RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: For the brief systemic therapy (BST), the evaluation of the patient's position towards the care is a prerequisite to psychotherapy. Three positions of the patient are described. The "tourist's" position: the patient claims to have no problem and doesn't suffer. Someone asks him to make an appointment, sometimes with threats. The "complaint's" position: the patient claims to suffer, but attributes the responsibility of this suffering to others. These two positions are not good for beginning a therapy. The "customer's" position differs from both previous positions. The "customer" considers that he has a psychological problem which depends on him and he is motivated in the resolution of it. In theory, the "customer" is more motivated and the therapeutic alliance is better. It is for this reason that the BST estimates the position of the patient at first, to bring the patient to the "customer's" position. The objective of this study is to assess an interview which identifies the patient's position towards the care, and to validate the theoretical elaborations of the brief systemic therapy. METHOD: The study concerns the follow-up of outpatients who consult a psychiatrist for the first time. The evaluation of the patients checks their position towards care using the Tourist-Complaint-Customer (TCC) inventory, how they suffer, the therapeutic alliance (scale Haq-2) and the compliance during care. The evaluation by the psychiatrists checks the suffering perceived, the motivation perceived and the diagnoses according to the DSM. RESULTS: The typology of these patients is made up of one half "complaint", a quarter of "tourist" and a quarter of "customer". The "customer's" position is correlated with the therapeutic alliance and the motivation perceived by the psychiatrist. The motivation perceived by the psychiatrist is correlated with the therapeutic alliance. These results correspond to the theoretical elaborations of the BST. CONCLUSION: the TCC inventory provides information on the motivation and the therapeutic alliance. If the patient is in "tourist" or "complaint" position, we recommend that the psychiatrist "work" to bring the patient to "customer" position. The evaluation of the position of the patient is simple and rich in information. We recommend that it be given a place in the daily practice of psychiatry.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Motivación , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Psiquiatría , Psicoterapia Breve , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria , Mecanismos de Defensa , Negación en Psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Psicoanalítica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the representations of insane, mentally ill and depressive persons, in a representative sample from the French General Population. METHODS: Data were derived from the multicentric survey "Mental Health in the General Population: images and realities", carried out in 47 French public sites between 1999 and 2003. A face-to-face questionnaire was used to interview a representative sample of French metropolitan subjects, aged 18 and over, non-institutionalized and homeless. These subjects were recruited using quota sampling for age, sex, socioprofessional and education levels, according to data from the 1999 national French population census. Representations of insane, mentally ill and depressive persons were explored by a specific questionnaire with open and semi-open questions. Psychiatric diagnoses were identified using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A national database was then constituted by pooling data from all sites, weighted for age, sex, level of education, socioprofessional level and work status to be representative of the French general population. RESULTS: Of the 36,000 individuals included in this study, over 75% associated the words "insane" and "mentally ill" with violent and dangerous behaviours and the term "depressive" with sadness, isolation and suicide. Young people, those with higher education and higher income level more frequently associated dangerous behaviours with mental illness rather than with insanity. The study shows that the general population draws a clear line between the representation of insane and mentally ill on one hand, and depressive on the other hand. Insane and mentally people are described as abnormal, irresponsible, unconscious, socially excluded, far from being curable, and to be cured against their will by psychotropic drugs and psychiatric hospitalisation. Whereas the depressive is perceived as a more familiar character, suffering, curable, who can be cured with psychotropic drugs and social support, but not to be hospitalized. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the overwhelming representations of insanity and mental illness in the French general population. As those stereotypes strongly affect access to care and behaviours toward psychiatric patients, the results show the need to think over the best way to fight against stigma and discrimination, in order to reduce psychiatric patients' social exclusion.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Opinión Pública , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Internamiento Obligatorio del Enfermo Mental , Conducta Peligrosa , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Escolaridad , Femenino , Francia , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Pronóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/epidemiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Responsabilidad Social , Estigma Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Violencia/psicología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used all over the world. Their psychiatric side-effects are rarely known. We report a case of indomethacin related depersonalization and have done a review of literature. We wanted to show the NSAIDs's side-effects. These are non specific, they can be either affective disorders, depersonalization states, hallucinations, or paranoid psychosis (which seems to be the most frequent). The symptomatology is easily suppressed, as soon as NSAIDs are stopped and/or psychotherapeutic symptomatic treatment is started. Different explanations are proposed: prostaglandin inhibition for the NSAIDs in general, indolic molecular structure (which looks like serotonin) for the indomethacin in particular which is the NSAID the most find in these side effects. There is several studies about the role of prostaglandin in psychiatry above all about schizophrenia. Some therapeutic essays were realized with prostaglandins precursors. The rest of the nosology is less studied.