Every nano-step counts: a critical reflection on do's and don'ts in researching nanomedicines for retinal gene therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Retinal disease affects millions of people worldwide, generating a massive social and economic burden. Current clinical trials for retinal diseases are dominated by gene augmentation therapies delivered with recombinant viruses as key players. As an alternative, nanoparticles hold great promise for the delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics as well. Nevertheless, despite numerous attempts, 'nano' is in practice not as successful as aspired and major breakthroughs in retinal gene therapy applying nanomaterials are yet to be seen. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we summarize the advantages of nanomaterials and give an overview of nanoparticles designed for retinal nucleic acid delivery up to now. We furthermore critically reflect on the predominant issues that currently limit nano to progress to the clinic, where faulty study design and the absence of representative models play key roles. EXPERT OPINION: Since the current approach of in vitro - in vivo experimentation is highly inefficient and creates misinformation, we advocate for a more prominent role for ex vivo testing early on in nanoparticle research. In addition, we elaborate on several concepts, including systematic studies and open science, which could aid in pushing the field of nanomedicine beyond the preclinical stage.

Together is Better: mRNA Co-Encapsulation in Lipoplexes is Required to Obtain Ratiometric Co-Delivery and Protein Expression on the Single Cell Level.

Liposomes can efficiently deliver messenger RNA (mRNA) into cells. When mRNA cocktails encoding different proteins are needed, a considerable challenge is to efficiently deliver all mRNAs into the cytosol of each individual cell. In this work, two methods are explored to co-deliver varying ratiometric doses of mRNA encoding red (R) or green (G) fluorescent proteins and it is found that packaging mRNAs into the same lipoplexes (mingle-lipoplexes) is crucial to efficiently deliver multiple mRNA types into the cytosol of individual cells according to the pre-defined ratio. A mixture of lipoplexes containing only one mRNA type (single-lipoplexes), however, seem to follow the "first come - first serve" principle, resulting in a large variation of R/G uptake and expression levels for individual cells leading to ratiometric dosing only on the population level, but rarely on the single-cell level. These experimental observations are quantitatively explained by a theoretical framework based on the stochasticity of mRNA uptake in cells and endosomal escape of mingle- and single-lipoplexes, respectively. Furthermore, the findings are confirmed in 3D retinal organoids and zebrafish embryos, where mingle-lipoplexes outperformed single-lipoplexes to reliably bring both mRNA types into single cells. This benefits applications that require a strict control of protein expression in individual cells.

Vaccinia Virus Protein B18R: Influence on mRNA Immunogenicity and Translation upon Non-Viral Delivery in Different Ocular Cell Types.

In the last few years, interest has grown in the use of nucleic acids as an ocular therapy for retinal genetic diseases. Recently, our research group has demonstrated that mRNA delivery could result in effective protein expression in ocular cells following subretinal injection. Yet, although mRNA therapy comes with many advantages, its immunogenicity resulting in hampered mRNA translation delays development to the clinic. Therefore, several research groups investigate possible strategies to reduce this innate immunity. In this study, we focus on B18R, an immune inhibitor to suppress the mRNA-induced innate immune responses in two ocular cell types. We made use of retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells and Müller cells both as immortalized cell lines and primary bovine cells. When cells were co-incubated with both B18R and mRNA-MessengerMAX lipoplexes we observed an increase in transfection efficiency accompanied by a decrease in interferon-ß production, except for the Müller cells. Moreover, uptake efficiency and cell viability were not hampered. Taken together, we showed that the effect of B18R is cell type-dependent but remains a possible strategy to improve mRNA translation in RPE cells.

Influence of pathogenic stimuli on Müller cell transfection by lipoplexes.

Neuroprotection is a mutation-independent therapeutic strategy that seeks to enhance the survival of neuronal cell types through delivery of neuroprotective factors. The Müller cell, a retinal glial cell type appreciated for its unique morphology and neuroprotective functions, could be regarded as an ideal target for this strategy by functioning as a secretion platform within the retina following uptake of a transgene of our choice. In this in vitro study we aimed to investigate the capability of Müller cells to take up a standard liposomal vector (i.e. Lipofectamine 2000) and process its pDNA or mRNA cargo into the reporter GFP protein. By doing so, we found that mRNA outperformed pDNA in Müller cell transfection efficiency. Since neuroprotection is explored as a therapy for diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma, we furthermore examined the Müller cell's lipoplex-induced transfection efficiency and cytotoxicity in stressful conditions linked to these diseases - i.e. hypoxia, hyperglycemia and oxidative stress. Interestingly, Müller cells were able of maintaining high GFP expression regardless of these noxious stimuli. In terms of lipoplex-induced toxicity, hyperglycemia seemed to have a protective effect while hypoxia and oxidative stress led to a slightly higher toxicity. In conclusion, our study indicates that mRNA-lipoplexes have potential in transfecting Müller cells in healthy as well as diseased conditions.

Ocular barriers to retinal delivery of intravitreal liposomes: Impact of vitreoretinal interface.

Drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye is challenging due to several anatomical and physiological barriers. Thus, there is a need for prolonged action and targeted drug delivery to treat retinal diseases. Intravitreal injections avoid anterior eye barriers, but the vitreoretinal interface and inner limiting membrane (ILM) may prevent access of drug delivery systems to the retina. Existing data on retinal permeation of intravitreal nanoparticles are sparse and probably misleading due to the inter-species differences of retinal structures in rodents and humans. To bridge this gap, retinal permeation of light-activated liposomes was studied in an ex vivo bovine explant system that simulates the structure of vitreoretinal interface and intact ILM. Our findings indicate that the particle size plays a significant role in determining the retinal penetration as the liposomes of >100 nm sized failed to overcome the ILM and could not permeate into the retina. In addition, our results demonstrate the impact of surface charge and PEG-coating on retinal penetration. Small (≈ 50 nm) anionic liposomes with PEG coating showed the most extensive distribution and cellular localization in the retina. In summary, this study extends understanding of ocular barriers, and provides valuable information to augment design of retinal drug delivery systems.

Müller cells as a target for retinal therapy.

Müller cells are specialized glial cells that span the entire retina from the vitreous cavity to the subretinal space. Their functional diversity and unique radial morphology render them particularly interesting targets for new therapeutic approaches. In this review, we reflect on various possibilities for selective Müller cell targeting and describe how some of their cellular mechanisms can be used for retinal neuroprotection. Intriguingly, cross-species investigation of their properties has revealed that Müller cells also have an essential role in retinal regeneration. Although many questions regarding this subject remain, it is clear that Müller cells have unique characteristics that make them suitable targets for the prevention and treatment of numerous retinal diseases.

Morphology and Composition of the Inner Limiting Membrane: Species-Specific Variations and Relevance toward Drug Delivery Research.

The inner limiting membrane (ILM) represents the structural boundary between the vitreous and the retina, and is suggested to act as a barrier for a wide range of retinal therapies. While it is widely acknowledged that the morphology of the human ILM exhibits regional variations and undergoes age-related changes, insight into its structure in laboratory animals is very limited. Besides presenting a detailed overview of the morphology and composition of the human ILM, this review specifically reflects on the species-specific differences in ILM structure. With these differences in mind, we furthermore summarize the most relevant reports on the barrier role of the ILM with regard to viral vectors, nanoparticles, anti-VEGF medication and stem cells. Overall, this review aims to deliberate on the impact of species-specific ILM variations on drug delivery research as well as to pinpoint knowledge gaps which future basic research should resolve.

The obstacle course to the inner retina: Hyaluronic acid-coated lipoplexes cross the vitreous but fail to overcome the inner limiting membrane.

Considerable research over the last few years has revealed dysregulation of growth factors in various retinal diseases, such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy and photoreceptor degenerations. The use of messengerRNA (mRNA) to transiently overexpress a specific factor could compensate for this imbalance. However, a critical challenge of this approach lies in the ability to efficiently deliver mRNA molecules to the retinal target cells. In this study we found that intravitreal (IVT) injection is an attractive approach to deliver mRNA to the retina, providing two critical barriers can be overcome: the vitreous and the inner limiting membrane (ILM). We demonstrated that the vitreous is indeed a major hurdle in the delivery of the cationic mRNA-complexes to retinal cells, both in terms of vitreal mobility and cellular uptake. To improve their intravitreal mobility and avoid unwanted extracellular interactions, we evaluated the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) as an electrostatic coating strategy. This HA-coating provided the complexes with a negative surface charge, markedly enhancing their mobility in the vitreous humor, without reducing their cellular internalization and transfection efficiency. However, although this coating strategy allows the mRNA-complexes to successfully overcome the vitreal barrier, the majority of the particles accumulated at the ILM. This study therefore underscores the crucial barrier function of the ILM toward non-viral retinal gene delivery and the need to smartly design mRNA-carriers able to surmount the vitreous as well as the ILM.

Non-viral delivery of chemically modified mRNA to the retina: Subretinal versus intravitreal administration.

mRNA therapeutics have recently experienced a new wave of interest, mainly due to the discovery that chemical modifications to mRNA's molecular structure could drastically reduce its inherent immunogenicity and perceived instability. On this basis, we aimed to explore the potential of chemically stabilized mRNA for ocular applications. More specifically, we investigated the behavior of mRNA-loaded lipid-based carriers in human retinal cells (in vitro), in bovine retinal explants (ex vivo) and in mouse retinas (in vivo). We demonstrate a clear superiority of mRNA over pDNA to induce protein expression in different retinal cell types, which was further enhanced by chemical modification of the mRNA, providing up to ~1800-fold higher reporter gene expression compared to pDNA. Moreover, transgene expression could be detected for at least 20 days after a single administration of chemically modified mRNA in vitro. We furthermore determined the localization and extent of mRNA expression depending on the administration route. After subretinal (SR) administration, mRNA expression was observed in vivo and ex vivo. By contrast, intravitreal (IVT) administration resulted in limited expression in vivo. Using ex vivo bovine explants with an intact vitreoretinal (VR) interface we could attribute this to the inner limiting membrane (ILM), which presents a large barrier for non-viral delivery of mRNA, trapping mRNA complexes at the vitreal side. When the vitreous was removed, which compromises the ILM, mRNA expression was apparent and seemed to colocalize with Müller cells or photoreceptors after respectively IVT or SR administration. Taken together, this study represents a first step towards mRNA-mediated therapy for retinal diseases.

In vitro and ex vivo models to study drug delivery barriers in the posterior segment of the eye.

Many ocular disorders leading to blindness could benefit from efficient delivery of therapeutics to the retina. However, despite extensive research into drug delivery vehicles and administration techniques, efficacy remains limited because of the many static and dynamic barriers present in the eye. Comprehension of the various barriers and especially how to overcome them can improve our ability to estimate the potential of existent drug delivery vectors and support the design of new ones. To this end, this review gives an overview of the most important ocular barriers for each administration route to the back of the eye. For each barrier, its biological composition and its role as an obstacle towards macromolecules, nanoparticles and viral vectors will be discussed; special attention will be paid to the influence of size, charge and lipophilicity of drug(s) (carrier) on their ability to overcome each barrier. Finally, the most significant available in vitro and ex vivo methods and models to test the potential of a therapeutic to cross each barrier are listed.

Search for the Source of the Retinal Relaxing Factor.

Purpose/Aim of the study: the retinal relaxing factor (RRF) is an unidentified paracrine factor, which is continuously released from retinal tissue and causes smooth muscle cell relaxation. This study tried to identify the cellular source of the RRF. Furthermore, the possible RRF release by voltage-dependent sodium channel activation and the calcium-dependency of the RRF release were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: mouse femoral arteries were mounted in myograph baths for in vitro isometric tension measurements. The vasorelaxing effect of chicken retinas, which contain no vascular cells, and of solutions incubated with MIO-M1 or primary Müller cell cultures were evaluated. The RRF release of other retinal cells was investigated by using cell type inhibitors. Concentration-response curves of veratridine, a voltage-dependent sodium channel activator, were constructed in the presence or absence of mouse retinal tissue to evaluate the RRF release. The calcium-dependency of the RRF release was investigated by evaluating the vasorelaxing effect of RRF-containing solutions made out of chicken retinas in the absence or presence of calcium. RESULTS: Chicken retinas induced vasorelaxation, whereas solutions incubated with Müller cell cultures did not. Moreover, the gliotoxin DL-α-aminoadipic acid, the microglia inhibitor minocycline, and the tetrodotoxin-resistant voltage-dependent sodium channel 1.8 inhibitor A-803467 could not reduce the RRF-induced relaxation. Concentration-response curves of veratridine were not enlarged in the presence of retinal tissue, and RRF-containing solutions made in the absence of calcium induced a substantial, but reduced vasorelaxation. CONCLUSIONS: the RRF is not released from vascular cells and probably neither from glial cells. The retinal cell type that does release the RRF remains unclear. Veratridine does not stimulate the RRF release in mice, and the RRF release in chickens is calcium-dependent as well as calcium-independent.

Toward smart design of retinal drug carriers: a novel bovine retinal explant model to study the barrier role of the vitreoretinal interface.

Retinal gene delivery via intravitreal injection is hampered by various physiological barriers present in the eye of which the vitreoretinal (VR) interface represents the most serious hurdle. In this study, we present a retinal explant model especially designed to study the role of this interface as a barrier for the penetration of vectors into the retina. In contrast to all existing explant models, the developed model is bovine-derived and more importantly, keeps the vitreous attached to the retina at all times to guarantee an intact VR interface. After ex vivo intravitreal injection into the living retinal explant, the route of fluorescent carriers across the VR interface can be tracked. By applying two different imaging methods on this model, we discovered that the transfer through the VR barrier is size-dependent since 40 nm polystyrene particles are more easily taken up in the retina than 100 and 200 nm sized particles. In addition, we found that removing the vitreous, as commonly done for culture of conventional explants, leads to an overestimation of particle uptake, and conclude that the ultimate barrier to overcome for retinal uptake is undoubtedly the inner limiting membrane. Damaging this matrix resulted in a massive increase in particle transfer into the retina. In conclusion, we have developed a highly relevant ex vivo model that maximally mimics the human in vivo physiology which can be applied as a representative test set-up to assess the potential of promising drug delivery carriers to cross the VR interface.

Evading innate immunity in nonviral mRNA delivery: don't shoot the messenger.

In the field of nonviral gene therapy, in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA has emerged as a promising tool for the delivery of genetic information. Over the past few years it has become widely known that the introduction of IVT mRNA into mammalian cells elicits an innate immune response that has favored mRNA use toward immunotherapeutic vaccination strategies. However, for non-immunotherapy-related applications this intrinsic immune-stimulatory activity directly interferes with the aimed therapeutic outcome, because it can seriously compromise the expression of the desired protein. This review presents an overview of the immune-related obstacles that limit mRNA advance for non-immunotherapy-related applications.