Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurobiol Dis ; 174: 105877, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36162738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Systemic and neuroinflammatory processes play key roles in neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD). Physical trauma which induces considerable systemic inflammatory responses, represents an evident environmental factor in aging. However, little is known about the impact of physical trauma, on the immuno-pathophysiology of PD. Especially blunt chest trauma which is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate in the elderly population, can induce a strong pulmonary and systemic inflammatory reaction. Hence, we sought out to combine a well-established thoracic trauma mouse model with a well-established PD mouse model to characterize the influence of physical trauma to neurodegenerative processes in PD. METHODS: To study the influence of peripheral trauma in a PD mouse model we performed a highly standardized blunt thorax trauma in a well-established PD mouse model and determined the subsequent local and systemic response. RESULTS: We could show that blunt chest trauma leads to a systemic inflammatory response which is quantifiable with increased inflammatory markers in bronchoalveolar fluids (BALF) and plasma regardless of the presence of a PD phenotype. A difference of the local inflammatory response in the brain between the PD group and non-PD group could be detected, as well as an increase in the formation of oligomeric pathological alpha-Synuclein (asyn) suggesting an interplay between peripheral thoracic trauma and asyn pathology in PD. CONCLUSION: Taken together this study provides evidence that physical trauma is associated with increased asyn oligomerization in a PD mouse model underlining the relevance of PD pathogenesis under traumatic settings.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas no Penetrantes , Animales , Ratones , alfa-Sinucleína/metabolismo , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/patología , Traumatismos Torácicos/patología , Heridas no Penetrantes/patología
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38869511

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The operating room (OR) is a high-cost and high-revenue area in a hospital comprising extremely complex process steps to treat patients. The perioperative process quality can be optimized through an efficiency-oriented central OR management based on performance indices. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic with the corresponding OR restrictions, there was a significant nation- and worldwide decline in the performance, which may have a lasting impact. Therefore, we proposed the hypothesis that COVID-19 pandemic-related OR restrictions could reduce operative performance in the long term. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of perioperative processing times was conducted exemplarily at the University Hospital Ulm using a pre-post design, examining the corresponding second quarters of 2019 to 2022. In total, n = 18,489 operations with n = 314,313 individual time intervals were analyzed. The statistical analyses included the Kruskal-Wallis test adjusted for multiple testing, and the significance level was set at p < 0.01. RESULTS: The results revealed not only a significant decrease in the case volume by 31% (2020) and 23% (2021) during the COVID-19 crisis years, but also significant time delays in various process steps; e.g. the median patient's OR occupancy time (column time) rose from 65 min (2019) to 87 min (2020) and remained elevated (72 min in 2021 and 74 min in 2022, respectively). Even in 2022, beyond the pandemic, the net anaesthesia time was permanently enhanced by 9 min per case. Furthermore, both, the incision-to-closure time and surgeon attachment time were each significantly prolonged by 7 additional minutes, and the time from the end of anaesthesia to the release of the next patient was extended by 4 min. Selected standardized index operations showed only a trend towards these changes, even with a decrease in the incision-to-closure time over time. CONCLUSION: Overall, long-term changes were found in essential perioperative process times even after retraction of the COVID-19 restrictions, indicating some processual "slow down" after the Covid-19-induced "shut down". Further analyses are needed to determine the appropriate targeted control measures to improve processing times and increase the process quality.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA