Femoral neck fractures: Key points to consider for fixation or replacement a narrative review of recent literature.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are frequent injuries and not rarely complicated by non-union, implant failure, and avascular necrosis. Some of these fractures represent a dilemma for trauma surgeons. Which fracture should be fixed? Which replaced with a prosthesis? How? The aim of this narrative review is to investigate the literature in order to provide the most updated and evidence-based knowledge about FNF' treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature research has been performed to find the essential key points to consider when dealing with FNF and their treatment. The most representative papers and the new meta-analysis were matched with authors' experience to give a concise but comprehensive view of the problem. Timing, age, comorbidities, vascularization of the femoral head, displacement, instability, comminution of the fracture, bone quality, and surgeon experience seem to be the major topics to consider in the decision making. We then focus on the optimal fixation or replacement as suggested by the literature. RESULTS: Age is the main independent factor to consider. Timing seems essential in the elderly population to reduce mortality and important in the younger patients to reduce complications. Vascular supply should be always considered. Displacement, instability, and comminution of the fracture are negative prognostic factors for fixation as well as, theoretically, bone quality. In the elderly hip replacement is mostly indicated. A stable and solid fixation is mandatory to allow early mobilization. Sliding Hip Screws (SHS) seem preferable to cannulated screws for displaced/unstable (Pauwels II-III, posterior comminution) and basicervical fracture patterns or in smokers. There is a tendency toward Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) also in the elderly if the patient is an indipendent ambulator without severe comorbidities. Dual mobility cups are gaining popularity in THA for FNF. CONCLUSIONS: FNF are frequent injuries and represent, in some cases, a dilemma for the trauma surgeon. Age, timing, comorbidities, bone quality, femoral head vascularization, fracture displacement, intrinsic instability, and comminution as surgeon experience should be carefully evaluated before surgery. A case-to-case analysis of the patient-related factors helps the surgeon to make the right choice and reduce the well-known complications.

Management of Acromioclavicular Osteoarthritis in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Scoping Review.

Purpose The treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis during shoulder arthroscopy is a discussed topic. The aim of this scoping review is to report the current recommendations regarding the management of this disorder in patients undergoing surgery for rotator cuff tears. Methods A scoping review was performed in Pubmed\Medline and Embase in March 2017, restricted to English language literature. The following keywords were used: ("rotator cuff tear" OR " rotator cuff" OR "rotator cuff repair") AND ("acromioclavicular joint arthritis" OR "ac joint arthritis" OR "ac joint" OR "acromioclavicular joint"). Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective trials, and therapeutic case series. Exclusion criteria were reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions. Results Two retrospective studies and three randomized controlled trials were identified. Clinical studies reported results of 443 shoulders, with an average age of 60.48 years and a mean follow-up of 31.7 months. Many differences were found regarding the design of the studies, patient's selection, surgical procedures, and instrumental and clinical evaluations. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical outcome scores between patients that underwent rotator cuff repair in association with distal clavicular resection and patients with isolated rotator cuff repair. Conclusion Results of this scoping review underline a lack of evidence-based recommendations about the management of ACJ osteoarthritis in association with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Surgical procedures such as distal clavicle resection (DCR) should be performed carefully in this cohort of patients. More prospective randomized studies are needed to reach a consensus about the correct surgical approach to DCR in patients with signs of ACJ osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tears. Level of Evidence Level III.

Titanium and steel fracture fixation plates with different surface topographies: Influence on infection rate in a rabbit fracture model.

INTRODUCTION: Implant-related infection is a challenging complication in musculoskeletal trauma surgery. In the present study, we examined the role of implant material and surface topography as influencing factors on the development of infection in an experimental model of plating osteosynthesis in the rabbit. METHODS: The implants included in this experimental study were composed of: standard Electropolished Stainless Steel (EPSS), standard titanium (Ti-S), roughened stainless steel (RSS) and surface polished titanium (Ti-P). Construct stability and load-to-failure of Ti-P implants was compared to that of Ti-S implants in a rabbit cadaveric model. In an in vivo study, a rabbit humeral fracture model was used. Each rabbit received one of three Staphylococcus aureus inocula, aimed at determining the infection rate at a low, medium and high dose of bacteria. Outcome measures were quantification of bacteria on the implant and in the surrounding tissues, and determination of the infectious dose 50 (ID50). RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between Ti-S and Ti-P regarding stiffness or failure load in the cadaver study. Of the 72 rabbits eventually included in the in vivo study, 50 developed an infection. The ID50 was found to be: EPSS 3.89×10(3) colony forming units (CFU); RSS 8.23×10(3) CFU; Ti-S 5.66×10(3) CFU; Ti-P 3.41×10(3) CFU. Significantly lower bacterial counts were found on the Ti-S implants samples compared with RSS implants (p<0.001) at the high inoculum. Similarly, lower bacterial counts were found in the bone samples of animals in the Ti-S group in comparison with both RSS and EPSS groups, again at the high inoculation dose (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: No significant differences were seen in susceptibility to infection when comparing titanium and steel implants with conventional or modified topographies. Ti-P implants, which have previously been shown in preclinical studies to reduce complications associated with tissue adherence, do not affect infection rate in this preclinical fracture model. Therefore, Ti-P implants are not expected to affect the infection rate, or influence implant stability in the clinical situation.