True insulin and intact proinsulin levels in acromegalic patients.

To determine whether proinsulin (PI) contributes significantly to the immunoreactive insulin (IRI) concentrations in acromegalics, we measure PI, "true insulin" and IRI in a group of acromegalics compared with a control group. Serum PI was determined by the immunofluorimetric assay (IFMA). Insulin was also determined by an IFMA that measures true insulin and by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). We performed an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in a total group of 46 subjects: 10 controls with normal OGTT and body mass index < 25 kg/m2 (control group I), 10 controls with normal OGTT and body mass index > 25 kg/m2 (control group II), 15 patients with active acromegaly and normal OGTT and 11 patients with active acromegaly and IGT. Plasma glucose, serum GH, insulin and proinsulin were measured in all OGTT samples. Basal levels of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) were measured in acromegalics. Mean body mass index in acromegalics with normal and impaired glucose tolerance were significantly higher compared with control group I and similar when compared with control group II. Proinsulin increased during OGTT in acromegalics with impaired glucose tolerance compared to control group I, and only fasting proinsulin compared to control group II. In normal OGTT acromegalics, only fasting proinsulin was increased. The RIA insulin during OGTT was significantly higher for both acromegalic groups compared to control group I and only at fasting when compared with control group II. This difference was not evident when insulin was measured by IFMA. These results suggest that in acromegalics, hyperinsulinism measured by RIA was at least in part due to hyperproinsulinism.

Proinsulin and insulin levels according to glucose tolerance among Japanese-Brazilians, aged 40-79 years. Japanese-Brazilian Diabetes Study Group.

This study of the Japanese-Brazilians living in Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil, aimed at determining the prevalence of DM in the first (Issei) and second (Nisei) generations, according to WHO criteria. Insulin and proinsulin were determined by new immunofluorimetric assays (IMFA), that measure true insulin and intact proinsulin, at fasting and 2 h after glucose load. The data showed a very scattered distribution, so only medians are shown and no statistical testing applied. There was a tendency for higher proinsulin levels in the diabetic groups. The highest fasting proinsulin levels were seen in the diabetic patients, either obese or non-obese. The post-load insulin levels were higher in diabetic and IGT individuals, compared to normals. Both generations showed a distinct behaviour for the obese and non-obese groups, and no major differences were observed between generations. This population seems to be sensitive to environmental changes, since the obese groups showed the higher levels of proinsulin and insulin. In the evaluation of the role of the environmental factors in the pathogenesis of DM, proinsulin and insulin levels could act as early markers of pancreatic dysfunctions.

Specific insulin and proinsulin in normal glucose tolerant first-degree relatives of NIDDM patients.

In order to identify early abnormalities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) we determined insulin (using an assay that does not cross-react with proinsulin) and proinsulin concentrations. The proinsulin/insulin ratio was used as an indicator of abnormal beta-cell function. The ratio of the first 30-min increase in insulin to glucose concentrations following the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; I30-0/G30-0) was taken as an indicator of insulin secretion. Insulin resistance (R) was evaluated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method. True insulin and proinsulin were measured during a 75-g OGTT in 35 individuals: 20 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and without diabetes among their first-degree relatives (FDR) served as controls, and 15 with NGT who were FDR of patients with NIDDM. The FDR group presented higher insulin (414 pmol/l vs 195 pmol/l; P = 0.04) and proinsulin levels (19.6 pmol/l vs 12.3 pmol/l; P = 0.03) post-glucose load than the control group. When these groups were stratified according to BMI, the obese FDR (N = 8) showed higher fasting and post-glucose insulin levels than the obese NGT (N = 9) (fasting: 64.8 pmol/l vs 7.8 pmol/l: P = 0.04, and 60 min post-glucose: 480.6 pmol/l vs 192 pmol/l: P = 0.01). Also, values for HOMA (R) were higher in the obese FDR compared to obese NGT (2.53 vs 0.30; P = 0.075). These results show that FDR of NIDDM patients have true hyperinsulinemia (which is not a consequence of cross-reactivity with proinsulin) and hyperproinsulinemia and no dysfunction of a qualitative nature in beta-cells.

A specific and highly sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for human proinsulin.

We describe a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay specific for human proinsulin using a combination of two high-affinity monoclonal antibodies, one against insulin and the other specific for intact proinsulin and for split 65-66 and des 64-65 proinsulin forms. The assay employs only 200 microl of serum, with a detection limit of 0.1 pmol/l. The intra-assay variation coefficient was less than 3% between 3 and 1000 pmol/l. There was 0% cross-reaction with insulin, C-peptide, split 32-33 and des 31-32 proinsulin. Serum concentration of proinsulin was analyzed in 50 subjects during an oral glucose tolerance test (10 non-obese control, 10 obese controls, 10 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, 10 patients with type II diabetes mellitus (DM) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) < 140 mg/dl, and 10 patients with type II DM and FBG > 150 mg/dl). Mean fasting serum proinsulin levels measured by this assay in non-obese controls (0.84 - 0.90 pmol/l; 0.1-2.4 pmol/l) were lower than the results reported by other investigators. There was an increase of proinsulin related to obesity and increased glucose levels, suggesting that proinsulin levels increase with insulin resistance.

Comparison of the determination of insulin by a monoclonal antibody-based immunofluorometric assay and by radioimmunoassay.

This paper describes an immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) for insulin and compares it with the classical radioimmunoassay (RIA). Monoclonal antibodies against insulin were produced and used to develop the IFMA. One, immobilized on microtiter plates, was used for capture, the other, labelled with Europium, was used as tracer antibody. The IFMA presents sensitivity to an amount of insulin of 3 pmol/l and acceptable values for intra- and interassay error. The IFMA presented superimposable curves for human insulin, Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin and des-Lys64,Arg65, and no cross-reactivity with human proinsulin, Arg32/Glu33-split and des-Arg31,Arg32. The RIA showed 100% cross-reactivity with human proinsulin, 90% with Arg32/Glu33-split, 193% with Arg65/Gly66-split, 340% with des-Arg31,Arg32 and 170% with des-Lys64,Arg65. The assays were used to measure insulin in 300 serum samples from 50 subjects submitted to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Twenty were normal, 10 had impaired glucose tolerance and 20 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The mean value (+/- SEM) obtained by IFMA was 166.7 +/- 12.1 pmol/l and the mean value obtained by RIA was 339.6 +/- 18.6, with a correlation of r = 0.80 (P < 0.01). Comparison of basal insulin levels of the different groups of individuals using IFMA or RIA led to the same conclusions. The area under the curve showed statistically significant differences only for the comparison between normal lean subjects and individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, when measured by RIA. Our data stress the importance of methodology definition when comparing insulin results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Specific insulin and proinsulin in normal glucose tolerant first-degree relatives of NIDDM patients

In order to identify early abnormalities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) we determined insulin (using an assay that does not cross-react with proinsulin) and proinsulin concentrations. The proinsulin/insulin ratio was used as an indicator of abnormal ß-cell function. The ratio of the first 30-min increase in insulin to glucose concentrations following the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; I30-0/G30-0) was taken as an indicator of insulin secretion. Insulin resistance (R) was evaluated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) method. True insulin and proinsulin were measured during a 75-g OGTT in 35 individuals: 20 with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and without diabetes among their first-degree relatives (FDR) served as controls, and 15 with NGT who were FDR of patients with NIDDM. The FDR group presented higher insulin (414 pmol/l vs 195 pmol/l; P = 0.04) and proinsulin levels (19.6 pmol/l vs 12.3 pmol/l; P = 0.03) post-glucose load than the control group. When these groups were stratified according to BMI, the obese FDR (N = 8) showed higher fasting and post-glucose insulin levels than the obese NGT (N = 9) (fasting: 64.8 pmol/l vs 7.8 pmol/l; P = 0.04, and 60 min post-glucose: 480.6 pmol/l vs 192 pmol/l; P = 0.01). Also, values for HOMA (R) were higher in the obese FDR compared to obese NGT (2.53 vs 0.30; P = 0.075). These results show that FDR of NIDDM patients have true hyperinsulinemia (which is not a consequence of cross-reactivity with proinsulin) and hyperproinsulinemia and no dysfunction of a qualitative nature in ß-cells

A specific and highly sensitive time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for human proinsulin

We describe a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay specific for human proinsulin using a combination of two high-affinity monoclonal antibodies, one against insulin and the other specific for intact proinsulin and for split 65-66 and des 64-65 proinsulin forms. The assay employs only 200 micro liters of serum, with a detection limit of 0.1 pmol/l. The intra-assay variation coefficient was less than 3 percent between 3 and 1000 pmol/l. There was 0 percent cross-reaction with insulin, C-peptide, split 32-33 and des 31-32 proinsulin. Serum concentration of proinsulin was analyzed in 50 subjects during an oral glucose tolerance test (10 non-obese controls, 10 obese controls, 10 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, 10 patients with type II diabetes meIlitus (DM) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) <140 mg/dl, and 10 patients with type II DM and FBG >150 mg/dl). Mean fasting serum proinsulin levels measured by this assay in non-obese controls (0.84 +/-0.90 pmol/l; 0.1-2.4 pmol/l) were lower than the results reported by her investigators. There was an increase of proinsulin related to obesity and increased glucose levels, suggesting that proinsulin levels increase with insulin resistance.

Comparison of the determination of insulin by a monoclonal antibody-based immunofluorometric assay and by radioimmunoassay

This paper describes an immunofluorometric assay (IFMA) for insulin and compares it with the classical radioimmunoassay (RIA). Monoclonal antibodies against insulin were produced and used to develop the IFMA. One, immobilized on microtiter plates, was used for capture, the other, labelled with Europium, was used as tracer antibody. The IFMA presentes sensitivity to an amount of insulin of 3 pmol/1 and acceptable valueus for intra- and interassay error. The IFMA presented superimposable curves for human insulin, Arg65/Gly66-split proinsulin and des-Lys64, Arg65, and no cross-reactivity with human proinsulin, Arg32/Glu33 -split and des-Arg31, Arg32. The RIA showed 100 percent cross-reactivity with human proinsulin, 90 pecent with des-Arg31, Arg32 and 170 percent with des-Lys64, Arg65. The assay were used to measure insulin in 300 serum samples from 50 subjects submitted to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Twenty were normal, 10 had impaired glucose tolerance and 20 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The mean value (ñ SEM) obtained bu IFMA was 166.7 ñ 12.1 pmol/1 and the mean value obtained by RIA was 339.6 ñ 18.6, with a correlacion of r = 0.80 (P0.01). Comparison of basal insulin levels of the different groups of individuals using IFMA or RIA led to the same conclusions. The area under curve showed statistically significant differences only for the comparison between normal lean subjects and individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, when measured by RIA...(au)