Increased gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency associated with estrogen-induced luteinizing hormone surges in ovariectomized ewes.

Hypophyseal portal blood samples were taken from ovariectomized (OVX) ewes given 50 micrograms estradiol benzoate. This estrogen treatment elicited a biphasic alteration (decrease then increase) in LH secretion. During the negative feedback phase, pulsatile GnRH secretion continued; at this time the interpulse interval for the GnRH pulses (49.5 +/- 5.7 min, mean +/- SE, n = 6) was similar to that in 7 control OVX ewes (53.4 +/- 8.7 min). During the positive feedback phase the GnRH interpulse interval (26.8 +/- 9.8 min; n = 6) was significantly (P less than 0.05) less than in the controls. In 3/7 cases the GnRH pulse frequency in OVX controls was within the range observed for estrogen-treated sheep during the positive feedback phase. These data suggest that, in most cases, the LH surge that can be induced by estrogen in OVX ewes, is associated with an increased GnRH pulse frequency. In some animals the inherent GnRH pulse frequency may already be at a rate that is high enough to permit an LH surge by action of estrogen on the pituitary. In general, the mean concentrations of GnRH in portal blood during the LH surge were higher than those in untreated animals, suggesting an overall increase in GnRH output during the LH surge. Pulsatile GnRH secretion continues throughout the early negative feedback phase, suggesting that the predominant effect of estrogen at this time is at the pituitary level.

Effect of restricted feeding on the concentrations of growth hormone (GH), gonadotropins, and prolactin (PRL) in plasma, and on the amounts of messenger ribonucleic acid for GH, gonadotropin subunits, and PRL in the pituitary glands of adult ovariectomized ewes.

The effects of long term restricted feeding on the synthesis, storage, and release of GH, LH, FSH, and PRL were examined in adult ovariectomized ewes. Two groups of six ewes were fed a diet of either 1000 g/day (normal feeding) or 400-600 g/day (restricted feeding) hay for 20 weeks. Restricted feeding increased mean plasma GH concentrations and the amplitude of GH pulses, but did not affect GH pulse frequency. In contrast, mean plasma LH and FSH concentrations and LH pulse frequency were decreased by restricted feeding. Mean plasma PRL concentrations were unaffected by treatment. The levels of mRNA for GH in pituitary cytosol were increased by restricted feeding, but no changes were seen in mRNA levels of alpha-subunit, LH beta, FSH beta, or PRL. The pituitary contents of hormones measured did not change with the level of feeding. In conclusion, these data show that long term restricted feeding affects anterior pituitary function in adult ewes, presumably reflecting alterations in the secretion of hypothalamic releasing and inhibiting factors.

The negative feedback effects of testicular steroids are predominantly at the hypothalamus in the ram.

This study aimed to delineate the hypothalamic and/or pituitary actions of testosterone and its primary metabolites 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone and estradiol (E) in adult castrated rams (wethers) during the breeding season. In Exp 1, wethers were treated for a week with twice daily injections (im) of peanut oil, 8, 16 or 32 mg/day testosterone propionate (TP) or dihydrotestosterone benzoate (DHTB) or an sc silastic implant containing 1 or 3 cm E. TP decreased plasma LH concentrations, increased (P less than 0.05) LH interpulse interval, did not have consistent effects on LH pulse amplitude, and had minimal effects on plasma FSH concentrations. DHTB decreased LH and FSH concentrations and increased (P less than 0.05) LH interpulse interval. E reduced (P less than 0.05) plasma LH and FSH concentrations and increased LH interpulse interval but had no effects on LH pulse amplitude. In Exp 2, hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected wethers given 125 ng GnRH every 2 h, were treated with either peanut oil, 32 mg/day TP or DHTB or 3 cm E. None of the treatments affected plasma LH or FSH concentrations or LH pulse amplitude. Exp 3 investigated the effects on GnRH of treatment of wethers either with peanut oil or TP. TP reduced GnRH concentrations (P less than 0.05) and pulse amplitude (P less than 0.01) and increased interpulse interval (P less than 0.05). These data provide evidence that, during the breeding season, the principal site of negative feedback of testicular steroids in the ram is the hypothalamus, resulting in decreased GnRH secretion; feedback effects at the pituitary are minimal.

Circulating half-lives of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone in pituitary extracts and isoform fractions of ovariectomized and intact ewes.

Previous studies have shown that the circulating half-life (t 1/2) of serum FSH in ewes after hypophysectomy (HPX) increased 10-fold after ovariectomy (OVEX). The basis for this difference was examined in this study by determining the circulating half-life of serum FSH and LH in HPX ewes after administration of pituitary extracts and gonadotropin isoform fractions. High-speed supernatants of pituitaries from gonadal-intact and OVEX ewes were fractionated by electrofocusing in sucrose gradients and based on the pI distribution of FSH and LH divided into four pools, pH 4.3-4.8, 4.8-5.55, 5.8-6.7, and 6.7-10. These extracts were administered by iv bolus injection to HPX gonadal-intact ewes and blood samples collected between 15-1000 min later. The clearance pattern for both serum FSH and LH was heterogenous, indicative of a major rapid and a minor slow dissociating component. A significant (P less than 0.05) difference in circulating half-lives (rapid component) was observed between pituitary extracts from intact and OVEX ewes for FSH (t 1/2 = 32.8 +/- 8.6 min vs. 89.9 +/- 32.3 min) but not LH (31.3 +/- 9.2 min vs. 39.3 +/- 6.1 min, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed between the corresponding FSH or LH isoform preparations. To establish if the difference in circulating half-lives obtained after HPX and bolus iv injection was due to mode of delivery, an extract of pituitaries from OVEX ewes was infused for 12 h into HPX sheep and the t 1/2 values determined after cessation of treatment and compared to those after a bolus injection. The clearance of both FSH and LH from plasma after infusion was significantly prolonged than after a bolus injection. It is concluded that the difference in circulating half-lives of FSH between pituitary extracts from intact and OVEX ewes after bolus administration is due to a difference in pituitary FSH composition. However, the prolonged clearance with infusion compared to bolus administration suggests that extrapituitary factors are also responsible.

Effect of restricted feeding on the relationship between hypophysial portal concentrations of growth hormone (GH)-releasing factor and somatostatin, and jugular concentrations of GH in ovariectomized ewes.

These studies characterized the secretion of GH-releasing factor (GRF) and somatostatin (SRIF) into the hypophysial portal circulation in ewes after long term restricted feeding. In addition, we examined the temporal relationship between the concentrations of these two hypothalamic peptides in portal blood and the concentration of GH in jugular blood. Six sheep were fed 1000 g hay/day (normal feeding) and 6 sheep were fed 400-600 g hay/day (restricted feeding). This resulted in a wt loss of 35% in restricted animals compared with 6% in control animals after 20 weeks. Fluctuations in portal levels of GRF indicated a pulsatile pattern of secretion with approximately 60% of pulses coincident with, or immediately preceding, a GH pulse. Similarly, 65% of GH pulses were associated with GRF pulses. Restricted feeding increased (P less than 0.01) mean ( +/- SEM) plasma GH levels (9.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 2.9 +/- 0.6 ng/ml) and mean GH pulse amplitude (7.9 +/- 1.8 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml) but did not affect mean GH pulse frequency (6.0 +/- 1.1 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.1 pulses/8 h). The level of feeding had no effect on mean portal concentration of GRF (restricted: 5.5 +/- 0.8, normal: 6.6 +/- 1.4 pg/ml), GRF pulse amplitude (14.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 13.5 +/- 0.7 pg/ml), or GRF pulse frequency (5.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.7 +/- 0.9 pulses/8 h). Portal concentrations of SRIF in sheep on a restricted diet were half (P less than 0.01) those of sheep fed a normal diet (10.2 +/- 2.3 vs. 19.6 +/- 1.6 pg/ml). Pulses of SRIF were not significantly associated with changes in GH or GRF concentrations. These data indicate a functional role for hypothalamic GRF in initiating GH pulses. Furthermore, the increase in GH secretion in underfed sheep was most probably due to a decrease in the release of SRIF into hypophysial portal blood. Restricted feeding had no affect on GRF secretion, but because of the reduced exposure of the pituitary gland to SRIF, it is possible that responsiveness to GRF is enhanced.

The posterior pituitary regulates prolactin, but not adrenocorticotropin or gonadotropin, secretion in the sheep.

The aim of this study was to determine the role of the posterior pituitary gland in the control of PRL, LH, FSH, and ACTH secretion in sheep. Posterior pituitary function was removed in ovariectomized ewes by electrical lesioning of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial tract immediately posterior to the stalk-median eminence (LESION); controls were subjected to sham surgery (SHAM). LESION caused a 2-fold increase in plasma PRL concentrations on days 1-3 after surgery. Thereafter, concentrations gradually declined until they were similar to those in SHAM ewes. There was no change in plasma concentrations of LH, FSH, or ACTH after LESION. Plasma PRL responses to insulin in SHAM ewes were completely abolished, and the plasma PRL response to chlorpromazine was reduced to almost half by LESION. In contrast, audiovisual stress (barking dog) and serotonin challenge caused an immediate release of PRL in both LESION and SHAM ewes, with the amplitude of the responses indistinguishable between groups. LESION had no effect on the plasma ACTH responses to audiovisual stress, insulin, or serotonin. We conclude that the posterior pituitary gland is involved in the regulation of PRL under some circumstances, but not of LH, FSH, or ACTH secretion in the sheep. Accordingly, changes in PRL release after hypothalamopituitary disconnection in this species may reflect a loss of posterior lobe function rather than the removal of hypothalamic inputs. In addition, the PRL response to insulin is dependent on a functional posterior pituitary gland, whereas responses to audiovisual stress and serotonin appear to rely on inputs to the pituitary gland via the median eminence and the long hypothalamo-hypophysial portal blood vessels.

Studies on the interaction between ethanol and amfonelic acid.

Amfonelic acid (AFA), a non-amphetamine central stimulant dose-dependently reduced the hypnotic effect of ethanol in C57B1/6 mice. It did not enhance the elimination of ethanol. Amfonelic acid failed to modify the duration of pentobarbitone-induced hypnosis or the ethanol-induced hypothermia in these animals. Combined treatment with amfonelic acid and a lipophilic alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist was not more effective than amfonelic acid alone in blocking ethanol hypnosis. The stimulation of locomotor activity by amfonelic acid in C57B1/6 mice was more sensitive to the blocking effect of ethanol than stimulation induced by d-amphetamine. The blocking effect of amfonelic acid, but not that of d-amphetamine, on the effects of ethanol developed tolerance. In pimozide-pretreated mice, amfonelic acid failed to reduce the ethanol-induced hypnosis. Hence it appears that dopamine (DA) released by amfonelic acid is responsible for its antagonism of ethanol. However, though amfonelic acid acted as a strong releaser of DA in Swiss-Webster, CD-1, DBA-2 and BALB/c mice, in these strains it failed to reduce the effect of ethanol. Moreover, methylphenidate, a dopaminergic stimulant, which acts by a mechanism similar to that of amfonelic acid was not effective in reducing the hypnotic effect of ethanol in C57B1/6 mice. For these reasons, additional mechanisms may have to be considered to explain this strain-dependent effect of amfonelic acid.

The significance of small pulses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone.

A series of experiments was conducted to ascertain the significance of 'small' pulses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In the first experiment, ovariectomized hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) ewes were given 250 ng pulses of GnRH every 2 h for 1 week, 25 ng pulses every 2 h for 24 h, 25 ng pulses hourly for 24 h and then alternating hourly pulses of 25 and 250 ng. During the 25 ng pulses, LH was not detectable in plasma and FSH concentrations declined after 2 days. Following the 25 ng pulses, the resumption of 250 ng pulses led to exaggerated LH responses (mean +/- S.E.M. pulse amplitude 18.7 +/- 1.7 vs 10.2 +/- 1.2 micrograms/l in the first week). In a second experiment, ovariectomized-HPD ewes were maintained on 250 ng GnRH pulses every 2 h for 1 week and were then given three 25 ng pulses mid-way between the 250 ng pulses. Samples of blood were taken over three 250 ng pulses without 25 ng insertions and over three pulses with insertions. The insertion of 25 ng GnRH pulses did not cause LH pulses in their own right and did not alter the LH responses to the 250 ng pulses. In a third experiment, 50 ng GnRH pulses were inserted between the 250 ng GnRH pulses, as in experiment 2; these 50 ng pulses caused small LH pulses and led to a reduction in the response of the LH pulse amplitude to the 250 ng pulses. The 'small' LH pulses which occurred in response to 50 ng GnRH compensated for the reduced responses to the 250 ng pulses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The oestrogen-induced surge of LH requires a 'signal' pattern of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone input to the pituitary gland in the ewe.

Two experiments were conducted with ovariectomized and hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected (HPD) ewes to ascertain the pattern of inputs, to the pituitary gland, of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) necessary for the full expression of an oestrogen-induced LH surge. The standard GnRH replacement to these sheep was to give pulses of 250 ng (i.v.) every 2h; at the onset of experimentation, pulses were given hourly. In experiment 1, groups of sheep (n = 7) were given an i.m. injection of 50 micrograms oestradiol benzoate, and after 10 h the GnRH pulse frequency or pulse amplitude was doubled. Monitoring of plasma LH concentrations showed that a doubling of pulse frequency produced a marked increase in baseline values, whereas a doubling of amplitude had little effect on the LH response. In a second experiment, ovariectomized HPD sheep that had received hourly pulses of GnRH for 16 h after an i.m. injection of oil or 50 micrograms oestradiol benzoate were given either a 'bolus' (2.25 micrograms GnRH) or a 'volley' (500 ng GnRH pulses 10 min apart for 30 min, plus a 500 ng pulse 15 min later). Both groups then received GnRH pulses (250 ng) every 30 min for the next 13 h. Oestrogen enhanced the LH responses to the GnRH treatments, and the amount of LH released was similar in ovariectomized HPD ewes given oestrogen plus bolus or volley GnRH treatments and ovariectomized hypothalamo-pituitary intact ewes given oestrogen. These results suggest that the oestrogen-induced LH surge is initiated by a 'signal' pattern of GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus.

Effects of modifying gonadotrophin-releasing hormone input before and after the oestrogen-induced LH surge in ovariectomized ewes with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection.

The patterns of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) input to the pituitary gland that affect the expression of a positive-feedback event by oestrogen on LH secretion were investigated in ovariectomized ewes with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection (HPD). In experiment 1, ovariectomized HPD ewes were given hourly i.v. pulses of 250 ng GnRH and an i.m. injection of 50 micrograms oestradiol benzoate (OB). The ewes were given a bolus pulse of 2.25 micrograms GnRH 16 h after injection of OB, followed by half-hourly pulses of 250 ng GnRH for 14 h (treatment A). The LH surge response was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater in these ewes compared with that in ewes given a continuous infusion of GnRH (250 ng/h) after the OB injection, followed by a continuous infusion of 500 ng GnRH/h after the bolus pulse of GnRH (treatment B). When no GnRH was administered after the OB injection, except for the bolus pulse of GnRH (treatment C), the surge response was significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced compared with that in treatment A, and was reduced compared with treatment B. These data suggest that GnRH pulses are important in the generation of the OB-induced LH surge, but that a baseline secretory component can prime the pituitary to some extent. In experiment 2, a doubling of the continuous infusion dose of GnRH used in treatment B to 500 ng/h before the bolus pulse of GnRH and to 1 micrograms/h afterwards (treatment D) gave a similar response compared with treatment A, suggesting that if the baseline input of GnRH is of sufficient magnitude, it can overcome the lack of pulsatile input. In experiment 3, halving the GnRH pulse amplitude used in treatment A from 250 to 125 ng (treatment E) did not reduce the LH surge response, implying that when the GnRH input is in a pulsatile mode, the amplitude of GnRH pulses is less important than the pulsatile nature per se. In experiment 4, removal of GnRH input after the bolus pulse of GnRH (treatment F) significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced the surge response compared with when pulses were maintained (treatment A), indicating that GnRH input is still required once the LH surge has been initiated. Collectively, these experiments show that several forms of GnRH delivery, both pulsatile and baseline, can result in the full expression of a positive-feedback response in ovariectomized ewes treated with oestrogen.

Transient increase in prolactin secretion following hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection in ewes during anoestrus and the breeding season.

Hypothalamic control of prolactin secretion was studied in ovariectomized ewes by comparing the effects of hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection (HPD) and sham-operation (sham-HPD). HPD caused a two-fold increase in plasma prolactin concentrations on days 1 and 7 following surgery during anoestrus and a tenfold increase during the breeding season. Thereafter, concentrations gradually declined to be similar to those in sham-HPD ewes by day 43 (breeding season) and day 145 (anoestrus). The maximum plasma prolactin response to HPD was similar during the two seasons (anoestrus: 128 +/- 15 bs breeding season: 118 +/- 13 micrograms/l). Sham-HPD had no effect on plasma prolactin concentrations. Prolactin pulse frequency was not affected by HPD, but increases in plasma prolactin concentrations were associated with increases in pulse amplitude. At the time of the normal anoestrus, plasma prolactin concentrations rose in both the HPD and sham-HPD ewes, raising the question of extra-hypothalamic regulation of seasonal changes in prolactin secretion. Plasma LH and FSH concentrations became undetectable in HPD ewes but were unaltered in sham-HPD ewes. We conclude that hypothalamic inhibition of pituitary prolactin secretion in the sheep can be demonstrated by HPD but that this effect is not sustained. This transience may indicate the additional requirement of hypothalamic-releasing factors in the control of prolactin release. In addition, the surgically isolated ovine pituitary of the HPD animal has an inherent pulsatile secretion of prolactin.

Prolonged secretion of prolactin in response to thyrotrophin-releasing hormone after hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection in the ewe.

Surgical disconnection of the ovine hypothalamus from the pituitary gland (hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection; HPD) has provided a useful experimental model for studying the control of gonadotrophin secretion. The objective of the present study was to define the characteristics of prolactin secretion using stimuli acting through the hypothalamus or directly on the pituitary gland in HPD ewes. Prolactin responses to either a stressful stimulus or the dopaminergic antagonists metoclopramide (20 mg i.v.) or chlorpromazine (50 mg i.v.) seen in intact animals (sham-HPD) were completely abolished by HPD. Injection of TRH (100 micrograms i.v.) caused an immediate release of prolactin in both groups of ewes. In the HPD ewes plasma prolactin concentrations remained raised for at least 3 h after TRH injection, whereas in sham-HPD ewes prolactin concentrations began to decline after 20 min. Administration of bromocriptine (1 mg i.v.) 10 min after TRH inhibited the prolonged response to TRH in HPD ewes. The results support the hypothesis that prolactin exerts a short-loop feedback effect on its own secretion at the hypothalamic level.

Effects of constant infusion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone in ovariectomized ewes with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection: further evidence for differential control of LH and FSH secretion and the lack of a priming effect.

Experiments were conducted in ovariectomized ewes after hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection (HPD) to examine LH and FSH secretion during constant infusion of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or physiological saline and to determine whether or not a constant GnRH background enhances or diminishes pituitary responsiveness to GnRH pulses. Whereas pulsatile GnRH infusions maintained LH and FSH secretion, constant infusions (125 or 250 ng/h) led to the complete cessation of LH secretion and reduced FSH secretion. The rate of decline of plasma FSH concentrations was significantly (P less than 0.01) greater in animals receiving 250 ng GnRH/h than in saline-treated animals, whereas that in animals receiving 125 ng/h was not significantly different. When GnRH pulses were administered during constant GnRH infusion, the plasma LH pulse amplitudes were similar to those seen without the GnRH background. These data show that, in ovariectomized-HPD ewes FSH secretion does not require GnRH pulses and may merely reflect ongoing FSH synthesis and a constant low background of GnRH does not affect pituitary responsiveness to GnRH pulses.

Analysis of the ratio of biological to immunological LH secreted during the oestrogen-induced LH surge in the ewe.

Plasma concentrations of in-vitro biological and immunological LH were measured throughout the LH surge in cyclic ewes and in ovariectomized ewes treated i.m. with oestradiol benzoate. Both activities increased in parallel during the LH surge in both groups, although the ratio of biological to immunological activities (B/I ratio) was highest at the peak of the LH surge. The two activities were highly correlated (r = 0.86-0.92), with similar slopes from their regression analysis for the cyclic and ovariectomized groups (1.15 and 1.16 respectively). However, the intercepts of the regression lines did not pass through the origin, but intersected the y (radioimmunoassay) axis, suggesting that these serum samples contained immunoactivity not associated with LH bioactivity. In conclusion, an increase in the LH B/I ratio was observed during the LH surge in oestrogen-treated ovariectomized ewes and in cyclic ewes. This increase was not attributable to a change in the relationship between these two LH activities during the LH surge, but rather to the detection of bioinactive immunoactive material in plasma of unknown composition.

Release of prolactin is independent of the secretion of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone into hypophysial portal blood of sheep.

In order to determine whether pituitary prolactin release was directly related to the secretion of TRH into hypophysial portal blood, serial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected from seven lactating and three non-lactating ewes. In another experiment, samples were collected from five ovariectomized ewes while being exposed to an audio-visual stress and then later administered with chlorpromazine. Secretion of TRH was pulsatile in all ewes and independent of prolactin secretion; TRH pulses coincided with significant increases in prolactin secretion in only 15% of cases and only 29% of prolactin pulses were associated with TRH pulses. Sixty-seven per cent of suckling bouts were associated with increases in prolactin secretion, but only 22% of these were associated with significant increases in TRH secretion. Chlorpromazine increased prolactin levels fourfold but did not affect portal concentrations of TRH. Audio-visual stress was not a reliable method of causing prolactin release in this model. Mean portal concentrations of TRH and jugular concentrations of prolactin were not significantly correlated. These results show that hypothalamic TRH and pituitary prolactin are secreted independently in the sheep, implying that increases in prolactin release caused by suckling or chlorpromazine are not the direct result of increased TRH secretion.

Long-term negative feedback effects of oestrogen and progesterone on the pituitary gland of the long-term ovariectomized ewe.

The effects of long-term treatment with physiological doses of oestradiol or oestradiol plus progesterone on plasma gonadotrophin levels and pituitary content of LH and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors were studied in ovariectomized-hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ewes given 250 ng pulses of GnRH every 2 h (i.v.). A pilot experiment showed that 3 cm long Silastic implants (s.c.) reduced both LH pulse frequency and pulse amplitude in long-term (greater than 6 months) ovariectomized ewes. The main experiment was conducted over 3 weeks in ovariectomized-hypothalamo-pituitary disconnected ewes that had received pulsatile GnRH replacement for 1 week after pituitary surgery. Group 1 (n = 5) received GnRH pulses alone throughout the study. Group 2 (n = 6) received oestradiol in week 2 and oestradiol plus progesterone in week 3 and in group 3 (n = 6) the steroid treatments were reversed. Oestradiol reduced (P less than 0.05) the mean (+/- S.E.M.) amplitude of LH in pulses in group 2 (from 8.2 +/- 1.6 to 5.0 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) and group 3 (from 11.6 +/- 1.2 to 9.3 +/- 1.0 micrograms 1): an additional effect of progesterone was seen in group 2 but not group 3. The amplitudes of the LH pulses did not change in the control ewes. Plasma concentrations of FSH were reduced by approximately 50% by the oestradiol treatments with no additional effects of progesterone. There was no effect of steroidal treatment on pituitary content of LH or pituitary levels of GnRH receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Concentrations of dopamine and noradrenaline in hypophysial portal blood in the sheep and the rat.

The concentrations of dopamine, noradrenaline and their respective primary neuronal metabolites 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethyleneglycol (DHPG) were measured in the hypophysial portal and peripheral plasma of sheep and rats by combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Hypophysial portal and jugular blood samples were taken at 5- to 10-min intervals for 3-7 h from six conscious ovariectomized ewes. Blood was also collected for 30 min under urethane anaesthesia from the cut pituitary stalk from 16 pro-oestrous female and five intact male rats. In ovariectomized ewes, noradrenaline concentrations were higher in hypophysial portal plasma than in peripheral plasma (6.6 +/- 0.8 vs 2.2 +/- 0.4 nmol/l). In contrast, dopamine was undetectable (less than 1 nmol/l) in the portal and peripheral plasma of all ewes. Plasma levels of DOPAC and DHPG in portal and jugular samples were similar. In all pro-oestrous female rats, plasma concentrations of dopamine were higher in portal blood than in jugular blood (8.0 +/- 1.4 vs 4.8 +/- 0.6 nmol/l). Detectable concentrations of dopamine were measured in the portal plasma of two out of five male rats. Noradrenaline concentrations were higher in portal plasma than in peripheral plasma of both female (8.3 +/- 1.7 vs 3.7 +/- 0.6 nmol/l) and male (14.8 +/- 2.7 vs 6.1 +/- 1.2 nmol/l) rats. These data show that noradrenaline, but not dopamine, is secreted into the long portal vessels in sheep. The results suggest that there are species differences in the secretion of hypothalamic dopamine into hypophysial portal blood.

Direct pituitary inhibition of prolactin secretion by dopamine and noradrenaline in sheep.

The effects of dopamine, noradrenaline and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) on the release of prolactin were examined in ovariectomized ewes. Infusion of dopamine (0.5 or 1 microgram/kg per min for 2 h i.v.) reduced plasma prolactin concentrations in a dose-dependent manner, whereas DOPAC (5 or 10 micrograms/kg per min for 2 h i.v.) had no effect. In a further series of experiments, ovariectomized hypothalamopituitary disconnected ewes were given dopamine or noradrenaline (each at 0.5 or 1 microgram/kg per min for 2 h i.v.), and both amines reduced mean plasma concentrations of prolactin with similar potency in a dose-dependent manner. These effects were blocked by treatment with pimozide and prazosin respectively. During the infusion of dopamine, the peripheral plasma concentrations of DOPAC and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylethyleneglycol (DHPG) were increased (DOPAC, 22 +/- 7 (S.E.M.) to 131 +/- 11 nmol/l; DHPG, 2.9 +/- 0.3 to 6.4 +/- 0.2 nmol/l), but plasma concentrations of dopamine and noradrenaline did not change. Finally, administration of domperidone, a specific dopamine receptor antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier, resulted in a sustained increase in plasma prolactin concentrations in ovariectomized ewes. We conclude that the secretion of prolactin from the pituitary gland is under dual inhibitory regulation by both dopamine and noradrenaline in the sheep.

Glutamate secretion and NAD(P)H levels during calcium-dependent depolarization of slices of the dentate gyrus.

Evidence from studies involving release, postsynaptic responses, inactivation, storage and synthesis etc. support the contention that glutamate may be the transmitter of the perforant input to the granule cells in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. In the present report the release of endogenous glutamate and the levels of reduced pyridine nucleotides (NAD(P)H) has been measured in parallel experiments on slices from the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. A Ca-dependent release of glutamate is evoked by tissue depolarization caused either with electrical field stimulation or with elevated KC1. Electrical stimulation induced a transient increase in tissue NAD(P)H levels, the increase being inhibited by approximately 50% during Ca-free conditions. KC1 stimulation, on the other hand, produced a long-lasting decrease in NAD(P)H, the decrease being halved in the absense of Ca. A metabolic relation between stimulus secretion and energy utilization is discussed.

Human growth hormone releasing factor (hGRF) modulates calcium currents in human growth hormone secreting adenoma cells.

Electrophysiology of human growth hormone secreting tumour cells and its modification by hGRF has been studied using on-cell and Nystatin-perforated whole-cell recording configurations. Local application of hGRF (10 nM) produced an increase in the frequency of action potentials. Ca2+ currents were isolated by a ramp depolarizing pulse from -120 mV to +60 mV in the presence of tetrodotoxin (1 microM). Human GRF increased the Ca2+ currents which could be blocked by Ni+ (300 microM). We conclude that an increase in Ca2+ current is integral to the action of hGRF on these cells.