Rotational Laxity Control by the Anterolateral Ligament and the Lateral Meniscus Is Dependent on Knee Flexion Angle: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: Injury to the anterolateral ligament (ALL) has been reported to contribute to high-grade anterolateral laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Failure to address ALL injury has been suggested as a cause of persistent rotational laxity after ACL reconstruction. Lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) tears have also been shown to cause increased internal rotation of the knee. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to determine the functional relationship between the ALL and LMPR in the control of internal rotation of the ACL-deficient knee. Specifically: (1) We asked if there was a difference in internal rotation among: the intact knee; the ACL-deficient knee; the ACL/ALL-deficient knee; the ACL/LMPR-deficient knee; and the ACL/ALL/LMPR-deficient knee. (2) We also asked if there was a difference in anterior translation among these conditions. METHODS: Sixteen fresh frozen cadaveric knee specimens (eight men, mean age 79 years) were potted into a hip simulator (femur) and a 6 degree-of-freedom load cell (tibia). Rigid optical trackers were inserted into the proximal femur and distal tibia, allowing for the motion of the tibia with respect to the femur to be tracked during biomechanical tests. A series of points on the femur and tibia were digitized to create bone coordinate systems that were used to calculate internal rotation and anterior translation. Biomechanical testing involved applying a 5-Nm internal rotation moment to the tibia from full extension to 90° of flexion. Anterior translation was performed by applying a 90-N anterior load using a tensiometer. Both tests were performed in 15° increments tested sequentially in the following conditions: (1) intact; and (2) ACL injury (ACL-). The specimens were then randomized to either have the ALL sectioned (3) first (M+/ALL-); or (4) the LMPR sectioned first (M-/ALL+) followed by the other structure (M-/ALL-). A one-way analysis of variance was performed for each sectioning condition at each angle of knee flexion (α = 0.05). RESULTS: At 0° of flexion there was an effect of tissue sectioning such that internal rotation of the M-/ALL- condition was greater than ACL- by 1.24° (p = 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-2.70) and the intact condition by 2.5° (p = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.69-3.91). In addition, the mean (SD) internal rotations for the M+/ALL- (9.99° [5.39°]) and M-/ALL+ (12.05° [5.34°]) were greater by 0.87° (p = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.13-3.83) and by 2.15°, respectively, compared with the intact knee. At 45° the internal rotation for the ACL- (19.15° [9.49°]), M+/ALL- (23.70° [7.00°]), and M-/ALL- (18.80° [8.27°]) conditions was different than the intact (12.78° [9.23°]) condition by 6.37° (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 1.37-11.41), 8.47° (p < 0.01; 95% CI, 3.94-13.00), and 6.02° (p = 0.01; 95% CI, 1.73-10.31), respectively. At 75° there was a 10.11° difference (p < 0.01; 95% CI, 5.20-15.01) in internal rotation between the intact (13.96° [5.34°]) and the M+/ALL- (23.22° [4.46°]) conditions. There was also a 4.08° difference (p = 0.01; 95% CI, 1.14-7.01) between the intact and M-/ALL- (18.05° [7.31°]) conditions. Internal rotation differences of 6.17° and 5.43° were observed between ACL- (16.28° [6.44°]) and M+/ALL- (p < 0.01; 95% CI, 2.45-9.89) as well as between M+/ALL- and M-/ALL- (p = 0.01; 95% CI, -8.17 to -1.63). Throughout the range of flexion, there was no difference in anterior translation with progressive section of the ACL, meniscus, or ALL. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL and LMPR both play a role in aiding the ACL in controlling internal rotation laxity in vitro; however, these effects seem to be dependent on flexion angle. The ALL has a greater role in controlling internal rotation at flexion angles > 30o. The LMPR appears to have more of an effect on controlling rotation closer to extension. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Injury to the ALL and/or LMPR may contribute to high-grade anterolateral laxity after ACL injury. The LMPR and the ALL, along with the iliotibial tract, appear to act in concert as secondary stabilizers of anterolateral rotation and could be considered as the "anterolateral corner" of the knee.

The infra-meniscal fibers of the anterolateral ligament are stronger and stiffer than the supra-meniscal fibers despite similar histological characteristics.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current investigation was to characterize biomechanical differences between the supra- and infra-meniscal sections of the anterolateral ligament (ALL). We hypothesized that the supra-meniscal fibers of the ALL would be stronger and stiffer than the infra-meniscal fiber. METHODS: Nine cadaveric knee specimens [mean (SD) age = 79 (14.6) years] were dissected to identify the borders of the ALL while maintaining the anatomy of the lateral meniscus. The specimens were randomly assigned to either a supra-meniscal (the ALL below the meniscus was sectioned leaving only the supra-meniscal ALL intact) or an infra-meniscal (the ALL above the meniscus was sectioned leaving only the infra-meniscal attachment intact) group. The specimens were potted into dental cement such that the ALL was pulling laterally on the meniscus when the specimens were secured within an Instron materials testing machine. The specimens were subjected to a tensile failure test at 1 mm/s. The load at failure and stiffness were calculated from the force-displacement curves, while peak stress was calculated by normalizing the peak force to the cross-sectional area of the ALL. Furthermore, one intact knee specimen was used to perform a histological analysis on the two ALL sections using Masson's Trichome staining. RESULTS: The infra-meniscal ALL had a significantly (p = 0.03) higher load to failure (195.0 vs. 132.1 N) and was significantly (p = 0.03) stiffer than the supra-meniscal fibers (24.8 vs. 12.3 N/mm). The relatively similar cross-section areas also resulted in the infra-meniscal sections having a greater peak stress (p = 0.04) (11.1 vs. 5.4 MPa). Histological analysis showed relatively consistent fiber orientation with similar organization noted throughout the fibers. CONCLUSIONS: The ALL-meniscal construct that includes the infra-meniscal fibers was significantly stronger and stiffer than the construct that includes the supra-meniscal fibers. The infra-meniscal ALL is another important component of the anterolateral complex of the knee, and should be considered when presented with an ACL and/or meniscal injury.

The biomechanical and morphological characteristics of the ligamentum mucosum and its potential role in anterior knee pain.

BACKGROUND: The ligamentum mucosum is composed of dense regular connective tissue and traverses from the distal femur to the infrapatellar fat pad. While the gross and histologic morphology has been studied, there is currently no evidence concerning the biomechanical properties of the ligamentum mucosum and the potential of anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the anatomical, mechanical and histological properties of the ligamentum mucosum. METHODS: Dissections were performed on cadaveric knee specimens (N = 18) and histological analysis (n = 6) was performed to define the anatomical characteristics of the ligamentum mucosum using standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Masson's trichrome, and immunohistochemical methods. Biomechanical testing (n = 5) was conducted to determine the tensile properties of the ligamentum mucosum. The peak load at failure, stiffness, and strain were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of the knees had a ligamentum mucosum and the histological analysis confirmed it to be composed of dense regular connective tissue. Small peripheral nerves were identified in the junction between the ligamentum mucosum and the fat pad. The average (SD) peak force of failure, stiffness, and strain were 31.9 N (19.0), 5.1 N/mm (3.59), and 0.83 (0.14), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The tensile strength and stiffness of the ligamentum mucosum is considerably less than the primary stabilizers of the knee joint. Based on these findings, it is improbable that the ligamentum mucosum has a meaningful effect on the kinematics of the extensor mechanism; perturbations of the tissue and the connected infrapatellar fat pad could potentially play a role in the pathogenesis of anterior knee pain.