The cat was mechanically ventilated for 12 h prior to being successfully weaned from the ventilator. However, the improvement was transient and mechanical ventilation was reinitiated 6 h later owing to respiratory fatigue. On the second day, the cat developed unexplained central nervous system signs and was euthanized. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: To our knowledge, this is the first case report to describe ventilatory failure secondary to radical chest wall resection in a cat. Hypoventilation with subsequent need for mechanical ventilation is a potential complication that should be considered during preoperative planning in patients requiring extensive chest wall resections.

Terms, Definitions, Nomenclature, and Routes of Fluid Administration.

Fluid therapy is administered to veterinary patients in order to improve hemodynamics, replace deficits, and maintain hydration. The gradual expansion of medical knowledge and research in this field has led to a proliferation of terms related to fluid products, fluid delivery and body fluid distribution. Consistency in the use of terminology enables precise and effective communication in clinical and research settings. This article provides an alphabetical glossary of important terms and common definitions in the human and veterinary literature. It also summarizes the common routes of fluid administration in small and large animal species.

Evaluation of peripheral and central venous pressure in awake dogs and cats.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether peripheral venous pressure (PVP) was correlated with central venous pressure (CVP) when measured by use of different catheter sizes, catheterization sites, and body positions in awake dogs and cats. ANIMALS: 36 dogs and 10 cats. PROCEDURES: Dogs and cats with functional jugular and peripheral venous catheters were enrolled in the study. Peripheral venous catheters (18 to 24 gauge) were placed in a cephalic, lateral saphenous, or medial saphenous vein. Central venous catheters (5.5 to 8.5 F) were placed in the jugular vein and advanced into the cranial vena cava. Catheters were connected to pressure transducers and a blood pressure monitor capable of displaying 2 simultaneous pressure tracings. For each animal, the mean of 5 paired measurements of PVP and CVP was calculated. The relationship between PVP and CVP when measured by use of different catheter sizes, catheterization sites, and body positions was determined. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD PVP was 5.7 +/- 5.8 mm Hg higher than CVP in dogs and 6.0 +/- 6.9 mm Hg higher than CVP in cats. However, results of multiple regression analysis did not indicate a significant correlation between PVP and CVP, regardless of catheter size, catheter position, or body position. The relationship was weak in both dogs and cats. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The PVP was poorly correlated with CVP when different catheter sizes, catheterization sites, and patient positions were evaluated. Peripheral venous pressure should not be used to approximate CVP in awake dogs and cats.