Captopril test and renal duplex scanning for the primary screening of renovascular disease.

To evaluate the utility of renal duplex scanning and the captopril test in the detection and functional assessment of renovascular disease, by comparing their results with those of angiography and captopril isotopic renography (CIR). Sixty hypertensive patients with aortoiliac disease and 16 with clinically suspected renovascular hypertension (RVH) were included. All the patients underwent renal duplex scanning prior to angiography. In addition, isotopic renograms and a determination of peripheral plasma renin activity (PRA) at baseline and 60 min after oral intake of 50 mg of captopril were both performed. A postcaptopril PRA > 5.7 ng/mL/h was considered as diagnostic of a positive captopril test. On the basis of the results of the angiography and isotopic renograms, all the patients were classified into three groups: group I (n = 33), essential hypertension (EHT); group II (n = 20), hypertension and angiographic RAS > 60% but negative CIR; and group III (n = 24), RAS > 60% and positive CIR. This last condition was considered as highly suspicious for RVH. Renal duplex scanning showed greater accuracy than captopril PRA or CIR for detecting RAS > 60% (groups II and III) with 87.3% versus 52.4% and 45.3% sensitivity (S), and 91.5% versus 84.4% and 92.8% specificity (Sp), respectively. The captopril test correctly identified 44 of 51 EHT patients (groups I and II) and 20 of 23 highly suspected of RVH (group III) with 87% S, 86.5% Sp, 74.1% PPV, and 93.6% NPV. Accuracy was further increased when a combined approach (renal duplex scanning and captopril test) was followed (82.6% S, 93.7% Sp, 86.4 PPV, and 91.8 NPV). In our study, renal duplex scanning was a useful screening method for detecting anatomical RAS. A combination of both renal duplex scanning and captopril test may be an appropriate approach to the primary screening for RVH, thereby permitting the selection of those patients indicated for angiography.

Screening for carotid and renal artery stenoses in patients with aortoiliac disease.

Patients with severe stenoses of the carotid and renal arteries define a population at high risk but most of them are asymptomatic. Here arises the question of who must be tested and what would be the actual utility of a screening program in the general or selected populations. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a duplex-based screening for carotid and renal arteries stenoses, in a subset of patients with aortoiliac arterial disease, in terms of: (1) prevalence of occlusive disease of the carotid and renal arteries detected and surgical procedures generated; (2) analysis of clinical variables that could be useful to increase the suspicion index for the disease; and (3) predictive values of duplex scanning adjusted for the observed prevalence. One hundred sixty eight consecutive patients selected for elective aortoiliac surgery were included. Carotid duplex scanning, renal duplex scanning and/or aortorenal angiography, and recording of clinical predictive variables were obtained in all the patients. The statistical analysis included prevalence rates, multivariate analysis, and predictive values of carotid and renal duplex scanning adjusted for the observed prevalence. Greater than 50% asymptomatic stenosis in at least one of the internal carotid arteries (CAS > 50%) was detected in 47 (28%) patients [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.2%-34.8%]; 67 (39.9%) patients showed greater than 60% stenosis in one or both renal arteries (RAS > 60%) (95% CI: 32.5%-47.3%). Based on current surgical indications, carotid endarterectomy was performed in 24 (14.3%) patients and a bypass to the renal artery in 30 (17.8%) patients. Logistic regression analysis accepted the following variables, in this order: carotid bruit, age, and ankle/brachial index for predicting carotid artery stenosis; and hypertension and CAS for predicting renal artery stenosis. Based on previous validation studies of duplex scanning accuracy, estimated positive predictive values for significant stenosis of the carotid and renal arteries showed a range of 80.5%-89.1% and 82.3%-89.7%, respectively. Routine screening of the carotid and renal arteries may be justified in those patients with aortoiliac aneurysmal and occlusive disease, provided there is a high prevalence of clinically significant lesions and sufficient predictive values of duplex scanning are obtained.

Value of Doppler parameters in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to assess the accuracy and optimal threshold values of the Doppler parameters of the renal arteries and parenchyma for detecting renal artery stenosis (RAS) greater than 60% and occlusion. METHODS: Renal duplex ultrasonography and standard angiographic studies of the renal arteries were performed in 78 patients for comparative analysis. Three degrees of RAS were considered: less than 60%, greater than 60%, and occlusion. The following parameters of the Doppler wave were measured in the signal obtained from the main renal artery and interlobar arteries: peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity, peripheral resistance index, acceleration time, acceleration index, and renal/aortic ratio (RAR). RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis identified the PSV in the renal artery as the best parameter to differentiate RAS less than 60% from RAS greater than 60%. Only when this parameter was excluded were the RAR and end-diastolic velocity in the renal artery the variables accepted as the best predictors. Receiver-operator curve analysis revealed a PSV in the main renal artery greater than 198 cm/sec and RAR greater than 3.3 as the best cutoff points for detecting RAS greater than 60%. A PSV above this threshold provided 87.3% sensitivity and 91.5% specificity. The RAR showed similar specificity (92.4% but a much lower sensitivity (76.4%). A kidney length less than 8.5 cm, in addition to an absent Doppler signal in renal parenchyma, was the best criterion to identify renal artery occlusion. On the basis of the above-mentioned criteria, renal duplex scanning correctly identified 86 of 94 cases of RAS less than 60%, 41 of 48 cases of RAS greater than 60%, and six of seven occlusions (kappa value = 0.8). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the PSV in the renal artery is the best predicting Doppler parameter to detect RAS greater than 60%. A PSV greater than 198 cm/sec may be an appropriate cutoff point to diagnose this group of stenosis. The RAR did not add any predicting utility in this series. An absent Doppler signal in the renal parenchyma and a kidney length less than 8.5 cm were the best predictors of renal artery occlusion.

The role of the circle of Willis in carotid occlusion: assessment with phase contrast MR angiography and transcranial duplex.

PURPOSE: To study the collateral pathways recruited after occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA), and to evaluate its influence on the impairment of hemispheric blood flow supply and development of low flow infarcts. METHODS: 38 patients with ICA occlusion (18 asymptomatic; five transient ischaemic attacks; and 15 strokes) were included. Infarcts on cerebral MR scanning were categorised in order to differentiate patients with territorial infarcts or no lesion (group I; n = 22) from those with brain damage due to low flow (group II; n = 16). Patency and direction of flow in the communicating arteries were assessed by means of cine phase contrast MR angiography (PC-MRA). Flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) was measured by means of transcranial Duplex (TCD). RESULTS: Cine PC-MRA revealed a reversed ophthalmic artery blood flow ipsilateral to the ICA occlusion in all except two patients in group I and one patient in group II (NS). Posterior to anterior flow in the ipsilateral posterior communicating artery (PCoA) was detected in 16 (73%) patients in group I and in 13 (81%) in group II (NS). In contrast, reversed blood flow in the ipsilateral A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery, through a patent anterior communicating artery (ACoA), was identified in 19 (86%) patients of group I, vs. 7 (44%) of group II (p = 0.005). The relative risk of low-flow infarcts was significantly higher in those cases with non-functioning ACoA (odds ratio = 8.1; p < 0.05). TCD showed a lower peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the ipsilateral MCA than in the contralateral one (60 +/- 9 cm/s vs. 90 +/- 11 cm/s; p < 0.005). Those patients without crossed flow through the ACoA, showed an even lower PSV in the ipsilateral MCA (55 +/- 7 cm/s vs. 64 +/- 9 cm/s; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that even though ICA occlusion may occur without cerebral damage, collateral blood supply is not enough to maintain normal hemispheric perfusion. The ACoA may be a key collateral pathway as a non-functioning ACoA is associated with an increased risk of developing low-flow infarcts.