Hospital discharge instructions: comprehension and compliance among older adults.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the prevalence or risk factors for non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions among older adults. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the prevalence of non-comprehension and non-compliance with discharge instructions and to identify associated patient characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Four hundred and fifty adults aged ≥ 65 admitted to medical and surgical units of a tertiary care facility and meeting inclusion criteria. MEASURES: We collected information on demographics, psycho-social factors, discharge diagnoses, and medications using surveys and patient medical records. Domains within discharge instructions included medications, follow-up appointments, diet, and exercise. At 5 days post-discharge, we assessed comprehension by asking patients about their discharge instructions, and compared responses to written instructions from medical charts. We assessed compliance among patients who understood their instructions. RESULTS: Prevalence of non-comprehension was 5 % for follow-up appointments, 27 % for medications, 48 % for exercise and 50 % for diet recommendations. Age was associated with non-comprehension of medication [odds ratio (OR) 1.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.04, 1.12] and follow-up appointment (OR 1.08; 95 % CI 1.00, 1.17) instructions. Male sex was associated with non-comprehension of diet instructions (OR 1.91; 95 % CI 1.10, 3.31). Social isolation was associated with non-comprehension of exercise instructions (OR 9.42; 95 % CI 1.50, 59.11) Depression was associated with non-compliance with medication (OR 2.29; 95 % CI 1.02, 5.10) and diet instructions (OR 3.30; 95 % CI 1.24, 8.83). CONCLUSIONS: Non-comprehension of discharge instructions among older adults is prevalent, multi-factorial, and varies by domain.

Admission delays' magnitude of traumatized patients in the emergency department of a hospital in Egypt: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Injury is an escalating public health problem, representing about 9% of global mortality, which disproportionately impacts lower- and middle-income countries. There are approximately 12,000 annual fatalities from road traffic injuries in Egypt, but a little information about delays in seeking emergent care is available. OBJECTIVES: To measure the time interval between sustaining an injury and presentation to the emergency department of Ain Shams University Surgery Hospital and to identify possible causes of these delays. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, facilitated survey of a convenience sample of trauma patients presenting to the emergency department of Ain Shams University Surgery Hospital from 1 February to 31 May 2014. Data obtained included: demographic information, trauma incident details, and injury assessment. RESULTS: The average reported transport time for patients from injury to hospital arrival was 3.8 h, while the mean ambulance response time was 45 min. Referral from other hospitals was revealed to be a significant cause of delay (P = 0.004), while ignorance of the local ambulance phone number could not be confirmed as a cause (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that trauma patients at our hospital experience more than 3 h of delay until they reach the ED. It also identified the possible causes accounting for that delay. However, additional nationwide research is needed to establish the clear causation or association of these causes with the delay intervals.