RESUMEN
Bladder cancer is one of the most common cancers of the urinary tract and the 10th most common cancer worldwide according to the World Health Organization (WHO), with a higher incidence in men than in women. Bladder cancer rarely presents with a clinical picture of bone marrow infiltration which may result in thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). TMA is a syndrome triggered by a wide variety of conditions, some of which are associated with cancer. It is a rare condition in patients with solid tumors, the incidence of which is increasing as awareness of this complication improves. Tumor-induced TMA may exhibit a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Here we review the case of a 57-year-old male suffering from transitional bladder cancer with bone marrow infiltration that led to TMA Syndrome. We were able to diagnose the cause and treat the patient in a manner that achieved complete remission of symptoms.
RESUMEN
Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis (XGPN) is a rare, serious, and chronic inflammatory disorder of the kidney characterized by a destructive process that invades the renal parenchyma, which is most commonly associated with urinary tract obstruction and infection. It affects women more often than men. Case presentation: Herein, the authors report a case of a 48-year-old male presented to their hospital with complaints of malaise, fever, chills, left flank pain, and a history of a staghorn calculus in the renal pelvis, which was removed by surgery 7 years ago. Ultrasonography and computed tomography scans showed an enlarged left kidney with cystic formation and pelvicalyceal system dilation with the presence of multiple large stones. The renogram showed a dysfunctioning left kidney. An open radical left nephrectomy was performed. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was suspected in both the gross and microscopic examinations. The immunohistochemistry was the decisive factor in confirming the diagnosis of XGPN. Clinical discussion: Preoperative and postoperative diagnosis of XGPN can sometimes be difficult due to diverse differential diagnoses. The misinterpretation of 'foam cells' as 'clear cells' consistent with RCC is the most important diagnostic challenge for pathologists. Conclusion: The unusual findings of this case report suggest a careful evaluation of patients with a renal cystic mass, that can be misdiagnosed as a RCC. A combined computed tomography scan evaluation together with histopathology and immunohistochemistry are essential for a correct diagnosis of this rare renal entity.