Detection of hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Four serologic tests compared.

To determine the best method for detecting HCV infection in immunosuppressed patients, stored frozen serum from 101 liver transplant recipients was tested for hepatitis C virus. Each sample was tested by four assays. HCV RNA was detected by both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and branched DNA signal amplification. Antibody to HCV was determined using second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) and recombinant immunoblot assay. Forty one transplant recipients met the working definition for true positives of HCV infection. Of these "true positives," 98% were positive by HCV RNA PCR assay, 88% by b-DNA signal amplification assay, 88% by anti-HCV EIA, and 63% demonstrated two or more reactive bands on recombinant immunoblot. Five of 57 (9%) HCV-antibody negative recipients had HCV RNA detected by both methods. Of 44 HCV enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) repeatedly reactive samples, the recombinant immunoblot was negative in 2 and indeterminate in 13. HCV RNA was present in 9 of 13 recombinant immunoblot indeterminate sera. Nine EIA repeatedly reactive sera were negative by both tests for HCV RNA. In liver transplant recipients, HCV infection is best determined by measurement of HCV RNA. Antibody formation may be delayed or suppressed in a minority of patients despite > 10(9) equivalents/L (> 10(6)/mL) of HCV RNA in serum. Recombinant immunoblots with a single reactive band pattern often indicate HCV infection in immunosuppressed patients.

Improved detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus using a second generation ELISA.

A screening assay for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV); ORTHO HCV ELISA Test System, Second Generation, was compared with the currently licensed c100-3 based test (ORTHO HCV ELISA Test System). The second generation ELISA differs from the c100-3 based assay in that it detects circulating antibodies to both structural (nucleocapsid) and non-structural (NS3/NS4) HCV proteins. Specimens tested consisted of a cohort of 35 patients diagnosed with non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) and 3971 presumably healthy volunteer blood donors. Second generation ELISA demonstrated significantly greater clinical sensitivity in patients with acute phase NANBH (80% vs. 60%) as well as chronic disease (88% vs. 72%). Additional specimens reactive only in second generation ELISA, demonstrated reactivity to HCV antigens c33c and/or c22-3 in supplemental testing by the Chiron HCV RIBA Assay System. The second generation ELISA also detected additional RIBA reactive volunteer blood donors (0.18% of the population tested) that were nonreactive in first generation ELISA. This data indicated that second generation ELISA would detect approximately 2 additional anti-HCV reactive donors per 1,000 screened. Specificities obtained with this low risk population were 99.6% for first generation and 99.7% for second generation ELISA.

New generation RIBA hepatitis C strip immunoblot assays.

Second generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) Elisas are currently in use in Europe and have been submitted for approval in the United States. These new assays contain additional antigens from the putative nucleocapsid and NS-3 regions of the HCV genome in addition to the c100-3 antigen present in first generation Elisas. A supplementary test, the second generation RIBA (Chiron Co trademark) HCV strip immunoblot assay (2-RIBA HCV SIA) has also been developed. The strip immuno-blot assay uses four recombinant HCV antigens (5-1-1 [NS-4], c100-3 [NS-4], c33c [NS-3], and c22-3 [NS-3 [nucleocapsid]) slot blotted on nitrocellulose. Screening of random volunteer blood donors with the Ortho (Ortho Diagnostic Systems trademark) second generation HCV Elisa (2-Ortho HCV Elisa) indicates that a substantial change in the repeat reactive donor population is observed with the new test. Two notable features of this change are: i) a large number of samples reactive in the 2-RIBA HCV SIA for the second generation antigens, c33c and c22-3, are detected by the 2-Ortho HCV Elisa; ii) the percentage of 2-Ortho HCV Elisa reactive specimens found indeterminate (reactive for only one HCV antigen) by the 2-RIBA HCV SIA is higher than in first generation HCV Elisas (approximately 25 versus 5%). In addition, 2-ortho HCV Elisa repeat reactive, 2-RIBA HCV SIA indeterminate samples are dominated by reactivity to c22-3 instead of c100-3 which is the case for first generation HCV Elisa repeat reactive samples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Substituted hemins as probes for structure-function relationships in horseradish peroxidase.

Low temperature visible spectra of Compounds I from peroxidases reconstituted with protohemin, 2-formyl-4-vinyldeuterohemin, 2-vinyl-4-formyldeuterohemin, 2,4-dimethyldeuterohemin, and 2,4-diacetyldeuterohemin reveal that these Fe(IV) porphyrin pi-cation radicals take the 2A2u of peroxidase-type electronic ground state. Compound I of deuterohemin horseradish peroxidase, however, takes the 2A1u or catalase type pi-cation radical electronic ground state. Since deuterohemin horseradish peroxidase possesses no catalase activity, the structure of the peroxidase apoprotein (other than those factors which might influence the Compound I pi-cation radical ground state) is concluded to play the major role in determining the reactivity of Compound I toward hydrogen donors. Studies on peroxidases substituted with the hemins 2-formyl-4-vinyldeuterohemin, 2-vinyl-4-formyldeuterohemin, 2,4-dimethyldeuterohemin, and mesohemin reveal that isoelectronic hemins differentially interact with the peroxidase apoprotein. The hemin 2- and 4-substituents are therefore concluded to interact sterically with the horseradish peroxidase apoprotein. While a variety of 2- and 4-substituted hemins were observed to bind rapidly with apo horseradish peroxidase to form active substituted enzymes, small changes in the substituents in the 6- and 7-positions had drastic effects on the rates of binding to apoperoxidase and the activities of the reconstituted enzymes. Even addition of a single methylene to form butyrate instead of propionate side chains drastically altered the rate of binding of the hemin and the activity of the substituted enzyme. It therefore appears that while the 2-, 4-, 6-, and 7-substituents of the hemins in horseradish peroxidase all interact with the protein, the polypeptide chain possesses more conformational flexibility in the area which binds the 2- and 4-substituents.

Hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients with chronic liver disease: ELISA and RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay results.

In a study using the current first generation Ortho ELISA, a second generation Ortho ELISA, and the RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay, all patients who were strongly positive for antihepatitis C virus (HCV) on ELISAs (OD490 > 3) were reactive to RIBA for multiple bands. While all ELISA false positive samples had low or intermediate OD490 values, RIBA confirmed HCV reactivity in 50% of the patients reactive to ELISA with a low suspicion of HCV infection, thus suggesting that RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay will be most useful for patients who react weakly positive or intermediate to ELISA.

Non-A, non-B posttransfusion hepatitis: comparing C and non-C hepatitis.

Using assays to detect antibodies against antigens (C-100, 5-1-1, C-22 and C-33) of the hepatitis C virus, we tested stored sera from 40 patients prospectively identified as having non-A, non-B posttransfusion hepatitis. The 28 patients who demonstrated seroconversion ("documented hepatitis C") had more severe initial disease; all 20 cases of chronic hepatitis occurred in this subgroup. Only 2 of the 12 patients who did not demonstrate such seroconversion even had symptoms. In the group of patients with documented hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis was more commonly seen in men (89%) than in women (40%). The patients in whom antibody to the C-100 antigen developed were younger and had received more blood than had those patients who had hepatitis C diagnosed by demonstration of antibodies to the 5-1-1, C-22 or C-33 antigen (or all three). The proportion of cases of posttransfusion hepatitis that could be associated with antibody sero-conversion decreased around the time that blood banks switched to an all-volunteer system. The hepatitis seen in patients who failed to demonstrate serological evidence of hepatitis C virus exposure was usually clinically unimportant; it may or may not have been due to viral infection.

New-generation RIBA hepatitis C strip immunoblot assays.

Second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) ELISAs are currently in use in Europe and have been submitted for approval in the United States. These new assays contain additional antigens from the putative nucleocapsid and NS-3 regions of the HCV genome in addition to the c100-3 antigen present in first-generation ELISAs. A supplementary test, the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (2-RIBA HCV SIA) has also been developed. The strip immunoblot assay uses four recombinant HCV antigens [5-1-1 (NS-4), c100-3 (NS-4), c33c (NS-3), and c22-3 (NS-3) (nucleocapsid)] slot blotted on nitrocellulose. Screening of random volunteer blood donors with the Ortho second-generation HCV ELISA (ORTHO HCV 2.0 ELISA) indicates that a substantial change in the repeat reactive donor population is observed with the new test. Two notable features of this change are: (1) A large number of samples reactive in the 2-RIBA HCV SIA for the second-generation antigens, c33c and c22-3, are detected by the ORTHO HCV 2.0 ELISA; (2) the percentage of ORTHO HCV 2.0 ELISA reactive specimens found indeterminate (reactive for only one HCV antigen) by the 2-RIBA HCV SIA is higher than in first-generation HCV ELISAs (approximately 25 vs. 5%). In addition, ORTHO HCV 2.0 ELISA repeat reactive, 2-RIBA HCV SIA indeterminate samples are dominated by reactivity to c22-3 instead of c100-3, which is the case for first-generation HCV ELISA repeat reactive samples. Resolution of 2-RIBA HCV SIA indeterminate samples as either containing anti-HCV antibodies or not, is important in both diagnostic and blood screening environments, especially where donor notification is required. Our approach to resolution of these troublesome samples evolved from initial work with HCV peptides. Early studies with an experimental strip immunoblot assay containing 5 peptides from the nucleocapsid, E2 (NS-1), NS-4, and NS-5 regions of the viral genome indicated that peptides from the nucleocapsid and NS-4 regions of the genome could provide additional evidence for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies with good specificity, but other peptides suffered from poor specificity. In addition, no immunoreactive peptide from the NS-3 (c33c) region of the virus is available, presumably because the major epitope(s) of this key second-generation antigen is a conformational determinant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Concordance between hepatitis C virus serotyping assays.

Hepatitis C virus testing has evolved from a simple enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to complex molecular tests including qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as well as multiple methods to determine geno and serotypes. Serotyping assays have been described and are being further refined to aid describing the epidemiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and may have a role in predicting response treatment. This study describes the concordance between two serotyping assay systems, a recombinant immunoblot assay Chiron RIBA Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA) and a more competitive ELISA peptide assay, using PCR as the standard. Serotype was successfully determined in 144/202 (71%) patients by the Murex ELISA assay and 179/202 (89%) by the Chiron strip immunoblot assay (SIA) assay (P < 0.001). Concordance between restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and the Murex assay was 139/144 (97%) between RFLP and the Chiron SIA was 171/179 (96%) and between the Murex and Chiron SIA was 136/144 (94%). These assays provided a reliable, simple, and rapid method of determining HCV serotype.

Hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients.

To determine the prevalence and significance of hepatitis C virus infection in kidney transplant recipients, paired serum samples collected from 100 renal allograft recipients on admission for kidney transplantation and 1 yr after transplantation were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus with second-generation enzyme immunoassay and recombinant immunoblot assay and for hepatitis C virus RNA with reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Before kidney transplantation, hepatitis C virus antibody was detected with second-generation enzyme immunoassay in 18 patients (12 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-positive, 6 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-indeterminate). Nine of 12 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-positive and 2 of 6 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-indeterminate samples were hepatitis C virus RNA positive. In addition, 7 of 82 patients who had no detectable antibody on second-generation enzyme immunoassay or second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay were hepatitis C virus RNA positive. After kidney transplantation, hepatitis C virus antibody was detected in 19 patients (12 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-positive, 7 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-indeterminate, 14 seropositive for hepatitis C virus antibody). Eleven of 12 patients with second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-positive results and 4 of 7 with second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay-indeterminate results were positive for hepatitis C virus RNA. Hepatitis C virus RNA was present in 28 patients 1 yr after kidney transplantation. Six patients appeared to have acquired active hepatitis C virus infection 1 yr after kidney transplantation (seroconverted to hepatitis C virus RNA positivity).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Evaluation of indeterminate c22-3 reactivity in volunteer blood donors.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25 percent of blood donor sera that are repeatably reactive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) on second-generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA 2.0) are indeterminate on second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0), and over 76 percent of these results are due to single reactivity to the HCV recombinant antigen c22-3. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Data are presented on 46 volunteer allogeneic blood donors who were reactive on EIA2.0 and c22-3 indeterminate in RIBA 2.0. Index and follow-up samples were evaluated by using a panel of five synthetic peptide EIAs, a prototype strip immunoblot assay that uses synthetic peptides in addition to recombinant protein (RIBA 3.0), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for HCV RNA. RESULTS: All 46 donations had normal alanine aminotransferase values; only 2 (4.3%) reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. With a panel of 12 synthetic peptides spanning the entire sequence of the c22-3 recombinant antigen, 33 plasmas (72%) reacted to one peptide or none, including 19 plasmas with reactivity restricted entirely to the N-terminal peptide (1-15 amino acids) of c22-3. With RIBA 3.0, 28 donations (61%) were nonreactive, including 25 that reacted with one peptide or none in EIA. Of these 25 plasmas, 18 reacted with the N-terminal sequence only. All 46 index donations were tested by PCR; the single PCR-positive unit reacted with four HCV peptides, was positive by RIBA 3.0, and reacted for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Twenty-six index donors were successfully recalled 3 to 7 months after their index donation. None seroconverted to positivity in RIBA 2.0, 1 was nonreactive, and 25 remained positive for c22-3 only. The restricted epitope reactivity in peptide EIA and RIBA 3.0 was maintained over time in all cases. All 26 of the follow-up samples tested negative by PCR. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the restricted peptide reactivity and PCR negativity of index and follow-up samples, it is concluded that the majority of c22-3 RIBA 2.0-indeterminate results are due to nonspecific cross-reactivity to restricted (principally, N-terminal) regions of HCV core antigen.

Epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori in chronic haemodialysis patients using the new RIBA H. pylori SIA.

BACKGROUND: There are few data concerning the epidemiology of H. pylori in patients on chronic haemodialysis (HD) treatment. These surveys concerned small populations and were made with ELISA technique. However, ELISA-based assays do not differentiate between strains of H. pylori that are associated with ulcers. Recent literature reports that formation of ulcers correlates strongly with the expression of cytotoxin-associated protein (CagA) and vacuolating cytotoxin (VacA) of H. pylori. METHODS: A novel serological test (RIBA H. pylori strip immunoblot assay (SIA)) has been recently introduced, it uses the H. pylori lysate (Lys) along with two additional purified recombinant antigens derived from CagA and VacA of H. pylori. AIM: To study the epidemiology of H. pylori using RIBA H. pylori SIA among chronic HD patients and blood donors as a control group. In addition, the activity of H. pylori was analysed by immunoblot technique in a group of patients with documented ulcers and normal renal function. RESULTS: The prevalence of antibody towards H. pylori among HD patients, blood donors, and patients with documented ulcers was 56% (127/228), 53% (84/158), and 100%, (21/21) respectively; the difference was significant (P=0.0001). The frequency of anti-H. pylori-positive individuals was significantly higher in patients with documented ulcers than HD patients and blood donors, 21/21 (100%) vs 211/386 (55%), P=0.0001. The frequency of antibody to H. pylori in the HD population was significantly associated with race (P= 0.005); no relationship between anti-H. pylori antibody and numerous demographic, biochemical, and clinical features of patients was seen. The frequency of antibodies against virulent strains of H. pylori in HD patients and blood donors with H. pylori was 60% (76/127) and 61% (51/84) respectively; it was 86% (18/21) among individuals with documented ulcers. No significant difference among these three groups occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of antibody towards H. pylori by RIBA H. pylori SIA was high both in HD patients and blood donors; patients with documented ulcers and normal renal function had significantly higher frequency of anti-H. pylori antibody. The anti-H. pylori antibody rate among HD patients was strongly associated with race. The prevalence of antibody against virulent strains of H. pylori did not change among HD patients and control groups. Studies in large cohorts of HD patients with documented peptic ulcer disease are in progress.

Increased detection of hepatitis C virus infection in commercial plasma donors by a third-generation screening assay.

BACKGROUND: Routine screening of blood donations with second-generation hepatitis hepatitis C virus (HCV) assays has substantially reduced the occurrence of posttransfusion hepatitis. However, following the development of third-generation assays, several studies indicated that these assays may identify HCV-infected individuals who are not identified by second-generation assays. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of a third-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA-3) was compared with a second-generation ELISA (ELISA-2) in a side-by-side study of 9936 commercial blood donors. ELISA-reactive specimens were subjected to supplemental analysis by third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: ELISA-3 demonstrated greater sensitivity than ELISA-2, detecting 1 additional recombinant immunoblot assay-positive specimen per 2000 tested. ELISA-3 also detected 1 additional HCV-infectious polymerase chain reaction-positive unit among approximately 10,000 units screened. CONCLUSION: The incremental sensitivity achieved with ELISA-3 can be expected to eliminate approximately 20 infectious donations per week among those made by commercial donors in the United States. In accordance with previous studies, most of the improved sensitivity of ELISA-3 derives from its increased detection of anti-c33c (NS3), rather than from the inclusion of HCV antigen NS5.

Evaluation of a novel serotyping system for hepatitis C virus: strong correlation with standard genotyping methodologies.

Direct sequencing and analysis of viral genomes are definitive methods for identifying various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes. However, HCV genome sequencing methods are cumbersome and unsuitable for analyzing large numbers of clinical samples. We have developed a convenient, reliable, and reproducible RIBA strip immunoblot assay system for determining HCV serotype. Briefly, the assay consists of an immunoblot strip on which there are five lanes of immobilized serotype-specific HCV peptides from the nonstructural (NS-4) and core regions of the genomes of HCV types 1,2, and 3. HCV serotype is deduced by determining the greatest intensity of reactivity to the NS-4 serotype-specific HCV peptide band in relation to the intensity of the human immunoglobulin G internal control bands on each strip. HCV core peptide reactivity is used only in the absence of NS-4 reactivity. We used this assay to successfully serotype a high percentage of sera from well-documented HCV-infected patients. Our serotyping results correlated 99% with the findings from the standard restriction fragment length polymorphism genotyping methods. Less than 5% of the serum samples were untypeable. For a selected group of alpha interferon-treated patients we observed that the nonresponders (76.2%) and a majority of the responders who relapsed (72.2%) had type 2 HCV infection. A small population (n= 8) of complete responders was split 3:4:1 as type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively. Our data indicate that this new serotyping assay has the potential to be a highly specific and reliable method for typing of HCV infection in patients.

Improved detection of hepatitis C virus antibodies in high-risk populations.

Sera from 483 patients at high (group 1, n = 313) and lower (group 2, n = 170) risk for exposure to hepatitis C were tested for antibodies to hepatitis C using first-generation (c100-3) and second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay. The second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and nitrocellulose-based immunoblot assay differ from c100-3-based systems in the addition of expression products from the NS3/NS4 (c33c, c200) and putative nucleocapsid (c22-3) region of the hepatitis C genome. In group 1, the sensitivity of detection of hepatitis C antibodies was 45%, 55% and 46% by the first- and second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and recombinant immunoblot assay, respectively. In group 2, antibodies were detected by each test system in 26%, 32% and 7% of patients, respectively. Most sera (99%) reactive with the first-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were reactive with the second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (in group 1, 89% of these specimens demonstrated reactivity to at least one antigen with the immunoblot assay, compared with only 31% in group 2). An additional 12% (group 1) and 6% (group 2) of specimens demonstrated reactivity with the second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay only (of these, 75% [group 1] and 9% [group 2] demonstrated reactivity to at least one antigen with the immunoblot assay). Ninety-eight percent of specimens not reactive with both enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test systems were also nonreactive by recombinant immunoblot assay.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Automated RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay: a novel tool for the diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients.

Hemodialysis (HD) patients remain a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Serological assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, ELISAs) are the only tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States for the diagnosis of HCV. The RIBA HCV Strip Immunoblot Assay (SIA) is an established method for supplemental testing of repeat reactive hepatitis C ELISA patients on HD. However, the current manual procedure is labor intensive, requiring subjective band scoring and result interpretation. Recently, the automated CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System has been designed to perform RIBA supplemental testing. The CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System consists of a bench-top instrument that provides objective evaluation of the RIBA immunoblot strips, by measuring the light differentially reflected from the developed bands and white background, creating a density of reflectance. The CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System assesses the intensity of each of the reactive bands in relation to the intensity of the internal control bands on each RIBA HCV strip. Comparison between processor and manual protocols was performed using a large (n = 200) cohort of ELISA 3.0 HCV negative and positive patients on maintenance HD. The test characteristics of RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA were identical with manual and automated runs. The relative intensity values of antigenic bands by the CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System between anti-HCV positive and negative patients were significantly different; only 15 of 784 (1.9%) antigenic bands had borderline reactivities. The correlation of test results between manual and automated runs was very high (kappa value 0.989). Among positive results by RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, there was a strong concordance between manual and automated runs with regard to the pattern of reactivity (kappa value 0.943). The discordant results between manual and automated protocols were attributable to increased variability of antigen scores close to the cutoff value for both tests. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA in the HD population accurately with minimal operator involvement. The test characteristics of RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA were identical by manual and automated runs. There was a strong correlation between the results of the manual and automated runs; the few discordant results between the two procedures were mostly due to increased variability of antigen scores close to the cutoff value for both tests. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the USA have recently included chronic HD patients among those persons for whom routine HCV testing is recommended; HCV-infected patients on HD often have a high rate of indeterminate results by manual RIBA technology which is operator dependent for band scoring and result interpretation. The CHIRON RIBA HCV 3.0 Processor System may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of ELISA repeat reactive specimens in clinical practice within dialysis units.

Automated RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) strip immunoblot assay for reproducible HCV diagnosis.

A comparison between the CHIRON RIBA hepatitis C virus (HCV) processor and manual systems was performed by using 88 specimens repeatedly reactive by the second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (HCV 2.0 ELISA) and 111 random specimens from volunteer donors. For the second-generation RIBA HCV strip immunoblot assay (SIA) (RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA), test results correlated strongly between the manual and the automated runs (kappa value, 0.937). For the RIBA HCV 3.0 SIA, the correlation of the test results was also high (kappa value, 0.899). Among the specimens with positive results by RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs, there was a very strong concordance of the test results between the manual and the automated runs with regard to the reactive bands. Nine samples had discordant results between the manual and the automated runs; this was probably attributable to increased variability in antigen scores close to the cutoff values for both tests. Run-to-run and within-run testing by the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System showed a very low rate of conflicting values. In conclusion, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System is capable of performing RIBA HCV 2.0 and 3.0 SIAs accurately with minimal operator involvement. In addition, the CHIRON RIBA HCV Processor System shows excellent reproducibility, with the potential for operator-to-operator and site-to-site variability being greatly reduced. Our data indicate that this novel methodology may be very useful for supplemental anti-HCV testing of specimens repeatedly reactive by ELISA in routine clinical assessments and epidemiologic evaluations.

Rapid and specific detection of Sin Nombre virus antibodies in patients with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome by a strip immunoblot assay suitable for field diagnosis.

To develop a rapid antibody test for Sin Nombre hantavirus (SNV) infection for diagnosis of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in field settings where advanced instrumentation is not available, a strip immunoblot assay bearing four immobilized antigens for SNV and a recombinant nucleocapsid protein antigen of Seoul hantavirus (SEOV) was prepared. The SNV antigens included a full-length recombinant-expressed nucleocapsid (N) protein (rN), a recombinant-expressed G1 protein (residues 35 to 117), and synthetic peptides derived from N (residues 17 to 59) and G1 (residues 55 to 88). On the basis of the observed reactivities of hantavirus-infected patient and control sera, we determined that a positive assay requires reactivity with SNV or SEOV rN antigen and at least one other antigen. Isolated reactivity to either viral rN antigen is indeterminate, and any pattern of reactivity that does not include reactivity to an rN antigen is considered indeterminate but is unlikely to represent hantavirus infection. Fifty-eight of 59 samples from patients with acute SNV-associated HPS were positive according to these criteria, and one was initially indeterminate. Four of four samples from patients with HPS due to other hantaviruses were positive, as were most samples from patients with SEOV and Puumala virus infections. Of 192 control serum samples, 2 (1%) were positive and 2 were indeterminate. Acute SNV infection was distinguishable from remote SNV infection or infection with hantaviruses other than SNV by the presence of G1 peptide antigen reactivities in the former. The strip immunoblot assay shows promise for the detection of SNV antibodies early in the course of HPS.