Microbiota signature of oral chronic graft-versus-host disease 6+ years after transplantation.

Not available.

A Positive Psychology Intervention in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors (PATH): A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) survivors experience significant psychological distress and low levels of positive psychological well-being, which can undermine patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as quality of life (QoL). Hence, we conducted a pilot randomized clinical trial to assess the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a telephone-delivered positive psychology intervention (Positive Affect for the Transplantation of Hematopoietic stem cells intervention [PATH]) for improving well-being in HSCT survivors. METHODS: HSCT survivors who were 100 days post-HSCT for hematologic malignancy at an academic institution were randomly assigned to either PATH or usual care. PATH, delivered by a behavioral health expert, entailed 9 weekly phone sessions on gratitude, personal strengths, and meaning. We defined feasibility a priori as >60% of eligible participants enrolling in the study and >75% of PATH participants completing ≥6 of 9 sessions. At baseline and 9 and 18 weeks, patients self-reported gratitude, positive affect, life satisfaction, optimism, anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), QoL, physical function, and fatigue. We used repeated measures regression models and estimates of effect size (Cohen's d) to explore the preliminary effects of PATH on outcomes. RESULTS: We enrolled 68.6% (72/105) of eligible patients (mean age, 57 years; 50% female). Of those randomized to PATH, 91% completed all sessions and reported positive psychology exercises as easy to complete and subjectively useful. Compared with usual care, PATH participants reported greater improvements in gratitude (ß = 1.38; d = 0.32), anxiety (ß = -1.43; d = -0.40), and physical function (ß = 2.15; d = 0.23) at 9 weeks and gratitude (ß = 0.97; d = 0.22), positive affect (ß = 2.02; d = 0.27), life satisfaction (ß = 1.82; d = 0.24), optimism (ß = 2.70; d = 0.49), anxiety (ß = -1.62; d = -0.46), depression (ß = -1.04; d = -0.33), PTSD (ß = -2.50; d = -0.29), QoL (ß = 7.70; d = 0.41), physical function (ß = 5.21; d = 0.56), and fatigue (ß = -2.54; d = -0.33) at 18 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: PATH is feasible, with promising signals for improving psychological well-being, QoL, physical function, and fatigue in HSCT survivors. Future multisite trials that investigate PATH's efficacy are needed to establish its effects on PROs in this population.

Characterization of orofacial features in sclerodermatous chronic graft-versus-host disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). The sclerodermatous form of cGVHD can be particularly debilitating; however, orofacial sclerodermatous involvement remains poorly described. OBJECTIVE: To characterize orofacial features of sclerodermatous cGVHD in a single center cohort of patients who underwent alloHCT. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data were collected from electronic medical records and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: There were 39 patients who received alloHCT between 1993 and 2017 and developed orofacial sclerodermatous cGVHD. Concomitant cutaneous sclerodermatous cGVHD was common (n = 20, 51%). Orofacial sclerodermatous cGVHD features included fibrous bands of the buccal mucosa (n = 23, 59%), limited mouth opening (n = 19, 54%), perioral fibrosis (n = 8, 21%), and focal gingival recession (n = 4, 10%). Oral mucosal fibrosis was observed at the site of active or resolved chronic lichenoid inflammation in 30 patients, with all but two also presenting with a history of ulcerations. Management included jaw stretching exercises (n = 10; 6 stable/improved), surgery (n = 3; 2 improved), and intralesional corticosteroid injections (n = 2; 2 improved). CONCLUSIONS: Orofacial involvement with sclerodermatous cGVHD can present with multiple manifestations including fibrous banding, limited mouth opening, perioral fibrosis, and focal gingival recession. Surgical and non-surgical management strategies may improve clinical function and reduce morbidity.

Revisiting Timing and Decision Modeling for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Development of a Pipeline for Removing Allergy Labels in Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Penicillin allergy is reported by 10% to 20 % of patients, but when evaluated only 1% to 2% may have a true allergy. Patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have a high likelihood of requiring beta-lactam antibiotics due to increased infection risk, which can be limited by a penicillin allergy label. When a penicillin allergy is recorded, alternatives are needed, including more expensive broader-spectrum antibiotics, with increases in drug-resistant bacteria, longer hospital stays, higher expenditures, and increases in nosocomial infections, such as Clostridium difficile colitis. This group of patients already undergoes extensive pretreatment testing and would especially benefit from allergy delabeling. This study aimed to develop a self-sustaining, low-cost pipeline between an HSCT clinic and an allergy clinic to identify and successfully delabel low-risk patients who endorse an allergy to penicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, or ampicillin before admission to the hospital. We developed a survey to triage allergy risk, identified key stakeholders in building the pipeline, and underwent 4 plan, do, study, act (PDSA) cycles. Changes were made in each of the PDSA cycles to minimize cost and uncompensated provider time, as well as to increase patient retention throughout the pipeline by increasing appointment availability and decreasing reliance on patients to independently progress through the pathway. Of the 410 patients with planned HSCT who were screened over 11 months, 89 (21.7%) were listed as having a penicillin and/or beta lactam allergy. All but 1 (66 of 67; 98.5%) of the participants completed the survey accurately when confirmed by an allergist, and the survey was 100% accurate in predicting delabeling success in low-risk patients. Of eligible patients, 43.8% (n = 39) were successfully delabeled before their transplant date, and 97.4% of these (n = 38) have undergone HSCT to date. This pipeline is maintained by approximately 5 hours of work per week (1 hour of allergy physician time, 4 hours of nurse and/or clinical coordinator time), with no other direct costs. There is an estimated direct savings of at least $1914.93 per patient delabeled. We successfully designed and implemented a pipeline between the HSCT clinic and the allergy clinic as a quality improvement initiative to identify and address high rates of reported beta-lactam allergies. We identified and addressed patient-based factors, logistical, temporal, and financial barriers that impacted patient retention and sustainability. This model is expected to yield significant and sustained cost savings for the healthcare system as well as to improve patient outcomes, and this hypothesis is currently undergoing formal analysis. We anticipate that this model can be used to create a similar pipeline in other healthcare systems for HSCT recipients, as well as patients in other clinical settings, such as oncology and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Comparison of treatment response measures in cutaneous sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Cutaneous sclerosis, a highly morbid subtype of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD), demonstrates limited treatment response under current NIH Response Measures. We explored novel sclerosis-specific response measures using Chronic GVHD Consortium data. A training cohort included patients with cutaneous sclerosis from a randomized trial of imatinib vs. rituximab, and a Consortium observational study. The validation cohort was a different Consortium observational study. Clinician-reported measures (baseline, and baseline to 6-month change) were examined for association with 6-month clinician-reported response. Patient-reported measures (baseline and baseline to 6-month change) were studied for association with 6-month patient-reported response. A total of 347 subjects were included (training 183, validation 164). While multiple skin and joint measures were associated with clinician-reported response on univariate analysis, PROM total score, PROM total score change, and NIH 0-3 skin change were retained in the final multivariate model (AUC 0.83 training, 0.75 validation). Similarly, many patient-reported measures were associated, but final multivariate analysis retained the HAP AAS, SF36 vitality change, LSS skin, and LSS skin change in the model (AUC 0.86 training, 0.75 validation). We identified which sclerosis measures have greatest association with 6-month clinician- and patient-reported treatment response, a previously unstudied area. However, given the observed performance in the validation cohorts, we conclude that further work is needed. Novel response measures may be needed to optimally assess treatment response in cutaneous sclerosis.

Comparison of Older Related versus Younger Unrelated Donors for Older Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Analysis.

For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), HLA-matched related donors (MRDs) have traditionally been the preferred donor source. However, as the age of recipients increases, their sibling donors are aging as well. In this study, we investigated whether younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) might be a better donor source than similarly aged sibling donors for patients age >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 499 patients age 60 to 70 years with AML or MDS who underwent alloHCT from an older MRD (donor age ≥50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ≤35 years) between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. Of these, 360 patients (72%) received an MUD graft and 139 (28%) received an MRD graft. The median recipient age was 64 years in the MRD group and 66 years in the MUD group. With a median follow-up among survivors of 53 months (range, 9 to 147 months ), the 4-year progression-free survival was 40% in the MRD group and 41% in the MUD group (P = .79) and the 4-year overall survival was 50% and 44%, respectively (P = .15), with no between-group differences in nonrelapse mortality, relapse, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. In the MUD group, we also compared the effect of donor age 18 to 24 years and donor age 25 to 35 years and found no differences in outcomes between the groups. We conclude that outcomes are comparable between the use of older MRDs and use of younger MUDs for elderly patients with AML or MDS, that there is no donor age effect among younger MUDs, and that the use of either donor type is reasonable.

Study Protocol: Predicting the Quality of Response to Specific Treatments (PQRST) in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Despite significant progress in chronic GVHD therapies, challenges remain in understanding pleomorphic phenotypes and varying response to treatment. The goal of the Predicting the Quality of Response to Specific Treatments (PQRST) in chronic GVHD study is to identify predictors of treatment response. This report describing the study design seeks to raise awareness and invite collaborations with investigators who wish to access clinical data and research samples from this study. METHODS: This is a prospective, observational cohort study involving data collection from patients who are beginning first-, second-, or third-line systemic therapy for chronic GVHD with defined agents. Evaluable participants will have baseline assessments and research samples prior to starting the index therapy, and 1 month after starting treatment. Response assessments occur at 3 and 6 months after start of treatment, or if a new systemic therapy is started before 6 months. Target enrollment is approximately 200 patients at 8 institutions, with at least 6 months of follow up to determine response to index therapy. RESULTS: Enrollment started in July 2020 and was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic; as of 3/1/2024, 137 evaluable participants have been enrolled. DISCUSSION: The Chronic GVHD Consortium "PQRST" is a large longitudinal cohort study that aims to investigate predictors of treatment response by identifying biologically and clinically defined patient subgroups. We welcome investigators to collaborate in the use of these data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04431479.

Cost-Effectiveness of Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Older Patients With High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome: Analysis of BMT CTN 1102.

PURPOSE: BMT CTN 1102 was a phase III trial comparing reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (RIC alloHCT) to standard of care for persons with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We report results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside the clinical trial. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-four patients received HCT (n = 260) or standard of care (n = 124) according to availability of a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Cost-effectiveness was calculated from US commercial and Medicare perspectives over a 20-year time horizon. Health care utilization and costs were estimated using propensity score-matched cohorts of HCT recipients in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (age 50-64 years) and Medicare (age 65 years and older). EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) surveys of trial participants were used to derive health state utilities. RESULTS: Extrapolated 20-year overall survival for those age 50-64 years was 29% for HCT (n = 105) versus 13% for usual care (n = 44) and 31% for HCT (n = 155) versus 12% for non-HCT (n = 80) for those age 65 years and older. HCT was more effective (+2.36 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs] for age 50-64 years and +2.92 QALYs for age 65 years and older) and more costly (+$452,242 in US dollars (USD) for age 50-64 years and +$233,214 USD for age 65 years and older) than usual care, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $191,487 (USD)/QALY and $79,834 (USD)/QALY, respectively. For persons age 50-64 years, there was a 29% chance that HCT was cost-effective using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150K (USD)/QALY and 51% at a $200K (USD)/QALY. For persons age 65 years and older, the probability was 100% at a WTP >$150K (USD)/QALY. CONCLUSION: Among patients age 65 years and older with high-risk MDS, RIC HCT is a high-value strategy. For those age 50-64 years, HCT is a lower-value strategy but has similar cost-effectiveness to other therapies commonly used in oncology.

Active infection at the time of CD34+ selected stem cell boost is associated with treatment failure and poor survival.

BACKGROUND: The use of CD34+ selected stem cell boost (SCB) post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) has been increasing. Predictors of treatment failure following SCB, both in the context of poor graft function (PGF) or other settings, are not well-characterized. We report among the largest single center retrospective experiences of the use of SCB and evaluate potential predictors of response and outcomes. METHODS: 58 patients who underwent HCT between 2015 and 2022 and who received SCB were identified. The indication for SCB was predominantly PGF, defined as the presence of 2 or more cytopenias for at least two consecutive weeks beyond day +14 after alloHCT in the presence of ≤ 30% bone marrow cellularity and ≥ 90% donor myeloid chimerism in the absence of morphological disease. RESULTS: The median dose of infused CD34+ selected SCB products was 3.88 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 0.99-9.92). The median 2-year OS and NRM following SCB was 47% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 6-month grade III-IV acute and 2-year moderate-severe chronic GVHD following SCB were 3.4% and 12%, respectively. Overall response (CR + PR) was attained in 36/58 (62%) patients, and in 69% with PGF. On multivariable analysis, an active infection at the time of SCB was the greatest predictor of poor response and survival (p=0.013) following SCB. CONCLUSION: SCB can restore hematopoiesis in the majority of patients, particularly for those with poor graft function in whom there is no active infection at infusion.

Prophylactic maintenance with venetoclax/azacitidine after reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic transplant for high-risk MDS and AML.

ABSTRACT: We conducted a phase 1 trial assessing safety and efficacy of prophylactic maintenance therapy with venetoclax and azacitidine (Ven/Aza) for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after Ven and fludarabine/busulfan conditioning (Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT) with tacrolimus and methotrexate as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Among 27 patients who underwent Ven/FluBu2 allo-SCT (55.6% with prior Ven exposure, and 96% with positive molecular measurable residual disease), 22 received maintenance therapy with Aza 36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 5, and Ven 400 mg by mouth on days 1 to 14 per assigned dose schedule/level (42-day cycles × 8, or 28-day cycles × 12). During maintenance, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, which were transient and manageable. Infections were uncommon (n = 4, all grade 1-2). The 1-year and 2-year moderate/severe chronic GVHD rates were 4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3%-18%) and 22% (95% CI, 9%-40%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 25 months among survivors, the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Among the 22 patients who received Ven/Aza maintenance, the 2-year OS, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, and cumulative incidence of relapse rates were 67% (95% CI, 43%-83%), 59% (95% CI, 36%-76%), 0%, and 41% (95% CI, 20%-61%), respectively. Immune monitoring demonstrated no significant impact on T-cell expansion but identified reduced B-cell expansion compared with controls. This study demonstrates prophylactic Ven/Aza maintenance can be safely administered for patients with high-risk MDS/AML, but a randomized study is required to properly assess any potential benefit. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03613532.