Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(1): 104050, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37741025

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation (CI) in children with malformed ears can be challenging through the standard surgical technique. Several alternative approaches have been described. The endoscopic-assisted approach can be chosen as an effective and safe surgical technique, overcoming the drawbacks of the traditional approach. MATERIAL: We further describe a combined technique based on a limited mastoidectomy with no posterior tympanotomy and an endoscopic transmeatal approach to the round window (RW): the electrode is driven from the mastoid to the middle ear through the attic. RESULTS: The concomitant endoscopic assistance allows for improved surgical vision, reducing the risk of major complications. The main advantages of this technique are related to better visualization of the RW for safe insertion of the electrode; avoidance of damage to the facial nerve (FN), due to direct visualization, and sparing the posterior tympanotomy; avoidance of subtotal petrosectomy, if not necessary. CONCLUSION: The purpose of this article, supported with a video file, is to describe step by step this endoscopic-assisted procedure in a patient with middle ear malformation.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Niño , Humanos , Implantación Coclear/métodos , Oído/cirugía , Oído Medio/cirugía , Audición , Ventana Redonda/cirugía
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(12): 5293-5298, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37393199

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To critically illustrate the personal experience with using the "Remote Check" application which remotely monitors the hearing rehabilitation level of cochlear implant users at home and further allows clinicians to schedule in-clinic sessions according to the patients' needs. METHODS: 12-month prospective study. Eighty adult cochlear implant users (females n = 37, males n = 43; age range 20-77 years) with ≥ 36 months of cochlear implant experience and ≥ 12 months of stable auditory and speech recognition level volunteered for this 12-month long prospective study. For each patient, at the beginning of the study during the in-clinic session to assess the stable aided hearing thresholds and the cochlear implant integrity and patient's usage, the "Remote Check" assessment baseline values were obtained. "Remote Check" outcomes were collected at different times in the subsequent at-home sessions, to identify the patients that had to reach the Center. Chi-square test has been used for statistical analysis of the comparison of the "Remote Check" outcomes and in-clinic session results. RESULTS: "Remote Check" application outcomes demonstrated minimal or no differences between all sessions. The at-home Remote Check application reached the same clinical outcomes as the in-clinic sessions in 79 out 80 of participants (99%) with high statistical significance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: "Remote Check" application supported hearing monitoring in cochlear implant users that were not able to attend the in-clinic review during COVID-19 pandemic time. This study demonstrates that the application can be a useful routine tool also for clinical follow-up of cochlear implant users with stable aided hearing.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Percepción del Habla , Telemedicina , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Estudios Prospectivos , Pandemias
3.
Head Neck ; 45(1): 197-206, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36250285

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To retrospectively evaluate oncological outcomes in two groups of patients with pT4aN0 glottic SCC treated with total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND) who underwent postoperative radiotherapy or exclusive clinical and radiological follow-up. METHODS: It includes patients with pT4N0 glottic SCC who underwent TL and unilateral or bilateral ND with or without PORT. Divided in two comparison groups: the first group underwent adjuvant RT (TL-PORT); the second group referred to clinical and radiological follow-up (TL). RESULTS: PORT was associated with a better OS while no differences were found in terms of DSS. A better local control is achieved when PORT is administered while no differences in terms of regional and distant control rates were found. Bilateral ND positively impacts on the regional control while the PNI negatively impact the regional control. CONCLUSIONS: A tailored PORT protocol might be considered for pT4N0 glottic SCC treated with TL and ND, both considering the ND's extent and presence of PNI.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Laríngeas , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/cirugía , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Laringectomía/métodos , Disección del Cuello/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Glotis/cirugía , Glotis/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA