Strengthening oropharyngeal muscles as an approach to treat post-stroke obstructive sleep apnea: A feasibility randomised controlled trial.

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating oropharyngeal exercise (OPE) intervention as an alternative therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Despite the high prevalence of OSA in this population, the standard therapy, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), is often poorly tolerated. Thirty stroke/TIA patients with OSA unable to tolerate CPAP were randomly assigned to an oropharyngeal exercise or sham exercise protocol. They performed exercises for 6 weeks, 5 days per week, 30 minutes twice per day. Feasibility was ascertained by the proportion of enrolled patients who completed more than 80% of the OPE regimen. Isometric tongue pressures, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), daytime sleepiness, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes were collected at baseline, post-training (6-week follow-up), and retention (10-week follow-up) to document preliminary efficacy. Adherence to study exercises was excellent, with 83% of participants completing more than 80% of the exercises. The isometric tongue pressures were observed to improve in the oropharyngeal exercise group (compared with the sham group), along with a decrease in OSA severity (measured by the AHI and ODI), reduced daytime sleepiness, and enhanced quality of life outcomes following the exercise programme. Only the effects on posterior isometric tongue pressure and daytime sleepiness remained significantly different between groups at the retention session. In conclusion, an RCT evaluating the efficacy of oropharyngeal exercises on post-stroke/TIA OSA is feasible and our preliminary results suggest a clinically meaningful effect.

Laxatives are Associated with Poorer Polysomnography-derived Sleep Quality.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize 1) the relationship between laxative use and objective sleep metrics, and 2) the relationship between laxative use and self-reported insomnia symptoms in a convenience sample of middle-aged/elderly patients who completed in-laboratory polysomnography. METHODS: We cross-sectionally analyzed first-night diagnostic in-laboratory polysomnography data for 2946 patients over the age of 40 (mean age 60.5 years; 48.3% male). Laxative use and medical comorbidities were obtained through self-reported questionnaires. Patient insomnia symptoms were based on self-report. Associations between laxative use and objective sleep continuity were analyzed using multivariable linear regression models. Associations between laxative use and insomnia were assessed using multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, total recording time, and relevant comorbidities, laxative users had a 7.1% lower sleep efficiency (p < 0.001), 25.5-minute higher wake after sleep onset (p < 0.001), and a 29.4-minute lower total sleep time (p < 0.001) than patients not using laxatives. Laxative users were found to be at greater odds of reporting insomnia symptoms (OR = 1.7, p = 0.024) than patients not using laxatives. CONCLUSION: Laxative use is associated with impairments in objective sleep continuity. Patients using laxatives were also at greater odds of reporting insomnia symptoms.

Investigating changes in cognition associated with the use of CPAP in cognitive impairment and dementia: A retrospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of CPAP use on cognition in a clinical cohort with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cognitive impairment due to neurodegenerative or vascular etiologies after controlling for baseline sleepiness. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 171 patients with cognitive impairment and an OSA diagnosis confirmed with in-laboratory polysomnography or home sleep apnea testing (mean age 69.8 ± 10.6; 66% male) who were eligible to use CPAP. Baseline and follow-up Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) were obtained from clinical and research visits conducted before and after CPAP initiation. Good CPAP adherence was defined as CPAP use ≥4 h/night, for 7 days/week at follow-up. Associations between CPAP adherence and follow-up cognitive scores were analyzed using multivariable linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, baseline ESS, duration of CPAP therapy, relevant comorbidities and the random effect of research study cohort, good CPAP adherence (compared to poor CPAP adherence or no use of CPAP) for a duration of 2-12 months was associated with a 2.3-point (1.2-3.3 95% CI) higher follow-up MoCA score (p < 0.001) and a 1.2-point (0.3-2.3 95% CI) higher follow-up MMSE score (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with OSA and cognitive impairment due to a neurodegenerative or vascular etiology, use of CPAP is associated with improved cognitive outcomes. The findings of this study may aid in motivating patients to use CPAP and support future randomized controlled trials in this area.