Outcomes and costs of outpatient and inpatient cataract surgery: a randomised clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and perceived health outcomes and cost between ambulatory and inpatient cataract surgery. An unmasked randomised clinical trial was undertaken. Cataract surgery patients of three public hospitals in Barcelona (Spain) who met inclusion criteria for ambulatory surgery were randomly assigned to two groups: outpatient hospital and inpatient hospital. Primary outcome measures were early and late postoperative surgical complications and visual acuity. Secondary outcome measures were perceived visual function, overall perceived health status, and costs. A total of 464 outpatients and 471 inpatients were analysed. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in visual acuity (P =.48), nor for the other clinical and perceived health outcome measures, except for early postoperative complications. Outpatients presented at least one complication in the first 24 h after surgery more frequently than inpatients (64 vs. 43; RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1, 2.4), but 4 months after surgery the differences in complications rates between groups disappeared. The cost of surgery was lower for outpatients than for inpatients (1001 vs. 1218 Euros; P <.001). Ambulatory cataract surgery was more cost-effective than inpatient surgery. Despite the higher risk of early complications in the outpatient hospital group, these differences may not be clinically relevant because the 4-month postoperative outcomes were not affected.

Medicare's DRG-weights in a European environment: the Spanish experience.

Hospital payment systems are being changed to mixed systems, composed of case-mix categories and structure indicators. The Health Care Financing Administration's Diagnosis-Related-Groups (HCFA's DRG-weights are used in Catalonia as Prospective Payment System (PPS)-instruments for hospital inpatient reimbursement. The Catalonian and Spanish health systems, however, are very different from the US health environment. The aim of this study is to determine whether the HCFA's DRG-weights fit the special characteristics of a European environment. To do this, cost-based weights, determined from information from the cost accounting system of two public hospitals in Barcelona, are compared with Medicare-weights. A total of 35 262 discharges representing 12 794 million pesetas are analyzed. Medicare-weights do not differ globally from cost-based-weights and the adjusted correlation weighted least squares regression between the two weight-scales is 95%. There are, however, systematic deviations in six DRG-groupings. The most important deviations are concentrated in Ambulatory Surgery categories, in DRGs in which prostheses are used, and in specialties excluded from several PPSs because of extreme variables in treatment intensity. In conclusion, Medicare-weights can be used to pay hospital output in European environment but they should be adjusted to avoid systematic deviations.

[Public hospital payment system in Spain: the experience of Catalonia and Andalusia]. / Cómo pagamos a nuestros hospitales. La referencia de Cataluña y el contrapunto desde Andalucía.

Since the mid-1990s, the introduction of new public hospital payment systems to improve the efficiency of Spanish hospitals within the context of managed competition has been debated. Blended systems, which recognize the importance of the activity performed, as well as the role of the hospital in the public health system, have emerged as the best-matched tools both in risk assignment and in efficiency-economic feasibility dialectic. In this article, the payment method used in Catalonia since 1997 is analyzed and contrasted with that introduced in Andalusia in 1998. The evaluation focuses on the instruments used to incorporate the mixed model in the two different settings. On the one hand, the capacity of diagnosis related groups (DRGs) to define hospital product cost is limited. Furthermore, DRGs require numerous adjustments before introduction into Spain. On the other hand, structural level can be defined through the Grade of Memberships in Catalonia and the Basic Centers in Andalusia. We also analyze the introduction of the different methods into Spain and their adaptation to the Catalan and Andalusian environments. The transition periods seem not to have led to a definitive solution and have served to highlight the fragility of the instruments used and of the use that has been made of them. We conclude that the introduction of new tools to improve hospital efficiency through payment systems was precipitate and, to a certain extent, naive. Public hospital payment systems can be considered to be effective when they manage to allocate resources over a period of time. Ensuring the efficiency of public hospitals implies daily work on the part of each hospital and the information systems generated by regional health systems and will not be achieved through external financial tools poorly adapted to the setting in which they are applied.

[Profile of the hospital case mix of the immigrant population in Barcelona, Spain]. / Perfil de la casuística hospitalaria de la población inmigrante en Barcelona.

OBJECTIVE: Although the immigrant population in cities such as Barcelona has tripled in the last five years, until now the impact of this group on the health system has not been rigorously evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare hospital resource utilization among the immigrant population with that among the native population through case mix, demographic characteristics and hospital day use. MATERIAL AMD METHODS: We analyzed 15,057 discharges from Hospital del Mar in Barcelona in 2000. This hospital attends 60% of admissions from the Ciutat Vella district. In 2000, 21% of the population of this district were immigrants. Socio-demographic patient characteristics and case mix were compared between the immigrant and the native population. Hospital resource use was compared according to age, case mix (diagnosis related groups) and seriousness (severity, complications and comorbidities) of the events requiring medical care. RESULTS: The case mix of the immigrant population differed from that of the autochthonous population due to pronounced ge differences and a higher fertility rate. Thirty-three percent of immigrant admissions were for deliveries. The mean cost of discharge of immigrants from low-income countries was 30% lower than that for the remaining discharges. After adjusting for age, case mix and severity, length of stay among the immigrant population was significantly shorter. A 5% reduction was found after adjusting for case mix and a 10% reduction was found when all the factors were considered. CONCLUSIONS: Case mix differences are due to age and socio-cultural factors. Immigrants are rejuvenating the ageing native population and the role of gynecology-obstetrics and pediatrics needs to be increased. The finding that resource use per discharge is lower among immigrants from low-income countries contradicts the expectation that lower socioeconomic status leads to higher hospital resource use intensity. Therefore, new hypotheses and analyses that explain this situation should be put forward.

[Methadone maintenance programs with supplementary services: a cost-effectiveness study]. / Programas de mantenimiento de metadona con servicios auxiliares: un estudio de coste-efectividad.

OBJECTIVE: Methadone maintenance programs (MMP) currently offer the best treatment for opioid-addicted patients. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of three MMPs that offered varying levels of supplementary services. Health-related quality of life was used as a measure of effectiveness. METHODS: A 12-month follow-up study of 586 patients beginning methadone treatment in Drug Care Centers in Barcelona was performed. The Nottingham Health Profile was used to measure quality of life. Standard unit costs and total cost per patient were calculated from activity registries. Sociodemographic, health-related and toxicological data were collected through a semi-structured interview. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed through two multiple linear regressions with the same adjusting variables. RESULTS: The greater the number of supplementary services involved, the higher the costs. The adjusted models revealed a significant increase in health-related quality of life (an increase of 8% in the Nottingham Health Profile) and in costs (17%) between low- and medium-intensity programs. CONCLUSION: The medium-intensity program showed the best cost-effectiveness ratio. However, the study's limitations preclude categoric generalization of the data.

Efficacy of treatment for hyperglycemic crisis in elderly diabetic patients in a day hospital.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective cohort study was to compare the costs of day hospital (DH) care for hyperglycemic crisis in elderly diabetic patients with those of conventional hospitalization (CH). Secondary objectives were to compare these two clinical scenarios in terms of glycemic control, number of emergency and outpatient visits, readmissions, hypoglycemic episodes, and nosocomial morbidity. METHODS: The study population comprised diabetic patients aged >74 years consecutively admitted to a tertiary teaching hospital in Spain for hyperglycemic crisis (sustained hyperglycemia [>300 mg/dL] for at least 3 days with or without ketosis). The patients were assigned to DH or CH care according to time of admission and were followed for 6 months after discharge. Exclusion criteria were ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar crisis, hemodynamic instability, severe intercurrent illness, social deprivation, or Katz index >D. RESULTS: Sixty-four diabetic patients on DH care and 36 on CH care were included, with no differences in baseline characteristics. The average cost per patient was 1,345.1±793.6 € in the DH group and 2,212.4±982.5 € in the CH group (P<0.001). There were no differences in number of subjects with mild hypoglycemia during follow-up (45.3% DH versus 33.3% CH, P=0.24), nor in the percentage of patients achieving a glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) <8% (67.2% DH versus 58.3% CH, P=0.375). Readmissions for hyperglycemic crisis and pressure ulcer rates were significantly higher in the CH group. CONCLUSION: DH care for hyperglycemic crises is more cost-effective than CH care, with a net saving of 1,418.4 € per case, lower number of readmissions and pressure ulcer rates, and similar short-term glycemic control and hypoglycemia rates.

Unmet needs for cataract surgery in Spain according to indication criteria. Evaluation through a simulation model.

AIMS: Despite the increase in cataract surgery rates, the volume of unmet needs for this type of surgery in the population is substantial due to ageing and widening of the indication criteria. Our objective was to assess future trends in needs for cataract surgery according to different scenarios of indication criteria. METHODS: A discrete-event simulation model was built for the population aged 50 years or older in five regions of Spain (45.7% of the population). Different scenarios of worse eye visual acuity thresholds for indication criteria were compared. Data from the North London Eye Study were used to project the baseline needs for surgery onto the study population. The surgery rate of each region was calculated using the Minimum Data Set. The model used data for the year 2003 and the simulation horizon was 5 years. RESULTS: The volume of need predicted for the year 2008 when scenarios of 0.5 (20/40) and 0.4 (20/50) visual acuity thresholds were used was 69,214 and 51,315 surgeries needed per million inhabitants, respectively. However, unmet needs decreased when a 0.3 (20/70) threshold was used. The increment in the cataract surgery rate needed to prevent the cataract backlog from increasing was 60% for a 0.5 threshold and 50% for a 0.4 threshold. CONCLUSION: Application of indication criteria following current guidelines would substantially increase unmet needs for surgery in the next 5 years.

Clinical outcomes and costs of cataract surgery performed by planned ECCE and phacoemulsification.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical outcomes and costs of cataract surgery between patients operated with standard extracapsular extraction (ECCE) and those undergoing phacoemulsification. SETTING: Patients from the Ophthalmology Department of a teaching hospital in Barcelona (Spain) scheduled for cataract surgery, not combined with any other ophthalmic procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis has been performed on a database of 1046 patients undergoing ECCE and phacoemulsification. The outcome measures used were: surgical complications, visual acuity and costs of surgery and of follow-up. Overall rate of all complications and postoperative visual acuity were compared between the two groups, adjusting for age, preoperative visual acuity, medical and ocular comorbidity. RESULTS: 31.9% of the patients (334) underwent phacoemulsification, and 68.1% (712) underwent ECCE. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification presented a frequency of intra- and postoperative complications lower than those undergoing ECCE (odds ratio 0.57, 95%CI 0.37-0.87 and 0.66, 95%CI 0.46-0.96, respectively), specifically for intraoperative iris trauma (3.1% vs 0.3%, p = 0.004), residual posterior capsular opacity (2% vs 0.3%, p = 0.035) and postoperative corneal edema (7.4% vs 3.6%, p = 0.016). Costs of intervention and follow-up were lower for phacoemulsification compared with ECCE (23.9% and 14%, respectively). But global costs were slightly higher for phacoemulsification (4.87%), due to supply costs, which were more than twice those of ECCE. CONCLUSIONS: Phacoemulsification, when performed by an experienced surgeon, has better clinical outcomes than planned extracapsular extraction, and costs may be lower since supply costs are expected to decrease as the phacoemulsification technique becomes more widespread.

Risk adjustment: beyond patient classification systems.

UNLABELLED: Diagnosis related groups (DRGs) are widely used in several countries. Their various versions aim to value the cost of hospital production. In Europe, the patient classification systems and standard weights used are usually the American originals. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to analyse the extent to which DRGs and DRG-weights explain patient cost variability. Different components of patient cost (severity, comorbidities, complications and socioeconomic status), which are not well explained by DRG and which can be approximated by using administrative data, were also analysed. METHODS: A total of 35,262 discharges from two public hospitals in Barcelona were analysed. The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA)-DRGs and the All Patient Refined (APR)- DRGs were calculated. Severity was adjusted by Disease Staging, and comorbidities and complications were calculated using Elixhauser and Charlson comorbidities groupings. An ecological socioeconomic status indicator was used. Linear regressions were estimated to explain per-patient cost variability. RESULTS: We found that Medicare's DRG-weights explained only 19% of cost variability. Cost-based weights explained nearly 40% (38-42%, depending on the DRG classification used). Exclusion of outliers increased explanatory power to R² = 47-48%. The remaining adjustment variables increased R² to 49-51%. DISCUSSION: Medicare's DRG-weights are not well-suited to Europe. Cost-based DRG-weights and outlier trimming have significantly greater explanatory power. The remaining clinical and socioeconomic variables have considerably less explanatory power but were statistically significant and behaved as expected. Spanish and other European health authorities should adapt DRG-classification systems to their environments for use in hospital production cost valuation.