Investigating psychological mechanisms linking pain severity to depression symptoms in women cancer survivors at a cancer center with a rural catchment area.

PURPOSE: Women cancer survivors, especially those in rural areas, with high levels of depression may be acutely susceptible to pain due to the ways they think, feel, and behave. The current study seeks to elucidate the relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors, by examining the putative mediators involved in this relationship, specifically their self-efficacy for managing their health, how overwhelmed they were from life's responsibilities, and relational burden. METHODS: Self-report data were collected from 183 cancer survivors of breast, cervical, ovarian, or endometrial/uterine cancer, who were between 6 months and 3 years post-active therapy. RESULTS: Women cancer survivors with higher (vs. lower) symptoms of depression had more severe pain. Individual mediation analyses revealed that survivors with higher levels of depression felt more overwhelmed by life's responsibilities and had lower self-efficacy about managing their health, which was associated with greater pain severity. When all mediators were simultaneously entered into the same model, feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities significantly mediated the link between survivors' symptoms of depression and their pain severity. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors may be attributed in part to their self-efficacy and feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities. Early and frequent assessment of psychosocial factors involved in pain severity for women cancer survivors may be important for managing their pain throughout the phases of cancer survivorship.

Unveiling rural and Appalachian disparities in cigarette smoking through the social vulnerability index and other county-level characteristics.

PURPOSE: Mitigating tobacco-related disparities in the Appalachian region and rural areas is crucial. This study seeks to gauge cigarette smoking prevalence in Virginia counties, uncover rurality and Appalachian-linked disparities, and explore local drivers of these gaps. METHOD: A 2011-2019 Virginia BRFSS data were used to estimate county-level cigarette smoking rates in adults aged 18 or older. Counties were categorized as urban/rural and Appalachian/non-Appalachian, with a focus on rural-Appalachian. Disparities in cigarette smoking rates and associated factors were analyzed via the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method. The study assessed 4 dimensions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's social vulnerability index (SVI): socioeconomic, minority status, household composition, and housing. Additionally, county-specific factors such as tobacco agriculture, physician availability, coal mining, and tobacco retailer density were examined. FINDINGS: Rural areas exhibited a 6.18% higher cigarette smoking prevalence compared to urban areas (P<.001). SVI dimensions accounted for 53.2% of the disparity, county features explained 16.4%, and 30.4% remained unexplained. Appalachian areas had a 6.79% higher cigarette smoking prevalence than non-Appalachian areas (P<.001). SVI dimensions explained 51.4% of the disparity, county features accounted for 21.8%, leaving 26.8% unexplained. Rural-Appalachian areas showed a 7.8% higher cigarette smoking prevalence (P<.001). SVI dimensions contributed to 51.7% of the disparity, county features explained 9.6%, and 38.7% remained unexplained. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial disparities in cigarette smoking prevalence exist in underserved areas of Virginia, including rural, Appalachian, and rural-Appalachian regions. While SVI dimensions, physician availability, tobacco agriculture, and coal mining contribute, yet notable gaps remain unexplained. Targeted interventions must tackle unique challenges in disadvantaged areas to reduce smoking and promote health equity.