Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 82
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(SI2): SI170-SI180, 2023 02 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35583252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate medication prescription patterns among children with JIA, including duration, sequence and reasons for medication discontinuation. METHODS: This study is a single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospective data from the electronic medical records of JIA patients receiving systemic therapy aged 0-18 years between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2019. Patient characteristics (age, gender, JIA subtype) and medication prescriptions were extracted and analysed using descriptive statistics, Sankey diagrams and Kaplan-Meier survival methods. RESULTS: Over a median of 4.2 years follow-up, the 20 different medicines analysed were prescribed as monotherapy (n = 15) or combination therapy (n = 48 unique combinations) among 236 patients. In non-systemic JIA, synthetic DMARDs were prescribed to almost all patients (99.5%), and always included MTX. In contrast, 43.9% of non-systemic JIA patients received a biologic DMARD (mostly adalimumab or etanercept), ranging from 30.9% for oligoarticular persistent ANA-positive JIA, to 90.9% for polyarticular RF-positive JIA. Among systemic JIA, 91.7% received a biologic DMARD (always including anakinra). When analysing medication prescriptions according to their class, 32.6% involved combination therapy. In 56.8% of patients, subsequent treatment lines were initiated after unsuccessful first-line treatment, resulting in 68 unique sequences. Remission was the most common reason for DMARD discontinuation (44.7%), followed by adverse events (28.9%) and ineffectiveness (22.1%). CONCLUSION: This paper reveals the complexity of pharmacological treatment in JIA, as indicated by: the variety of mono- and combination therapies prescribed, substantial variation in medication prescriptions between subtypes, most patients receiving two or more treatment lines, and the large number of unique treatment sequences.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Productos Biológicos , Niño , Humanos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Países Bajos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Datos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38123516

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To quantify differences in hospital-associated costs, and accompanying travel costs and productivity losses, before and after withdrawing TNFi in JIA patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from electronic medical records of paediatric JIA patients treated with TNFi, which were either immediately discontinued, spaced (increased treatment interval) or tapered (reduced subsequent doses). Costs of hospital-associated resource use (consultations, medication, radiology procedures, laboratory testing, procedures under general anaesthesia, hospitalisation) and associated travel costs and productivity losses were quantified during clinically inactive disease until TNFi withdrawal (pre-withdrawal period) and compared with costs during the first and second year after withdrawal initiation (first and second year post-withdrawal). RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included of whom 26 immediately discontinued TNFi, 30 spaced and zero tapered. Mean annual costs were €9,165/patient on active treatment (pre-withdrawal) and decreased significantly to €5,063/patient (-44.8%) and €6,569/patient (-28.3%) in the first and second year post-withdrawal, respectively (p< 0.05). Of these total annual costs, travel costs plus productivity losses were €834/patient, €1,180/patient, and €1,320/patient, in the three periods respectively. Medication comprised 80.7%, 61.5% and 72.4% of total annual costs in the pre-withdrawal, first, and second year post-withdrawal period, respectively. CONCLUSION: In the first two years after initiating withdrawal, the total annual costs are decreased compared with the pre-withdrawal period. However, cost reductions were lower in the second year compared with the first year post-withdrawal, primarily due to restarting or intensifying biologics. To support biologic withdraw decisions, future research should assess the full long-term societal cost impacts, and include all biologics.

3.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 1333, 2023 07 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37438796

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As Canada and other high-income countries continue to welcome newcomers, we aimed to 1) understand newcomer parents' attitudes towards routine-childhood vaccinations (RCVs), and 2) identify barriers newcomer parents face when accessing RCVs in Alberta, Canada. METHODS: Between July 6th-August 31st, 2022, we recruited participants from Alberta, Canada to participate in moderated focus group discussions. Inclusion criteria included parents who had lived in Canada for < 5 years with children < 18 years old. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content and deductive thematic analysis. The capability opportunity motivation behaviour model was used as our conceptual framework. RESULTS: Four virtual and three in-person focus groups were conducted with 47 participants. Overall, parents were motivated and willing to vaccinate their children but experienced several barriers related to their capability and opportunity to access RCVs. Five main themes emerged: 1) lack of reputable information about RCVs, 2) language barriers when looking for information and asking questions about RCVs, 3) lack of access to a primary care provider (PCP), 4) lack of affordable and convenient transportation options, and 5) due to the COVID-19 pandemic, lack of available vaccine appointments. Several minor themes were also identified and included barriers such as lack of 1) childcare, vaccine record sharing, PCP follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that several barriers faced by newcomer families ultimately stem from issues related to accessing information about RCVs and the challenges families face once at vaccination clinics, highlighting opportunities for health systems to better support newcomers in accessing RCVs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Alberta , Cuidado del Niño , Vacunación
4.
PLoS Biol ; 17(5): e3000243, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31107871

RESUMEN

We report a systematic review and meta-analysis of research using animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). We systematically searched 5 online databases in September 2012 and updated the search in November 2015 using machine learning and text mining to reduce the screening for inclusion workload and improve accuracy. For each comparison, we calculated a standardised mean difference (SMD) effect size, and then combined effects in a random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the impact of study design factors and reporting of measures to reduce risks of bias. We present power analyses for the most frequently reported behavioural tests; 337 publications were included. Most studies (84%) used male animals only. The most frequently reported outcome measure was evoked limb withdrawal in response to mechanical monofilaments. There was modest reporting of measures to reduce risks of bias. The number of animals required to obtain 80% power with a significance level of 0.05 varied substantially across behavioural tests. In this comprehensive summary of the use of animal models of CIPN, we have identified areas in which the value of preclinical CIPN studies might be increased. Using both sexes of animals in the modelling of CIPN, ensuring that outcome measures align with those most relevant in the clinic, and the animal's pain contextualised ethology will likely improve external validity. Measures to reduce risk of bias should be employed to increase the internal validity of studies. Different outcome measures have different statistical power, and this can refine our approaches in the modelling of CIPN.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Conducta Animal , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Vías de Administración de Medicamentos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Sesgo de Publicación , Publicaciones , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Spinal Cord ; 60(12): 1041-1049, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35606413

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical literature. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of biomaterial-based combination (BMC) strategies for the treatment of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), the effects of individual biomaterials in the context of BMC strategies, and the factors influencing their efficacy. To assess the effects of different preclinical testing paradigms in BMC strategies. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search of Embase, Web of Science and PubMed. All controlled preclinical studies describing an in vivo or in vitro model of SCI that tested a biomaterial in combination with at least one other regenerative strategy (cells, drugs, or both) were included. Two review authors conducted the study selection independently, extracted study characteristics independently and assessed study quality using a modified CAMARADES checklist. Effect size measures were combined using random-effects models and heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression with tau2, I2 and R2 statistics. We tested for small-study effects using funnel plot-based methods. RESULTS: 134 publications were included, testing over 100 different BMC strategies. Overall, treatment with BMC therapies improved locomotor recovery by 25.3% (95% CI, 20.3-30.3; n = 102) and in vivo axonal regeneration by 1.6 SD (95% CI 1.2-2 SD; n = 117) in comparison with injury only controls. CONCLUSION: BMC strategies improve locomotor outcomes after experimental SCI. Our comprehensive study highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides a foundation for the design of future experiments.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Regeneración de la Medula Espinal , Animales , Humanos , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Materiales Biocompatibles/uso terapéutico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos
6.
J Infect Dis ; 223(3): 452-461, 2021 02 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32614406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Norovirus is a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis. With vaccines in development, population-based estimates of norovirus burden are needed to identify target populations, quantify potential benefits, and understand disease dynamics. METHODS: We estimated the attributable fraction (AF) for norovirus infections in children, defined as the proportion of children testing positive for norovirus whose gastroenteritis was attributable to norovirus. We calculated the standardized incidence and emergency department (ED) visit rates attributable to norovirus using provincial gastroenteritis visit administrative data. RESULTS: From 3731 gastroenteritis case patients and 2135 controls we determined that the AFs were 67.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.5%-100%) and 91.6% (88.8%-94.4%) for norovirus genogroups I (GI) and II (GII), respectively. Norovirus GII AF varied by season but not age. We attributed 116 episodes (95% CI, 103-129) and 59 (51-67) ED visits per 10 000 child-years to norovirus GII across all ages, accounting for 20% and 18% of all medically attended gastroenteritis episodes and ED visits, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In children, a large proportion of norovirus GII detections reflect causation, demonstrating significant potential for norovirus GII vaccines. Seasonal variation in the norovirus GII AF may have implications for understanding the role asymptomatic carriage plays in disease dynamics.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Caliciviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Caliciviridae/virología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Gastroenteritis/virología , Norovirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alberta , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Heces/virología , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Epidemiología Molecular , Norovirus/clasificación , Norovirus/genética , Estaciones del Año , Adulto Joven
7.
Genet Med ; 23(2): 272-279, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989270

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We provide a description of the diagnostic odyssey for a cohort of children seeking diagnosis of a rare genetic disorder in terms of the time from initial consultation to most recent visit or receipt of diagnosis, the number of tests per patient, and the types of tests received. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 299 children seen at the Alberta Children's Hospital (ACH) Genetics Clinic (GC) for whom the result of at least one single-gene test, gene panel, or chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) was recorded. RESULTS: Of 299 patients, 90 (30%) received a diagnosis in the period of the review. Patients had an average of 5.4 tests each; 236 (79%) patients received CMA; 172 (58%) patients received single-gene tests and 34 (11%) received gene panels; 167 (56%) underwent imaging/electrical activity studies. The mean observation period was 898 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 791, 1004). Among patients with visits recorded prior to visiting ACH GC, 43% of the total observation time occurred prior to the GC. CONCLUSION: As genomic technologies expand, the nature of the diagnostic odyssey will change. This study has outlined the current standard of care in the ACH GC, providing a baseline against which future changes can be assessed.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Genéticas , Genómica , Alberta , Niño , Humanos , Análisis por Micromatrices , Estudios Retrospectivos
8.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(12): e922-e929, 2021 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30281552

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to elicit pediatric emergency physician's treatment choices for preschool-aged children with wheeze, determine the characteristics of the presenting child that influence treatment choices, and determine whether there is clinical equipoise by eliciting physician willingness to enroll these children in a placebo-controlled trial of corticosteroids. METHODS: Discrete choice experiments varying the characteristics of the presenting child were designed to elicit Canadian emergency physician's treatment choices, both in the emergency department (ED) and at discharge, for young children presenting with wheeze and their willingness to enroll in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). RESULTS: Most physicians chose to treat children with albuterol both in the ED and at discharge for all clinical scenarios. The proportion of physicians who chose to treat children with oral corticosteroids both in the ED and at discharge varied widely (from 12% to 81%) across all scenarios. Physician preference whether preschool children with wheeze should be treated with corticosteroids varied depending on the child's age, history of atopy, and previous and continuous wheeze. Between 73% and 86% of physicians were willing to enroll these children in an RCT indicating clinical equipoise. CONCLUSIONS: Physician treatment choices varied widely indicating clinical equipoise as to the effectiveness of corticosteroids in this population of patients. Management choices with respect to albuterol and corticosteroids were not consistent with published national and international guidelines. In line with this finding, physician's considerable willingness to enroll these children in an RCT may suggest that they are seeking guidance on how to manage these patients.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ruidos Respiratorios , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Canadá , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos
9.
Inj Prev ; 25(4): 340-347, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30185540

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify, summarise and critically assess studies reporting costs and consequences of sport and recreation injury prevention strategies among children and adolescents. DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS AND DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, CINAHL, Pubmed, Econlit and SPORTDiscus and PEDE. Included studies were peer reviewed full economic evaluations or cost analyses of sport/recreation injury prevention among children and adolescents≤18 years of age. The Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1896 unique records; eight studies met inclusion criteria. Six studies were related to injury prevention in the context of recreation, two were related to sports. For recreation studies in cycling and swimming: costs per head injury averted was US$3109 to $228 197; costs per hospitalisation avoided was US$3526 to 872 794; cost per life saved/death avoided was US$3531 to $103 518 154. Sport interventions in hockey and soccer were cost saving (fewer injuries and lower costs). Global quality assessments ranged from poor to good. Important limitations included short time horizons and intermediate outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Few rigorous economic evaluations related to sport and recreation injury prevention have been conducted. The range of estimates and variation in outcomes used preclude specific conclusions; however, where strategies both improve health and are cost saving, implementation should be prioritised. Future economic evaluations should incorporate time horizons sufficient to capture changes in long-term health and use utility-based outcome measures in order to capture individual preferences for changes in health states and facilitate comparison across intervention types.


Asunto(s)
Prevención de Accidentes/economía , Traumatismos en Atletas/prevención & control , Deportes , Prevención de Accidentes/métodos , Adolescente , Traumatismos en Atletas/economía , Niño , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos
11.
PLoS Biol ; 13(10): e1002273, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26460723

RESUMEN

The reliability of experimental findings depends on the rigour of experimental design. Here we show limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in a random sample of life sciences publications, significantly lower reporting of randomisation in work published in journals of high impact, and very limited reporting of measures to reduce the risk of bias in publications from leading United Kingdom institutions. Ascertainment of differences between institutions might serve both as a measure of research quality and as a tool for institutional efforts to improve research quality.


Asunto(s)
Disciplinas de las Ciencias Biológicas/métodos , Investigación Biomédica/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto , Animales , Disciplinas de las Ciencias Biológicas/tendencias , Investigación Biomédica/normas , Investigación Biomédica/tendencias , Exactitud de los Datos , Humanos , Factor de Impacto de la Revista , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/tendencias , Sesgo de Publicación , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sesgo de Selección , Reino Unido
12.
Circ Res ; 118(8): 1223-32, 2016 Apr 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26888636

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Cardiac stem cells (CSC) therapy has been clinically introduced for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction (MI). To date, there has been no systematic overview and meta-analysis of studies using CSC therapy for MI. OBJECTIVE: Here, we used meta-analysis to establish the overall effect of CSCs in preclinical studies and assessed translational differences between and within large and small animals in the CSC therapy field. In addition, we explored the effect of CSC type and other clinically relevant parameters on functional outcome to better predict and design future (pre)clinical studies using CSCs for MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic search was performed, yielding 80 studies. We determined the overall effect of CSC therapy on left ventricular ejection fraction and performed meta-regression to investigate clinically relevant parameters. We also assessed the quality of included studies and possible bias. The overall effect observed in CSC-treated animals was 10.7% (95% confidence interval 9.4-12.1; P<0.001) improvement in ejection fraction compared with placebo controls. Interestingly, CSC therapy had a greater effect in small animals compared with large animals (P<0.001). Meta-regression indicated that cell type was a significant predictor for ejection fraction improvement in small animals. Minor publication bias was observed in small animal studies. CONCLUSIONS: CSC treatment resulted in significant improvement of ejection fraction in preclinical animal models of MI compared with placebo. There was a reduction in the magnitude of effect in large compared with small animal models. Although different CSC types have overlapping culture characteristics, we observed a significant difference in their effect in post-MI animal studies.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Miocitos Cardíacos/trasplante , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Animales , Infarto del Miocardio/patología , Miocitos Cardíacos/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Med Educ ; 52(2): 150-160, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28949032

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Simulation-based medical education (SBME) is now ubiquitous at all levels of medical training. Given the substantial resources needed for SBME, economic evaluation of simulation-based programmes or curricula is required to demonstrate whether improvement in trainee performance (knowledge, skills and attitudes) and health outcomes justifies the cost of investment. Current literature evaluating SBME fails to provide consistent and interpretable information on the relative costs and benefits of alternatives. CONTENT: Economic evaluation is widely applied in health care, but is relatively scarce in medical education. Therefore, in this paper, using a focus on SBME, we define economic evaluation, describe the key components, and discuss the challenges associated with conducting an economic evaluation of medical education interventions. As a way forward to the rigorous and state of the art application of economic evaluation in medical education, we outline the steps to gather the necessary information to conduct an economic evaluation of simulation-based education programmes and curricula, and describe the main approaches to conducting an economic evaluation. CONCLUSION: A properly conducted economic evaluation can help stakeholders (i.e., programme directors, policy makers and curriculum designers) to determine the optimal use of resources in selecting the modality or method of assessment in simulation. It also helps inform broader decision making about allocation of scarce resources within an educational programme, as well as between education and clinical care. Economic evaluation in medical education research is still in its infancy, and there is significant potential for state-of-the-art application of these methods in this area.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/normas , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Educación Médica/métodos , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Curriculum , Humanos
14.
BMC Pediatr ; 18(1): 199, 2018 06 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29933740

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Measuring adolescents' preferences for health states can play an important role in evaluating the delivery of pediatric healthcare. However, formal evaluation of the common direct preference elicitation methods for health states has not been done with adolescents. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test how these methods perform in terms of their feasibility, reliability, and validity for measuring health state preferences in adolescents. METHODS: This study used a web-based survey of adolescents, 18 years of age or younger, living in the United States. The survey included four health states, each comprised of six attributes. Preferences for these health states were elicited using the visual analogue scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. The feasibility, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of each of these preference elicitation methods were tested and compared. RESULTS: A total of 144 participants were included in this study. Using a web-based survey format to elicit preferences for health states from adolescents was feasible. A majority of participants completed all three elicitation methods, ranked those methods as being easy, with very few requiring assistance from someone else. However, all three elicitation methods demonstrated weak test-retest reliability, with Kendall's tau-a values ranging from 0.204 to 0.402. Similarly, all three methods demonstrated poor construct validity, with 9-50% of all rankings aligning with our expectations. There were no significant differences across age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using a web-based survey format to elicit preferences for health states from adolescents is feasible. However, the reliability and construct validity of the methods used to elicit these preferences when using this survey format are poor. Further research into the effects of a web-based survey approach to eliciting preferences for health states from adolescents is needed before health services researchers or pediatric clinicians widely employ these methods.


Asunto(s)
Salud del Adolescente , Estado de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Internet , Prioridad del Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 62(10): 1251-1258, 2016 05 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26917812

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic administration to individuals with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection remains controversial. We assessed if antibiotic administration to individuals with STEC infection is associated with development of hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). METHODS: The analysis included studies published up to 29 April 2015, that provided data from patients (1) with STEC infection, (2) who received antibiotics, (3) who developed HUS, and (4) for whom data reported timing of antibiotic administration in relation to HUS. Risk of bias was assessed; strength of evidence was adjudicated. HUS was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes restricted the analysis to low-risk-of-bias studies employing commonly used HUS criteria. Pooled estimates of the odds ratio (OR) were obtained using random-effects models. RESULTS: Seventeen reports and 1896 patients met eligibility; 8 (47%) studies were retrospective, 5 (29%) were prospective cohort, 3 (18%) were case-control, and 1 was a trial. The pooled OR, including all studies, associating antibiotic administration and development of HUS was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], .89-1.99; I(2) = 42%). The repeat analysis including only studies with a low risk of bias and those employing an appropriate definition of HUS yielded an OR of 2.24 (95% CI, 1.45-3.46; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, use of antibiotics was not associated with an increased risk of developing HUS; however, after excluding studies at high risk of bias and those that did not employ an acceptable definition of HUS, there was a significant association. Consequently, the use of antibiotics in individuals with STEC infections is not recommended.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones por Escherichia coli , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/epidemiología , Síndrome Hemolítico-Urémico/microbiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli Shiga-Toxigénica/patogenicidad
16.
BMC Pediatr ; 15: 89, 2015 Jul 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26226953

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Each year in Canada there are 5 million episodes of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) with up to 70% attributed to an unidentified pathogen. Moreover, 90% of individuals with AGE do not seek care when ill, thus, burden of disease estimates are limited by under-diagnosing and under-reporting. Further, little is known about the pathogens causing AGE as the majority of episodes are attributed to an "unidentified" etiology. Our team has two main objectives: 1) to improve health through enhanced enteric pathogen identification; 2) to develop economic models incorporating pathogen burden and societal preferences to inform enteric vaccine decision making. METHODS/DESIGN: This project involves multiple stages: 1) Molecular microbiology experts will participate in a modified Delphi process designed to define criteria to aid in interpreting positive molecular enteric pathogen test results. 2) Clinical data and specimens will be collected from children aged 0-18 years, with vomiting and/or diarrhea who seek medical care in emergency departments, primary care clinics and from those who contact a provincial medical advice line but who do not seek care. Samples to be collected will include stool, rectal swabs (N = 2), and an oral swab. Specimens will be tested employing 1) stool culture; 2) in-house multiplex (N = 5) viral polymerase chain reaction (PCR) panel; and 3) multi-target (N = 15) PCR commercially available array. All participants will have follow-up data collected 14 days later to enable calculation of a Modified Vesikari Scale score and a Burden of Disease Index. Specimens will also be collected from asymptomatic children during their well child vaccination visits to a provincial public health clinic. Following the completion of the initial phases, discrete choice experiments will be conducted to enable a better understanding of societal preferences for diagnostic testing and vaccine policy. All of the results obtained will be integrated into economic models. DISCUSSION: This study is collecting novel samples (e.g., oral swabs) from previously untested groups of children (e.g., those not seeking medical care) which are then undergoing extensive molecular testing to shed a new perspective on the epidemiology of AGE. The knowledge gained will provide the broadest understanding of the epidemiology of vomiting and diarrhea of children to date.


Asunto(s)
Gastroenteritis/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Alberta/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diarrea/microbiología , Heces/microbiología , Gastroenteritis/economía , Gastroenteritis/microbiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Técnicas Microbiológicas , Modelos Económicos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Manejo de Especímenes , Vómitos/microbiología
17.
Stroke ; 45(10): 3055-63, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25184357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Poststroke depression is a prevalent complication of stroke with unclear pathogenesis. The benefits of antidepressants in this context and their effects on stroke recovery other than effects on mood are not clearly defined, with some studies suggesting efficacy in improving functional outcome in both depressed and nondepressed stroke patients. We have analyzed the preclinical animal data on antidepressant treatment in focal cerebral ischemia, modeled±depression, to help inform clinical trial design. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from experiments testing the efficacy of antidepressants versus no treatment to reduce infarct volume or improve neurobehavioral or neurogenesis outcomes in animal models of stroke. We used random-effects metaregression to test the impact of study quality and design characteristics and used trim and fill to assess publication bias. RESULTS: We identified 44 publications describing the effects of 22 antidepressant drugs. The median quality checklist score was 5 of a possible 10 (interquartile range, 4-7). Overall, antidepressants reduced infarct volume by 27.3% (95% confidence interval, 20.7%-33.8%) and improved neurobehavioral outcomes by 53.7% (46.4%-61.1%). There was little evidence for an effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on infarct volume. For neurobehavioral outcomes there was evidence of publication bias. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most frequently studied antidepressant subtype and improved neurobehavioral outcome by 51.8% (38.6%-64.9%) and increased neurogenesis by 2.2 SD (1.3-3.0). CONCLUSIONS: In line with current clinical data and despite some limitations, antidepressant treatments seem to improve infarct volume and neurobehavioral outcome in animal models of ischemic stroke.


Asunto(s)
Antidepresivos/farmacología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Recuperación de la Función/efectos de los fármacos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/patología , Animales , Humanos
18.
Value Health ; 17(2): 297-301, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24636390

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The specification of the utility function has received limited attention within the discrete choice experiment (DCE) literature. This lack of investigation is surprising given that evidence from the contingent valuation literature suggests that welfare estimates are sensitive to different specifications of the utility function. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of different specifications of the utility function on results within a DCE. METHODS: The DCE elicited the public's preferences for waiting time for hip and knee replacement and estimated willingness to wait (WTW). RESULTS: The results showed that the WTW for the different patient profiles varied considerably across the three different specifications of the utility function. Assuming a linear utility function led to much higher estimates of marginal rates of substitution (WTWs) than with nonlinear specifications. The goodness-of-fit measures indicated that nonlinear specifications were superior.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Modelos Teóricos , Prioridad del Paciente , Listas de Espera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Dinámicas no Lineales , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Qual Life Res ; 23(1): 363-71, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23743857

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Preference-weighted HRQoL (utility) ratings are increasingly used to guide clinical and resource allocation decisions, but their performance has not always been adequately explored. We sought to examine patterns of health utility ratings in community populations with depressive disorders and painful conditions. METHODS: We used two Canadian cross-sectional health surveys that obtained Comprehensive Health Status Measurement System/Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) ratings and identified people with painful conditions and major depression. We estimated the frequency of item endorsements and mean utility ratings in these groups. RESULTS: Interesting differences between health state ratings and diagnostic categories were noted. For example, 71% of those professionally diagnosed with migraine reported that they usually have "no pain." Despite this, utility ratings were lower in those respondents with depressive episodes and in those with painful conditions. Greater than additive reductions in HUI3 scores were noted in most instances where both depressive disorders and painful conditions were present. CONCLUSIONS: Health utility ratings confirm the clinical impression that painful conditions and depressive disorders magnify each other's impact. Despite weak alignment between the health state definitions incorporated into utility ratings and the diagnostic concepts examined, the HUI3 appeared to capture HRQoL decrements and negative synergies associated with the co-occurrence of depressive episodes and painful conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Indicadores de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Sistema de Vigilancia de Factor de Riesgo Conductual , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Quebec/epidemiología , Curva ROC , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 18(6): 423, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24760492

RESUMEN

Cancer pain is not a single entity but a complex pain state involving different pain syndromes, with inflammatory, neuropathic, compressive, and ischaemic mechanisms. Current therapeutic regimens are based largely on opioids, although opioid treatment can lead to many side effects. Studies using animal models of cancer pain are aimed at understanding cancer pain and developing novel therapies. The most frequently reported models are of bone cancer pain, predominantly modelling pain associated with tumour growth within bone marrow. Here we summarise recent findings from studies using animal models of cancer pain and discuss the methodological quality of these studies.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacología , Neoplasias Óseas/fisiopatología , Cannabinoides/farmacología , Dolor/etiología , Médula Espinal/fisiopatología , Animales , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Melanoma/complicaciones , Ratones , Neuroglía , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/fisiopatología , Médula Espinal/efectos de los fármacos , Médula Espinal/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA