Live Rotavirus Vaccination Appears Low-risk in Infants Born to Mothers With Inflammatory Bowel Disease on Biologics.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Biologic therapies in the context of inflammatory bowel disease and pregnancy lead to improved maternal and fetal outcomes. Placental transfer results in detectable drug concentrations in infants. Rotavirus infection results in diarrheal related hospitalizations; however, the live oral vaccine is not currently recommended in biologic exposed infants. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of maternal biologic therapies on the infant immune system and safety of live rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants. METHODS: Biologic-exposed infants underwent standardized clinical assessments, drug concentration, and immune function testing (complete blood count, differential, immunoglobulin levels, extended B-cell and T-cell subset enumeration, Recent Thymic Emigrants, regulatory T-cell numbers, mitogen stimulation assays, and review of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles in the newborn screen). Rotavirus vaccine-specific adverse effects following immunizations up to 42 days post the last dose of the vaccine series were recorded. RESULTS: There were 57 infants born to 52 mothers with inflammatory bowel disease exposed to infliximab (n = 21), adalimumab (n = 19), vedolizumab (n = 10), and ustekinumab (n = 7) in the third trimester for a median of 39 weeks (interquartile range, 38-39 weeks) at delivery. Immunologic assessments validated for age were normal in all infants despite median infliximab concentrations of 6.1 ug/mL (range, 0.4-28.8 ug/mL), adalimumab concentrations of 1.7 ug/mL (range, 0.7-7.9 ug/mL), ustekinumab concentrations of 0.6 ug/mL (range, 0-1.1), and undetectable for vedolizumab at 10.7 weeks (interquartile range, 9.4-12.4) of age. The live oral rotavirus vaccine series was provided to 50 infants with the first dose given at a median of 13 weeks of age. No adverse effects following immunization were reported. CONCLUSION: Immune function testing was normal, and administration of live rotavirus vaccination appeared low-risk in biologic-exposed infants irrespective of circulating drug levels.

Development and evaluation of virtual simulation games to increase the confidence and self-efficacy of healthcare learners in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion.

BACKGROUND: Although healthcare providers (HCPs) are the most trusted source of vaccine information, there is a paucity of easily accessible, multidisciplinary educational tools on vaccine communication for them. Virtual simulation games (VSGs) are innovative yet accessible and effective tools in healthcare education. The objectives of our study were to develop VSGs to increase HCP confidence and self-efficacy in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion, and evaluate the VSGs' effectiveness using a pre-post self-assessment pilot study. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team of experts in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and simulation development created three VSGs for HCP learners focused on addressing conversations with vaccine hesitant individuals. We evaluated the VSGs with 24 nursing students, 30 pharmacy students, and 18 medical residents who completed surveys and 6-point Likert scale pre-post self-assessments to measure changes in their confidence and self-efficacy. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline confidence and self-efficacy across the three HCP disciplines, despite varied levels of education. Post-VSG confidence and self-efficacy (median: 5) were significantly higher than pre-VSG (median: 4-5) for all three HCP disciplines (P ≤ 0.0005), highlighting the effectiveness of the VSGs. Medical residents reported significantly lower post-VSG confidence and self-efficacy than nursing and pharmacy learners despite completing the most significant amount of education. CONCLUSIONS: Following the completion of the VSGs, learners in medicine, nursing, and pharmacy showed significant improvement in their self-assessed confidence and self-efficacy in holding vaccine conversations. The VSGs as an educational tool, in combination with existing clinical immunization training, can be used to increase HCP confidence and engagement in vaccine discussions with patients, which may ultimately lead to increased vaccine confidence among patients.

COVID-19 vaccine confidence, concerns, and uptake in children aged 5 and older in Calgary, Alberta: a longitudinal cohort study.

Objectives: Beginning early in the pandemic, there was a worldwide effort to develop effective vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Before and after the approval and implementation of vaccines, there were concerns about their need as well as their safety and rapid development. We explored child demographic characteristics and parental concerns to identify factors associated with the decision to vaccinate. Methods: A cohort of 1035 children from Calgary was assembled in 2020 to participate in 5 visits every 6 months for survey completion and blood sampling for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Visits 1 to 2 occurred before approval of vaccines for children; Visits 3 to 5 occurred after vaccine approval for different age groups. We described vaccine concerns and utilized logistic regression to examine factors associated with the decision to vaccinate in children ≥5 years of age. Results: Children ≥12 years of age, of non-white or non-black ethnicity, and who had received previous influenza vaccines had higher odds of being vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Children with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection had lower odds of being vaccinated. The most common concerns in early 2021 were about vaccine safety. By summer 2022, the most common concern was a belief that vaccines were not necessary. Through the study 88% of children were vaccinated. Conclusions: Age, ethnicity, previous infections, and vaccine attitudes were associated with parental decision to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2. For children who remained unvaccinated, parents continued to have safety concerns and questioned the necessity of the vaccine. Complacency about the need for vaccination may be more challenging to address and overcome than concerns about safety alone.

Barriers experienced by families new to Alberta, Canada when accessing routine-childhood vaccinations.

BACKGROUND: As Canada and other high-income countries continue to welcome newcomers, we aimed to 1) understand newcomer parents' attitudes towards routine-childhood vaccinations (RCVs), and 2) identify barriers newcomer parents face when accessing RCVs in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Between July 6th-August 31st, 2022, we recruited participants from Alberta, Canada to participate in moderated focus group discussions. Inclusion criteria included parents who had lived in Canada for < 5 years with children < 18 years old. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content and deductive thematic analysis. The capability opportunity motivation behaviour model was used as our conceptual framework. RESULTS: Four virtual and three in-person focus groups were conducted with 47 participants. Overall, parents were motivated and willing to vaccinate their children but experienced several barriers related to their capability and opportunity to access RCVs. Five main themes emerged: 1) lack of reputable information about RCVs, 2) language barriers when looking for information and asking questions about RCVs, 3) lack of access to a primary care provider (PCP), 4) lack of affordable and convenient transportation options, and 5) due to the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of available vaccine appointments. Several minor themes were also identified and included barriers such as lack of 1) childcare, vaccine record sharing, PCP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that several barriers faced by newcomer families ultimately stem from issues related to accessing information about RCVs and the challenges families face once at vaccination clinics, highlighting opportunities for health systems to better support newcomers in accessing RCVs.

Revaccination and Adverse Event Recurrence in Patients with Adverse Events following Immunization.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the risk of recurrence of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) upon revaccination and to determine among patients with suspected vaccine allergy whether allergy skin test positivity was associated with AEFI recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective observational study included patients assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic Network from 2013 to 2019 with AEFIs who required revaccination with the vaccine temporally associated with their AEFI. Participants underwent standardized assessment and data collection. Special Immunization Clinic physicians used guidelines to inform their recommendations. Participants were followed up after revaccination to capture AEFI recurrences. Data were transferred to a central database for descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 588 participants were assessed for 627 AEFIs; 570 (91%) AEFIs occurred in children <18 years of age. AEFIs included immediate hypersensitivity (130/627; 21%), large local reactions (110/627; 18%), nonurticarial rash (51/627; 8%), seizures (26/627; 4%), and thrombocytopenia (11/627; 2%). Revaccination was recommended to 513 of 588 (87%) participants. Among participants recommended and due for revaccination during the study period, 63% (299/477) were revaccinated. AEFI recurrence was 10% (31/299) overall, 31% (15/49) for large local reactions, and 7% (5/66) for immediate hypersensitivity. No recurrence was serious. Among 92 participants with suspected vaccine allergy who underwent skin testing and were revaccinated, the negative predictive value of skin testing for AEFI recurrence was 96% (95% CI 92.5%-99.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals with AEFIs were safely revaccinated. Among those with suspected vaccine allergy, skin testing may help determine the safety of revaccination.

Attitudes, behaviours and barriers to public health measures for COVID-19: a survey to inform public health messaging.

BACKGROUND: Public support of public health measures including physical distancing, masking, staying home while sick, avoiding crowded indoor spaces and contact tracing/exposure notification applications remains critical for reducing spread of COVID-19. The aim of our work was to understand current behaviours and attitudes towards public health measures as well as barriers individuals face in following public health measures. We also sought to identify attitudes persons have regarding a COVID-19 vaccine and reasons why they may not accept a vaccine. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in August 2020, in Alberta, Canada in persons 18 years and older. This survey evaluated current behaviours, barriers and attitudes towards public health measures and a COVID-19 vaccine. Cluster analysis was used to identify key patterns that summarize data variations among observations. RESULTS: Of the 60 total respondents, the majority of persons were always or often physically distancing (73%), masking (65%) and staying home while sick (67%). Bars/pubs/lounges or nightclubs were visited rarely or never by 63% of respondents. Persons identified staying home while sick to provide the highest benefit (83%) in reducing spread of COVID-19. There were a large proportion of persons who had not downloaded or used a contact tracing/exposure notification app (77%) and who would not receive a COVID-19 vaccine when available (20%) or were unsure (12%). Reporting health authorities as most trusted sources of health information was associated with greater percentage of potential uptake of vaccine but not related to contact tracing app download and use. Individuals with lower concern of getting and spreading COVID-19 showed the least uptake of public health measures except for avoiding public places such as bars. Lower concern regarding COVID-19 was also associated with more negative responses to taking a potential COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSION: These results suggest informational frames and themes focusing on individual risks, highlighting concern for COVID-19 and targeting improving trust for health authorities may be most effective in increasing public health measures. With the ultimate goal of preventing spread of COVID-19, understanding persons' attitudes towards both public health measures and a COVID-19 vaccine remains critical to addressing barriers and implementing targeted interventions and messaging to improve uptake.

Approach to Chilblains During the COVID-19 Pandemic [Formula: see text].

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) chilblains is a well-reported cutaneous pattern of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2). Through this narrative review, we provide an evidence-based overview of idiopathic and secondary chilblains, distinguishing features of COVID-19 chilblains, and a systematic clinical approach to history, examination, investigations, and treatment. In the absence of cold or damp exposure, COVID-19 should be considered as a cause of acute chilblains. The timing of onset of COVID-19 chilblains relative to active SARS-CoV-2 viremia remains unclear. Patients with suspected COVID-19 chilblains should thus follow public health guidelines for COVID-19 testing and self-isolation.

A mixed-methods needs assessment for an antimicrobial stewardship curriculum in pediatrics.

Objective: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) education initiatives for multidisciplinary teams are most successful when addressing psychosocial factors driving antimicrobial prescribing (AP) and when they address the needs of the team to allow for a tailored approach to their education. Design: We conducted a mixed-methods embedded study as a needs assessment, involving quantitative analysis of AS concerns observed by pharmacists through an audit while attending clinical team rounds, as well as qualitative semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) to identify psychosocial barriers and facilitators for antimicrobial prescribing for an inpatient general pediatric service. We analyzed the data using deductive and inductive methods by mapping the TDF to a model for social determinants of antimicrobial prescribing (SDAP) in pediatric inpatient health care teams. Setting: The Clinical Teaching Unit (CTU) and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Canada. Participants: Interviews (n = 23) with staff and resident physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists. Results: Psychosocial facilitators and barriers for AS practice in the PICU and CTU which were identified included: collaboration, shared decision-making, locally accessible guidelines, and an overarching goal of doing right by the patient and feeling empowered as a prescriber. Some of the barriers identified included the norm of noninterference, professional comparisons, limited resources, feeling inadequately trained in AS, emotional prescribing, and a pejorative monitoring system. Conclusions: Our findings identified barriers and facilitators to AS decisions on pediatric inpatient teams as well as actionable needs in psychosocial-based AS education.

Normal Infant Immunologic Assessment and Uneventful Live Rotavirus Vaccination Despite Continuous Tofacitinib Exposure In Utero and During Breastfeeding.

Background: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are effective for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, this class of medications is not recommended during pregnancy or breastfeeding based on animal data suggesting teratogenesis and recent reports of transmammary transfer after maternal ingestion, raising concerns for immune system development in babies exposed to these drugs. Methods: We present the case of a patient with IBD treated with a JAK inhibitor who decided to continue the medication throughout her pregnancy and during breastfeeding. This is the first reported case of a detailed immunologic profile in a baby exposed to tofacitinib in utero and during lactation. Results: A 30-year-old female with ulcerative colitis with previous exposure to vedolizumab and infliximab achieved complete remission with tofacitinib therapy. The patient became pregnant after 5 months of JAK inhibitor therapy and decided to continue tofacitinib during pregnancy and while breastfeeding. The patient delivered a healthy offspring with no congenital malformations, a normal detailed immunologic profile, and subsequent safe provision of the live oral rotavirus vaccine. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of individualized counseling for patients of childbearing age who are candidates for JAK inhibition. Those who are pregnant or breastfeeding with refractory disease may have limited medical therapeutic options. Ongoing effective therapy for IBD resulted in complete disease remission in the mother and favorable outcomes in the infant. Further, an in-depth infant immunological assessment can lead to specific vaccination recommendations in exposed infants.

"You can push these conversations, but don't push your patient away": healthcare learner perspectives on virtual simulation games as an educational approach to address vaccine hesitancy.

Background: Vaccine hesitancy is a significant threat to public health. Healthcare providers (HCPs) can address hesitancy during routine patient conversations; however, few multidisciplinary education tools exist for HCPs to learn to engage in vaccine discussion especially considering new vaccine technologies such as mRNA vaccines. The objectives of this study were to explore HCP learners' experiences with COVID-19 vaccine communication, and qualitatively evaluate an online learning module composed of virtual simulation games (VSGs) which utilize the PrOTCT Framework for HCP vaccine communication. Methods: Three virtual focus groups were conducted from December 2022 to January 2023 with Canadian healthcare learners in nursing (N = 6), pharmacy (N = 9), and medicine (N = 7) who participated in a larger study measuring the effectiveness of the VSGs. Using a pragmatic approach, a qualitative thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo to identify themes and subthemes. Results: A total of 22 HCP learners participated in this study and three key themes were identified. Across all three disciplines, participants expressed that (1) their prior education lacked training on how to hold vaccine conversations, resulting in uncomfortable personal experiences with patients; (2) the VSGs increased their confidence in holding vaccine conversations by providing novel tools and skills; and (3) participants also provided feedback to improve the VSGs which was implemented and supported the dissemination to all HCP professions. Conclusion: Although HCPs are a trusted source of vaccine information, participants in this study felt they received little training on how to engage in challenging conversations regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The introduction of the PrOTCT Framework and presumptive statements provided novel strategies for HCP to initiate vaccine conversations, especially considering new vaccine technologies and participants appreciated the emphasis on coping strategies and resilience. It is essential that HCP are provided both opportunities to practice managing these conversations, and tools and skills to succeed at an early point in their careers to prepare them for future roles in vaccine advocacy, delivery, and promotion.

Revaccination outcomes among adolescents and adults with suspected hypersensitivity reactions following COVID-19 vaccination: A Canadian immunization research network study.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions. Infectious disease physicians and allergists in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network developed guidance for evaluating patients with adverse events following immunization (AEFI) including suspected hypersensitivity. This study evaluated management and adverse event recurrence following subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations. METHODS: Individuals aged 12 years and older enrolled at participating SICs before February 28, 2023 who were referred for suspected or diagnosed hypersensitivity reaction following COVID-19 vaccination, or for prevaccination assessment of suspected allergy to a COVID-19 vaccine component were included. De-identified clinical assessments and revaccination data, captured in a centralized database, were analyzed. The Brighton Collaboration case definition (BCCD) for anaphylaxis (2023 version) was applied. RESULTS: The analysis included 206 participants from 13 sites: 26 participants referred for pre-vaccination assessment and 180 participants referred for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination (15/180 [8.3%] with BCCD confirmed anaphylaxis, 84 [46.7%] with immediate hypersensitivity symptoms not meeting BCCD, 33 [18.3%] with other diagnosed hypersensitivity reactions, and 48 [26.7%] participants with a final diagnosis of non-hypersensitivity AEFI). Among participants referred for AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination, 166/180 (92.2%) were recommended for COVID-19 revaccination after risk assessment, of whom 158/166 (95.2%) were revaccinated (all with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine). After revaccination, 1/15 (6.7%) participants with prior anaphylaxis, 1/77 (1.3%) with immediate hypersensitivity not meeting criteria for anaphylaxis and 1/24 (4.2%) with other physician diagnosed hypersensitivity developed recurrent AEFI symptoms that met the BCCD for anaphylaxis. All 26 participants referred pre-vaccination, including 9 (34.6%) with history of polyethylene glycol-asparaginase reactions, were vaccinated without occurrence of immediate hypersensitivity symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals in this national cohort who experienced a hypersensitivity event following COVID-19 vaccination and were referred for specialist review were revaccinated without AEFI recurrence, suggesting that specialist evaluation can facilitate safe revaccination.

Antibiotic Prescribing Practices for Urinary Tract Infection in a Pediatric Emergency Department: Is This a Problem Worth Cefix-ing?

Background: Pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) is associated with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Objective: To determine the least-broad-spectrum oral antibiotic that would cover 80% of pathogens from lower (afebrile) and upper (febrile) UTIs in a Canadian pediatric emergency department (ED). Methods: This retrospective case series involved children discharged from the ED between September 2020 and February 2021 with a diagnosis of UTI and collection of a sample for urinalysis that had growth on culture. Results: Of 188 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 184 (97.9%) were discharged on antibiotics. Culture results indicated a UTI in 170 cases (92.4% of those discharged on antibiotics). The 95 urinary isolates from lower UTIs were susceptible to cephalexin (n = 81, 85.3%), cefixime (n = 78, 82.1%), nitrofurantoin (n = 76, 80.0%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (n = 64, 67.4%), and amoxicillin (n = 55, 57.9%). The 75 urinary isolates from upper UTIs were susceptible to cefixime (n = 71, 94.7%), TMP-SMX (n = 57, 76.0%), and amoxicillin (n = 48, 64.0%). The mean prescribed duration of antibiotic therapy was 8.3 days for patients with a lower UTI and 9.1 days for those with an upper UTI (mean difference 0.80 days, 95% confidence interval 0.05-1.54). Conclusions: Empiric treatment with cephalexin or nitrofurantoin would have been successful for almost all lower UTIs. More complete reporting of cephalexin minimal inhibitory concentrations might have allowed use of this drug for most upper UTIs. Although there was a trend toward shorter duration of therapy for lower versus upper UTI, lower UTIs were always treated for longer than recommended by current guidelines.

Contexte: L'infection des voies urinaires (IVU) pédiatrique présente des défis diagnostiques et thérapeutiques. Objectif: Déterminer l'antibiotique oral à large spectre le moins élevé qui couvrirait 80 % des pathogènes des IVU inférieures (sans fièvre) et des IVU supérieures (avec fièvre) dans un service d'urgences pédiatriques canadien. Méthodes: Cette série de cas rétrospective impliquait des enfants sortis du service des urgences entre septembre 2020 et février 2021 avec un diagnostic d'IVU et la collecte d'un échantillon pour une analyse d'urine avec croissance dans la culture d'urine. Résultats: Parmi les 188 patients répondant aux critères d'inclusion, 184 (97,9 %) ont reçu des antibiotiques au moment du congé. Les résultats de la culture ont indiqué une IVU dans 170 cas (92,4 % des patients ayant reçu des antibiotiques au moment du congé). Les 95 isolats urinaires des IVU inférieures étaient sensibles à la céphalexine (n = 81, 85,3 %), au céfixime (n = 78, 82,1 %), à la nitrofurantoïne (n = 76, 80,0 %), au triméthoprime-sulfaméthoxazole (TMP-SMX) (n = 64, 67,4 %) et à l'amoxicilline (n = 55, 57,9 %). Les 75 isolats urinaires des IVU supérieures étaient sensibles au céfixime (n = 71, 94,7 %), au TMP-SMX (n = 57, 76,0 %) et à l'amoxicilline (n = 48, 64,0 %). La durée moyenne de prescription d'antibiotiques était de 8,3 jours pour les patients atteints d'une IVU inférieure et de 9,1 jours pour ceux atteints d'une IVU supérieure (différence moyenne 0,80 jours, IC à 95 % 0,05­1,54). Conclusions: Un traitement empirique avec la céphalexine ou la nitrofurantoïne aurait été efficace pour la grande majorité des infections urinaires inférieures. Un rapport plus complet des concentrations minimales inhibitrices de la céphalexine aurait peut-être permis d'utiliser ce médicament pour la plupart des infections urinaires supérieures. Bien qu'il y ait eu une tendance vers une durée de traitement plus courte pour les infections urinaires inférieures par rapport aux infections urinaires supérieures, les infections urinaires inférieures étaient toujours traitées plus longtemps que ce qui est recommandé par les lignes directrices actuelles.

Case report: Blotchy skin in a puffy neonate: is there a new association?

Introduction: Purpura fulminans in the neonatal population is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition complicated by thrombosis, resultant vital organ necrosis, and gangrene of the extremities. Considering the rapid evolution of the pathogenetic mechanism, an index of suspicion, early identification, and prompt intervention are imperative for improved outcomes. The majority of purpura fulminans cases have an infectious etiology, but it is essential to consider other congenital and acquired causes. Case description: We present a clinical case of a female neonate to emphasize the correlation between purpura fulminans, congenital chylothorax, involvement of the PAK2 gene, and the occurrence of retinal detachment in both eyes. After draining the congenital chylothorax, the neonate developed purpura fulminans due to a loss of protein C, S, and antithrombin factors, previously not reported in the literature. The purpuric lesions resolved after the administration of fresh frozen plasma. Subsequently, no recurring purpura fulminans lesions were noted following the normalization of the antithrombotic factor levels in the serum. Subsequently, the child also developed retinal detachment in both eyes.

Immunological effects and safety of live rotavirus vaccination after antenatal exposure to immunomodulatory biologic agents: a prospective cohort study from the Canadian Immunization Research Network.

BACKGROUND: People with inflammatory or autoimmune diseases are recommended to continue immunomodulatory biologic agents throughout pregnancy. However, concerns regarding potential immunosuppression in infants exposed to biologic agents have led to recommendations to avoid live vaccines in the first 6-12 months of life. We aimed to examine whether live rotavirus vaccine could be administered safely to infants exposed to biologic agents, assessed in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, infants exposed to biologic agents in utero were referred to one of six SIC sites in Canada for rotavirus vaccination recommendations. Children with other contraindications to rotavirus vaccination or older than 15 weeks were excluded. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were conducted according to a standard clinical pathway. Data were collected for relevant medical history, pregnancy outcomes, biologic agent exposure history, physical examination, laboratory results of the child, SIC recommendations for rotavirus vaccination, rotavirus vaccine series completion, and adverse events after immunisation. After parental consent, deidentified data were transferred to a central database for analysis. Children recommended for rotavirus vaccination were followed up for 8 months after series initiation to ascertain severe and serious adverse events, including severe diarrhoea, vomiting, and intussusception. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2017, and Dec 31, 2021, 202 infants were assessed and 191 eligible infants were enrolled (97 [51%] were female and 94 [49%] were male). When including those exposed to multiple agents, the most common biologic agents to which infants were exposed were infliximab (67 [35%] of 191), adalimumab (49 [26%]), ustekinumab (18 [9%]), and vedolizumab (17 [9%]). Biologic agent exposure continued into the third trimester for 178 (93%) infants. No clinically significant abnormalities in lymphocyte subsets, quantitative immunoglobulins, or mitogen responses were detected. After SIC assessment, rotavirus vaccination was recommended for 187 (98%) of 191 infants, all of whom were followed up. By end of follow-up on Aug 19, 2022, 168 (90%) infants had initiated rotavirus vaccination; 150 (80%) completed the series. No serious adverse events after immunisation were reported, but three (2%) infants required medical attention, one for vomiting and change in stools who was subsequently diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease, one for rash on labia unrelated to vaccination, and one for vomiting and diarrhoea associated with a milk allergy. INTERPRETATION: Findings from this study suggest that lymphocyte subsets and the safety of live rotavirus vaccination are generally not affected by in-utero exposure to biologic agents. Rotavirus vaccination can be offered to infants exposed to anti-TNF agents in utero. FUNDING: Public Health Agency of Canada and Canadian Institutes of Health Research through the Canadian Immunization Research Network.

Persuasive Messages for Improving Adherence to COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors: Randomized Online Experiment.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19, including physical distancing, masking, staying home while sick, and avoiding crowded indoor spaces, remains critical for limiting the spread of COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of using various persuasive appeals (deontological moral frame, empathy, identifiable victim, goal proximity, and reciprocity) at improving intentions to adhere to prevention behaviors. METHODS: A randomized online experiment using a representative sample of adult Canadian residents with respect to age, ethnicity, and province of residence was performed from March 3 to March 6, 2021. Participants indicated their intentions to follow public health guidelines, saw one of six flyers featuring a persuasive appeal or no appeal, and then rated their intentions a second time. Known correlates of attitudes toward public health measures were also measured. RESULTS: Intentions to adhere to public health measures increased in all appeal conditions. The message featuring an empathy appeal resulted in a greater increase in intentions than the control (no appeal) message. Moreover, the effectiveness of persuasive appeals was moderated by baseline intentions. Deontological, empathy, identifiable victim, and reciprocity appeals improved intentions more than the control message, but only for people with lower baseline intentions to adhere to nonpharmaceutical interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Public health marketing campaigns aiming to increase adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviors could achieve modest gains by employing a range of persuasive appeals. However, to maximize impact, it is important that these campaigns be targeted to the right individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05722106; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05722106.

The Alberta Telestewardship Network: Building a platform to enable capacity building in antimicrobial stewardship-results of an initial pilot study.

Background: Resources to improve antimicrobial stewardship (AS) are limited, but a telestewardship platform can enable capacity building and scalability. The Alberta Telestewardship Network (ATeleNet) was designed to focus on outreach across the province of Alberta, Canada, and facilitate AS activities. Methods: Outreach occurred virtually between pharmacists and physicians in hospital and long-term care settings throughout Alberta via secure, enterprise video conferencing software on both desktop and mobile devices. We used a quantitative questionnaire adapted from the telehealth usability questionnaire to capture the health provider's experience during each session. The questionnaire consisted of 39 questions, and a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the degree of agreement and collate responses into a descriptive analysis. Results: A total of 33 pilot consultations were completed between July 6, 2020 and December 15, 2021. The majority (22, 85%) of respondents agreed that video conference-based virtual sessions are an acceptable means to provide health care and that they were able to express themselves effectively to other health care professionals (23, 88%). Respondents agreed the system was simple to use (23, 96%), and that they could become productive quickly using the system (23, 88%). Overall, 24 (92%) respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the virtual care platform. Conclusions: We implemented and evaluated a telehealth consultation and collaborative care service between AS providers at multiple centres. AHS has since prioritized similar workflows, including access to specialists in acute care, as part of their virtual health strategy. Evaluation results will be shared with provincial stakeholders for further strategic planning and deployment.

Historique: Les ressources pour améliorer la gérance antimicrobienne (GA) sont limitées, mais une plateforme de télégérance peut favoriser le renforcement des capacités et l'échelonnabilité. L'Alberta Telestewardship Network (réseau de télégérance de l'Alberta, ou ATeleNet) a été conçu pour mettre l'accent sur le rayonnement dans la province de l'Alberta, au Canada et pour faciliter les activités de GA. Méthodologie: Le rayonnement s'est produit virtuellement entre des pharmaciens et des médecins d'établissements hospitaliers et d'établissements de soins de longue durée de l'Alberta par logiciel de visioconférence sécurisé sur des ordinateurs de bureau et des appareils mobiles. Les chercheurs ont utilisé un questionnaire quantitatif adapté du questionnaire sur la convivialité de la télésanté pour saisir l'expérience du dispensateur de soins lors de chaque séance. Le questionnaire était composé de 39 questions, et une échelle de Likert de cinq points a permis d'évaluer le degré d'entente et de recueillir les réponses dans une analyse descriptive. Résultats: Au total, les chercheurs ont effectué 33 consultations pilotes entre le 6 juillet 2020 et le 15 décembre 2021. La majorité des répondants (n = 22, 85 %) ont convenu que les séances en visioconférence représentaient un moyen acceptable de fournir des soins de santé et leur permettaient de s'exprimer avec efficacité auprès des autres professionnels de la santé (n = 23, 88 %). Les répondants ont indiqué que le système était facile à utiliser (n = 23, 96 %), et qu'ils pouvaient vite devenir productifs (n = 23, 88 %). Dans l'ensemble, 24 répondants (92 %) étaient satisfaits ou très satisfaits de la plateforme de soins virtuels. Conclusions: Les chercheurs ont lancé et évalué une consultation en télésanté et un service de soins coopératifs entre fournisseurs de GA de multiples centres. Depuis, les Services de santé de l'Alberta ont priorisé des processus de travail semblables dans leur stratégie de santé virtuelle, y compris pour l'accès à des spécialistes en soins aigus. Les résultats de l'évaluation seront transmis à des intervenants provinciaux en vue d'une planification et d'un déploiement stratégiques.