Which is the Optimal Method of Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy, the Intracorporeal or Extracorporeal Anastomosis Technique?

Introduction: The laparoscopic approach to right colectomy is gradually gaining a leading role in the surgical treatment of right colonic diseases. However, not all aspects of the procedure are standardized and the method of reconstruction of the digestive tract is still under debate. The present study critically evaluates the extracorporeal (EA) and intracorporeal (IA) techniques used for creation of the ileocolic anastomosis during a laparoscopic right colectomy. Material and Method: The EA and IA anastomotic techniques are described in detail. The peri operative data of a cohort of consecutive patients operated by our surgical team was retrospectively recorded and analyzed regarding type of anastomosis, the path for transition from EA to IA and the incidence of postoperative complications. Furthermore, an analysis of randomized clinical trials, reviews and meta-analyses that provided a comparative evaluation of EA versus IA was performed to provide a more in-depth integration of our own data into the literature. Results: EA was used at the beginning of our experience but was later replaced by IA which became the favorite anastomotic technique. There was no anastomotic fistula recorded in the EA or IA groups but in our cohort IA was unexpectedly associated with higher incidence of peritoneal drainage, prolonged ileus, surgical site infections, anastomotic bleeding and chyloperitoneum. However, IA allows better visualization of the ileal and colonic stumps, avoids twisting of the anastomosis, prevents extraction-related tearing of the mesocolon and reduces the risk of post operative hernia. Data from the literature also shows that IA is generally associated with earlier postoperative return of bowel function, less morbidity and less postoperative pain. Conclusions: Based on this study and the data currently present in the literature it can not be concluded that IA should be considered as the standard of care for laparoscopic right colectomy. The decision for an EA or IA anastomosis ultimately belongs to the surgeon and is influenced by his surgical skill and experience. The results of ongoing randomized controlled trials on large group of patients may bring more clarity on this issue in the future.

The Value of Staging Laparoscopy for Optimal Multidisciplinary Treatment in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Introduction: Despite improvements in the conventional preoperative tools used for staging of gastric cancer, their accuracy still needs to be improved. Laparoscopy has the potential to visualize and characterize the tumor, the peritoneal cavity and the lymph nodes and thus to better select patients for the optimal treatment strategy. Material and Method: Patients with gastric cancer staged initially with contrast enhanced computer tomography and endoscopic ultrasound were also evaluated by laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in a distinct preoperative staging procedure. The perioperative data was recorded in a prospective database and was used to decide within the multidisciplinary team the optimal treatment protocol for each patient. The database was retrospectively reviewed for this study. Results: Among the 20 CT-scan M0 patients analyzed, peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected in 15% of the cases. In other 15% of patients laparoscopy upstaged the tumor and directed the patient towards neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Laparoscopic guided percutaneous core biopsies settled the definitive diagnosis in 3 further cases. In total, laparoscopic staging brought important information in 65% of cases and changed the treatment plan in 30% of patients. Conclusions: In the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, laparoscopy has the potential to overcome some of the limitations of the conventional staging methods and offers additional informations which finally change the treatment plan in as much as a third of patients with gastric cancer.