A multi-institutional comparison of mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine vs high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) has a poor prognosis and is best treated with salvage chemotherapy as a bridge to allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT). However, the optimal salvage therapy remains unknown. Here we compared two salvage regimens; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (MEC) and mitoxantrone and high-dose Ara-C (Ara-C couplets). We analyzed 155 patients treated at three academic institutions between 1998 and 2017; 87 patients received MEC and 68 received Ara-C couplets. The primary endpoint was overall response (OR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of hospitalization, hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities, and success in proceeding to alloSCT. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts were well matched, though patients receiving Ara-C couplets had more co-morbidities (48.5% vs 33%; P = .07). OR was achieved in 43.7% of MEC and 54.4% of Ara-C couplets patients (P = .10). Ara-C couplets patients also trended towards a longer OS and PFS, more frequently proceeded to alloSCT (31% vs 54.4%; P = .003), and experienced less febrile neutropenia (94% vs 72%; P < .001) and grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicities (17.2% vs 2.94%; P = .005). No significant differences in other toxicities or median duration of hospitalization were noted. This is the first multi-institutional study directly comparing these regimens in a racially diverse population of R/R AML patients. Although these regimens have equivalent efficacy in terms of achieving OR, Ara-C couplets use is associated with significant reductions in toxicities, suggesting it should be used more frequently in these patients.

Phase I Study of Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib (MLN8237) in Combination With Selective VEGFR Inhibitor Pazopanib for Therapy of Advanced Solid Tumors.

OBJECTIVES: Pazopanib is a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor. Alisertib is a highly selective inhibitor of mitotic Aurora A kinase. There is preclinical evidence that mitosis-targeting agents exhibit antiangiogenic effects. Thus, the combination of these 2 agents may have a synergistic effect on tumor vasculature. The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal tolerated dose (OTD) for alisertib and pazopanib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This phase 1b study evaluated the OTD of alisertib twice a day, on days 1 to 7 with pazopanib, once a day, continuously in a 21-day cycle, both taken orally. Disease response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 every 2 cycles. OTD cohort was expanded to assure safety and perform pharmacokinetics analysis. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients received treatment. Seventy-seven percent of the patients had received at least 3 prior chemotherapy regimens. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in dose level (DL) 2+ (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 mucositis) and DL 3 (grade 3 liver transaminases elevation and grade 3 abdominal pain). The OTD was determined to be DL 2: alisertib 20 mg twice daily and pazopanib 600 mg daily. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that clearance of alisertib was reduced by ∼40% in the presence of pazopanib compared with clearance in the absence of pazopanib. Fourteen patients had stable disease and 2 patients had a partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of alisertib with pazopanib demonstrates manageable safety and early clinical evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced malignancies (NCT01639911).