Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Sci Monit ; 20: 2151-6, 2014 Nov 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25366169

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) has high prevalence and substantial socio-economic burden. MATERIAL/METHODS: The study included 35 Italian Centers recruiting an overall number of 3383 adult patients with rhinitis (48% males, 52% females, mean age 29.1, range 18-45 years). For each patient, the attending physician had to fill in a standardized questionnaire, covering, in particular, some issues such as the ARIA classification of allergic rhinitis (AR), the results of skin prick test (SPT), the kind of treatment, the response to treatment, and the satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: Out of the 3383 patients with rhinitis, 2788 (82.4%) had AR: 311 (11.5%) had a mild intermittent, 229 (8.8%) a mild persistent, 636 (23.5%) a moderate-severe intermittent, and 1518 (56.1%) a moderate-severe persistent form. The most frequently used drugs were oral antihistamines (77.1%) and topical corticosteroids (60.8%). The response to treatment was judged as excellent in 12.2%, good in 41.3%, fair in 31.2%, poor in 14.5%, and very bad in 0.8% of subjects. The rate of treatment dissatisfaction was significantly higher in patients with moderate-to-severe AR than in patients with mild AR (p<0.0001). Indication to allergen immunotherapy (AIT) was significantly more frequent (p<0.01) in patients with severe AR than with mild AR. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the appropriateness of ARIA guidelines in classifying the AR patients and the association of severe symptoms with unsuccessful drug treatment. The optimal targeting of patients to be treated with AIT needs to be reassessed.


Asunto(s)
Recolección de Datos , Rinitis Alérgica/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Rinitis Alérgica/patología , Pruebas Cutáneas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 35(1): 43-6, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24433596

RESUMEN

The efficacy of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is well supported by evidence from trials and meta-analyses. However, its actual performance in daily practice may be diminished by several pitfalls, including inappropriate patient selection, and, especially, the use of allergen extracts of insufficient quality. We performed a survey, the Allergen Immunotherapy Decision Analysis, to evaluate which criteria specialists use to choose products for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in adult patients suffering from allergic respiratory disease. We surveyed a total of 169 Italian allergists randomly chosen from a database belonging to a market research company (Lexis Ricerche, Milan, Italy). The survey was performed between October and November 2012 under the aegis of the European Center for Allergy Research Foundation and consisted of a questionnaire-based electronic survey prepared by a scientific board of 12 AIT experts. The questionnaire comprised two parts, the first of which contained 14 items to be ranked by each participant according to the importance assigned to each when choosing SLIT products. The physicians' rankings assigned major importance to the level of evidence-based validation of efficacy and safety, standardization of the product, efficacy based on personal experience, and defined content(s) of the major allergen(s) in micrograms. The results of this survey show that Italian allergists rank the quality-related characteristics of allergen extracts as highly important when choosing products for AIT. The allergists' preference for high-quality products should be addressed by regulatory agencies and by producers.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Inmunoterapia Sublingual/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inmunoterapia Sublingual/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia Sublingual/normas , Adulto Joven
3.
Clin Mol Allergy ; 11(1): 3, 2013 Dec 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24308506

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of component-resolved diagnosis was a great advance in diagnosis of allergy. In particular, molecular allergy techniques allowed investigation of the association between given molecular profiles and clinical expression of allergy. We evaluated the possible correlation between the level of specific IgE (sIgE) to single components of Phleum pratense and clinical issues such as the severity of allergic rhinitis (AR) and the presence or absence of asthma. METHODS: The study included 140 patients with rhinitis and/or asthma caused by sensitization to grass pollen. sIgE to Phl p 1, Phl p 5, Phl p 7, and Phl p 12 from Phleum pratense were measured, and the correlation between the stage of AR according to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines and the presence of asthma was studied by multivariate logistic regression in terms of sIgE and ARIA stage, while univariate logistic regression was used for IgE and a dichotomic classification of asthma as present or absent. RESULTS: Ten patients had intermittent AR, 48 had mild persistent AR, and 82 had severe persistent AR. Asthma was present in 86 patients and absent in 54. A significant correlation was found between severe persistent AR and presence of asthma (p < 0.01). The only significant correlation between clinical data and sIgE values was that of low values of sIgE to Phl p 5 and absence of asthma (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary finding suggests that low values of sIgE to Phl p 5 are correlated with the absence of asthma in patients with grass-pollen induced allergy. The data, provided they are confirmed by further studies, could be useful when selecting patients who are candidates for allergen immunotherapy, since a higher risk of asthma could be used as a selection criterion for using this approach.

4.
Clin Mol Allergy ; 10(1): 7, 2012 Jun 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22694773

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Grass pollen is a major cause of respiratory allergy worldwide and contain a number of allergens, some of theme (Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 5, and Phl 6 from Phleum pratense, and their homologous in other grasses) are known as major allergens. The administration of grass pollen extracts by immunotherapy generally induces an initial rise in specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) production followed by a progressive decline during the treatment. Some studies reported that immunotherapy is able to induce a de novo sensitisation to allergen component previously unrecognized. METHODS: We investigated in 30 children (19 males and 11 females, mean age 11.3 years), 19 treated with sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) by a 5-grass extract and 11 untreated, the sIgE and sIgG4 response to the different allergen components. RESULTS: Significant increases (p < 0.001) were detected for Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 5, and Phl p 6, while sIgE levels induced in response to Phl p 7 and Phl p 12 were low or absent at baseline and unchanged following SLIT treatment; no new sensitisation was detected. As to IgG4, significant increases were found for Phl p2 and Phl p 5, while the increase for Phl p 12 was not significant. In the control group, no significant increase in sIgE for any single allergen component was found. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that the initial phase of SLIT with a grass pollen extract enhances the sIgE synthesis and show that the sIgE response concerns the same allergen components which induce IgE reactivity during natural exposure.

5.
Haematologica ; 96(9): 1357-65, 2011 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21565906

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical use of ex vivo-expanded T-regulatory cells for the treatment of T-cell-mediated diseases has gained increasing momentum. However, the recent demonstration that FOXP3(+) T-regulatory cells may contain interleukin-17-producing cells and that they can convert into effector cells once transferred in vivo raises significant doubts about their safety. We previously showed that rapamycin permits the ex vivo expansion of FOXP3(+) T-regulatory cells while impairing the proliferation of non-T-regulatory cells. Here we investigated the Th17-cell content and the in vivo stability of rapamycin-expanded T-regulatory cells as pertinent aspects of cell-based therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: T-regulatory-enriched cells were isolated from healthy volunteers and were expanded ex vivo with rapamycin with a pre-clinical applicable protocol. T-regulatory cells cultured with and without rapamycin were compared for their regulatory activity, content of pro-inflammatory cells and stability. RESULTS: We found that CD4(+)CCR6(+)CD161(+) T cells (i.e., precursor/committed Th17 cells) contaminate the T-regulatory cells cultured ex vivo in the absence of rapamycin. In addition, Th17 cells do not expand when rapamycin-treated T-regulatory cells are exposed to a "Th17-favorable" environment. Rapamycin-expanded T-regulatory cells maintain their in vitro regulatory phenotype even after in vivo transfer into immunodeficient NOD-SCID mice despite being exposed to the irradiation-induced pro-inflammatory environment. Importantly, no additional rapamycin treatment, either in vitro or in vivo, is required to keep their phenotype fixed. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that rapamycin secures ex vivo-expanded human T-regulatory cells and provide additional justification for their clinical use in future cell therapy-based trials.


Asunto(s)
Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Sirolimus/farmacología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/citología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antígenos CD4/metabolismo , Células Cultivadas , Citocinas/biosíntesis , Femenino , Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/metabolismo , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Subunidad alfa del Receptor de Interleucina-2/metabolismo , Leucocitos Mononucleares/efectos de los fármacos , Leucocitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , Linfocitos T Reguladores/metabolismo , Células Th17/metabolismo
8.
Biologics ; 8: 221-6, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25246765

RESUMEN

The molecular allergy technique, currently defined as component-resolved diagnosis, significantly improved the diagnosis of allergy, allowing for differentiation between molecules actually responsible for clinical symptoms (genuine sensitizers) and those simply cross-reacting or shared by several sources (panallergens), thus influencing the appropriate management of a patient's allergy. This also concerns allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which may be prescribed more precisely based on the component-resolved diagnosis results. However, the advance in diagnosis needs to be mirrored in AIT. According to consensus documents and to expectations of specialists, therapy should be based on standardized extracts containing measured amounts of the clinically relevant molecules, ie, the major allergens. The new generation of extracts for sublingual immunotherapy fulfills these requirements and are thus defined as biomolecular (BM). BM refers to natural extracts with a defined content of major allergens in micrograms. All Staloral BM products are indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis with or without asthma. The effectiveness of AIT is related to its ability to modify the immunological response of allergic subjects. The 5-grass and house dust mite extracts were evaluated addressing the T helper 1, T helper 2, and T helper 3 cells by polymerase chain reaction array on mRNA extracted from Waldeyer's ring tissue (adenoids). Sublingual immunotherapy with a defined content of major allergens in micrograms induced a strong downregulation of genes involved in T helper 2 and T helper 1 activation and function, allowing the definition of the immunologic effect as "bio-homeostatic". This clinical and immunological model must be implemented with respect to other allergens, thus expanding the application of a treatment with a unique disease-modifying capacity.

9.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 30(2): 203-5, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24127824

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adenoids, tubal tonsil, palatine tonsil, and lingual tonsil are immunological organs included in the Waldeyer's ring, the basic function of which is the antibody production to common environmental antigens. Adenoidal hypertrophy (AH) is a major medical issue in children, and adenoidectomy is still the most used treatment worldwide. The response of adenoids to allergens is a good model to evaluate their immunological function. This report assessed the immunological changes in adenoid tissues from children with allergic rhinitis (AR) undergoing sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: Adenoid samples from 16 children (seven males, nine females, mean age 7.12 years) with AH and clinical indication to adenoidectomy were collected. Of them, five children were not allergic and 11 had house dust mite and grass pollen-induced AR. Among allergic children, in four AR was treated by antihistamines while in seven AR was treated by high-dose SLIT during 4-6 months. The evaluation addressed the T helper 1 (Th1), Th2, and Th3 cells by performing a PCR array on mRNA extracted from adenoid samples. RESULTS: In non-allergic children, a typical Th1 pattern was found. SLIT induced a strong down-regulation of genes involved in Th2 and Th1 activation and function. In particular, in SLIT-treated allergic children IL-4, CCR2, CCR3, and PTGDR2 (Th2 related genes) and CD28, IL-2, and INHA (Th1 related genes) expression was reduced, compared with children treated with antihistamines. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary findings warrant investigation in trials including larger numbers of patients, but indicate that hypertrophic adenoids of allergic children have the typical response to the specific allergen administered by SLIT. This should suggest that one should reconsider the immunological role of adenoids.


Asunto(s)
Tonsila Faríngea/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunología , Tonsila Palatina/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia , Inmunoterapia Sublingual , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Regulación hacia Abajo , Femenino , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Polen/inmunología , Pyroglyphidae/inmunología , ARN Mensajero/genética , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Linfocitos T Reguladores/inmunología , Células TH1/inmunología , Células Th2/inmunología
10.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 13(7): 947-53, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24821477

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was introduced as a safer option to subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) which was associated with the possible occurrence of systemic reactions including anaphylaxis and, though very rarely, fatalities. Some anaphylactic reactions to SLIT are reported, mainly in adults but also in children. It is therefore important to investigate the risk factors related to such reactions. AREAS COVERED: Data from the literature on the safety of SLIT in children were reviewed. The data reviewed concerned the application of this treatment to patients with respiratory allergy and also possible new indications such as food allergy, atopic dermatitis and latex allergy. Reports of anaphylactic reactions were analyzed to identify the potential risk factors. EXPERT OPINION: SLIT is a well tolerated treatment, the common side effect being local reactions in the mouth. Systemic reactions, concerning the skin and the airway, are rare and anaphylactic reactions are extremely rare.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia Sublingual/efectos adversos , Administración Sublingual , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Niño , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo
11.
J Inflamm Res ; 7: 39-44, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24715761

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: House dust mites (HDMs) are a major cause of allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma worldwide. Recent studies suggested that the allergen load presents seasonal modifications, giving rise to seasonal variation in nasal inflammation and symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate by nasal cytology whether nasal inflammation in mite-allergic patients changes with the seasons of the year. METHODS: The study included 16 patients (seven males and nine females, mean age 38.1 years) with persistent AR caused by monosensitization to HDMs. Nasal cytology was performed in all patients once monthly for 1 year. RESULTS: Nasal cytology showed that the cells most commonly detected in the nasal mucosa were neutrophils. During the period from October to April, a peak in the number of neutrophils and also the presence of significant numbers of eosinophils, mast cells, and lymphocytes/plasma cells were found, which shows the occurrence of more intense inflammation during these months. CONCLUSION: Nasal cytology provides useful data in detecting nasal inflammation and its association with the clinical stage of AR. The seasonal variations in nasal cytology are likely to be induced by the fluctuations in the HDM allergen that have been uncovered in recent investigations.

12.
Immunotherapy ; 5(2): 131-3, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23413904

RESUMEN

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment of allergic diseases able to maintain its efficacy after discontinuation of treatment. The available literature suggests that a 3-year duration of treatment maintains the efficacy on allergic symptoms for at least an equivalent period of time. The current paper compares the 3- and 5-year duration in children with dust mite-induced asthma, and confirms that 3 years of SIT maintains its effectiveness for a further 3 years after stopping, with no significant difference compared with 5 years. Thus, 3 years is likely to be an adequate duration of SIT; however, studies with more prolonged follow-up periods are needed to investigate the persistence of the clinical benefit over time.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Antígenos Dermatofagoides/administración & dosificación , Asma/terapia , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Animales , Antígenos Dermatofagoides/inmunología , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/inmunología , Niño , Dermatophagoides farinae/inmunología , Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus/inmunología , Polvo , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Allergy Rhinol (Providence) ; 4(2): e77-81, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24124641

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may be cured by allergen immunotherapy (AIT). However, patient characteristics for prescribing AIT are not well defined. This study aimed at evaluating the patient's profile to be a candidate for AIT in a cohort of patients suffering from AR, evaluated in 20 Italian Allergy or Ear, Nose, and Throat Centers. The study has been performed on 198 patients (98 men; mean age, 26.8 years) with AR (assessed by Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma [ARIA] criteria). The kind and the number of prescribed allergen extracts, type of diagnosis, severity of symptoms, and patient's perception of symptoms and drug use were evaluated. Patients were subdivided in AIT-treated and without AIT (as controls) subgroups. Most of the patients (69.7%) had persistent AR with moderate-severe symptoms. The mean number of sensitization was 3.4. ARIA classification and sensitization number did not affect AIT choice, but the type of allergen was relevant. AIT-treated patients had milder symptoms than controls if assessed by doctors, but AIT patients perceived more severe symptoms and larger drug use than controls. This study shows that the choice of AIT is based on patient's perception and type of allergen, but number of sensitizations, symptom severity assessed by doctors, and ARIA classification are not relevant factors. The key message might be that it is always relevant to pay attention to the complaints referred by the patient.

14.
Clin Drug Investig ; 33(5): 343-9, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23532801

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is aimed at modifying the immune response to a causative allergen, thereby reducing clinical symptoms and symptomatic medication intake and improving quality of life. Long-term AIT research has led to the development of 5-grass pollen tablets, currently indicated for the treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis (AR). METHODS: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using the Average Adjusted Symptom Score (AAdSS) to compare the effect of treatment of AR with 5-grass pollen tablets versus placebo treatment. Using the results of the VO34.04 and VO53.06 trials and economic data, cost-effectiveness analysis of 5-grass pollen tablet treatment was performed from the Italian third-party payer perspective with cost data derived from a study of 2008 updated to 2011. Also a societal perspective was considered by using the costs related to the losses of productivity by following the human capital approach. Using the results of the analysis, the estimated receiver-operating characteristic curve was plotted to evaluate medication effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a decision tree constructed to model the possible outcomes and costs for adults and paediatric patients with a low, medium, and high AAdSS. Finally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of the results as well as their consistency at an assumed cost-effectiveness threshold of € 30,000/QALY. RESULTS: The results indicate that compared to the placebo, the 5-grass pollen tablet treatment provides a benefit of 0.127 QALYs in medium AAdSS patients and of 0.143 QALYs in high AAdSS patients. The 5-grass pollen tablet treatment was found to cost € 1,024/QALY for patients with a medium AAdSS and € 1,035/QALY for patients with a high AAdSS. Of all the simulations performed in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 99 % indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the 5-grass pollen tablet treatment was below the threshold of € 30,000/QALY in patients with medium and high AAdSS, whereas it was found to be dominated in 67 % of simulations related to patients with low AAdSS. CONCLUSION: The 5-grass pollen tablet is a cost-effective treatment for adult AR patients with a medium or high AAdSS. This finding should be carefully considered when deciding the management strategy for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/economía , Alérgenos/uso terapéutico , Desensibilización Inmunológica/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Sublingual , Adulto , Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Simulación por Computador , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Árboles de Decisión , Desensibilización Inmunológica/métodos , Humanos , Italia , Modelos Económicos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/economía , Comprimidos , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
J Asthma Allergy ; 6: 127-33, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24353432

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An important subpopulation in allergic rhinitis is represented by patients with severe form of disease that is not responsive to drug treatment. It has been reported that grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy is effective in drug-resistant patients. In a real-life study, we evaluated the efficacy of 5-grass pollen tablets in patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis not responsive to drug therapy. METHODS: We carried out this multicenter observational study in adults and adolescents with grass-induced allergic rhinitis not responsive to drug therapy who were treated for a year with 5-grass pollen tablets. Clinical data collected before and after sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) included Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) classification of allergic rhinitis, response to therapy, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients entered the study. By ARIA classification, three patients had moderate to severe intermittent allergic rhinitis, ten had mild persistent allergic rhinitis, and 34 had moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis. There were no cases of mild intermittent allergic rhinitis before SLIT. After SLIT, 33 patients had mild intermittent allergic rhinitis, none had moderate to severe intermittent allergic rhinitis, seven had mild persistent allergic rhinitis, and seven had moderate to severe persistent allergic rhinitis. The mean medication score decreased from 4.2±1.3 before to 2.4±2.0 after SLIT (P<0.01), representing a reduction of 42%. The response to treatment before SLIT was judged as poor by 70% of patients and very poor by 30%. Patient satisfaction was significantly increased after SLIT (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In real life, most patients with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis not responsive to drug treatment can achieve control of the condition with one season of treatment using 5-grass pollen tablets.

16.
Ital J Pediatr ; 38: 50, 2012 Sep 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22998686

RESUMEN

The sensitization to more allergens, such as polysenitization, is becoming a frequent characteristic of allergic patients, since the childhood. However, this phenomenon is considered an obstacle to prescribe immunotherapy by many doctors. This study investigated the relevance of polysensitization in a cohort of allergic children and evaluated the number of allergen extracts prescribed for these children. There are allergens that are frequent, but not prescribed. This issue should be matter of adequate debate for Italian paediatricians.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Niño , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
17.
Ital J Pediatr ; 38: 51, 2012 Sep 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23009215

RESUMEN

Nasal cytology is a very useful diagnostic tool in nasal disorders, being able to detect both the cellular modifications of the nasal epithelium caused by either allergen exposure or irritative stimuli (that may be physical or chemical, acute or chronic), or inflammation. Over these past few years, nasal cytology has allowed to identify new disorders, such as the non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophils (NARES), the non-allergic rhinitis with mast cells (NARMA), the non-allergic rhinitis with neutrophils (NARNE), and the non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophils and mast cells (NARESMA). The rhinocytogram is actually able to distinguish the different forms of allergic rhinitis and to suggest the appropriate treatment, such as antinflammatory drugs or allergen immunotherapy. The technique is easy to perform and nasal cytology is therefore particularly suitable even for children. Such a consideration suggests the utility of a systematic use of nasal cytology in the diagnostic work-up of nasal disorders in children, in order to reach a proper defined diagnosis and to set a rational therapeutic approach: in facts, these two elements are fundamental in order to prevent from complications and to improve the patient's quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Mucosa Nasal/citología , Enfermedades Nasales/patología , Niño , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Enfermedades Nasales/inmunología , Enfermedades Nasales/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Nasales/terapia , Rinitis/inmunología , Rinitis/patología , Rinitis/fisiopatología , Rinitis/terapia
18.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 6: 117-23, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22654506

RESUMEN

The house dust mite is a major cause of respiratory allergy worldwide. The management of mite allergy is based on avoidance measures, drug treatment, and allergen immunotherapy, but only allergen immunotherapy is able to modify the natural history of the disease. Injectable subcutaneous immunotherapy was introduced a century ago, while sublingual immunotherapy was proposed in the 1980s and emerged in the ensuing years as an effective and safe option to subcutaneous immunotherapy. However, the quality of the extracts to be used in allergen immunotherapy is crucial for the success of treatment. The mite extract for sublingual immunotherapy known as Staloral 300 was developed to offer optimal characteristics concerning the mite culture medium, standardization, and allergen dose. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with Staloral 300 have provided a substantial part of the clinical evidence analyzed in a meta-analysis of the efficacy of allergen immunotherapy in mite-induced rhinitis and asthma. Safety and tolerability are very good, mild local reactions in the mouth being the most common side effect. This makes it feasible to carry out sublingual immunotherapy for the 3-5-year duration needed to achieve long-lasting tolerance to the specific allergen. The performance of Staloral 300 may provide optimal conditions for an effective and safe sublingual immunotherapy in patients with mite-induced respiratory allergy.


Asunto(s)
Desensibilización Inmunológica/normas , Pyroglyphidae/inmunología , Animales , Asma/terapia , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Desensibilización Inmunológica/economía , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/terapia , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/terapia
19.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 12(16): 2527-32, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21883032

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in patients with insect sting allergy is not questioned. However, its safety, especially when honeybee is used, is a matter of concern. AREAS COVERED: A systematic review of the literature on VIT was done, with both aqueous and depot extracts, to compare the frequency of systemic reactions to honeybee and vespid venoms. A Medline search was performed using the keywords 'venom immunotherapy', 'safety' and 'tolerability'. The articles obtained were analyzed regarding the total number of patients treated with either honeybee or vespid VIT, the number and severity of systemic reactions during therapy, the type of extract used (aqueous or depot) and the administration regimen. EXPERT OPINION: The incidence of systemic reactions to VIT was 25.1% for honeybee venom and 5.8% for vespid venom (p < 0.0001), while it was similar with aqueous and depot extracts in the whole population of patients. This confirms that during VIT systemic reactions are significantly more frequent with honeybee venom compared with vespid venom, while there are no significant overall differences in systemic reactions between aqueous and depot extracts.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Venenos de Abeja/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Inmunoterapia , Venenos de Avispas/inmunología , Animales , Abejas/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/inmunología , Avispas/inmunología
20.
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets ; 10(6): 472-6, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21999180

RESUMEN

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common allergic disease. The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines classify AR according to its duration and severity and suggest recommended treatments, but there is evidence that these guidelines are insufficiently followed. Considering the validity of histopathological data, physicians are more likely to be persuaded by such information on AR. Thus, we attempted to define the severity of AR by nasal cytology on the basis of the ARIA classification. We examined 64 patients with AR caused by sensitization to grass pollen. We clinically defined AR according to the ARIA classification and performed nasal cytology by Rhino-probe sampling, staining and reading by optical microscopic observation. Clinically, 22 (34.4%), 21 (32.8%), 10 (15.6%), and 11 (17.2%) patients had mild intermittent, moderate-to-severe intermittent, mild persistent, and moderate-to-severe persistent AR, respectively. Nasal cytology detected neutrophils in 49 patients, eosinophils in 41 patients, mast cells in 21 patients, and lymphocytes or plasma cells in 28 patients. The patients with moderate-to-severe AR had significantly more mast cells and lymphocytes/ plasma cells than those with mild AR. Our findings demonstrate that the ARIA classification of AR severity is associated with different cell counts in nasal cytology; especially, moderate-to-severe AR shows significantly increased counts of mast cells and lymphocyte or plasma cells. The ease of performing nasal cytology ensures is feasibility as an office AR diagnostic procedure for primary care physicians, able to indicate when anti-inflammatory treatments, such as intranasal corticosteroids and subcutaneous or sublingual allergen immunotherapy, are needed.


Asunto(s)
Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/patología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/inmunología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/patología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Técnicas Citológicas/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/patología , Masculino , Mucosa Nasal/citología , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA