RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Efforts have been made to better risk stratify patients given the rise in incidence of endometrial cancer (EC). The 2023 FIGO staging now incorporates histologic subtype and molecular classification into determination of EC stage. We sought to elucidate if the new staging system demonstrated prognostic differences compared to the 2009 staging system. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on women treated for EC at our institution from September 2013 to May 2023 and combined with the publicly available TCGA Nature 2013 dataset. Detailed clinical information was captured. Patients were restaged according to the 2023 guidelines. Survival estimates were obtained using Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves for progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: 919 patients were included in our analysis. The datasets were comparable regarding histologic grade, stage, and age at diagnosis. 175 (31.5%) of patients in the institution dataset and 115 (31.6%) patients in the TCGA dataset experienced a stage change. Most patients whose stage changed were upstaged (275/290; 94.8%). 3-year PFS estimates for stage IA patients with no stage change versus those upstaged were 92.3% (95% CI: 87.2, 95.4) v. 72.0% (95% CI: 68.4, 84.9), p = 0.002. No significant differences in survival difference were seen in other stage subsets. CONCLUSION: Modest survival differences exist in patients with EC originally staged as IA who underwent upstaging. No significant survival difference is observed in patients who are restaged to stage II or III subsets. Improved risk stratification is needed in assessing prognosis and adjuvant therapy for patients with endometrial cancer.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: While high-risk HPV (hrHPV) testing is not formally recommended as a surveillance modality in patients with a history of cervical cancer, it is often performed in routine practice. It is unclear whether the presence of hrHPV infection after cervical cancer treatment is associated with recurrent disease. METHODS: Patients with a cervical cancer diagnosis who were seen in a single institution between May 2012 and December 2019 were retrospectively identified. Squamous cell, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous, and neuroendocrine histologies were included. Those with cancer progression within 3 months of treatment or < 1 year of documented surveillance were excluded. Patients who had hrHPV testing performed were included in the primary outcome analysis. RESULTS: Of the 262 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 58 (22%) recurrences were diagnosed, and recurrence was most commonly detected by a surveillance imaging study (71%). Among the 169 patients that were tested for hrHPV during the surveillance period, 41 (24%) had at least one positive hrHPV test. Recurrent disease was diagnosed in 24 (14%). Of the 24 patients with recurrent disease, 5 (21%) had at least one positive hrHPV test during surveillance, versus 36 (24%) of 145 patients without recurrent disease (p = 0.67). No recurrences were detected by hrHPV testing. CONCLUSIONS: Positive hrHPV testing in the surveillance setting was not associated with cervical cancer recurrence but did lead to additional studies and procedures. Our findings do not support the routine use of hrHPV testing for the evaluation of cervical cancer recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Biopsia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Colposcopía , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/patología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/virologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To report the response to progestin therapy in young women with endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or FIGO grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma (FIGO 1 EAC) based on clinicopathologic features, including abnormal DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). DESIGN: Consecutive case series. SETTING: Olive View-UCLA Medical Center in Sylmar, CA, USA, and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA, USA. POPULATION: Women ≤55 years old with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC. METHODS: Response to progestin therapy in 84 consecutive patients was assessed based on clinicopathologic factors, including age, body mass index (BMI), initial histology, and IHC staining for MMR proteins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of abnormal MMR protein expression and response to progestin therapy were determined. RESULTS: Six (7%) patients had abnormal IHC staining, of whom five (83%) had FIGO 1 EAC at initial diagnosis. Following progestin treatment, none of the endometrial lesions in patients with abnormal IHC for MMR proteins had resolution of hyperplasia or malignancy, in contrast to 41 (53%) with normal staining (P = 0.028). Age ≤40 years and initial lesion (CAH versus FIGO 1 EAC) were predictors of response to progestin; BMI was not. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, 7% of women ≤55 years of age with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC had loss of MMR proteins by IHC. These patients had a higher incidence of invasive cancer and a lower incidence of resolution with progestin therapy. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Abnormal MMR protein expression predicts poor response to progestins in young women with CAH or FIGO 1 EAC.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Reparación de la Incompatibilidad de ADN , Hiperplasia Endometrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Progestinas/uso terapéutico , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Hiperplasia Endometrial/genética , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaginal cancer is a rare malignancy making up 1-2% of all female genital tract cancers. Among vaginal cancers, sarcomas constitute 2% of malignant vaginal lesions, with leiomyosarcomas being the most common type of sarcoma. There is a paucity of data to guide treatment of vaginal sarcomas. This case report details a patient diagnosed with a gynecologic sarcoma during pregnancy who is subsequently treated for residual vaginal disease in the postpartum period with local resection and adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy. CASE: A 31-year-old gravida 4 para 0 who presented at 22-weeks gestation with vaginal bleeding to an outside hospital and expelled a mass 11 cm in diameter from the vagina during her admission. Findings were consistent with a high grade gynecologic sarcoma. She underwent planned cesarean section at 36 weeks gestational age with uterine pathology showing no sarcoma. At her 3 month postpartum visit she was found to have a 1 cm posterior vaginal wall lesion which was resected and consistent with vaginal sarcoma. She underwent adjuvant brachytherapy. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the challenges with obtaining a correct pathological diagnosis for pregnant patients with vaginal sarcoma during pregnancy. Surgical resection with negative margins remains an important treatment component. Given the low incidence of disease occurrence in pregnancy and rare number of cases reported in literature, further elucidation of timing of delivery and adjuvant treatment is warranted.
RESUMEN
Placental Site Trophoblastic Tumor (PSTT) is a rare malignancy that often presents with extensive disease and can be resistant to traditional treatments. We present the case of a woman with stage IV PSTT who was initially managed with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by tumor debulking. Adjuvant therapy was guided by further pathologic analysis that revealed high levels of staining for PD-L1 as well as the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Subsequently, the patient was treated with traditional chemotherapy with the EP/EMA regimen with the addition of pembrolizumab. The patient's treatment course was complicated by the development of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, autoimmune thyroiditis thought to be secondary to immunotherapy, and significant tinnitus secondary to platinum agents. Currently the patient is in follow up and remains in a complete remission.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of computed tomography-texture analysis (CTTA) in differentiating between in-situ and minimally-invasive from invasive adenocarcinomas in subsolid lung nodules (SSLNs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed 49 SSLNs in 44 patients. There were 27 men and 17 women with a mean age of 63±7 (SD) years (range: 47-78years). For each SSLN, type (pure ground-glass or part-solid) was assessed by consensus and CTTA was conducted independently by each observer using a filtration-histogram technique. Different filters were used before histogram quantification: no filtration, fine, medium and coarse, followed by histogram quantification using mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean positive pixels (MPP), skewness and kurtosis. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 pure ground-glass and 36 part-solid nodules corresponding to 16 adenocarcinomas in-situ (AIS), 5 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas (MIA) and 28 invasive adenocarcinomas (IVA). At uni- and multivariate analysis CTTA allowed discriminating between IVAs and AIS/MIA (P<0.05 and P=0.025, respectively) with the following histogram parameters: skewness using fine textures and kurtosis using coarse filtration for pure ground-glass nodules, and SD without filtration for part-solid nodules. CONCLUSION: CTTA has the potential to differentiate AIS and MIA from IVA among SSLNs. However, our results require further validation on a larger cohort.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma in Situ/patología , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma del Pulmón/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Adenocarcinoma is the most common histologic type of lung cancer. Recent lung adenocarcinoma classifications from the International Association for the Study of Lung cancer, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ETS/ERS, 2011) and World Health Organization (WHO, 2015) define a wide range of adenocarcinoma types and subtypes featuring different prognosis and management. This spectrum of lesions translates into various CT presentations and features, which generally show good correlation with histopathology, stressing the key role of the radiologist in the diagnosis and management of those patients. This review aims at helping radiologists to understand the basics of the up-to-date adenocarcinoma pathological classifications, radio-pathological correlations and how to use them in the clinical setting, as well as other imaging-related correlations (radiogenomics, quantitative analysis, PET-CT).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/clasificación , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/clasificación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/clasificación , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/patología , Estadística como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Genetic testing for inherited predisposition to diverse cancers has recently become available as a clinical service. We conducted a follow-up study of the initial series of US families who underwent RB1 genetic testing to evaluate long-term effects of the service. PROCEDURE: We enrolled 52 of 71 eligible families who responded to a follow-up study questionnaire administered 3-10 years after receipt of their RB1 results. Each family had one proband with unilateral, non-familial retinoblastoma, which is associated with a 12% pre-test probability of hereditary retinoblastoma. RB1 testing identified germline RB1 mutations in five patients, lowered the carrier probability to 2% in 21 patients, and did not substantially modify the carrier probability in the remaining 26. RESULTS: Diverse medical specialists offered and arranged for RB1 testing, and their recommendation was the most influential factor in the decision to be tested. Pre-test counseling was provided by ophthalmologists (30), oncologists (11), and geneticists and genetic counselors (11). Most respondents, regardless of test result, were satisfied and perceived gains from their genetic testing. Based on small numbers, families with reduced likelihood of hereditary retinoblastoma reported more positive outcomes. Parents of RB1 carriers were more likely to seek medical services, worry, and decide against having more children. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of follow-up studies of families who had genetic testing. Results from our small series suggest that genetic information and counseling are important components of RB1 clinical genetic testing, and long-term adverse effects of testing are uncommon.