Minimal unilateral peak nasal inspiratory flow correlates with patient reported nasal obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Nasal septoplasty is a common surgical procedure, but a significant number of patients report equal, or some even worsened, symptom load postoperatively. Rhinologists struggle to find objective tests that adequately reflects disease burden. This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between the PNIF measurement of the most obstructed side with patient reported outcomes. METHODS: Bilateral and unilateral PNIF measurements were performed before and after topical decongestion in 528 patients scheduled for surgery due to nasal obstruction. Subjective outcomes were measured using Nasal Obstruction VAS and SNOT-22 with subdomains. Correlations between subjective and objective measurements were calculated and further explored using multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Significant negative correlations between PNIF and patient reported outcomes were found. Both bilateral and minimal unilateral PNIF correlations with NO-VAS were equal and stronger than correlations with SNOT-22 including subdomains concerning problems with nasal obstruction. Minimal unilateral PNIF did not show statistically significant gender difference. Topical decongestion decreased statistical correlations. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal unilateral PNIF shows a statistically significant but weak negative correlation with preoperative patient reported nasal obstruction, and values do not differ between genders. Clinical evaluation of patients presenting complaints of nasal obstruction could be supported by minimal unilateral PNIF.

One-year results of the SCANDIV randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic lavage versus primary resection for acute perforated diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized trials demonstrated that laparoscopic lavage compared with resection for Hinchey III perforated diverticulitis was associated with similar mortality, less stoma formation but a higher rate of early reintervention. The aim of this study was to compare 1-year outcomes in patients who participated in the randomized Scandinavian Diverticulitis (SCANDIV) trial. METHODS: Between February 2010 and June 2014, patients from 21 hospitals in Norway and Sweden presenting with suspected perforated diverticulitis were enrolled in a multicentre RCT comparing laparoscopic lavage and sigmoid resection. All patients with perforated diverticulitis confirmed during surgery were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis of 1-year results. RESULTS: Of 199 enrolled patients, 101 were assigned randomly to laparoscopic lavage and 98 to colonic resection. Perforated diverticulitis was confirmed at the time of surgery in 89 and 83 patients respectively. Within 1 year after surgery, neither severe complications (34 versus 27 per cent; P = 0·323) nor disease-related mortality (12 versus 11 per cent) differed significantly between the lavage and surgery groups. Among the 144 patients with purulent peritonitis, the rate of severe complications (27 per cent (20 of 74) versus 21 per cent (15 of 70) respectively; P = 0·445) and disease-related mortality (8 versus 9 per cent) were similar. Laparoscopic lavage was associated with more deep surgical-site infections (32 versus 13 per cent; P = 0·006) but fewer superficial surgical-site infections (1 versus 17 per cent; P = 0·001). More patients in the lavage group underwent unplanned reoperations (27 versus 10 per cent; P = 0·010). Including stoma reversals, a similar proportion of patients required a secondary operation (28 versus 29 per cent). The stoma rate at 1 year was lower in the lavage group (14 versus 42 per cent in the resection group; P < 0·001); however, the Cleveland Global Quality of Life score did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: The advantages of laparoscopic lavage should be weighed against the risk of secondary intervention (if sepsis is unresolved). Assessment to exclude malignancy (although uncommon) is advised. Registration number: NCT01047462 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).