Flexible, scalable, and efficient targeted resequencing on a benchtop sequencer for variant detection in clinical practice.

The release of benchtop next-generation sequencing (NGS) instruments has paved the way to implement the technology in clinical setting. The need for flexible, qualitative, and cost-efficient workflows is high. We used singleplex-PCR for highly efficient target enrichment, allowing us to reach the quality standards set in Sanger sequencing-based diagnostics. For the library preparation, a modified NexteraXT protocol was used, followed by sequencing on a MiSeq instrument. With an innovative pooling strategy, high flexibility, scalability, and cost-efficiency were obtained, independent of the availability of commercial kits. The approach was validated for ∼250 genes associated with monogenic disorders. An overall sensitivity (>99%) similar to Sanger sequencing was observed in combination with a positive predictive value of >98%. The distribution of coverage was highly uniform, guaranteeing a minimal number of gaps to be filled with alternative methods. ISO15189-accreditation was obtained for the workflow. A major asset of the singleplex PCR-based enrichment is that new targets can be easily implemented. Diagnostic laboratories have validated assays available ensuring that the proposed workflow can easily be adopted. Although our platform was optimized for constitutional variant detection of monogenic disease genes, it is now also used as a model for somatic mutation detection in acquired diseases.

Identity-by-descent-guided mutation analysis and exome sequencing in consanguineous families reveals unusual clinical and molecular findings in retinal dystrophy.

PURPOSE: Autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, which hampers molecular diagnosis. We evaluated identity-by-descent-guided Sanger sequencing or whole-exome sequencing in 26 families with nonsyndromic (19) or syndromic (7) autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies to identify disease-causing mutations. METHODS: Patients underwent genome-wide identity-by-descent mapping followed by Sanger sequencing (16) or whole-exome sequencing (10). Whole-exome sequencing data were filtered against identity-by-descent regions and known retinal dystrophy genes. The medical history was reviewed in mutation-positive families. RESULTS: We identified mutations in 14 known retinal dystrophy genes in 20/26 (77%) families: ABCA4, CERKL, CLN3, CNNM4, C2orf71, IQCB1, LRAT, MERTK, NMNAT1, PCDH15, PDE6B, RDH12, RPGRIP1, and USH2A. Whole-exome sequencing in single individuals revealed mutations in either the largest or smaller identity-by-descent regions, and a compound heterozygous genotype in NMNAT1. Moreover, a novel deletion was found in PCDH15. In addition, we identified mutations in CLN3, CNNM4, and IQCB1 in patients initially diagnosed with nonsyndromic retinal dystrophies. CONCLUSION: Our study emphasized that identity-by-descent-guided mutation analysis and/or whole-exome sequencing are powerful tools for the molecular diagnosis of retinal dystrophy. Our approach uncovered unusual molecular findings and unmasked syndromic retinal dystrophies, guiding future medical management. Finally, elucidating ABCA4, LRAT, and MERTK mutations offers potential gene-specific therapeutic perspectives.