RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Postpartum psychosis (PP) is a severe psychiatric disorder affecting 1-2 per 1,000 deliveries. Prompt access to healthcare and timely initiation of treatment are crucial to minimizing harm and improving outcomes. This analysis seeks to fill gaps in knowledge surrounding barriers to care and treatment experiences among this population. METHODS: Participants were individuals with histories of PP who enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital Postpartum Psychosis Project (MGHP3). The MGHP3 Healthcare Access Survey, a cross-sectional questionnaire, assesses barriers to care, treatment-seeking behaviors, and experiences with treatment. Descriptive statistics were utilized to describe sample characteristics. RESULTS: 139 participants provided 146 episode-specific survey responses. Lack of available services was cited as the greatest barrier to care for PP. Among those who sought treatment, obstetric providers (34.5%) and emergency medical professionals (29.4%) were the most common initial points of contact. 82.2% of the respondents went to an emergency room or crisis center during their episode(s). Most (61.8%) reported being given insufficient information to manage their PP. Approximately half of participants were hospitalized (55.5%), the majority of whom had no access to their infant during hospitalization (70.4%). Of those breastfeeding or pumping at admission, 31.3% were not given access to a breast pump. 44.4% dealt with delivery-related medical issues during their hospitalization. CONCLUSION: This report is the first of its kind to assess key public health domains among individuals with PP. Findings point to several directions for future research and clinical practice to improve treatment timeliness and quality, potentially improving long-term outcomes related to this serious illness.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Periodo Posparto , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Massachusetts , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: Since its US Food and Drug Administration approval in 1996, olanzapine has been one of the most commonly prescribed atypical antipsychotics, making a better understanding of its reproductive safety profile critical. The goal of the current analysis was to determine the risk of major malformations among infants exposed to olanzapine during pregnancy compared with a group of nonexposed infants. METHODS/PROCEDURES: The National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications is a prospective pharmacovigilance program in which pregnant women are enrolled and interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Labor and delivery and pediatric medical records were screened for evidence of major malformations followed by adjudication by a dysmorphologist blinded to medication exposure. Infants with first-trimester exposure to olanzapine were compared with controls without second-generation antipsychotic exposure. FINDINGS/RESULTS: As of April 18, 2022, 2619 women have enrolled in the study. At the time of data extraction, 49 olanzapine-exposed infants and 1156 infants in the comparison group were eligible for these analyses. There were no major malformations associated with olanzapine exposure in the first trimester. The absolute risk for major malformations in the exposure group was 0.00% (95% confidence interval, 0.00-7.25) for olanzapine compared with 1.64% (95% confidence interval, 0.99-2.55) in the control group. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective cohort, no major malformations were associated with olanzapine exposure during the first trimester. Although these data are preliminary and cannot rule out more modest effects, they are nonetheless important, adding to the growing reproductive safety data for olanzapine.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos , Antipsicóticos , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Niño , Olanzapina , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Hospitales Generales , Datos Preliminares , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Massachusetts , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adult females is 3% to 4%. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is highly comorbid with other psychiatric disorders such as mood, anxiety, and substance use disorders. For reproductive-aged women, the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with stimulant medications may be considered during pregnancy or breastfeeding, although historically, data are lacking to inform these decisions. The aim of this investigation was to determine the risk of major malformations in infants after first-trimester prescription stimulant exposure in a small but rigorously characterized sample. METHODS/PROCEDURES: The Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications systematically ascertains information from pregnant females including demographic information, medical and psychiatric history, use of prescription medications, and other information relevant to fetal outcomes. Participants provide verbal informed consent and are interviewed twice during gestation and again at approximately 3 months postpartum. The primary outcome of interest is the presence of a major malformation identified within 6 months after birth. Redacted cases of major malformations are reviewed by a dysmorphologist blinded to medication exposure. FINDINGS/RESULTS: A total of N = 1988 women were eligible for this analysis, including the following exposures: n = 173 to mixed amphetamine salts; n = 40 to lisdexamfetamine; n = 45 to methylphenidate; n = 3 to dexmethylphenidate; and n = 1755 controls. The odds ratio of a major malformation among infants after first-trimester exposure to any stimulant was 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.61) compared with controls. There were no major malformations observed in infants exposed to lisdexamfetamine, methylphenidate, or dexmethylphenidate. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Although preliminary, this analysis from an ongoing pregnancy registry provides reassurance that these stimulants do not appear to have major teratogenic effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246765 .
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Clorhidrato de Dexmetilfenidato , Metilfenidato , Embarazo , Adulto , Femenino , Lactante , Humanos , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Dimesilato de Lisdexanfetamina/uso terapéutico , Hospitales Generales , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Anfetamina/uso terapéutico , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women with psychiatric disorders are vulnerable to relapse in pregnancy, and the COVID-19 pandemic has presented an additional stressor. METHODS: Data came from a supplemental study offered to women enrolled in the Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Women's Mental Health National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications. Registry participants were also invited to complete an email questionnaire relating to their experiences of pregnancy during the pandemic. Prepartum experiences of 230 respondents were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common diagnoses in this group were depression (30%), anxiety disorders (29%), and bipolar affective disorder (17%). Common stressors included changes in employment, greater childcare and/or schooling responsibilities, more conflict in the household, and increased isolation. Participants reported negative impacts and/or coping mechanisms associated with the pandemic, such as sleep problems, reduced physical activity, changes in eating, and greater amounts of screen time. Positive impacts and/or coping mechanisms were also reported, including more quality time with family, more time in nature, and being more appreciative of aspects of life previously taken for granted. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic has had an overall negative psychosocial impact on many pregnant women with preexisting psychiatric disorders. We also observed positive coping mechanisms, which could be drawn on as sources of resilience.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos Mentales , Embarazo , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Mujeres Embarazadas , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Adaptación Psicológica , Ansiedad , DepresiónAsunto(s)
Ansiedad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Periodo Posparto , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Ansiedad/complicaciones , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/terapia , Razonamiento Clínico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Trastornos Puerperales/psicología , Trastornos Puerperales/diagnóstico , Lactancia Materna/efectos adversos , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/complicaciones , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/psicología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Ansiolíticos/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perinatal anxiety affects 20% of women, and untreated maternal mental illness can cause deleterious effects for women and their children. Benzodiazepines are commonly used to treat anxiety disorders. The reported risk of congenital malformations after in utero benzodiazepine exposure has been inconsistent. METHODS: The Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications prospectively enrolls pregnant women with psychiatric illness who take one or more psychiatric medications. Participants are interviewed twice during pregnancy and at 12 weeks postpartum. Women taking any benzodiazepine during the first trimester of pregnancy were compared with a group of women taking psychiatric medication(s) other than benzodiazepines during pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 1053 women were eligible for this analysis; N = 151 women who had taken a benzodiazepine during the first trimester, and the comparison group was N = 902 women. There were 5 (3.21%) major malformations in the exposure group and 32 (3.46%) in the comparison group (odds ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.35-2.41). CONCLUSION: This ongoing pregnancy registry offers reassurance that benzodiazepines do not appear to have major teratogenic effects. The precision of relative risk estimate will improve as the number of participants increases. This and other pregnancy registries will better inform the reproductive safety of benzodiazepines.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Lactante , Niño , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Benzodiazepinas/efectos adversos , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Hospitales Generales , Sistema de Registros , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systematic data regarding long-term neurobehavioral effects of maternal antidepressant use during pregnancy are sparse. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of gestational exposure to antidepressants on later neurodevelopmental function. METHODS: This study describes a cohort of mother-child dyads (44 mothers, 54 children) in which maternal depressive symptoms and medication exposures were prospectively collected across pregnancy and the postpartum period. Children age 6 to 17 were assessed using validated instruments across domains of childhood behavior and executive memory and functioning. RESULTS: No associations were found between maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy and atypical neurodevelopment of children. Borderline clinical or clinical ranges of internalizing symptoms were associated with exposure to a higher maternal depressive symptom burden during pregnancy compared with those in the normal range. Compared with age- and sex-matched controls, the SSRI-exposed group showed superior performance on executive function tasks; findings did not demonstrate elevated risk for abnormal neurodevelopment in children age 6 to 17 exposed to SSRIs in utero. Deviations from the norm were instead associated with higher in utero exposure to maternal depression burden. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the need for rigorous studies of long-term outcomes after fetal antidepressant exposure.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal , Adolescente , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Niño , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Buspirone is commonly used to treat anxiety disorders among reproductive-aged women. To date, the reproductive safety of buspirone in humans has been particularly sparse. We sought to provide preliminary data from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications (NPRPM) on the risk of major malformations after first-trimester buspirone exposure. The NPRPM enrolls pregnant women with psychiatric disorders to prospectively assess for major congenital malformations after in utero exposure to psychotropics. Women are interviewed twice during pregnancy and once at 12 weeks postpartum. Data regarding women who took buspirone during the first trimester were extracted from the NPRPM database. Data were assessed as a rigorously ascertained case series to determine the incidence of major malformations among those exposed to buspirone. The primary outcome was obtained by maternal postpartum interview and medical record review. As of January 6, 2022, N = 97 women enrolled in the registry took buspirone during their first trimester. Of these women, 68 were evaluable and eligible for this analysis. Four women had twins, resulting in 72 infants. Among this sample, there were no malformations present. These preliminary data represent the only prospectively ascertained sample of pregnancy outcomes after first-trimester buspirone exposure. Albeit a small sample, no major malformations were observed in this cohort. The rigorous prospective ascertainment of outcomes is a strength of this study. Future analyses are planned that will include larger numbers of women with exposures to buspirone and comparison with control groups matched for demographic and diagnostic variables.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/epidemiología , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/etiología , Adulto , Buspirona/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
The normal physical changes associated with pregnancy may increase the risk of body dissatisfaction, which is associated with negative mental health outcomes including depression and disordered eating. The purpose of this study was to explore body image and eating concerns among a sample of participants in pregnancy and postpartum and to assess interest and suggestions for a relevant intervention. This was a cross-sectional survey study requiring 10-15 min to complete. Individuals were eligible to participate in the study if they were pregnant or within 1 year postpartum, between the ages of 18 and 45, able to read and write in English, and provided online informed consent. The survey included measures and open-text questions to explore body image, eating behaviors, and related concerns in the perinatal period and to inform the development of an intervention. There were 161 participants, and over 50% were dissatisfied with their body image; 52% were among pregnant participants and 56.2% of postpartum participants. Approximately 80% reported that they would have appreciated the opportunity to participate in a program focused on body acceptance or expectations of body changes in pregnancy and postpartum. We identified intervention preferences as well as commonly reported themes regarding experiences of body image and eating concerns in pregnancy and postpartum. Body dissatisfaction and eating concerns are prevalent issues in pregnancy and postpartum, and our findings underscore an opportunity to tailor an intervention relevant to body image and disordered eating for the perinatal population.
Asunto(s)
Insatisfacción Corporal , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Adolescente , Adulto , Imagen Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The purpose of this study is to examine initiation rates of breastfeeding and other breastfeeding outcomes among women taking second generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Participants were enrolled in the National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics; an ongoing prospective cohort study enrolling women age 18-45 years who are exposed and unexposed to SGAs during pregnancy. A 3-month postpartum interview collects information regarding breastfeeding behaviors. Specifically, women are asked the following questions about ever breastfeeding, still breastfeeding at 3 months postpartum, and whether women are breastfeeding exclusively, bottle-feeding exclusively, or breast and bottle feeding. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic variables and breastfeeding practices. Rates of breastfeeding initiation and continuation were higher among participants who did not use SGAs. Among women not on SGAs, 88.2% of women reported "ever breastfeeding" compared to 59.3% of women on an SGA. At 3 months postpartum, 47% of women on a non-SGA were exclusively breastfeeding compared to 23% of women on an SGA. While the majority of women on an SGA initiated breastfeeding, breastfeeding rates were considerably lower than for women who were not on a SGA. More research is needed on the safety of lactation and use of combinations of psychotropics for women in pregnancy and postpartum.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Lactancia Materna , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Asthma is one of the most common underlying diseases in women of reproductive age that can lead to potentially serious medical problems during pregnancy and lactation. A group of key stakeholders across multiple relevant disciplines was invited to take part in an effort to prioritize, strategize, and mobilize action steps to fill important gaps in knowledge regarding asthma medication safety in pregnancy and lactation. The stakeholders identified substantial gaps in the literature on the safety of asthma medications used during pregnancy and lactation and prioritized strategies to fill those gaps. Short-term action steps included linking data from existing complementary study designs (US and international claims data, single drug pregnancy registries, case-control studies, and coordinated systematic data systems). Long-term action steps included creating an asthma disease registry, incorporating the disease registry into electronic health record systems, and coordinating care across disciplines. The stakeholders also prioritized establishing new infrastructures/collaborations to perform research in pregnant and lactating women and to include patient perspectives throughout the process. To address the evidence gaps, and aid in populating product labels with data that inform clinical decision making, the consortium developed a plan to systematically obtain necessary data in the most efficient and timely manner.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Lactancia , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Asma/epidemiología , Lactancia Materna , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Investigación , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a common condition associated with childbirth, yet many women do not receive the treatment they need. Despite the growing practice of PPD screening, treatment and clinical outcomes among patients identified as likely having PPD remain unclear. METHOD: Women who were systematically screened and scored ≥12 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)-indicative of possible PPD-at their routine 6-week postpartum visit were eligible to participate and were contacted after 3 months for a follow-up interview and assessment. RESULTS: A total of 33 women participated in the study, out of 100 who scored ≥12 on the EPDS. Among the participants, 70% reported they received a referral to a health care provider for PPD, and nearly one-half said that they received psychotherapy and/or were prescribed a psychotropic. The 2 most commonly described barriers to treatment were perceptions of not needing or wanting help and concerns about breastfeeding while taking psychotropics. Nearly 40% of women scored ≥12 on the EPDS at the follow-up interview. CONCLUSIONS: Further systematic research on outcomes after PPD screening is needed to ensure that screening translates into meaningfully improved clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto , Depresión , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Depresión Posparto/terapia , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
Aripiprazole has become one of the most commonly prescribed psychotropics, making a more comprehensive understanding of its reproductive safety profile a priority. The goal of the current analysis was to determine the risk of major malformations in infants exposed during the first trimester of pregnancy to aripiprazole compared to infants whose mothers had psychiatric diagnoses but did not use an atypical antipsychotic during pregnancy. The National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics is a prospective pharmacovigilance program in which pregnant women are enrolled and interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Medical records are assessed to confirm presence or absence of major malformations. Pregnant women ages 18-45 with psychiatric diagnoses are enrolled. As of April 2020, N = 848 women who had delivered infants were eligible for analyses. A total of 158 women with first trimester exposure to aripiprazole were compared to 690 controls. For 163 infants born to women in the exposed group, seven major malformations were confirmed (4.29%), compared to fourteen of the 690 unexposed infants (1.99%). The unadjusted odds ratio for major malformations between aripiprazole-exposed and unexposed infants was 2.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.88, 5.57) The adjusted odds ratio for major malformations was 1.35 (95% confidence interval [CI] = (0.43, 4.20). After adjustment for confounding variables, the risk of major malformations after first trimester exposure to aripiprazole was not significant compared to controls. While these results are reassuring, they are limited by relatively small numbers of participants. Future analyses with larger numbers are expected to provide more of a complete and precise reproductive safety profile regarding aripiprazole use during pregnancy. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01246765.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Aripiprazol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hospitales Generales , Humanos , Lactante , Massachusetts , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pregnant and postpartum patients with substance use disorders (SUD) often have other co-occurring mental health disorders. Complications of substance use and mental health conditions, such as overdose and suicide, are a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. For individuals dually diagnosed with SUD and other mental health disorders, the perinatal period can be both a motivating and a vulnerable period for care. Barriers to optimal care include, but are not limited to, lack of screening, lack of referrals for care, a limited number of psychiatric providers available to care for pregnant patients, and stigma around mental health and addiction care in pregnancy. In this review, we discuss approaches to low-barrier perinatal psychiatric care for women with SUD to promote engagement in care. We review (1) appropriate psychiatric assessment and diagnostic work-up; (2) treatment planning incorporating shared-decision making, non-punitive and culturally sensitive patient-centred care, and principles of harm reduction with a focus on psychopharmacology, and (3) the benefits of an integrated and collaborative multidisciplinary care model for this subpopulation of vulnerable patients.
Asunto(s)
Atención Perinatal , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Posparto/psicología , Embarazo , Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been concern that exposure to lithium early in pregnancy may be associated with a marked increase in the risk of Ebstein's anomaly (a right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defect) in infants and overall congenital cardiac defects, but data are conflicting and limited. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study involving 1,325,563 pregnancies in women who were enrolled in Medicaid and who delivered a live-born infant between 2000 and 2010. We examined the risk of cardiac malformations among infants exposed to lithium during the first trimester as compared with unexposed infants and, in secondary analyses, with infants exposed to another commonly used mood stabilizer, lamotrigine. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated with control for psychiatric and medical conditions, medications, and other potential confounders. RESULTS: Cardiac malformations were present in 16 of the 663 infants exposed to lithium (2.41%), 15,251 of the 1,322,955 nonexposed infants (1.15%), and 27 of the 1945 infants exposed to lamotrigine (1.39%). The adjusted risk ratio for cardiac malformations among infants exposed to lithium as compared with unexposed infants was 1.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 2.68). The risk ratio was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.46 to 2.64) for a daily dose of 600 mg or less, 1.60 (95% CI, 0.67 to 3.80) for 601 to 900 mg, and 3.22 (95% CI, 1.47 to 7.02) for more than 900 mg. The prevalence of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects was 0.60% among lithium-exposed infants versus 0.18% among unexposed infants (adjusted risk ratio, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.00 to 7.06). Results were similar when lamotrigine-exposed infants were used as the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal use of lithium during the first trimester was associated with an increased risk of cardiac malformations, including Ebstein's anomaly; the magnitude of this effect was smaller than had been previously postulated. (Funded by the National Institute of Mental Health.).
Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Cardiopatías Congénitas/inducido químicamente , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Cardiopatías Congénitas/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Lamotrigina , Compuestos de Litio/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Prevalencia , Triazinas/efectos adversos , Triazinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Women often seek antidepressant alternatives for major depressive disorder (MDD) in anticipation of or during pregnancy. In this preliminary study, EnBrace HR, a prenatal supplement containing methylfolate, was investigated for depressive relapse prevention and for acute treatment of MDD in women planning pregnancy or during pregnancy. METHODS: This 12-week open-label study included women with histories of MDD who were planning pregnancy or pregnant < 28 weeks. At enrollment, Group 1 participants were well (not depressed) and planned to discontinue antidepressants for pregnancy. Group 2 participants were depressed. Primary outcome variables by group included MDD relapse and depressive symptoms, verified with the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview and the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), respectively. Biomarkers of inflammation and the folate cycle were collected. RESULTS: Group 1 participants (N = 11) experienced lower rates of depressive relapse (27.3% P = .005) than expected from a historical comparison group and no significant changes in MADRS scores. Group 2 participants (N = 6) experienced significant improvements in MADRS scores (P = .001), with 5 (83.3%) improving >50% and 1 improving 33.3%. One adverse event occurred, a hospitalization for depression. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest EnBrace HR is a well-tolerated intervention with potential efficacy for prevention and treatment of perinatal depression. Larger controlled trials are necessary.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Atención Prenatal , Tetrahidrofolatos/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Maternal major depressive disorder (MDD) has an adverse effect on child development and increases risk for child psychopathology. It is paramount to understand the course of maternal depression during the childhood years particularly before, during, and after pregnancy. OBJECTIVE: To follow the course of MDD in women with prior histories of depression followed during an index pregnancy. METHODS: Subjects were women with histories of MDD who had participated in prior prospective, observational studies during pregnancy. In the follow-up, participants completed a structured interview that addressed (1) the course of MDD since their index pregnancy, (2) new psychiatric diagnoses, and (3) the course of MDD and treatment across subsequent pregnancies. RESULTS: Out of 129 eligible women, 48.8% participated (N = 63) with an average/mean time of 12.9 years (SD = 1.9, 8.8-16.7) elapsed since participation in the prior pregnancy studies. Although approximately one third reported sustained remission from MDD since the pregnancy during which they had been originally followed, of the remaining two thirds of women who reported subsequent depressive episodes, almost one fifth (â¼12% of the total sample) endorsed depression more than 50% of the time following their index pregnancy. A total of 6.3% of the women with previous validated diagnoses of MDD reported new diagnoses of bipolar disorder. Women reported similar treatment choices regarding the use of antidepressants during pregnancies subsequent to the one followed in the previous study. CONCLUSION: Women with MDD experienced high rates of recurrent depression across the childbearing years. This represents a critical variable for clinical care and research.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , EmbarazoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Obesity during pregnancy is the most common high-risk obstetric condition, resulting in increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Individuals with psychiatric disorders have a higher risk of obesity than the general population, but data regarding implications of obesity in women with psychiatric disorders are sparse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess pre-pregnancy weights and gestational weight gain in women who were exposed to second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) during pregnancy compared to controls. METHODS: We assessed pre-pregnancy weights and gestational weight gain from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics for patients exposed to SGAs and controls unexposed to these medicines during pregnancy. Both groups experienced similar psychiatric morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 403 participants had evaluable data for these analyses (N = 279 exposed to SGAs; N = 124 controls). The mean pre-pregnancy weight, body mass index (BMI), and likelihood to begin pregnancy with an obese BMI were significantly higher in the exposed group compared to controls (p = 0.0003, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001 respectively), as were the mean weight and BMI at delivery (p < 0.0001). The mean weight gain did not differ significantly between groups. Across pre-pregnancy BMI categories, both groups gained more than the recommended amount of weight during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: We found that women exposed to SGAs began pregnancy with higher BMIs than controls. Both exposed and unexposed groups experienced similar weight gain during pregnancy. Strategies are needed to prevent excessive gestational weight gain and to reduce pre-pregnancy obesity in women with psychiatric disorders, especially those treated with SGAs.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Ganancia de Peso Gestacional/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Prospective studies have shown during the years preceding and following menopause, also known as "menopause transition", that midlife women are at higher risk for developing first-onset major depressive disorder (MDD). The biological factors associated with risk and resilience in this population are, however, largely unknown. Considering the growing body of evidence suggesting that inflammation, oxidative stress, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) are associated with the pathophysiology of MDD, we investigated serum levels of protein carbonyl, lipid peroxidation (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances-TBARS), thiol group content, BDNF, 3-nitrotyrosine, and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in a longitudinal cohort of first-onset MDD. One hundred and forty-eight women from the Harvard Study of Moods and Cycles, a prospective study of midlife women monitored throughout the transition to menopause, were studied. Within- and between-groups analyses of these peripheral markers were conducted in 37 women who developed and 111 women that did not develop MDD during the 3-year follow-up period. In women who developed MDD, HSP70 and 3-nitrotyrosine were elevated at baseline, whereas TBARS were elevated 6 months prior to development of MDD, as compared to those who did not develop MDD. Within-group analyses showed that HSP70, 3-nitrotyrosine, and BDNF decreased over time, whereas protein carbonyl was elevated only at 12 months prior to development of MDD. In women who did not develop MDD, HSP70 and thiol decreased over time. The development of MDD in midlife women may be associated with a systemic cascade of pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory events including increased HSP70, 3-nitrotyrosine, protein carbonyl, and lipid peroxidation and decreased BDNF.
Asunto(s)
Factor Neurotrófico Derivado del Encéfalo/sangre , Citocinas/sangre , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/sangre , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Inflamación/etiología , Estrés Oxidativo/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Proteínas HSP70 de Choque Térmico/sangre , Humanos , Peroxidación de Lípido/fisiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carbamilación de Proteína/fisiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Sustancias Reactivas al Ácido Tiobarbitúrico/metabolismo , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Tirosina/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether the use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and other antidepressants during pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of congenital cardiac defects is uncertain. In particular, there are concerns about a possible association between paroxetine use and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction and between sertraline use and ventricular septal defects. METHODS: We performed a cohort study nested in the nationwide Medicaid Analytic eXtract for the period 2000 through 2007. The study included 949,504 pregnant women who were enrolled in Medicaid during the period from 3 months before the last menstrual period through 1 month after delivery and their liveborn infants. We compared the risk of major cardiac defects among infants born to women who took antidepressants during the first trimester with the risk among infants born to women who did not use antidepressants, with an unadjusted analysis and analyses that restricted the cohort to women with depression and that used propensity-score adjustment to control for depression severity and other potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 64,389 women (6.8%) used antidepressants during the first trimester. Overall, 6403 infants who were not exposed to antidepressants were born with a cardiac defect (72.3 infants with a cardiac defect per 10,000 infants), as compared with 580 infants with exposure (90.1 per 10,000 infants). Associations between antidepressant use and cardiac defects were attenuated with increasing levels of adjustment for confounding. The relative risks of any cardiac defect with the use of SSRIs were 1.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13 to 1.38) in the unadjusted analysis, 1.12 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.26) in the analysis restricted to women with depression, and 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.22) in the fully adjusted analysis restricted to women with depression. We found no significant association between the use of paroxetine and right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.93) or between the use of sertraline and ventricular septal defects (relative risk, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large, population-based cohort study suggested no substantial increase in the risk of cardiac malformations attributable to antidepressant use during the first trimester. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institutes of Health.).