Longitudinal evaluation of major salivary gland functioning in Sjögren's disease patients in a prospective standard-of-care cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in major salivary gland functioning over time using salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS), salivary flow measurements (sialometry), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients diagnosed with primary Sjögren's disease (SjD). METHODS: Consecutive outpatients from the ongoing prospective REgistry of Sjögren Syndrome LongiTudinal (RESULT) cohort, all fulfilling the ACR-EULAR classification criteria for SjD, were included. SGUS images assessed with the Hocevar and OMERACT scoring system, unstimulated and stimulated whole saliva (UWS/SWS), unstimulated and stimulated submandibular/sublingual saliva (uSMSLS/sSMSLS) and parotid saliva, EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) general dryness, oral dryness, and Xerostomia Inventory were assessed at baseline (BL), 2-year (Y2) and 5-year (Y5) follow-up. RESULTS: In total, BL and Y2 data were available for 253 patients and 75 patients had already reached Y5. At group level, SGUS Hocevar (i.e., mean±SD: 22±10 at BL, 22±10 at Y2 and 23±10 at Y5), OMERACT scores, UWS, SWS and PROMs remained stable over time (all p>0.05). Slightly decreased uSMSLS (p=0.025) and sSMSLS (p=0.004) were observed at Y5. At individual patient level, a similar proportion showed an increase or decrease of ≥25% for Hocevar, UWS and SWS. At baseline, poor associations were observed between SGUS and PROMs and fair associations between sialometry and PROMs. Over time, changes in objective assessments did not correlate with changes in PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, major salivary gland functioning assessed with SGUS, sialometry and PROMs did not change significantly up to 5 years of follow-up in a standard-of-care cohort of SjD patients from daily clinical practice.

Added value of the salivary gland ultrasonography OMERACT score in the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's disease.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether addition of the salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) OMERACT score influences the performance of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Sjögren's disease (SjD) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Patients visiting the Sjögren Expertise centre in the University Medical Center Groningen for a diagnostic trajectory because of a suspicion of SjD were included. SGUS was performed of both parotid and submandibular glands. ROC analysis was used to assess the accuracy to predict clinical diagnosis of SjD with the SGUS OMERACT score, and by adding the SGUS OMERACT score to the ACR/EULAR criteria. Furthermore, the performance of the SGUS OMERACT and total SGUS Hocevar score were compared. RESULTS: In total, 419 consecutive patients were included. ROC analysis of the highest SGUS OMERACT score out of all four salivary glands (range 0-3) showed good accuracy (AUC 0.849) to predict clinical diagnosis of SjD, comparable to the accuracy of the total SGUS OMERACT score (range 0-12; AUC 0.868) and total Hocevar score (range 0-48; AUC 0.864). When incorporating the highest SGUS OMERACT score (cut-off score of ≥2) as additional item in the ACR/EULAR criteria, accuracy remained excellent (AUC 0.974), and clinical diagnosis could be predicted with a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 86.5%. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for predicting the clinical diagnosis of SjD remained excellent after incorporating the SGUS OMERACT score and extends the diagnostic options in patients suspected with SjD.

Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren's Syndrome (CRESS): development and validation of a novel outcome measure.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in primary Sjögren's syndrome used the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) as their primary endpoint. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of primary Sjögren's syndrome, it might be more appropriate to also assess other clinically relevant disease features. We aimed to develop a novel composite endpoint for assessing treatment efficacy in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: the Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjögren's Syndrome (CRESS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert team selected clinically relevant items and candidate measurements for inclusion in the composite score. For each measurement, cutoff points for response to treatment were chosen based on expert opinion, previously published data on minimal clinically important improvements, and trial data, primarily the week-24 data of the single-centre ASAP-III trial of abatacept versus placebo. CRESS was validated using data from three independent RCTs: one trial of rituximab (TRACTISS), one of abatacept (multinational trial), and one of tocilizumab (ETAP). We calculated the number and percentage of patients who were responders in the separate CRESS items, and the percentage of responders based on the total CRESS at the primary endpoint visits (week 48 for TRACTISS, week 24 for the other two trials). Patients with fewer than three items available for evaluating CRESS response were imputed as non-responders. FINDINGS: Based on expert opinion, five complementary items were selected to assess response: (1) systemic disease activity by Clinical ESSDAI (less than 5 points); (2) patient-reported symptoms by EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index, assessed by a decrease of at least 1 point or at least 15% from baseline; (3) tear gland item by Schirmer's test and ocular staining score, assessed by an increase of at least 5 mm or decrease of at least 2 points, respectively, in patients with abnormal Schirmer's test or ocular staining score findings at baseline, or, in patients with normal baseline values, assessed by no change to abnormal for both; (4) salivary gland item, assessed by unstimulated whole saliva secretion (increase of at least 25%) and salivary gland ultrasonography (decrease of at least 25%); and (5) serology, assessed by rheumatoid factor (decrease of at least 25%) and IgG (decrease of at least 10%). Total CRESS response is defined as response on at least three of five items. Post-hoc assessment of phase 3 trial data showed that CRESS response rates at the primary endpoint visits were 60% (24 of 40) for abatacept versus 18% (seven of 39) for placebo (p<0·0001) in ASAP-III, 49% (33 of 67) for rituximab versus 30% (20 of 66) for placebo (p=0·026) in the TRACTISS trial, 45% (41 of 92) for abatacept versus 32% (30 of 95) for placebo (p=0·067) in the multinational abatacept trial, and 18% (10 of 55) for tocilizumab versus 24% (13 of 55) for placebo (p=0·48) in the ETAP trial. INTERPRETATION: The CRESS is a feasible, well-balanced, composite endpoint for use in trials of primary Sjögren's syndrome. As a next step, the CRESS will require validation in a prospective RCT. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATION: For the Dutch translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.