Lower socioeconomic status may help explain racial disparities in asthma and atopic dermatitis prevalence: A mediation analysis.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in atopic disease (atopic dermatitis [AD], asthma, and allergies) prevalence are well documented. Despite strong associations between race and socioeconomic deprivation in the United States, and socioeconomic status (SES) and atopic diseases, the extent to which SES explains these disparities is not fully understood. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify racial disparities in childhood atopic disease prevalence and determine what proportion of those disparities is mediated by SES. METHODS: This study used the National Health Interview Survey (2011-2018) to investigate AD, asthma, and respiratory allergy prevalence in Black and White children and the extent to which measures of SES explain any identified disparities. RESULTS: By race, prevalences were as follows: AD, White 11.8% (95% CI: 11.4%, 12.2%) and Black 17.4% (95% CI: 16.6%, 18.3%); asthma prevalence, White 7.4% (95% CI: 7.0%, 7.7%) and Black 14.3% (95% CI: 13.5%, 15.0%); respiratory allergy, White 11.4% (95% CI: 11.0%, 11.9%) and Black 10.9% (95% CI: 10.3%, 11.6%). The percentage of the disparity between racial groups and disease prevalence explained by a multivariable measure of SES was 25% (95% CI: 15%, 36%) for Black versus White children with AD and 47% (95% CI: 40%, 54%) for Black versus White children with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative US population, Black children had higher prevalence of AD and asthma than White children did and similar prevalence of respiratory allergy; a multivariable SES measure explained a proportion of the association between Black versus White race and AD and a much larger proportion for asthma.

Racial and Ethnic Identity and Vulnerability to Upper Respiratory Viral Infections Among US Children.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there are racial/ethnic disparities in the risk of upper respiratory viral infection acquisition and/or lower respiratory manifestations. METHODS: We studied all children and children with asthma aged 6 to 17 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007-2012) to evaluate (1) the association between race/ethnicity and upper respiratory infection (URI) and (2) whether race/ethnicity is a risk factor for URI-associated pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation or decreased lung function. RESULTS: Children who identified as Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.38; 95% CI, 1.10-1.75) and Mexican American (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.16-1.94) were more likely to report a URI than those who identified as White. Among those with asthma, Black children were more than twice as likely to report a URI than White children (aOR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.31-3.95). Associations between URI and pulmonary eosinophilic inflammation or lung function did not differ by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that there may be racial and ethnic disparities in acquiring a URI but not in the severity of infection. Given that upper respiratory viral infection is tightly linked to asthma exacerbations in children, differences in the risk of infection among children with asthma may contribute to disparities in asthma exacerbations.

Virtual reality and noise canceling headphone distraction during pediatric dermatologic procedures.

Pain and anxiety related to medical procedures have long been recognized as a significant healthcare concern. If a patient's procedural pain and anxiety are not addressed, long-term physical and psychological sequelae including increased perceived pain, anxiety, disruptive behavior, trauma reactions, or refusal of future procedures can occur. The objective of our study was to assess the utility of a virtual reality (VR) headset or noise-canceling headphones (HP) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing pain and anxiety during pediatric dermatology procedures. Results indicated a significant difference between pre- versus post-procedure anxiety in the VR and HP groups but not the TAU group suggesting non-pharmacologic technology-based interventions such as VR and headphones may reduce patients' anxiety during pediatric dermatology procedures.

The Evolution of the Role of U.S. School Nurses in Adolescent Mental Health at the Individual, Community, and Systems Level: An Integrative Review.

School nurses are crucial to addressing adolescent mental health, yet evidence concerning their evolving role has not been synthesized to understand interventions across levels of practice (i.e., individual, community, systems). We conducted an integrative review of school nurse roles in mental health in the U.S. related to depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress. Only 18 articles were identified, published from 1970 to 2019, and primarily described school nurses practicing interventions at the individual level, yet it was unclear whether they were always evidence-based. Although mental health concerns have increased over the years, the dearth of rigorous studies made it difficult to determine the impact of school nurse interventions on student mental health outcomes and school nurses continue to feel unprepared and under supported in this area. More research is needed to establish best practices and systems to support school nursing practice in addressing mental health at all levels of practice.

Asthma and the social determinants of health.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize the growing body of literature on the role of social determinants of health (SDoH) in asthma and asthma disparities. DATA SOURCES: A pubmed.gov search was performed to identify published literature on SDoH, asthma, asthma disparities, and race and ethnicity. Current asthma statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were reviewed. STUDY SELECTIONS: Relevant articles on SDoH, asthma, asthma disparities, and race and ethnicity were reviewed in detail. RESULTS: Black and Latinx Americans have a higher asthma prevalence and greater asthma morbidity than White Americans and also bear a disproportionate burden of SDoH. Inequities in SDoH are rooted in structural racism and population-level injustices that affect the socioeconomic status, physical environment, and health care access/quality of Black and Latinx Americans. There is evidence that racial/ethnic inequities in SDoH, such as socioeconomic status, neighborhood environment, housing, environmental exposures, and health care access/quality, contribute to excess burden of asthma prevalence/incidence, morbidity, exacerbations, and abnormal lung function among certain racial/ethnic populations. In addition, Black and Latinx communities experience high levels of long-term stress, which may increase asthma risk through direct effects on the immune system and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical activation. Long-term stress may also mediate the effects of SDoH on asthma. CONCLUSION: Although there is clear evidence linking SDoH to excess asthma risk and implicating SDoH in asthma disparities, the extent to which asthma disparities are explained by inequities in SDoH and the relative contributions of each of these SDoH to asthma disparities remain unclear. This knowledge is needed to effectively develop and test systems-level interventions targeting SDoH, with the ultimate goal of meaningfully reducing racial/ethnic asthma disparities.

Validation of remote atopic dermatitis severity assessment with the Eczema Area and Severity Ondex in children using caregiver-provided photos and videos.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: We sought to quantify the reliability and validity of remote atopic dermatitis (AD) severity assessment using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) applied to caregiver-provided photos (p-EASI) and videos (v-EASI). METHODS: Children (0-17 years) with a physician diagnosis of AD were recruited. Caregivers took photos and a video of their child's skin. A clinician scored in-person EASI on the same day, then p-EASI and v-EASI for each participant 10 days or more between ratings. Two additional clinicians scored p-EASI and v-EASI. Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was employed to assess criterion validity using in-person EASI as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess interrater reliability of p-EASI and v-EASI. RESULTS: Fifty racially and ethnically diverse children (age [mean ± SD]: 4.3 ± 4.4 years; 42% female) with a range of AD severity (EASI: 6.3 ± 6.4) and Fitzpatrick skin types (1-2: 9%; 3-4: 60%; 5-6: 31%) were enrolled and received in-person EASI assessment. Fifty had p-EASI and 49 had v-EASI by the same in-person rater, and by two additional raters. The CCC and ICC for p-EASI were 0.89, 95% CI [0.83, 0.95] and 0.81, 95% CI [0.71, 0.89], respectively. The CCC and ICC for v-EASI were 0.75, 95% CI [0.63, 0.88] and 0.69, 95% CI [0.51, 0.81], respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this diverse population with a range of skin tones, p-EASI showed good criterion validity and good interrater reliability. v-EASI showed moderate to good criterion validity and moderate interrater reliability. Both may be reliable and valid options for remote AD severity assessment.

Reframing racial and ethnic disparities in atopic dermatitis in Black and Latinx populations.

Black people in the United States experience greater atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence, severity, and persistence when compared with White people. Although very little published literature describes AD in the Latinx population, additional differences in severity, persistence, and age of onset exist in contrast to White people. Thus far, genetic polymorphisms associated with increased risk and/or severity of AD are less common among Black people, so should confer reduced, rather than the observed increased, AD risk among Black people. Little is known regarding genetic risk factors in Latinx people. In contrast, there is consistent evidence that socioeconomic, environmental, and health care factors influence AD prevalence, severity, and/or persistence, and these same risk factors are more common among racial and ethnic minority populations as a result of racism. Researchers too often pursue genetic explanations for racial and ethnic AD disparities when the evidence points to the importance of contextual, rather than genetic, causes of these disparities. Reframing the prevailing view that innate differences among racial and ethnic groups are responsible for these disparities by emphasizing the role of racism and its downstream effects on contextual factors will be a critical first step toward shrinking these disparities.

Interventions to improve primary care provider management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review.

Most atopic dermatitis (AD) patients are managed by primary care providers (PCPs). PCP discomfort diagnosing and managing AD leads to suboptimal patient outcomes. In order to determine the efficacy of interventions aimed at improving PCP management of AD, a systematic literature review was performed for interventions to improve primary care management of AD. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, Cochrane, GREAT, and CINAHL were searched from database origin to February 24, 2020. Two reviewers independently performed the title/abstract and full-text review, and data extraction. Overall, 3009 non-duplicate articles were screened; 145 full-text articles were assessed. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 8 randomized controlled trials, 2 cohorts, 2 qualitative studies, and 1 unspecified design. Seven interventions (53.8%) significantly improved PCP knowledge/ability and/or a patient outcome, including patients consulting with a dermatology-trained nurse, pairing clinical education with expert consultation, pairing trainees with clinical mentors, giving clinicians a treatment guide, pairing clinical education with a treatment guide, and providing an eczema action plan. Studies had moderate-high risk-of-bias, moderate quality, and heterogeneous designs. There are few studies published and little evidence supporting the efficacy of interventions aimed at improving primary care management of AD. Further research is required to develop and implement effective interventions to improve primary care management of AD.

"I'm losing everything all over again": Responses from youth experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: Already at high-risk for adverse consequences associated with daily living, youth experiencing homelessness face additional barriers to health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to identify the self-reported experiences and healthcare needs of youth experiencing homelessness as services in the community began to shut down at the beginning of the pandemic. METHOD: From May through November 2020, qualitative data were obtained by telephone or Facebook messenger from 20 youth (M = 22.4, SD = 2.64 years) who had been enrolled in a longitudinal intervention study. RESULTS: Content analysis of qualitative data yielded 5 categories and 1 overall theme. Categories were resource availability, financial instability, mental health, relationship conflict, and maladaptive coping. The overall theme was multiple losses. Youths lost jobs, means of financial support for self and family, access to social and healthcare services, meaningful and important relationships, and skills and controls over high-risk behaviors such as substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Having similar experiences such as social isolation as those of high school students during the pandemic, the youths in this sample experienced multiple and simultaneous losses, needing time to grieve, and leaving them once more at high-risk for adverse outcomes.

Efficacy and patient opinion of wet-wrap dressings using 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized split-body control study.

BACKGROUND: Wet wraps can be an effective means of improving atopic dermatitis (AD). Little research has been done regarding the comparative efficacy of topical steroid vehicles and patient preference. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream used with wet wraps in pediatric patients with AD and to explore patient preference/opinion. METHODS: We performed a small, randomized, investigator-blind prospective study of 39 pediatric patients experiencing symmetric, bilateral AD flares. Patients were instructed to apply a topical steroid cream to one extremity and apply the same topical steroid in an ointment vehicle to the other extremity using the wet-wrap technique once or twice daily for 3 to 5 consecutive days. Patients were evaluated at a follow-up visit. RESULTS: Comparison of the change in Investigator's Global Assessment scores disclosed no significant difference between efficacy ratings of cream (mean difference = 0.72) and ointment (mean difference = 0.59) when used with wet wraps (P = 0.22). Although patients found the ointment more difficult to apply, they were more likely to prefer ointments for future prescriptions (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Patient preference of corticosteroid vehicle is what should ultimately drive treatment. In this small study, we found no difference in efficacy between triamcinolone acetonide wet wraps with cream vs ointment. Dermatologists should select the vehicle of the patient's choice as it may increase satisfaction with treatment.

Sensitivity Toward Gender and Sexually Diverse Populations: Development of a Scale.

BACKGROUND: Individuals who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, or nonbinary (LGBTQIA+) experience inequitable access to and utilization of health care services. Nurses' lack of awareness and sensitivity may contribute to this phenomenon. PURPOSE: This article describes the development and validation of the Gender and Sexual Diversity Sensitivity Scale (GSDSS). A sample of 210 undergraduate nursing students from a large research-intensive university completed the scale online. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Factor analysis illustrated a three-factor construct of the scale (i.e., General Education Experience, Cognitive Awareness, and Comfort With Interactions); Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from .66 to .91, and the total scale alpha coefficient was .782. CONCLUSION: The GSDSS has evidence of construct validity and reliability, and can be used in studies that include nursing and other health professional students. [J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(7):383-389.].

Differences in Psychometric Properties of Clinician- and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Atopic Dermatitis by Race and Skin Tone: A Systematic Review.

The psychometric validity and reliability of widely used atopic dermatitis (AD) outcome measures across different races and ethnicities are unclear. We describe the rates of reporting race, ethnicity, and skin tone in studies testing the psychometric properties of AD outcome measures and compare the psychometric analyses across race, ethnicity, and skin tone. We systematically reviewed MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting psychometric properties of clinician-reported or patient-reported outcome measures in AD (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42021239614). Overall, 16,100 nonduplicate articles were screened; 165 met inclusion criteria. Race and/or ethnicity were reported in 55 (33.3%) studies; of those, race was assessed by self-report in 10 studies (6.1%) or was unspecified in 45 (27.3%). A total of 16 studies (9.7%) evaluated psychometric property differences by race, and only five (4.4%) of those did not recognize it as a limitation. Properties assessed across race, ethnicity, or skin tone were differential item functioning, convergent validity feasibility, inter-rater reliability, intrarater reliability, test‒retest reliability, and known-groups validity. Multiple instruments demonstrated performance differences across ethnoracial groups. This review highlights the paucity of race/ethnicity consideration for psychometric property testing in AD outcome measurement instruments. More AD outcomes instruments should be validated in diverse populations.

Caregiver Preferences and Barriers Toward Accessing Pediatric Dermatology Care for Childhood Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic childhood illness. It is often treated by primary care providers (PCPs) though it may require referral to a dermatology specialist. METHOD: We administered an exploratory survey to 50 caregivers of children aged 0-17 years with AD to assess their preferences and barriers toward accessing dermatology specialty care for their child's AD. RESULTS: Caregivers felt PCPs and specialists equally listened to their child's AD concerns. However, many felt there was a difference in the care provided and control of the AD and preferred to see a specialist for ongoing management. DISCUSSION: Caregivers may benefit from their children being referred to dermatology specialists earlier and more often for their AD. Further work must be done to characterize preferences and barriers toward AD care across race and ethnicity.

Sociocultural Influences on Disparities in United States Children with Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Approximately 13% of United States (US) children have atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema. AD is a chronic skin condition associated with significant burdens on quality of life and both individual and overall health-care system costs. The pathogenesis of AD is considered to be multifactorial, with biologic factors such as family history and genetics often reported as influencing risk. Some lesser discussed determinants of AD prevalence and severity are sociocultural, such as race/ethnicity, neighborhood, housing type, income level, and family structure. While several factors appear to contribute to disparities in childhood AD, black or African American race/ethnicity most significantly predicts AD prevalence, severity, disease control, access to care, and family impact. There is a shortage of research related to disparities in AD, an important topic considering the large percentage of families that are affected by the disease. This article is a narrative literature review of sociocultural influences on AD disparities in US children. The purpose of this review is to increase awareness of these important risk factors and to suggest related, future areas of research that may positively impact overall outcomes in children with AD. Much work remains to be done in order to ensure equitable care and outcomes among all children with AD.