Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Gynecol Pathol ; 35(5): 395-401, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26598977

RESUMEN

Pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer is controversial, but the findings influence prognosis and treatment decisions. Noninvasive tools to identify women at high risk of lymph node metastasis can assist in determining the need for lymph node dissection and adjuvant treatment for patients who do not have a lymph node dissection performed initially. A retrospective review of surgical pathology was conducted for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma at our institution. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis of selected pathologic features were performed. A nomogram to predict for lymph node metastasis was constructed. From August 1996 to October 2013, 296 patients underwent total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and selective lymphadenectomy for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Median age at surgery was 62.7 yr (range, 24.9-93.6 yr). Median number of lymph nodes removed was 13 (range, 1-72). Of all patients, 38 (12.8%) had lymph node metastases. On univariate analysis, tumor size ≥4 cm, grade, lymphovascular space involvement, cervical stromal involvement, adnexal or serosal or parametrial involvement, positive pelvic washings, and deep (more than one half) myometrial invasion were all significantly associated with lymph node involvement. In a multivariate model, lymphovascular space involvement, deep myometrial invasion, and cervical stromal involvement remained significant predictors of nodal involvement, whereas tumor size of ≥4 cm was borderline significant. A lymph node predictive nomogram was constructed using these factors. Our nomogram can help estimate risk of nodal disease and aid in directing the need for additional surgery or adjuvant therapy in patients without lymph node surgery. Lymphovascular space involvement is the most important predictor for lymph node metastases, regardless of grade, and should be consistently assessed.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Endometrioide/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Nomogramas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patología , Carcinoma Endometrioide/secundario , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirugía , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Endometrio/patología , Endometrio/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/patología , Pelvis/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Adulto Joven
2.
Adv Anat Pathol ; 21(6): 383-93, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25299308

RESUMEN

Endometrial stromal tumors are rare uterine mesenchymal neoplasms that have intrigued pathologists for years, not only because they commonly pose diagnostic dilemmas, but also because the classification and pathogenesis of these tumors has been widely debated. The current World Health Organization recognizes 4 categories of endometrial stromal tumor: endometrial stromal nodule (ESN), low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). uterine sarcoma. These categories are defined by the presence of distinct translocations as well as tumor morphology and prognosis. Specifically, the JAZF1-SUZ12 (formerly JAZF1-JJAZ1) fusion identifies a large proportion of ESN and LG-ESSs, whereas the YWHAE-FAM22 translocation identifies HG-ESSs. The latter tumors appear to have a prognosis intermediate between LG-ESS and UUS, which exhibits no specific translocation pattern. This review (1) presents the clinicopathologic features of endometrial stromal tumors; (2) discusses their immunophenotype; and (3) highlights the recent advances in molecular genetics which explain their pathogenesis and lend support for a new classification system.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/clasificación , Tumores Estromáticos Endometriales/clasificación , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/clasificación , Terminología como Asunto , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biopsia , Diferenciación Celular , Proteínas Co-Represoras , Proteínas de Unión al ADN , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Endometriales/química , Neoplasias Endometriales/genética , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Tumores Estromáticos Endometriales/química , Tumores Estromáticos Endometriales/genética , Tumores Estromáticos Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Fusión Génica , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Clasificación del Tumor , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Fusión Oncogénica/genética , Fenotipo , Complejo Represivo Polycomb 2/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/química , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/genética , Sarcoma Estromático Endometrial/patología , Factores de Transcripción , Translocación Genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA