Quality of care and clinical inertia in the management of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: data from AMD annals.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with diabetes, and for this reason, all guidelines for CV risk management provide the same targets in controlling traditional CV risk factors in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes at equal CV risk class. Aim of our study was to evaluate and compare CV risk management in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes included in AMD Annals Database paying particular attention to indicators of clinical inertia. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective study of AMD Annals Database during year 2022. Patients with diabetes were stratified on the basis of their cardiovascular risk, according to ESC-EASD guidelines. The proportion of patients not treated with lipid-lowering despite LDL cholesterol > to 100 mg/dl or the proportion of patients not treated with antihypertensive drug despite BP > 140/90 mmhg and proportion of patients with proteinuria not treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensinogen receptor blockers (ACE/ARBs) were considered indicators of clinical inertia. The proportion of patients reaching at the same time HbA1c < 7% LDL < 70 mg/dl and BP < 130/80 mmhg were considered to have good multifactorial control. Overall quality of health care was evaluated by the Q-score. RESULTS: Using the inclusion criteria and stratifying patients by ESC/EASD Cardiovascular Risk categories, we included in the analysis 118.442 patients at High Cardiovascular risk and 416.246 patients at Very High Cardiovascular risk. The proportion of patients with good multifactorial risk factor control was extremely low in both T1D and T2D patients in each risk class. At equal risk class, the patients with T1D had lower proportion of subjects reaching HbA1c, LDL, or Blood Pressure targets. Indicators of clinical inertia were significantly higher compared with patients with T2D at equal risk class. Data regarding patients with albuminuria not treated with RAAS inhibitors were available only for those at Very High risk and showed that the proportion of patients not treated was again significantly higher in patients with T1DM. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, this study provides evidence of wide undertreatment of traditional cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes included in AMD Annals Database. Undertreatment seems to be more pronounced in individuals with T1D compared to those with T2D and is frequently due to clinical inertia.

Temporal trends in the starting of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes in Italy: data from the AMD Annals initiative.

AIMS: Opportunities and needs for starting insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) have changed overtime. We evaluated clinical characteristics of T2D subjects undergoing the first insulin prescription during a 15-year-observation period in the large cohort of the AMD Annals Initiative in Italy. METHODS: Data on clinical and laboratory variables, complications and concomitant therapies and the effects on glucose control after 12 months were evaluated in T2D patients starting basal insulin as add-on to oral/non-insulin injectable agents, and in those starting fast-acting in add-on to basal insulin therapy in three 5-year periods (2005-2019). RESULTS: We evaluated data from 171.688 T2D subjects who intensified therapy with basal insulin and 137.225 T2D patients who started fast-acting insulin. Overall, intensification with insulin occurred progressively earlier over time in subjects with shorter disease duration. Moreover, the percentage of subjects with HbA1c levels > 8% at the time of basal insulin initiation progressively decreased. The same trend was observed for fast-acting formulations. Clinical characteristics of subjects starting insulin did not change in the three study-periods, although all major risk factors improved overtime. After 12 months from the starting of basal or fast-acting insulin therapy, mean HbA1c levels decreased in all the three investigated time-periods, although mean HbA1c levels remained above the recommended target. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of T2D subjects, a progressively earlier start of insulin treatment was observed during a long observation period, suggesting a more proactive prescriptive approach. However, after 12 months from insulin prescription, in many patients, HbA1c levels were still out-of-target.

Sex differences in food choices, adherence to dietary recommendations and plasma lipid profile in type 2 diabetes - The TOSCA.IT study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetic women have a more adverse plasma lipid profile than men. Sex differences in dietary habits may play a role, but are little investigated. The study evaluates the quality of diet, adherence to the nutritional recommendations of the Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group and their relation with plasma lipid in men and women with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 2573 people, aged 50-75, enrolled in the TOSCA.IT study (clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00700856). Plasma lipids were measured centrally. Diet was assessed with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Women had a more adverse plasma lipid profile than men. Women consumed significantly more legumes, vegetables, fruits, eggs, milk, vegetable oils, and added sugar, whereas men consumed more starchy foods, soft drinks and alcoholic beverages. This stands for a higher proportion (%) of energy intake from saturated fat and added sugar (12.0 ± 2.4 vs 11.5 ± 2.5 and 3.4 ± 3.2 vs 2.3 ± 3.2, P < 0.04), and a higher intake of fiber (11.2 ± 2.8 vs 10.4 ± 2.6 g/1000 Kcal/day) in women. Adherence to the recommendations for saturated fat and fiber consumption was associated with significantly lower LDL-cholesterol regardless of sex. Adherence to the recommendations for added sugars was associated with significantly lower triglycerides and higher HDL-cholesterol in men and women. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women with diabetes show significant differences in adherence to nutritional recommendations, but sex differences in plasma lipid profile are unlikely to be explained by nutritional factors. Adherence to the nutritional recommendations is associated with a better plasma lipid profile regardless of sex, thus reinforcing the importance of substituting saturated for unsaturated fat sources, increasing fiber and reducing added sugar intake.

The quality of care in type 1 and type 2 diabetes - A 2023 update of the AMD Annals initiative.

AIMS: An initiative of continuous monitoring of the quality of diabetes care, promoted by the Association of Medical Diabetologists, is in place in Italy since 2006 (AMD Annals). The initiative was effective in improving quality of care indicators, assessed periodically through standardized measures. Here, we show the 2023 AMD Annals data on type 2 (T2D) and type 1 (T1D) diabetes. METHODS: A network of over 1/3 of diabetes centers in Italy periodically extracts anonymous data from electronic medical records, using a standardized software. Process, treatment and outcome indicators, and a validated score of overall care, the Q-score, were evaluated. RESULTS: 296 centers provided data on 573,164 T2D (mean age 69.7 ± 11.2 years) and 42,611 T1D subjects (mean age 48.6 ± 16.9 years). A HbA1c value ≤ 7.0 % was documented in 56.3 % of patients with T2D and 35.9 % of those with T1D. Only 6.6 % of T2D patients and 3.5 % of those with T1D reached the composite outcome of HbA1c ≤ 7.0 % + LDL-C < 70 mg/dl + BP < 130/80 mmHg. Notably, only 2.8 % and 3.2 % of T2D and T1D patients, respectively, showed a Q score < 15, which correlates with an 80 % higher risk of incident CVD events compared to scores > 25. CONCLUSIONS: We documented an overall good quality of care in both T1D and T2D subjects. However, the failure to achieve the targets of the main risk factors, especially if combined, in a still too large proportion of patients testify the difficulty to apply the more and more stringent indications recommended by guidelines in the everyday clinical practice.

Costs of treatment and complications of adult type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Costs associated with diabetes represent a large burden for patients and the health-care system. However, few studies examined the costs for diabetes treatment in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). This analysis was aimed to assess the costs of treatment associated with T1DM among adults in Italy from the national health-care system perspective. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected using a questionnaire assessing resource consumption retrospectively (drugs, visits, diagnostics, hospitalisations and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)). One-year costs were calculated for the 12 months preceding the survey. Cost estimation, referred to 2006, was carried out using univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models. Fifty-eight centres enrolled 1193 patients (49.5% women; aged between 18 and 55 years, average diabetes duration was 16.1 ± 9.8 years). The average annual cost for an adult patient with TDM1 was € 2450 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2358-2544). Insulin therapy and SMBG accounted together for 71.2% of total costs (35.6% and 35.6%, respectively); the remainder was shared by hospitalisations (18%), visits (4.0%), diagnostics (3.9%) and other drugs (2.9%). Univariate analyses showed that the presence of complications was associated with excess of costs, mainly related to the hospitalisation and drugs. Multivariate analyses confirmed these results showing that the presence of micro-vascular plus macrovascular complications doubles the cost of treatment. CONCLUSION: Strategies of care for T1DM that can improve disease management and prevent or delay the onset of complications could represent the most important tool to reduce costs in the long term while improving clinical outcomes and quality of life.

The AMD ANNALS: A continuous initiative for the improvement of type 2 diabetes care.

AIMS: Since 2006, the Italian AMD (Associations of Medical Diabetologists) Annals Initiative promoted a continuous monitoring of the quality of diabetes care, that was effective in improving process, treatment and outcome indicators through a periodic assessment of standardized measures. Here, we show the 2022 AMD Annals data on type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A network involving ∼1/3 of diabetes centers in Italy periodically extracts anonymous data from electronic clinical records, by a standardized software. Process, treatment and outcome indicators, and a validated score of overall care, the Q-score, were evaluated. RESULTS: 295 centers provided the annual sample of 502,747 T2D patients. Overall, HbA1c value ≤7.0% was documented in 54.6% of patients, blood pressure <130/80 mmHg in 23.0%, and LDL-cholesterol levels <70 mg/dl in 34.3%, but only 5.2% were at- target for all the risk factors. As for innovative drugs, 29.0% of patients were on SGLT2-i, and 27.5% on GLP1-RAs. In particular, 59.7% were treated with either GLP1-RAs or SGLT2-i among those with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), 26.6% and 49.3% with SGLT2-i among those with impaired renal function and heart failure, respectively. Notably, only 3.2% of T2D patients showed a Q score <15, which correlates with a 80% higher risk of incident CVD events compared to scores >25. CONCLUSIONS: The 2022 AMD Annals data show an improvement in the use of innovative drugs and in the overall quality of T2D care in everyday clinical practice. However, additional efforts are needed to reach the recommended targets for HbA1c and major CVD risk factors.

A prediction model to assess the risk of egfr loss in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function: The amd annals initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a model for predicting 5-year eGFR-loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with preserved renal function at baseline. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A cohort of 504.532 T2DM outpatients participating to the Medical Associations of Diabetologists (AMD) Annals Initiative was splitted into the Learning and Validation cohorts, in which the predictive model was respectively developed and validated. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model including all baseline characteristics was performed to identify predictors of eGFR-loss. A weight derived from regression coefficients was assigned to each variable and the overall sum of weights determined the 0 to 8-risk score. RESULTS: A set of demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters entered the final model. The eGFR-loss score showed a good performance in the Validation cohort. Increasing score values progressively identified a higher risk of GFR loss: a score ≥ 8 was associated with a HR of 13.48 (12.96-14.01) in the Learning and a HR of 13.45 (12.93-13.99) in the Validation cohort. The 5 years-probability of developing the study outcome was 55.9% higher in subjects with a score ≥ 8. CONCLUSIONS: In the large AMD Annals Initiative cohort, we developed and validated an eGFR-loss prediction model to identify T2DM patients at risk of developing clinically meaningful renal complications within a 5-years time frame.

Antineoplastic dosing in overweight and obese cancer patients: an Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM)/Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)/Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE)/Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper.

Most anticancer molecules are administered in body-size-based dosing schedules, bringing up unsolved issues regarding pharmacokinetic data in heavy patients. The worldwide spread of obesity has not been matched by improved methods and strategies for tailored drug dosage in this population. The weight or body surface area (BSA)-based approaches may fail to fully reflect the complexity of the anthropometric features besides obesity in cancer patients suffering from sarcopenia. Likewise, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic data on obese patients for the majority of chemotherapeutic agents as well as for new target drugs and immunotherapy. Therefore, although the available findings point to the role of dose intensity in cancer treatment, and support full weight-based dosing, empirical dose capping often occurs in clinical practice in order to avoid toxicity. Thus a panel of experts of the Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM), Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD), Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE), and Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF), provides here a consensus statement for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy and new biological cancer drug dosing in obese patients.

Early prediction of pancreatic cancer from new-onset diabetes: an Associazione Italiana Oncologia Medica (AIOM)/Associazione Medici Diabetologi (AMD)/Società Italiana Endocrinologia (SIE)/Società Italiana Farmacologia (SIF) multidisciplinary consensus position paper.

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a common cause of cancer-related death, due to difficulties in detecting early-stage disease, to its aggressive behaviour, and to poor response to systemic therapy. Therefore, developing strategies for early diagnosis of resectable PC is critical for improving survival. Diabetes mellitus is another major public health problem worldwide. Furthermore, diabetes can represent both a risk factor and a consequence of PC: nowadays, the relationship between these two diseases is considered a high priority for research. New-onset diabetes can be an early manifestation of PC, especially in a thin adult without a family history of diabetes. However, even if targeted screening for patients at higher risk of PC could be a promising approach, this is not recommended in asymptomatic adults with new-onset diabetes, due to the much higher incidence of hyperglycaemia than PC and to the lack of a safe and affordable PC screening test. Prompted by a well-established and productive multidisciplinary cooperation, the Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), the Italian Medical Diabetologists Association (AMD), the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), and the Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) here review available evidence on the mechanisms linking diabetes and PC, addressing the feasibility of screening for early PC in patients with diabetes, and sharing a set of update statements with the aim of providing a state-of-the-art overview and a decision aid tool for daily clinical practice.

Correlates of quality of life in adults with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin injection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aim of this study was to identify subgroups of adults with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) treated with Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) at higher risk of poor quality of life (QoL). A sample of consecutive patients completed the Diabetes Specific Quality of Life Scale (DSQOLS), investigating the daily burden and restrictions related to diabetes. Lower DSQOLS scores indicate worse QoL perception. METHODS AND RESULTS: The main results were obtained by using a regression-tree technique (RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation - RECPAM) and multivariate logistic regression. Overall, 472 patients aged between 18 and 55 years were recruited by 43 Italian centers. RECPAM analysis led to the identification of 5 classes characterized by a marked difference in QoL. Male patients not reporting episodes of ketoacidosis and using CSII for >2 years had the lowest likelihood of scoring in the lower tertile of the DSQOLS summary score, and thus represented the reference category. Patients who reported > or =1 ketoacidosis episodes (OR = 5.4; 95% CI 2.4-12.1) and female patients with a duration of diabetes of <10 years (OR = 5.9; 95% CI 2.6-13.5) had the highest likelihood of reporting poor QoL, while females with longer diabetes duration (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.7) and males treated with CSII for < or =2 years (OR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.1-4.6) showed a two-fold risk of poor QoL. Patient age, diabetic complications and civil status were globally predictive variables associated with poor QoL. CONCLUSION: We identified subgroups of T1DM individuals treated with CSII showing a major impairment in QoL. Specific strategies are needed to help the patient cope with this therapeutic modality, especially during the initial phase of treatment.

Quality of life and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes: a comparison between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections.

AIMS: The aim of this case-control study was to compare quality of life (QoL) and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) treated with either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or multiple daily injections (MDI). METHODS: Consecutive patients aged between 18 and 55 years, and attending diabetes clinics for a routine visit, completed the Diabetes-Specific Quality-of-Life Scale (DSQOLS), the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and the SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Case (CSII) and control subjects (MDI) were recruited in a 1 : 2 ratio. RESULTS: Overall, 1341 individuals were enrolled by 62 diabetes clinics; 481 were cases and 860 control subjects. Cases had a longer diabetes duration and were more likely to have eye and renal complications. Age, school education, occupation and HbA(1c) were similar. Of control subjects, 90% followed glargine-based MDI regimens and 10% used NPH-based MDI regimens. On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for socioeconomic and clinical characteristics, scores in the following areas of the DSQOLS were higher in cases than control subjects: diet restrictions (beta = 5.96; P < 0.0001), daily hassles (beta = 3.57; P = 0.01) and fears about hypoglycaemia (beta = 3.88; P = 0.006). Treatment with CSII was also associated with a markedly higher DTSQ score (beta = 4.13; P < 0.0001) compared with MDI. Results were similar when CSII was compared separately with glargine- or NPH-based MDI regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This large, non-randomized, case-control study suggests quality of life gains deriving from greater lifestyle flexibility, less fear of hypoglycaemia, and higher treatment satisfaction, when CSII is compared with either glargine-based or NPH-based MDI regimens.

Prevalence of elevated liver enzymes in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with the metabolic syndrome.

The occurrence of liver disease and raised liver enzymes is common in Type 2 diabetes, and may be multifactorial in origin. Very few studies are available on the exact prevalence of the phenomenon, however. We carried out an observational point-prevalence study of elevated liver enzymes in eight hospital-based Italian diabetes units. Data of 9621 consecutive Type 2 diabetes patients (males, 52.4%; median age, 65 yr) were analyzed, and alanine and aspartate aminotransferase (ALT, AST) and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) levels were related to body mass index (BMI), metabolic control and the presence of the metabolic syndrome. ALT, AST, and GGT levels exceeding the upper limit of normal were present in 16.0%, 8.8%, 23.1%, respectively, the prevalence being higher in males, increasing with obesity class and poor metabolic control, and decreasing with age. Elevated enzymes were systematically associated with most parameters of the metabolic syndrome. After correction for age, gender, BMI, and differences across centers, elevated triglyceride levels/fibrate treatment [odds ratio (OR), 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.34- 1.84] and an enlarged waist circumference (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.17-1.85) were the only parameters independently associated with high ALT. In a separate analysis, the presence of metabolic syndrome (Adult Treatment Panel III criteria) was highly predictive of raised liver enzymes. After exclusion of hepatitis B and C positive cases, tested in 2 centers, the prevalence of raised enzymes decreased by approximately 4%, but the association with the metabolic syndrome did not change significantly. In conclusion, the high prevalence of elevated liver enzymes in Type 2 diabetes is in keeping with the well-demonstrated risk of progressive liver disease. A large amount of diabetes patients may require a thorough clinical, laboratory and histological investigation.

Lipid, lipoprotein, and apolipoprotein assessment during an 8-wk very-low-calorie diet.

The influence of a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) on lipid pattern is controversial. To evaluate the long-term effect of semistarvation on lipid patterns, a group of severely obese patients [aged 37 +/- 12 y, body mass index (BMI) 40.0 +/- 0.9] underwent a VLCD for 8 wk. Total cholesterol (TC), LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), apolipoproteins A1 (apo A1) and B (apo B) were analyzed every week. TC (6.07 +/- 0.23 vs 5.53 +/- 0.25 mmol/L, P less than 0.0008), HDL-C (mmol/L 1.26 +/- 0.06 vs 1.04 +/- 0.05 mmol/L, P less than 0.0001), TGs (1.46 +/- 0.19 vs 1.06 +/- 0.10 mmol/L, P less than 0.0008), and apo A1 (1.57 +/- 0.06 vs 1.32 +/- 0.06 g/L, P less than 0.0002) decreased, whereas LDL-C and apo B showed a biphasic behavior: they significantly fell during the first 3 wk, but during the last weeks returned to their initial values.

[Comparison of three methods for the rapid determination of body composition]. / Tre metodiche a confronto per una rapida determinazione della composizione corporea.

The study of body composition is becoming increasingly important in the field of nutritional medicine. The possibility of assessing body composition easily and economically has therefore raised considerable interest. Using straightforward correlations, we have compared the data obtained from the assessment of BF% using plicometry, impedance analysis and the interactivity of close-infrared rays; in addition, we studied the possible influence of the distribution of fatty tissue, expressed as W/H, on the results obtained using these methods. One hundred and forty-eight subjects (51 M and 97 F) were studied aged between 13 and 76 years old, with BMI ranging between 16.8 and 56.4; subjects were divided into three groups according to BMI and W/H. The three methods proved to be well correlated in patients with BMI less than 30 (r between 0.92 and 0.74), whereas correlations were less marked and less significant in groups with BMI greater than 30. W/H seemed capable of influencing results obtained using these methods and this was more evident in results obtained using impedance analysis (p less than 0.0001). The three methods studied were comparable in normal weight and slightly overweight patients, whereas contrasting findings were obtained in patients with moderate and severe obesity. Extreme caution must therefore be used in interpreting the data obtained in these subjects.