RESUMEN
Visual review of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) is often an essential component for defining the zone of resection for epilepsy surgery. Unsupervised approaches using machine and deep learning are being employed to identify seizure onset zones (SOZs). This prompts a more comprehensive understanding of the reliability of visual review as a reference standard. We sought to summarize existing evidence on the reliability of visual review of iEEG in defining the SOZ for patients undergoing surgical workup and understand its implications for algorithm accuracy for SOZ prediction. We performed a systematic literature review on the reliability of determining the SOZ by visual inspection of iEEG in accordance with best practices. Searches included MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science on May 8, 2022. We included studies with a quantitative reliability assessment within or between observers. Risk of bias assessment was performed with QUADAS-2. A model was developed to estimate the effect of Cohen kappa on the maximum possible accuracy for any algorithm detecting the SOZ. Two thousand three hundred thirty-eight articles were identified and evaluated, of which one met inclusion criteria. This study assessed reliability between two reviewers for 10 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and found a kappa of .80. These limited data were used to model the maximum accuracy of automated methods. For a hypothetical algorithm that is 100% accurate to the ground truth, the maximum accuracy modeled with a Cohen kappa of .8 ranged from .60 to .85 (F-2). The reliability of reviewing iEEG to localize the SOZ has been evaluated only in a small sample of patients with methodologic limitations. The ability of any algorithm to estimate the SOZ is notably limited by the reliability of iEEG interpretation. We acknowledge practical limitations of rigorous reliability analysis, and we propose design characteristics and study questions to further investigate reliability.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal , Convulsiones , Humanos , Convulsiones/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/cirugía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Electrocorticografía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine if gender, generation, or personality traits influence resident perception of their operative role. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over a 4-wk period, daily surveys were sent to residents and staff to assess the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) role of residents on operative cases. Personality was assessed on completion of the survey period using the big five inventory (BFI). RESULTS: In 184 paired responses, resident perception of their operative role and staff reported resident role coincided in 82.1% surveys. In instances when resident perception differed from staff assessment, neither gender nor generation correlated with discrepancy between resident and staff assessment. High BFI agreeableness of staff was associated with more disparity, and high BFI neuroticism scores of staff translated to less disparity between resident-perceived and staff-assessed operative roles (odds ratio 2.63, P = 0.003 and odds ratio 0.44, P = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates agreement between resident and staff reports of ACGME resident operative role in most cases; however, staff personality traits influenced resident's perception of their operative role. Perceived underparticipation in operative cases may influence a resident's experience during training, which may impact their reporting of operative experience to the ACGME.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/educación , Internado y Residencia , Personalidad , Acreditación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepción , Caracteres SexualesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) occurs in about 30â¯% of patients with epilepsy, and the treatment options available to them have evolved over time. The classic treatment for medial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) is anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), but an initiative to find less invasive options has resulted in treatments such as neuromodulation, ablative procedures, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). SRS has been an appealing non-invasive option and has developed an increasing presence in the literature over the last few decades. This article provides an overview of SRS for MRE with two example cases, and we discuss the optimal technique as well as the advantages, alternatives, and risks of this therapeutic option. CASES: We present two example cases of patients with MRE, who were poor candidates for invasive surgical treatment options and underwent SRS. The first case is a 65-year-old female with multiple medical comorbidities, whose seizure focus was localized to the left temporal lobe, and the second case is a 19-year-old male with Protein C deficiency and medial temporal lobe sclerosis. Both patients underwent SRS to targets within the medial temporal lobe, and both achieve significant improvements in seizure frequency and severity. DISCUSSION: SRS has generally been shown to be inferior to ATL for seizure reduction in medically refractory mTLE. However, there are patients with epilepsy for which SRS can be considered, such as patients with medical comorbidities that make surgery high risk, patients with epileptogenic foci in eloquent cortex, patients who have failed to respond to surgical management, patients who choose not to undergo surgery, and patients with geographic constraints to epilepsy centers. Patients and their physicians should be aware that SRS is not risk-free. Patients should be counseled on the latency period and monitored for risks such as delayed cerebral edema, visual field deficits, and radiation necrosis.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Refractaria , Radiocirugia , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Masculino , Epilepsia Refractaria/cirugía , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Epilepsia del Lóbulo Temporal/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Neurosurgery at Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital in Temple, Texas began as a division in the Department of Surgery many decades ago. The hospital has long served as the flagship tertiary referral center for the Baylor Scott & White healthcare system, which merged in 2013 with Baylor University Medical Center, a hospital system based in Dallas. It is now the largest non-profit hospital system as well as the most awarded hospital system by the US News and World Report within the state of Texas. The Department of Neurosurgery was established at Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital in the 2006-2007 academic year. Between then and 2014, four neurosurgeons served as department chair or interim chair: Dr. Robert Buchanan, Dr. Gerhard Friehs, Dr. Ibrahim El Nihum, and Dr. David Garrett Jr. In 2014, Dr. Jason Huang was appointed chairman after a national search and established the neurosurgery residency program in 2015. The department has undergone tremendous growth under the leadership of Dr. Huang, and the residency program is a priority of the department. Surgical excellence is honed at primarily three campuses: Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital, Baylor Scott & White McLane Children's Medical Center, and Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest. In this editorial, we provide a brief history of the institution, a recent history of the neurosurgical presence at Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital in Temple, Texas, and briefly describe the program's future directions under the continued leadership of Dr. Jason Huang.
RESUMEN
Spinal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SSAH) is a rare condition that can cause spinal cord or nerve root compression and permanent neurologic damage. The reported etiologies include trauma, vascular malformations or aneurysms, coagulopathies, neoplasms, autoimmune disease, and spontaneous hemorrhage. If there is evidence of neurologic deterioration, it is commonly managed as a surgical emergency, but cases of conservative management have also been reported. In this case series, we present three patients who suffered from SSAH. The first was a spontaneous cervical SSAH that occurred following cardiac catheterization, the second was a spontaneous thoracolumbar SSAH in a patient with a known history of coagulopathy, and the third was a thoracolumbar SSAH that was caused by a dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF). All three patients exhibited neurologic deficits and thus underwent emergent decompression and hematoma evacuation. The patient with the dAVF also required open ligation of the fistula. Following surgical intervention, all three patients regained at least partial neurologic function, but one patient developed symptomatic arachnoid cysts that required further intervention. The presented case series highlights the importance and time-sensitivity of surgical decompression in patients experiencing neurologic deficits from SSAH. These cases underscore the urgency of timely neurosurgical intervention to mitigate neurologic impairment and add insights to the existing literature on this rare condition.
RESUMEN
There are multiple risk factors associated with spontaneous subdural hematoma (SDH), including substance abuse, hypertension, vascular abnormalities, and neoplasms. The illicit drugs typically cited as risk factors for spontaneous SDH are alcohol and cocaine. We report a rare case of spontaneous, significant SDH associated exclusively with methamphetamine. Although it is unclear whether the underlying pathophysiology involves vasculitis, sympathomimetic-induced hypertension, or a combination of both, this case further illustrates the risks of methamphetamine abuse.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In addition to the deleterious effects Covid-19 has on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, COVID-19 can also result in damage to the nervous system. This review aims to explore current literature on the association between COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of PubMed for literature published on COVID-19 and ICH. Ninety-four of 295 screened papers met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: The literature addressed incidence and mortality of ICH associated with Covid-19. It also revealed cases of COVID-19 patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, subdural hematomas, and hemorrhage secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis and ischemic stroke. ICH during COVID-19 infections was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for ICH appeared to be therapeutic anticoagulation, ECMO, and mechanical ventilation. Outcomes varied widely, depending on the severity of COVID-19 infection and neurologic injury. CONCLUSION: Although treatment for severe Covid-19 infections is often aimed at addressing acute respiratory distress syndrome, vasculopathy, and coagulopathy, neurologic injury can also occur. Evidence-based treatments that improve COVID-19 mortality may also increase risk for developing ICH. Providers should be aware of potential neurologic sequelae of COVID-19, diagnostic methods to rule out other causes of ICH, and treatment regimens.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Operative experience during residency lays the foundation for independent practice and additional specialty training following general surgery residency. The aim of this study was to examine operative experience of general surgery residents and detail the results of an intervention aimed at improving resident record keeping in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system to better reflect their experience. METHODS: Residents were asked to characterize variances in recorded operative experience identified through an audit of operative logs. Based on the results of the audit, an intervention was designed to prompt timely record keeping by residents. The intervention included education and discussion of survey audit results, weekly presentation of graphs detailing operative experience, and possible missed cases in the ACGME logs and addition of a first assistant column in morbidity and mortality (M&M) logs. RESULTS: The audit of case logs identified discrepancies in 24.2% of the 636 cases examined. Chief residents were significantly more accurate (95.9%) in recording operative experience in ACGME case logs, whereas 50.3% of junior resident case logs contained variances. Residents characterized discrepancies as "forgot to log" (9.6%), "staff did the case" (5.2%), "another resident did more of the case" (3.6%), "other" (3.6%), a "more advanced resident was present for the case" (1.6%), "not present for case" (0.6%), and "left for consult" (0.3%). Over the 4-week intervention period, residents logged between 72.7% and 94.0% of cases. A month following the intervention period, we observed a 13.3% increase in recorded cases compared with the intervention period. Review of first assistant case logging following inclusion of a "first assistant" column in M&M logs demonstrated a 70.5% increase in first assistant cases logged into the ACGME system compared with the same time period a year ago. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we found that weekly displays of cases improved resident record keeping in the ACGME case log system, especially by junior residents. We believe that the addition of first assistant column on M&M lists, periodic audits reviewed at conferences, and semiannual evaluations will help junior residents more accurately report their experience during training.