Reconceptualization of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated gastritis.

In recent years, with the extensive application of immunotherapy in clinical practice, it has achieved encouraging therapeutic effects. While enhancing clinical efficacy, however, it can also cause autoimmune damage, triggering immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Reports of immunotherapy-induced gastritis have been increasing annually, but due to its atypical clinical symptoms, early diag-nosis poses a certain challenge. Furthermore, it can lead to severe complications such as gastric bleeding, elevating the risk of adverse outcomes for solid tumor patients if immunotherapy is interrupted. Therefore, gaining a thorough under-standing of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of immune-related gastritis is of utmost importance for early identification, diagnosis, and treatment. Additionally, the treatment of immune-related gastritis should be personalized according to the specific condition of each patient. For patients with grade 2-3 irAEs, restarting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy may be considered when symptoms subside to grade 0-1. When restarting ICIs therapy, it is often recommended to use different types of ICIs. For grade 4 irAEs, permanent discontinuation of the medication is necessary.

Crocin Combined With Cisplatin Regulates Proliferation, Apoptosis And Emt Of Gastric Cancer Cells Via The Fgfr3/Mapk/Erk Pathway In Vitro And In Vivo.

INTRODUCTION: Cisplatin (DDP)-based chemotherapy remains the main therapeutic strategy for human gastric cancer (GC). Combination therapy with Chinese medicine monomers and DDP has been investigated as a means to enhance the anti-tumor effect of DDP while reducing toxicity. METHOD: Previous studies have shown that crocin combined with DDP can inhibit the apoptosis of BG-823 GC cells; however, the mechanism of this combination therapy in inhibiting GC is not fully unclear. In this study, we measured the IC50 values of crocin combined with DDP in AGS cells and assessed its effect on cell proliferation using an MTT assay. Furthermore, we assessed apoptosis, cell migration, and EMT-related protein levels by using flow cytometry, scratch assay, and Western blotting, respectively. Our results showed that crocin combined with DDP inhibited the proliferation, induced apoptosis, and inhibited invasion and EMT. Next, we performed RNA sequence and KEGG enrichment analysis on GC cells treated with Crocin+DDP. RESULTS: The results showed that the most significant factor down-regulated by this combination therapy was Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) expression and that a differential gene was enriched in the MAPK/ERK pathway. We further constructed an FGFR3 OE transfection plasmid to overexpress FGFR3 and evaluate its effects on proliferation, apoptosis, migration, EMT, and MAPK/ERK pathway proteins in GC cells. We also conducted subcutaneous tumorigenesis experiments in nude mice to evaluate the effects of crocin and DDP on the progression of GC xenografts in vivo. Finally, we performed a rescue experiment using the MAPK/ERK pathway inhibitor PD184352. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that up-regulation of FGFR3 reversed the inhibitory effect of crocin+DDP on the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Still, this effect could be counteracted by PD184352, which simultaneously regulated the proliferation, apoptosis, and EMT of AGS cells. In conclusion, crocin, combined with DDP, inhibits proliferation, apoptosis, and EMT of GC through the FRFR3/MAPK/ERK pathway.

Corrigendum: Comparison of clinical safety and feasibility between reduced-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic radical gastrectomy: A retrospective study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.995194.].

Oral bisphosphonates and incidence of cancers in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Several previous studies have shown that oral bisphosphonates (BPs) are associated with the incidence of 13 specific cancers, including lung cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the findings are heterogeneous. METHODS AND RESULTS: Relevant studies published in databases such as PubMed, Embase database, and Cochrane library were systematically retrieved from inception to August 25th, 2018, regardless of language, by two investigators independently. Afterwards, the maximum adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted from the retrieved studies. Finally, 13 cohort studies involving 1,510,763 participants were enrolled into this meta-analysis. No significant relationship was found between oral BPs and the risk of all-cause cancer in osteoporosis (OP) patients among the entire population (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80-1.18; I2 92.5%). Besides, oral BPs could remarkably reduce the incidence of breast cancer (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.68-0.92; I2 54%) and endometrial cancer (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.96; I2 0%) in postmenopausal OP females. In addition, oral BPs were also found to evidently reduce the incidence of upper gastrointestinal cancer in OP patients among the entire population (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.98; I2 36.1%). However, oral BPs may lead to increased risk of liver cancer in mixed genders (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.03-2.77; I2 30.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, oral BPs do not increase the risk of incidence of all-cause cancer; instead, they can reduce the incidence of breast, endometrial, and upper gastrointestinal cancers among the postmenopausal OP females. Our analysis stratified by gender suggests that oral BPs may increase the incidence of liver cancer in mixed genders, while no significant association was observed in females. Careful analysis of post-marketing data should be conducted to address the clinical relevance of our results on the putative association of oral BP use and liver cancer suggested by our meta-analysis.