Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A Western propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) has been shown to be safe and feasible in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). However, it is unclear whether RG is equivalent to laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), especially in the Western world. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of RG and LG in GC patients. METHODS: We reviewed all gastric adenocarcinoma patients who underwent curative gastrectomy by minimally invasive approach in our institution from 2009 to 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to reduce selection bias. DaVinci Si platform was used for RG. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients were eligible for inclusion (48 RG and 108 LG). Total gastrectomy was performed in 21.3% and 25% of cases in LG and RG, respectively. The frequency of stage pTNM II/III was 48.1%, and 54.2% in the LG and RG groups (p = 0.488). After PSM, 48 patients were matched in each group. LG and RG had a similar number of dissected lymph nodes (p = 0.759), operative time (p = 0.421), and hospital stay (p = 0.353). Blood loss was lower in the RG group (p = 0.042). The major postoperative complications rate was 16.7% for LG and 6.2% for RG (p = 0.109). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.1% and 0% for LG and RG, respectively (p = 1.0). There was no significant difference between the LG and RG groups for disease-free survival (79.6% vs. 61.2%, respectively; p = 0.155) and overall survival (75.9% vs. 65.7%, respectively; p = 0.422). CONCLUSION: RG had similar surgical and long-term outcomes compared to LG, with less blood loss observed in RG.

Risk Scoring System to Predict Mortality in Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has a particularly unfavorable prognosis. This limited survival raises doubts about which factors confer an extremely worse outcome and which patients could benefit from more aggressive treatments, in an attempt to improve survival and better control the disease. This study aimed to evaluate the survival outcomes of patients with PC due to GC and develop a prognostic score to predict 6-month mortality. We performed an analysis of clinical stage IV GC with PC. Scores were assigned to risk factors and calculated for each patient from nine variables. Among 326 IVB GC, 211 (64.7%) had PC and were included. After calculating the score, 136 (64.5%) GCs were classified as a low-risk group and 75 (35.5%) as a high-risk group. Median OS was 7.9 and 1.9 months for low- and high-risk patients (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group, 77.3% of the patients died in <6 mo (p < 0.001). Palliative surgery and chemotherapy were associated with better survival, and the prognostic groups maintained statistical significance even when the same type of treatment was performed. In conclusion, the scoring system developed with variables related to patient performance status and clinical data was able to distinguish GC with PC with a high risk of 6-month mortality. Accordingly, verifying and validating our findings in a large cohort of patients is necessary to confirm and guarantee the external validation of the results.

THE VALUE OF PREOPERATIVE PROGNOSTIC NUTRITIONAL INDEX IN GASTRIC CANCER AFTER CURATIVE RESECTION.

BACKGROUND: Predicting short- and long-term outcomes of oncological therapies is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. Malnutrition and the host immune status significantly affect outcomes in major surgeries. AIMS: To assess the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting outcomes in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2020. PNI was calculated as follows: PNI=(10 x albumin [g/dL])+(0.005 x lymphocytes [nº/mm3]). The optimal cutoff value was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (PNI cutoff=52), and patients were grouped into low and high PNI. RESULTS: Of the 529 patients included, 315 (59.5%) were classified as a low-PNI group (PNI<52) and 214 (40.5%) as a high-PNI group (PNI≥52). Older age (p=0.050), male sex (p=0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) III/IV (p=0.001), lower hemoglobin level (p<0.001), lower body mass index (p=0.001), higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p<0.001), D1 lymphadenectomy, advanced pT stage, pN+ and more advanced pTNM stage were related to low-PNI patient. Furthermore, 30-day (1.4 vs. 4.8%; p=0.036) and 90-day (3.3 vs. 10.5%; p=0.002) mortality rates were higher in low-PNI compared to high-PNI group. Disease-free and overall survival were worse in low-PNI patients compared to high-PNI (p<0.001 for both). ASA III/IV score, low-PNI, pT3/T4, and pN+ were independent risk factors for worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PNI can predict short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Low PNI is an independent factor related to worse disease-free and overall survival.

Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in patients with resectable gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) gastric cancer (GC) generally has a better prognosis than microsatellite-stable (MSS) GC and has been associated with nonsurvival benefit with the addition of chemotherapy (CMT) compared with surgery alone. However, patients with MSI have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between patients with MSI GC and those with MSS GC. In addition, this study analyzed the survival outcomes of patients with MSI GC who received CMT. METHODS: This study reviewed all patients with GC who underwent curative gastrectomy. Patients were divided into MSI group and the MSS group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: Among the 378 patients enrolled, 78 (20.6%) had MSI. Older age (P < .001), subtotal gastrectomy (P = .008), pN0 (P = .020), and earlier pTNM stage (P = .012) were associated with MSI GC. Survival analysis showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients in the MSI group (P = .012 and P = .019, respectively). After PSM, 78 patients were matched to each group. All variables assigned to the scores were well matched, and both groups became equivalent. After the matching, the differences in DFS and OS according to MSI/MSS status were estimated to be larger than before (DFS: 63.3% vs 41.4%; P = .002; OS: 65.8% vs 42.5%; P = .002). Regarding patients referred for CMT, there was no difference in DFS and OS between patients with MSI GC who underwent CMT and those who underwent surgery alone (P = .255 and P = .178, respectively). CONCLUSION: Even after controlling for clinicopathological characteristics, MSI was identified as a prognostic factor for patient survival. MSI GC showed no significant survival benefit with the addition of CMT.

Prognostic implications of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes within the tumor microenvironment in gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play a regulatory role in the tumor-associated immune response and are important in the prognosis and treatment response of several cancers. However, because of its heterogeneity, the prognostic value of TILs in gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association between the density of TILs and patients' outcomes in GC. METHODS: Patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative intent gastrectomy were retrospectively investigated. The groups for analysis were determined on the basis of TIL intensity and percentage of CD3+ T-cell infiltration by immunohistochemical. Furthermore, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability (MSI), T-cell ratio of CD4 to CD8, and programmed death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) status were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were enrolled: 124 patients with GCs (35.9%) were classified as the low-CD3+ TIL group, and 221 patients with GCs (64.1%) were classified as the high-CD3+ TIL group. Poorly differentiated histology (P = .014), EBV-positive status (P < .001), PD-L1-positive status (P = .001), and CD4 < CD8 (P < .001) were associated with high-CD3+ GC. There was no difference regarding MSI status, the degree of tumor invasion (pT), the presence of lymph node metastasis, and pTNM stage between low- and high-CD3+ groups. In survival analysis, the high-CD3+ group had better disease-free survival and overall survival rates than had the low-CD3+ group (P = .055 and P = .041, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, total gastrectomy, lymph node metastasis, advanced pT stage, and low CD3+ levels were independent factors related to worse survival. CONCLUSION: High CD3+ TILs levels were significantly associated with improved survival and could serve as prognostic biomarkers in GC. In addition, CD3+ T-cell infiltration was related to both EBV-positive and PD-L1-positive GC and may assist in the investigation of targets in immunotherapy.

O valor do índice nutricional prognóstico pré-operatório no câncer gástrico após ressecção curativa / The value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index in gastric cancer after curative resection

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Predicting short- and long-term outcomes of oncological therapies is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. Malnutrition and the host immune status significantly affect outcomes in major surgeries. AIMS: To assess the value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in predicting outcomes in gastric cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2009 and 2020. PNI was calculated as follows: PNI=(10 x albumin [g/dL])+(0.005 x lymphocytes [nº/mm3]). The optimal cutoff value was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (PNI cutoff=52), and patients were grouped into low and high PNI. RESULTS: Of the 529 patients included, 315 (59.5%) were classified as a low-PNI group (PNI<52) and 214 (40.5%) as a high-PNI group (PNI≥52). Older age (p=0.050), male sex (p=0.003), American Society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) III/IV (p=0.001), lower hemoglobin level (p<0.001), lower body mass index (p=0.001), higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p<0.001), D1 lymphadenectomy, advanced pT stage, pN+ and more advanced pTNM stage were related to low-PNI patient. Furthermore, 30-day (1.4 vs. 4.8%; p=0.036) and 90-day (3.3 vs. 10.5%; p=0.002) mortality rates were higher in low-PNI compared to high-PNI group. Disease-free and overall survival were worse in low-PNI patients compared to high-PNI (p<0.001 for both). ASA III/IV score, low-PNI, pT3/T4, and pN+ were independent risk factors for worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PNI can predict short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy. Low PNI is an independent factor related to worse disease-free and overall survival.

RESUMO RACIONAL: Estimar os desfechos de curto e longo prazo das terapias contra o câncer é crucial para o desenvolvimento de estratégias de tratamento eficazes. A desnutrição e o estado imunológico do hospedeiro afetam significativamente os desfechos em cirurgias de grande porte. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o valor do índice nutricional prognóstico pré-operatório (INP) na predição de desfechos em pacientes com câncer gástrico. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma análise de coorte retrospectiva de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia com intenção curativa para adenocarcinoma gástrico entre 2009 e 2020. O INP foi calculado da seguinte forma: INP=(10 x albumina [g/dL])+(0.005 x linfócitos [nº/mm3]). O valor de corte ideal foi determinado pela curva característica de operação do receptor (ponto de corte do INP=52), e os pacientes foram agrupados em INP baixo ou alto. RESULTADOS: Dos 529 pacientes incluídos, 315 (59,5%) foram classificados como grupo de baixo INP (INP<52) e 214 (40,5%) como grupo de alto INP (INP>52). Idade mais avançada (p=0,050), sexo masculino (p=0,003), escore da Sociedade Americana de Anestesiologistas (ASA) III/IV (p=0,001), menor nível de hemoglobina (p<0,001), menor índice de massa corpórea (p=0,001), maior relação neutrófilos-linfócitos (p<0,001), linfadenectomia D1, estágio pT avançado, pN+ e estágio pTNM mais avançado foram relacionados ao paciente com baixo INP. Além disso, as taxas de mortalidade em 30 dias (1,4 vs. 4,8%; p=0,036) e em 90 dias (3,3 vs. 10,5%; p=0,002) foram maiores no grupo com baixo PNI em comparação ao grupo com alto INP. A sobrevida livre de doença e a sobrevida global foram piores em pacientes com baixo INP em comparação com pacientes com alto INP (p<0,001 para ambos). Escore ASA III/IV, baixo INP, pT3/T4 e pN+ foram fatores de risco independentes para pior sobrevida. CONCLUSÕES: O INP pré-operatório pode predizer desfechos de curto e longo prazo de pacientes com câncer gástrico após gastrectomia curativa. Baixo INP é um fator independente relacionado a piores sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global.

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: study protocol of a phase ii trial / Quimioterapia intraperitoneal para o câncer gástrico com carcinomatose peritoneal: protocolo de estudo de um ensaio de fase ii

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer is considered a fatal disease, without expectation of definitive cure. As systemic chemotherapy is not sufficient to contain the disease, a multimodal approach associating intraperitoneal chemotherapy with surgery may represent an alternative for these cases. AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in stage IV gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. METHODS: This study is a single institutional single-arm prospective clinical trial phase II (NCT05541146). Patients with the following inclusion criteria undergo implantation of a peritoneal catheter for intraperitoneal chemotherapy: Stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma; age 18-75 years; Peritoneal carcinomatosis with peritoneal cancer index<12; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0/1; good clinical status; and lab exams within normal limits. The study protocol consists of four cycles of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with paclitaxel associated with systemic chemotherapy. After treatment, patients with peritoneal response assessed by staging laparoscopy undergo conversion gastrectomy. RESULTS: The primary outcome is the rate of complete peritoneal response. Progression-free and overall survivals are other outcomes evaluated. The study started in July 2022, and patients will be screened for inclusion until 30 are enrolled. CONCLUSIONS: Therapies for advanced gastric cancer patients have been evaluated in clinical trials but without success in patients with peritoneal metastasis. The treatment proposed in this trial can be promising, with easy catheter implantation and ambulatory intraperitoneal chemotherapy regime. Verifying the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel with systemic chemotherapy is an important progress that this study intends to investigate.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A carcinomatose peritoneal no câncer gástrico é considerada uma doença fatal, sem expectativa de cura definitiva. Como a quimioterapia sistêmica não é suficiente para conter a doença, uma abordagem multimodal associando a quimioterapia intraperitoneal à cirurgia pode representar uma alternativa para esses casos. OBJETIVOS: Investigar o papel da quimioterapia intraperitoneal em pacientes com câncer gástrico estágio IV com metástases peritoneais. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um ensaio clínico prospectivo unicêntrico, braço único, fase II (NCT05541146). Pacientes com os seguintes critérios de inclusão serão submetidos à implantação de cateter peritoneal para quimioterapia intraperitoneal: adenocarcinoma gástrico estágio IV; idade 18-75 anos; carcinomatose peritoneal com índice de câncer peritoneal<12; ECOG 0/1; bom estado clínico e exames laboratoriais dentro da normalidade. O protocolo do estudo consiste em 4 ciclos de quimioterapia intraperitoneal com Paclitaxel associado à quimioterapia sistêmica. Após o tratamento, os pacientes com resposta peritoneal avaliada por laparoscopia serão submetidos à gastrectomia de conversão. RESULTADOS: O desfecho primário é a taxa de resposta peritoneal completa. A sobrevida livre de progressão e global são outros desfechos avaliados. O estudo foi iniciado em julho de 2022 e os pacientes serão selecionados para inclusão até que 30 sejam inscritos. CONCLUSIONS: Terapias para pacientes com câncer gástrico avançado foram avaliadas em ensaios clínicos, mas sem sucesso em pacientes com metástase peritoneal. O tratamento proposto neste estudo pode ser promissor, com fácil implantação do cateter e regime de quimioterapia intraperitoneal ambulatorial. Verificar a eficácia e segurança do Paclitaxel associado à quimioterapia sistêmica é um progresso importante que o presente estudo pretende investigar.

O prognóstico dos diferentes subtipos de carcinomas de esôfago neuroendócrinos: um estudo de base populacional / The prognosis of the different esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma subtypes: a population-based study

ABSTRACT Background Neuroendocrine neoplasms are extremely rare and account for 0.4% to 2% of all malignant esophageal neoplasms. The burden of the neuroendocrine histological type on the patients' prognosis and survival is poorly debated. This study aimed to compare the survival rates of primary neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Methods This is a retrospective cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and logrank tests. Proportional Cox regression models were used to evaluate variables related to overall survival. Results After eligibility criteria, 66,528 patients were selected. The mean follow-up was 22.6 months (SD 35.6). Adenocarcinoma was predominant (62%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (36%). Large cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma each account for less than 1% each. On the long-term overall survival analysis, esophageal adenocarcinoma showed a better prognosis than all the other histologic types (P-value for logrank test <0.001). With adenocarcinoma as a reference, HR was 1.32 for large cell carcinoma (95%CI 1.2 to 1.45) and 1.37 for small cell carcinoma (95%CI 1.23 to 1.53). The HR was 1.22 for squamous cell carcinoma (95%CI: 1.2 to 1.24); and 1.3 for adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma (95%CI 1.01 to 1.66). For multivariate Cox regression analysis, besides age and stage, the neuroendocrine subtypes large cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma were considered independent prognostic variables. Conclusion In the esophagus, large cell carcinoma and small cell carcinoma show poorer long-term survival rates than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

RESUMO Contexto As neoplasias neuroendócrinas são extremamente raras e representam 0,4% a 2% de todas as neoplasias malignas do esôfago. A determinação prognóstica e avaliação de sobrevida para o tipo histológico neuroendócrino é pouco debatida. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar as taxas de sobrevida de neoplasias neuroendócrinas primárias comparadas com adenocarcinoma e carcinoma espinocelular de esôfago. Métodos Este é um estudo coorte retrospectivo do banco de dados do Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. A sobrevida global e a sobrevida específica do câncer foram avaliadas com curvas de Kaplan-Meier e testes de logrank. Modelos de regressão de Cox proporcional foram utilizados para avaliar as variáveis relacionadas à sobrevida global. Resultados Após critérios de elegibilidade, foram selecionados 66,528 pacientes. O seguimento médio foi de 22,6 meses (DP 35,6). O adenocarcinoma foi predominante (62%), seguido pelo carcinoma espinocelular (36%). Carcinoma de grandes células, carcinoma de pequenas células e carcinoma adenoneuroendócrino misto representam menos de 1% cada. Na análise de sobrevida global, o adenocarcinoma de esôfago apresentou um prognóstico melhor do que todos os outros tipos histológicos (P valor para teste de logrank < 0,001). Com adenocarcinoma como referência, HR foi de 1,32 para carcinoma de grandes células (IC95% 1,2 a 1,45) e 1,37 para carcinoma de pequenas células (IC95% 1,23 a 1,53). O HR foi de 1,22 para carcinoma espinocelular (IC95%: 1,2 a 1,24); e 1,3 para carcinoma adenoneuroendócrino (IC95% 1,01 a 1,66). Para a análise multivariada da regressão de Cox, além da idade e do estadiamento, os subtipos neuroendócrinos carcinoma de grandes células e carcinoma de pequenas células foram considerados variáveis prognósticas independentes. Conclusão No esôfago, o carcinoma de grandes células e o carcinoma de pequenas células apresentam menores taxas de sobrevida a longo prazo do que o carcinoma espinocelular e o adenocarcinoma.

Carnoy's solution increases lymph nodes count in colon cancer specimens when compared to formalin fixation: a randomized trial / A solução de carnoy aumenta a contagem de linfonodos em espécimes de câncer de cólon quando comparada à fixação com formalina. um estudo randomizado

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: At least 12 lymph nodes (LNs) should be examined following surgical resection of colon cancer. As it is difficult to find small LNs, fat clearing fixatives have been proposed, but there is no consensus about the best option. AIM: The objective of this study was to verify if Carnoy's solution (CS) increases the LN count in left colon cancer specimens. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial (clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT02629315) with 60 patients with left colon adenocarcinoma who underwent rectosigmoidectomy. Specimens were randomized for fixation with CS or 10% neutral buffered formalin (NBF). After dissection, the pericolic fat from the NBF group was immersed in CS and re-dissected (Revision). The primary endpoint was the total number of LNs retrieved. RESULTS: Mean LN count was 36.6 and 26.8 for CS and NBF groups, respectively (p=0.004). The number of cases with <12 LNs was 0 (CS) and 3 (NBF, p=0.237). The duration of dissection was similar. LNs were retrieved in all cases during the revision (mean: 19, range: 4-37), accounting for nearly 40% of the LNs of this arm of the study. After the revision, no case was found in the NBF arm with <12 LNs. Two patients had metastatic LNs during the revision (no upstaging occurred). CONCLUSION: Compared to NBF, CS increases LN count in colon cancer specimens. After conventional pathologic analysis, fixing the pericolic fat with CS and performing a second dissection substantially increased the number of LNs.

RESUMO - RACIONAL: Pelo menos 12 linfonodos (LNs) devem ser examinados após a ressecção cirúrgica do câncer de cólon. Como é difícil encontrar LNs pequenos, fixadores de clareadores de gordura foram propostos, mas não há consenso sobre a melhor opção. OBJETIVO: Verificar se a solução de Carnoy (SC) aumenta o número de LNs obtidos em espécimes de câncer de cólon esquerdo. MÉTODOS: Ensaio prospectivo randomizado (clinictrials.gov: NCT02629315) com 60 pacientes com adenocarcinoma de cólon esquerdo submetidos à retossigmoidectomia. As amostras foram randomizadas para fixação com SC ou formalina tamponada neutra a 10% (NBF). Após a dissecção, a gordura pericólica do grupo NBF foi imersa em SC e redissecada (Revisão). O endpoint primário foi o número total de LNs recuperados. RESULTADOS: O número médio de LNs foi de 36,6 e 26,8 para os grupos CS e NBF, respectivamente (p=0,004). O número de casos com <12 LNs foi 0 (CS) e 3 (NBF, p=0,237). A duração da dissecção foi semelhante. LNs foram recuperados em todos os casos durante a revisão (média de 19, intervalo: 4-37), representando quase 40% dos LNs deste braço do estudo. Após a revisão, nenhum caso no braço NBF permaneceu com <12 LNs. Dois pacientes tiveram LNs metastáticos encontrados durante a revisão (não ocorreu upstaging). CONCLUSÃO: Em comparação com NBF, a SC aumenta a contagem de LNs em espécimes de câncer de cólon. Após a análise patológica convencional, a fixação da gordura pericólica com SC e a realização de uma segunda dissecção aumentaram o número de LNs.

Surgical treatment in clinical stage iv gastric cancer: a comparison of different procedures and survival outcomes / Tratamento cirúrgico no câncer gástrico estágio clínico iv: uma comparação de diferentes procedimentos e resultados de sobrevida

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Even in clinical stage IV gastric cancer (GC), surgical procedures may be required to palliate symptoms or in an attempt to improve survival. However, the limited survival of these patients raises doubts about who really had benefits from it. AIM: This study aimed to analyze the surgical outcomes in stage IV GC treated with surgical procedures without curative intent. METHODS: Retrospective analyses of patients with stage IV GC submitted to surgical procedures including tumor resection, bypass, jejunostomy, and diagnostic laparoscopy were performed. Patients with GC undergoing curative gastrectomy served as the comparison group. RESULTS: Surgical procedures in clinical stage IV were performed in 363 patients. Compared to curative surgery (680 patients), stage IV patients had a higher rate of comorbidities and ASA III/IV classification. The surgical procedures that were performed included 107 (29.4%) bypass procedures (partitioning/gastrojejunal anastomosis), 85 (23.4%) jejunostomies, 76 (20.9%) resections, and 76 (20.9%) diagnostic laparoscopies. Regarding patients' characteristics, resected patients had more distant metastasis (p=0.011), bypass patients were associated with disease in more than one site (p<0.001), and laparoscopy patients had more peritoneal metastasis (p<0.001). According to the type of surgery, the median overall survival was as follows: resection (13.6 months), bypass (7.8 months), jejunostomy (2.7 months), and diagnostic (7.8 months, p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, low albumin levels, in case of more than one site of disease, jejunostomy, and laparoscopy, were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSION: Stage IV resected cases have better survival, while patients submitted to jejunostomy and diagnostic laparoscopy had the worst results. The proper identification of patients who would benefit from surgical resection may improve survival and avoid futile procedures.

RESUMO - RACIONAL: Mesmo no câncer gástrico (CG) em estágio clínico IV (ECIV), procedimentos cirúrgicos podem ser necessários para aliviar sintomas ou na tentativa de melhorar a sobrevida. No entanto, a sobrevida limitada desses pacientes levanta dúvidas sobre quem realmente se beneficiaria. OBJETIVO: Analisar os resultados cirúrgicos do CG ECIV tratado com procedimentos cirúrgicos sem intenção curativa. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva dos pacientes com CG ECIV submetido a procedimentos cirúrgicos, incluindo: ressecção tumoral, bypass, jejunostomia e laparoscopia diagnóstica. Pacientes submetidos à gastrectomia curativa serviram como grupo de comparação. RESULTADOS: Os procedimentos cirúrgicos em ECIV foram realizados em 363 pacientes. Comparado à cirurgia curativa (680 pacientes), os pacientes em ECIV apresentaram maior taxa de comorbidades e classificação ASA III/IV. Os procedimentos cirúrgicos realizados foram: 107 (29,4%) bypass (partição/anastomose gastrojejunal), 85 (23,4%) jejunostomias, 76 (20,9%) ressecções e 76 (20,9%) laparoscopias diagnósticas. Em relação às características dos pacientes, os ressecados apresentaram predomínio de metástases distantes (p=0,011); os de bypass associaram-se a doença em mais de um sítio (p<0,001); e os laparoscópicos, metástases peritoneais (p<0,001). A sobrevida global mediana de acordo com o tipo de cirurgia foi: ressecção (13,6 meses), bypass (7,8 meses), jejunostomia (2,7 meses) e diagnóstica (7,8 meses) (p<0,001). Na análise multivariada, níveis baixos de albumina, mais de um sítio de doença, jejunostomia e laparoscopia associaram-se a pior sobrevida. CONCLUSÃO: Pacientes em ECIV ressecados apresentam melhor sobrevida, enquanto aqueles submetidos à jejunostomia e laparoscopia diagnóstica tiveram piores resultados. A identificação adequada dos pacientes que se beneficiariam com a ressecção cirúrgica pode melhorar a sobrevida e evitar procedimentos pouco eficazes.

Staging laparoscopy is still a valuable tool for optimal gastric cancer management / A laparoscopia diagnóstica ainda é uma ferramenta essencial para o tratamento do câncer gástrico

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Complete surgical resection is the main determining factor in the survival of advanced gastric cancer patients, but is not indicated in metastatic disease. The peritoneum is a common site of metastasis and preoperative imaging techniques still fail to detect it. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of staging laparoscopy in the staging of advanced gastric cancer patients in a Western tertiary cancer center. METHODS: A total of 130 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent staging laparoscopy from 2009 to 2020 were evaluated from a prospective database. Clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed to identify factors associated with the presence of peritoneal metastasis and were also evaluated the accuracy and strength of agreement between computed tomography and staging laparoscopy in detecting peritoneal metastasis and the change in treatment strategy after the procedure. RESULTS: The peritoneal metastasis was identified in 66 (50.76%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of computed tomography in detecting peritoneal metastasis were 51.5, 87.5, and 69.2%, respectively. According to the Kappa coefficient, the concordance between staging laparoscopy and computed tomography was 38.8%. In multivariate analysis, ascites (p=0.001) and suspected peritoneal metastasis on computed tomography (p=0.007) were statistically correlated with peritoneal metastasis. In 40 (30.8%) patients, staging and treatment plans changed after staging laparoscopy (32 patients avoided unnecessary laparotomy, and 8 patients, who were previously considered stage IVb by computed tomography, were referred to surgical treatment). CONCLUSION: The staging laparoscopy demonstrated an important role in the diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis, even with current advances in imaging techniques.

RESUMO RACIONAL: A ressecção cirúrgica é o principal fator determinante na sobrevida de pacientes com câncer gástrico, mas não é indicada na presença de doença metastática. O peritônio é local comum de metástase, porém os métodos de imagem ainda falham na sua detecção. OBJETIVO: Avaliar o papel da Laparoscopia Diagnóstica no estadiamento de pacientes com câncer gástrico avançado em um centro oncológico ocidental terciário. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 130 pacientes com adenocarcinoma gástrico submetidos a Laparoscopia Diagnóstica de 2009 a 2020, a partir de um banco de dados prospectivo. As características clínico-patológicas foram analisadas para identificar fatores associados à presença de metástase peritoneal. Foram também avaliadas a acurácia e concordância entre a tomografia computadorizada e a Laparoscopia Diagnóstica na detecção de metástase peritoneal e na mudança de conduta após a Laparoscopia Diagnóstica. RESULTADOS: As metástases peritoneais foram identificadas em 66 pacientes (50,76%). A sensibilidade, especificidade e acurácia da tomografia computadorizada na sua detecção foram de 51,5%, 87,5% e 69,2%, respectivamente. De acordo com o coeficiente Kappa, a concordância entre a Laparoscopia Diagnóstica e a tomografia computadorizada foi de 38,8%. Na análise multivariada, ascite (p=0,001) e suspeita de metástase peritoneal na tomografia computadorizada (p=0,007) foram estatisticamente correlacionadas com metástase peritoneal. Em 40 pacientes (30,8%), o estadiamento e as estratégias de tratamento mudaram após a Laparoscopia Diagóstica (32 pacientes evitaram laparotomia e 8 pacientes, anteriormente considerados estágio IVb, foram tratados cirurgicamente). CONCLUSÕES: A Laparoscopia Diagnóstica demonstrou um papel importante no diagnóstico de metástases peritoneais, mesmo com métodos de imagem avançados.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been recognized as one of the most serious public health crises. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term impact of the pandemic on the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer (GC) in addition to their clinicopathological characteristics. We also verified adherence to the COVID-19 screening protocol adopted in the institution. METHODS: All patients with GC who underwent surgical treatment between 2015 and 2021 were retrospectively evaluated and divided into two groups according to the time period: control group (2015-2019) and COVID group (2020-2021). The institutional protocol recommends that patients referred for surgery undergo RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients were classified into the COVID group and 535 into the control group. The number of surgical procedures performed in the control group was 107 (SD±23.8) per year. Diagnostic procedures (p=0.005), preoperative chemotherapy (p<0.001), and adenocarcinomas without Lauren's subtype (p=0.009) were more frequent in the COVID group than in the control group. No significant difference was observed in the pathological characteristics and surgical outcomes of curative GC between the two groups. Evaluation of protocol compliance showed that of 83 patients with GC in the COVID group, 19 (22.9%) were not tested for COVID-19 before surgery. Two patients tested positive for COVID-19 (one preoperative and one postoperative). CONCLUSION: A decrease in the average number of surgeries and a higher frequency of diagnostic procedures occurred during the pandemic than in the previous time period. Tumor/node/metastasis classification, morbidity rates, and mortality rates in patients with GC during the pandemic did not differ from those in the previous time period. Accordingly, GC surgical treatment with acceptable screening protocol compliance could be safely performed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Impact of telephone monitoring on cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy / Impacto del monitoreo telefónico en pacientes oncológicos sometidos a esofagectomía y gastrectomía / Impacto do monitoramento telefônico em pacientes oncológicos submetidos a esofagectomia e gastrectomia

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate telephone monitoring for symptoms, quality of life, distress, admissions to the emergency center and the satisfaction of cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastrectomy. Method: Randomized controlled study in two groups, carried out at the Cancer Institute of the State of Sao Paulo; the intervention group received telephone monitoring for four moments after the surgery, while the control group received only institutional care. Results: Of the 81 patients evaluated, the domain most affected by quality of life was social relationships domain. Distress had no significant difference between groups and moments. In both groups, admissions to the emergency center were similar (p=0.539). Pain was the most reported symptom in telephone monitoring. There was statistical significance regarding patient satisfaction with monitoring (p=0.002). Conclusion: Telephone monitoring provided greater patient satisfaction in the intervention group, demonstrating the real impact of this process on the care of cancer patients.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar el monitoreo telefónico en los síntomas, en la calidad de vida, en el distrés, en las admisiones en el centro de emergencias y en la satisfacción del paciente oncológico sometido a esofagectomía y gastrectomía. Método: Se trata de un estudio aleatorizado en dos grupos, realizado en el Instituto del Cáncer del Estado de São Paulo, en el que el grupo intervención recibió el monitoreo telefónico en cuatro momentos tras la cirugía, mientras que el grupo control recibió solamente la atención institucional. Resultados: De los 81 pacientes evaluados, el dominio más afectado en la calidad de vida fue el desempeño del papel. El distrés no mostró diferencia entre los grupos y los momentos. En ambos grupos, las admisiones en el centro de emergencia eran similares (p=0,539). El dolor era el síntoma más informado en el monitoreo telefónico. Se encontró una significación estadística relacionada con la satisfacción del paciente y el monitoreo (p=0,002). Conclusión: El monitoreo telefónico brindó más satisfacción a los pacientes en el grupo intervención y demostró el impacto real de este proceso en el cuidado del paciente oncológico.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o monitoramento telefônico nos sintomas, qualidade de vida, distress, admissões no centro de emergência e a satisfação do paciente oncológico submetido a esofagectomia e gastrectomia. Método: Estudo randomizado em dois grupos, realizado no Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo; sendo que o grupo intervenção recebeu o monitoramento telefônico por quatro momentos após a cirurgia, enquanto que o grupo controle recebeu apenas o atendimento institucional. Resultados: Dos 81 pacientes avaliados, o domínio mais afetado na qualidade de vida foi o desempenho de papel. O distress não mostrou diferença entre os grupos e momentos. Em ambos os grupos, as admissões no centro de emergência foram semelhantes (p=0,539). A dor foi o sintoma mais relatado no monitoramento telefônico. Houve significância estatística em relação à satisfação do paciente com o monitoramento (p=0,002). Conclusão: O monitoramento telefônico proporcionou maior satisfação dos pacientes no grupo intervenção, demonstrando o real impacto desse processo no cuidado do paciente oncológico.

Cirurgia de resgate no câncer gástrico / Salvage surgery in gastric cancer

RESUMO - RACIONAL: A cirurgia de resgate é definida como a ressecção cirúrgica após falha de primeiro tratamento com intuito curativo. OBJETIVO: Relatar a experiência de um centro de referência no tratamento do câncer gástrico com a cirurgia de resgate para o adenocarcinoma de estômago. MÉTODOS: Análise retrospectiva dos pacientes com câncer gástrico operados entre 2009 e 2020. RESULTADOS: 40 pacientes foram submetidos à tentativa de gastrectomia de resgate com intuito curativo. Para análise, foram divididos em dois grupos: 23 pacientes após ressecção endoscópica e 17 após gastrectomia. No primeiro grupo, todos tiveram ressecção com margens livres, a média de internação foi 15,7 dias e 2 (8,6%) tiveram complicações maiores. No seguimento médio de 37,2 meses, houve apenas 1 recidiva. A sobrevida global média foi 46 meses. No grupo pós-gastrectomia 9 (52,9%) foram resgatados com intenção curativa, a média de internação foi 12,2 dias e 3 (17,6%) apresentaram complicações maiores. No seguimento médio de 22 meses, 5 recidivaram. A sobrevida global média e a sobrevida livre de doença foram respectivamente: 24 e 16,5 meses. CONCLUSÃO: A cirurgia de resgate no câncer gástrico oferece nova possibilidade de controle da doença a longo prazo e/ou aumento de sobrevida, tendo taxa de complicações aceitáveis.

ABSTRACT - BACKGROUND: Salvage surgery (SS) is defined as surgical resection after the failure of the first treatment with curative intent. AIM: The aim of this study was to report the experience of a reference center with SS for stomach adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with gastric cancer (GC) operated on between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS: Notably, 40 patients were recommended for salvage gastrectomy with curative-intent treatment. For analysis purpose, patients were divided into two groups: 23 patients after endoscopic resection and 17 patients after gastrectomy. In the first group, all patients underwent R0 resection, their average hospital length of stay (LOS) was 15.7 days, and 2 (8.6%) patients had major complications. During the average follow-up of 37.2 months, there was only one recurrence. The median overall survival (OS) was 46 months. In the postgastrectomy group, 9 (52.9%) patients were rescued with curative intent, the average hospital LOS was 12.2 days, and 3 (17.6%) had major complications. In a mean follow-up of 22 months, five patients relapsed. Median OS and disease-free survival were 24 and 16.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: SS in GC offers the possibility of long-term disease control and increased survival rate with an acceptable complication rate.

Recurrence in pn0 gastric cancer: risk factors in the occident

ABSTRACT Background: Nearly 10% of node negative gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery have disease recurrence. Western data is extremely poor on this matter and identifying the risk factors that associate with relapse may allow new strategies to improve survival. Aim: Verify the clinical and pathological characteristics that correlate with recurrence in node negative gastric cancer. Methods: All gastric cancer patients submitted to gastrectomy between 2009 and 2019 at our institution and pathologically classified as N0 were considered. Their data were available in a prospective database. Inclusion criteria were: gastric adenocarcinoma, node negative, gastrectomy with curative intent, R0 resection. Main outcomes studied were: disease-free survival and overall survival. Results: A total of 270 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 63-year-old and 155 were males. Subtotal gastrectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy were performed in 64% and 74.4%, respectively. Mean lymph node yield was 37.6. Early GC was present in 54.1% of the cases. Mean follow-up was 40.8 months and 19 (7%) patients relapsed. Disease-free survival and overall survival were 90.9% and 74.6%, respectively. Independent risk factors for worse disease-free survival were: total gastrectomy, lesion size ≥3.4 cm, higher pT status and <16 lymph nodes resected. Conclusion: In western gastric cancer pN0 patients submitted to gastrectomy, lymph node count <16, pT3-4 status, tumor size ≥3.4 cm, total gastrectomy and presence of lymphatic invasion, are all risk factors for disease relapse.

RESUMO Racional: Aproximadamente 10% dos pacientes com câncer gástrico submetidos a operação curativa e sem linfonodos acometidos irão apresentam recorrência da doença. Os dados ocidentais são extremamente pobres sobre este assunto e a identificação dos fatores de risco associados à recidiva podem permitir novas estratégias para melhorar a sobrevida. Objetivo: Identificar as características clínicas e patológicas que se correlacionam com recidiva em pacientes com câncer gástrico pN0. Métodos: Foram considerados todos os pacientes com câncer gástrico submetidos à gastrectomia entre 2009 e 2019 em nossa instituição e que na classificação patológica não apresentaram acometimento linfonodal. Os critérios de inclusão foram: adenocarcinoma gástrico, pN0, gastrectomia com intenção curativa, ressecção R0. Os principais desfechos estudados foram: sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global. Resultados: Ao todo 270 pacientes preencheram os critérios de inclusão. A idade média foi de 63 anos e 155 eram homens. A gastrectomia subtotal e a linfadenectomia D2 foram realizadas em 64% e 74,4%, respectivamente. A média de linfonodos ressecados foi de 37,6. Câncer gástrico precoce estava presente em 54,1% dos casos. O seguimento médio foi de 40,8 meses e 19 (7%) apresentaram recidiva. A sobrevida livre de doença e sobrevida global foram de 90,9% e 74,6%, respectivamente. Os fatores de risco independentes para pior sobrevida livre de doença foram: gastrectomia total, lesão ≥3,4 cm, status pT avançado e <16 linfonodos ressecados. Conclusão: Os fatores de risco para recidiva no grupo estudado foram: <16 linfonodos ressecados, status pT3-4, tumor ≥3,4 cm, gastrectomia total e presença de invasão linfática.

Brazilian gastric cancer association guidelines (part 2): update on treatment / Diretrizes da associação brasileira de câncer gástrico (parte 2): atualização sobre o tratamento

ABSTRACT Background : The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented. Aim : To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment. Methods: To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. Results : Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3. Conclusion : The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

RESUMO Racional: O II Consenso Brasileiro de Câncer Gástrico da Associação Brasileira de Câncer Gástrico ABCG (Parte 1) foi recentemente publicado. Nesta ocasião inúmeros especialistas que atuam no tratamento desta doença expressaram suas opiniões diante declarações apresentadas. Objetivo: Apresentar as Diretrizes da ABCG (Parte 2) quanto às indicações de tratamento cirúrgico, técnicas operatórias, extensão de ressecção e terapia combinada. Métodos: Para formulação destas diretrizes os autores realizaram extensa e atual revisão referente a cada declaração presente no II Consenso, utilizando as bases Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library e SciELO, inicialmente com os seguintes descritores: câncer gástrico, gastrectomia, linfadenectomia, terapia combinada. Ainda, cada declaração foi classificada de acordo com o nível de evidência e grau de recomendação. Resultados: Das 43 declarações presentes neste estudo, 11 (25,6%) foram classificadas com nível de evidência A, 20 (46,5%) B e 12 (27,9%) C. Quanto ao grau de recomendação, 18 (41,9%) declarações obtiveram grau de recomendação 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e um (2,3%) 3. Conclusão: O complemento das diretrizes aqui presentes possibilita que cirurgiões e oncologistas que atuam no combate ao câncer gástrico possam oferecer o melhor tratamento possível, de acordo com as condições locais disponíveis.

Preparing a high-performance surgical team: lessons from 11, 000 surgeries

SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: In the future, surgery will be centralized in hospitals with the best value (excellent results with reduced cost). High-performance teams will be required; however, available data concerning the specific abilities necessary to build and manage them are poor. OBJECTIVES: Share the set of competencies and skills established to build and lead a high-performance general surgery team. METHODS: In November 2012, a general surgery team started its activities at a tertiary hospital in Sao Paulo, Brasil. The model consisted of high volume performed by a small team. Experienced surgeons, motivated, and with technical and moral excellence were selected. A sense of unity was created and goals were shared. Complex cases were discussed daily and a prospective database to follow outcomes was established. The payment value was above the market. RESULTS: In 6 years and 4 months, 11,006 surgical procedures were performed (8,597 electives and 2,409 in an urgent setting). Cholecystectomy was the most common procedure (4,101; being 3,676 electives), followed by inguinal hernioplasty (n: 1,827) and appendectomy (n: 925). A total of 449 elective oncologic procedures were performed. The surgical site infection rate in clean procedures was 0.12%, 80 patients required re-do surgery (2.4% in an urgent setting and 0.2% of the electives). There were 22 postoperative deaths (0.66% for urgent and 0.07% for electives), 5 of the 6 deaths in elective patients were in oncologic cases. CONCLUSION: A competent surgical team, inserted in a model that favors performance and values the individual can deliver high volume with exceptional results.

RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: No futuro as cirurgias serão centralizadas em hospitais que tenham melhor valor (resultados excelentes com custo reduzido). Equipes de alta performance serão necessárias, entretanto a literatura acerca das habilidades específicas para montar e gerir essas equipes é muito pobre. OBJETIVOS: Compartilhar as competências e habilidades estabelecidas para construir e liderar uma equipe de cirurgia geral de alto desempenho. MÉTODOS: Em novembro de 2012, a equipe de cirurgia geral iniciou suas atividades em um hospital terciário na cidade de São Paulo (SP, Brasil). O modelo consistia em produzir alto volume com um time pequeno. Cirurgiões experientes, motivados e com excelência técnica e moral foram selecionados. Um senso de unidade foi criado e objetivos coletivos estabelecidos e compartilhados. O pagamento estava acima da média do mercado. RESULTADOS: Em 6 anos e 4 meses, 11.006 procedimentos cirúrgicos foram realizados (8.597 eletivos e 2.409 de urgência/emergência). A colecistectomia foi o procedimento mais comum (n: 4.101, sendo 3.676 eletivas), seguida da hernioplastia inguinal (n: 1.827) e da apendicectomia (n: 925). Um total de 449 cirurgias oncológicas eletivas foram realizadas. A infecção de sítio cirúrgico em procedimentos limpos foi de 0,12% (2,4% para cirurgias de urgência e 0,2% nas eletivas). Ocorreram 22 óbitos cirúrgicos (0,66% na urgência e 0,07% nas eletivas), 5 dos 6 óbitos eletivos ocorreram em pacientes oncológicos. CONCLUSÃO: Uma equipe competente, inserida em um modelo que favorece o desempenho e valoriza o indivíduo é capaz de entregar grande volume com resultados excepcionais.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio change after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a subgroup analysis / Evolução da relação neutrófilo-linfócito após gastrectomia curativa por câncer gástrico: análise de subgrupos

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the impact of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio change after curative surgery for gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery between 2009 and 2017 was performed. A cutoff value was established for the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in the pre- and postoperative periods, according to the median value, and four subgroups were formed (low-low/low-high/high-low/high-high). Clinical-pathological and survival data were analyzed and related to these subgroups. Results: A total of 325 patients were included in the study. The cutoff values of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were 2.14 and 1.8 for the pre and postoperative periods, respectively. In patients with stages I and II, the high-high subgroup presented worse overall survival (p=0.016) and disease-free survival (p=0.001). Complications were higher in the low-high subgroup of patients. Conclusion: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a low cost, efficient and reproducible marker. The prognosis individualization can be performed according to the identification of subgroups at a higher risk of complications and worse prognosis.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto da alteração da relação neutrófilo-linfócito após ressecção curativa por câncer gástrico. Métodos: Realizou-se análise retrospectiva de pacientes com câncer gástrico submetidos à gastrectomia curativa entre 2009 e 2017. Foi estabelecido valor de corte para a relação neutrófilo-linfócito nos períodos pré e pós-operatório de acordo com a mediana, e quatro subgrupos foram formados (baixo-baixo/baixo-alto/alto-baixo/alto-alto). Dados clínicos e patológicos e de sobrevida foram analisados e relacionados com estes subgrupos. Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo 325 pacientes. Os valores de corte para a relação neutrófilo-linfócito foram 2,14 e 1,8 para os períodos pré e pós-operatório, respectivamente. Em pacientes com estádios I e II, o subgrupo alto-alto apresentou pior sobrevida global (p=0,016) e sobrevida livre de doença (p=0,001). As complicações ocorreram mais em pacientes do subgrupo baixo-alto. Conclusão: A relação neutrófilo-linfócito é um marcador de baixo custo, eficiente e reprodutível. A individualização do prognóstico pode ser realizada de acordo com a identificação de subgrupos com maior risco de complicações e pior prognóstico.

Gastrectomy in octogenarians with gastric cancer: is it feasible? / Gastrectomia em octogenários com câncer gástrico: ela é factível?

ABSTRACT Background: The octogenarian population is expanding worldwide and demand for gastrectomy due to gastric cancer in this population is expected to grow. However, the outcomes of surgery with curative intent in this age group are poorly reported and it is unclear what matters most to survival: age, clinical status, disease´s stage, or the extent of the surgery performed. Aim: Evaluate the results of gastrectomy in octogenarians with gastric cancer and to verify the factors related to survival. Methods: From prospective database, patients aged 80 years or older with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who had undergone gastrectomy with curative intent were selected. Factors related to postoperative complications and survival were studied. Results: Fifty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. A total of 70.5% received subtotal gastrectomy and in 72.5% D1 lymphadenectomy was performed. Twenty-five (49%) had complications, in eleven major complications occurred (seven of these were clinical complications). Hospital length of stay was longer (8.5 vs. 17.8 days, p=0.002), and overall survival shorter (median of 1.4 vs. 20.5 months, p=0.009) for those with complications. D2 lymphadenectomy and the presence of postoperative complications were independent factors for worse overall survival. Conclusion: Octogenarians undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent have high risk for postoperative clinical complications. D1 lymphadenectomy should be the standard of care in these patients.

RESUMO Racional: A população octogenária está expandindo mundialmente e é esperado que a demanda por gastrectomia devido a câncer gástrico nessa faixa também aumente. Entretanto, os resultados da operação curativa nessa população são pobremente reportados e não está claro o que mais importa no resultado: idade, status clínico, estágio da doença, ou a extensão da operação. Objetivos: Avaliar os resultados cirúrgicos da gastrectomia em octogenários e verificar os fatores relacionados com a sobrevida. Métodos: Através de revisão de banco de dados prospectivo, pacientes com 80 anos ou mais de idade e adenocarcinoma gástrico comprovado histologicamente e submetidos a gastrectomia com intuito curativo foram analisados. Fatores relacionados a complicações pós-operatórias e sobrevida foram estudadas. Resultados: Cinquenta e um pacientes preencheram os critérios de inclusão. A gastrectomia subtotal foi realizada em 70,5% dos casos e a linfadenectomia D1 em 72,5% dos pacientes. Complicações ocorreram em 25 pacientes (49%), sendo que em 11 elas foram graves (sete foram complicações clínicas). Pacientes com complicações tiveram maior duração da internação hospitalar (8,5 vs. 17,8 dias, p=0,002) e sobrevida global mais curta (mediana de 1,4 vs. 20,5 meses, p=0,009). Linfadenectomia D2 e a presença de complicações foram fatores independentes de pior sobrevida global. Conclusão: Os octogenários submetidos à gastrectomia com intenção curativa apresentam alto risco de complicações clínicas no pós-operatório. A linfadenectomia D1 deve ser o padrão de atendimento nesses pacientes.