Utility of Postoperative Serial Renal Function Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to examine the rates of clinical actions (CAs) as a result of serial creatinine (SCr) values and to examine postoperative SCr trends to assess the utility of SCr measurements in radical cystectomy (RC) patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review using our institution's database on all patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma (UC) from 2009 to 2019. Preoperative and all postoperative inpatient creatinine values were recorded. Minor CAs included fluid boluses, fluid rate changes, and medication changes. Major CAs included OR take-backs for stent repositioning, nephrostomy tube placement, nephrology consultation, and hemodialysis. RESULTS: A total of 238 RCs were performed with a resultant 2952 SCr measurements. The median number of SCr measurements per patient was 9 (interquartile range, IQR 7) with median length of hospital stay of 10 days (IQR 9 days). There were 92 minor and 12 major CAs as a result of 3% and 0.44% of SCr measurements, respectively. All major CAs were seen in patients experiencing complicated postoperative course. The median postoperative day with the highest creatinine was day 2. Predictors of postoperative CAs included preoperative renal dysfunction and obesity. CONCLUSION: SCr measurements remain a clinically valuable tool in postoperative management. Nonetheless, this present study suggests that prolonged SCr monitoring is of limited clinical utility. As such, discontinuing SCr checks after postoperative day 3 in patients experiencing uncomplicated postoperative course is safe and may lead to both cost savings and decreased patient discomfort.

A Multimedia Strategy to Integrate Introductory Broad-Based Radiation Science Education in US Medical Schools.

US physicians in multiple specialties who order or conduct radiological procedures lack formal radiation science education and thus sometimes order procedures of limited benefit or fail to order what is necessary. To this end, a multidisciplinary expert group proposed an introductory broad-based radiation science educational program for US medical schools. Suggested preclinical elements of the curriculum include foundational education on ionizing and nonionizing radiation (eg, definitions, dose metrics, and risk measures) and short- and long-term radiation-related health effects as well as introduction to radiology, radiation therapy, and radiation protection concepts. Recommended clinical elements of the curriculum would impart knowledge and practical experience in radiology, fluoroscopically guided procedures, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and identification of patient subgroups requiring special considerations when selecting specific ionizing or nonionizing diagnostic or therapeutic radiation procedures. Critical components of the clinical program would also include educational material and direct experience with patient-centered communication on benefits of, risks of, and shared decision making about ionizing and nonionizing radiation procedures and on health effects and safety requirements for environmental and occupational exposure to ionizing and nonionizing radiation. Overarching is the introduction to evidence-based guidelines for procedures that maximize clinical benefit while limiting unnecessary risk. The content would be further developed, directed, and integrated within the curriculum by local faculties and would address multiple standard elements of the Liaison Committee on Medical Education and Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency of the Association of American Medical Colleges.