Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 139
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 384(21): 1991-2001, 2021 05 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34042388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of prosthetic joint infection usually consists of a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. The appropriate duration of antimicrobial therapy for this indication remains unclear. METHODS: We performed an open-label, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial to compare 6 weeks with 12 weeks of antibiotic therapy in patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infection that had been managed with an appropriate surgical procedure. The primary outcome was persistent infection (defined as the persistence or recurrence of infection with the initial causative bacteria, with an antibiotic susceptibility pattern that was phenotypically indistinguishable from that at enrollment) within 2 years after the completion of antibiotic therapy. Noninferiority of 6 weeks of therapy to 12 weeks of therapy would be shown if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the absolute between-group difference (the value in the 6-week group minus the value in the 12-week group) in the percentage of patients with persistent infection within 2 years was not greater than 10 percentage points. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients from 28 French centers were randomly assigned to receive antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks (205 patients) or for 12 weeks (205 patients). Six patients who withdrew consent were not included in the analysis. In the main analysis, 20 patients who died during follow-up were excluded, and missing outcomes for 6 patients who were lost to follow-up were considered to be persistent infection. Persistent infection occurred in 35 of 193 patients (18.1%) in the 6-week group and in 18 of 191 patients (9.4%) in the 12-week group (risk difference, 8.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 15.6); thus, noninferiority was not shown. Noninferiority was also not shown in the per-protocol and sensitivity analyses. We found no evidence of between-group differences in the percentage of patients with treatment failure due to a new infection, probable treatment failure, or serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with microbiologically confirmed prosthetic joint infections that were managed with standard surgical procedures, antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks was not shown to be noninferior to antibiotic therapy for 12 weeks and resulted in a higher percentage of patients with unfavorable outcomes. (Funded by Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, French Ministry of Health; DATIPO ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01816009.).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Prótesis de Cadera/efectos adversos , Prótesis de la Rodilla/efectos adversos , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Relacionadas con Prótesis/cirugía , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
2.
J Urol ; : 101097JU0000000000004047, 2024 May 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753587

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria prior to all urological surgeries breaching the mucosa. But little evidence supports this recommendation. At the least, risk stratification for postoperative UTI to support this strategy is lacking. The aim of this study was to define the associated factors for postoperative febrile infectious complications (UTI or surgical site infection) in urological surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicentric study including all consecutive patients undergoing any urological surgery with preoperative urine culture. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a UTI or surgical site infection occurring within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2023, in 10 centers, 2389 patients were included with 838 (35%) positive urine cultures (mono-/bi-/polymicrobial). Postoperative infections occurred in 106 cases (4.4%), of which 44 had negative urine cultures (41%), 42 had positive mono-/bimicrobial urine cultures (40%), and 20 had polymicrobial urine cultures (19%). In multivariable analysis, UTI during the previous 12 months of surgery (odds ratio [OR] 3.43; 95% CI 2.07-5.66; P < .001), monomicrobial/bimicrobial preoperative urine culture (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.57-8.42; P = .02), polymicrobial preoperative urine culture (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.52-5.14; P < .001), and operative time (OR 1.09; 95% CI 1.04-1.15; P < .001) were independent associated factors for postoperative febrile infections. CONCLUSIONS: Positive urine culture, including preoperative polymicrobial urine culture, prior to urological surgery was associated with postoperative infection. Additionally, patients experiencing infectious complications also had a higher incidence of other complications. The effectiveness of systematic preventive antibiotic therapy for a positive urine culture has not been conclusively established.

3.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 179, 2024 Mar 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38507063

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In the era of increased bacterial resistance, the main strategy is to reduce the prescription of antibiotics when possible. Nowadays, it is highly recommended to screen for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU), prior to urological surgery with potential mucosal breach or urine exposure. Screening and treating urinary colonization is a strategy widely adopted before radical and partial nephrectomy but without any evidence. Our main end point in this study is to analyze the relationship between preoperative urine culture and the risk of postoperative febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) or surgical-site infection (SSI) in partial or radical nephrectomy patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study between January 2016 and January 2023 in 11 French tertiary referral hospitals (TOCUS database). We collected the data for 269 patients including several pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables that could potentially increase the risk of postoperative UTI and SSI including preoperative urinary culture results. RESULTS: The incidence rate of postoperative UTI and SSI was 8.9% in our study. After conducting a logistic multivariate analysis, a propensity score matching analysis, and a subgroup analysis, we found no significant correlation between the urine culture and the postoperative UTI risk [OR = 1.2 (0.5-2.7) (p = 0.7)]. Only the postoperative non-infectious complications were related to a higher risk of postoperative UTI [OR = 12 (4-37), p < 0.001)]. CONCLUSION: Our research shows that screening and treating for ABU prior to radical or partial nephrectomy seems to be unnecessary to prevent postoperative UTI and SSI.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriuria , Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Bacteriuria/diagnóstico , Bacteriuria/epidemiología , Bacteriuria/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Urinálisis , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
4.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 36(2): 140-145, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36718940

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lower respiratory tract infections are one of the most common indications for antibiotic use in community and hospital settings. Usual guidelines for adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend 5-7 days of antibiotic treatment. In daily practice, physicians often prescribe 9-10 days of antibiotic treatment. Among available strategies to decrease antibiotic use, possibly preventing the emergence of bacterial resistance, reducing treatment durations is the safest and the most acceptable to clinicians. We aim to review data evaluating the efficacy of short antibiotic duration in adult CAP and which criteria can help clinicians to reduce antibiotic treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies and meta-analyses demonstrated that the treatment duration of 7 days or less was sufficient for CAP. Two trials found that 3-day treatments were effective, even in hospitalized CAP.To customize and shorten duration, clinical and biological criteria have been studied and reflect patient's response. Indeed, stability criteria were recently shown to be effective to discontinue antibiotic treatment. Procalcitonin was also studied but never compared with clinical criteria. SUMMARY: Treatment duration for CAP is still under debate, but several studies support short durations. Clinical criteria could be possibly used to discontinue antibiotic treatment.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Adulto , Humanos , Duración de la Terapia , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(12): 2919-2925, 2023 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864551

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Limited pharmacokinetics data support dalbavancin long-term use in off-label indications and the optimal dosing regimen is debated. We aimed to describe dalbavancin concentrations in an observational retrospective multicentre study. METHODS: Patients from 13 French hospitals, treated with 1500 mg doses of dalbavancin and for whom therapeutic drug monitoring was performed from June 2018 to March 2021 were included. Dalbavancin plasma concentrations were described at peak and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 weeks after the last 1500 mg dose. Concentrations in patients weighing more or less than 75 kg and with a GFR greater or less than 60 mL/min were compared. Microbiological data were collected and dalbavancin MIC was measured when possible. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients were included (69% treated for bone and joint infections, 16% for endocarditis). Thirty-five patients received a single dose of dalbavancin and 98 received several administrations. Two, 3 and 4 weeks after the last dose, median plasma concentrations were respectively 25.00, 14.80 and 9.24 mg/L for the first doses and 34.55, 22.60 and 19.20 mg/L for the second or subsequent doses. Weight and renal function had an impact on pharmacokinetics. Infection was documented in 105 patients (Staphylococcus spp. in 68% of cases). Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in 32.5% of cases (median MIC: 0.047 mg/L) and Staphylococcus epidermidis in 27% of cases (median MIC of 0.047 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma concentrations of dalbavancin were consistent with those described in clinical trials and those sought during the industrial development of the molecule.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Teicoplanina/farmacocinética , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus
6.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e161, 2023 09 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37721009

RESUMEN

Acute pyelonephritis (AP) epidemiology has been sparsely described. This study aimed to describe the evolution of AP patients hospitalised in France and identify the factors associated with urinary diversion and fatality, in a cross-sectional study over the 2014-2019 period. Adult patients hospitalised for AP were selected by algorithms of ICD-10 codes (PPV 90.1%) and urinary diversion procedure codes (PPV 100%). 527,671 AP patients were included (76.5% female: mean age 66.1, 48.0% Escherichia coli), with 5.9% of hospital deaths. In 2019, the AP incidence was 19.2/10,000, slightly increasing over the period (17.3/10,000 in 2014). 69,313 urinary diversions (13.1%) were performed (fatality rate 6.7%), mainly in males, increasing over the period (11.7% to 14.9%). Urolithiasis (OR [95% CI] =33.1 [32.3-34.0]), sepsis (1.73 [1.69-1.77]) and a Charlson index ≥3 (1.32 [1.29-1.35]) were significantly associated with urinary diversion, whereas E. coli (0.75 [0.74-0.77]) was less likely associated. The same factors were significantly associated with fatality, plus old age and cancer (2.38 [2.32-2.45]). This nationwide study showed an increase in urolithiasis and identified, for the first time, factors associated with urinary diversion in AP along with death risk factors, which may aid urologists in clinical decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Pielonefritis , Derivación Urinaria , Urolitiasis , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Escherichia coli , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos , Pielonefritis/epidemiología , Pielonefritis/etiología , Urolitiasis/epidemiología , Urolitiasis/cirugía , Urolitiasis/complicaciones , Francia/epidemiología
7.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e43980, 2023 06 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37134021

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Covidom was a telemonitoring solution for home monitoring of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, deployed in March 2020 in the Greater Paris area in France to alleviate the burden on the health care system. The Covidom solution included a free mobile application with daily monitoring questionnaires and a regional control center to quickly handle patient alerts, including dispatching emergency medical services when necessary. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide an overall evaluation of the Covidom solution 18 months after its inception in terms of effectiveness, safety, and cost. METHODS: Our primary outcome was to measure effectiveness using the number of handled alerts, response escalation, and patient-reported medical contacts outside of Covidom. Then, we analyzed the safety of Covidom by assessing its ability to detect clinical worsening, defined as hospitalization or death, and the number of patients with clinical worsening without any preceding alert. We evaluated the cost of Covidom and compared the cost of hospitalization for Covidom and non-Covidom patients with mild COVID-19 cases seen in the emergency departments of the largest network of hospitals in the Greater Paris area (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris). Finally, we reported on user satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 60,073 patients monitored by Covidom, the regional control center handled 285,496 alerts and dispatched emergency medical services 518 times. Of the 13,204 respondents who responded to either of the follow-up questionnaires, 65.8% (n=8690) reported having sought medical care outside the Covidom solution during their monitoring period. Of the 947 patients who experienced clinical worsening while adhering to daily monitoring, only 35 (3.7%) did not previously trigger alerts (35 were hospitalized, including 1 who died). The average cost of Covidom was €54 (US $1=€0.8614) per patient, and the cost of hospitalization for COVID-19 worsening was significantly lower in Covidom than in non-Covidom patients with mild COVID-19 cases seen in the emergency departments of Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. The patients who responded to the satisfaction questionnaire had a median rating of 9 (out of 10) for the likelihood of recommending Covidom. CONCLUSIONS: Covidom may have contributed to alleviating the pressure on the health care system in the initial months of the pandemic, although its impact was lower than anticipated, with a substantial number of patients having consulted outside of Covidom. Covidom seems to be safe for home monitoring of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización , Atención a la Salud , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
8.
Soins Gerontol ; 28(159): 28-30, 2023.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36717174

RESUMEN

Overall mortality in France is 147 568 deaths since the first wave. Although accounting for nearly 20% of deaths in France, the excess mortality in long-term care facilities compared to previous years has not been fully studied. The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of residents in long-term care facilities, with highly dependent elderly patients being the most exposed to the risk of death, with deleterious effects linked to the effects of confinement, which in Ehpad has resulted in major isolation of residents and the appearance by care teams of cognitive disorders appearing or deteriorating in residents, as well as a significant loss of autonomy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Casas de Salud , Francia/epidemiología
9.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 28(9): 1929-1931, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997528

RESUMEN

Nannizziopsis spp., fungi responsible for emerging diseases, are rarely involved in human bone and joint infections. We present a rare case of septic arthritis with necrotizing cellulitis caused by N. obscura in a patient in France who had undergone kidney transplant. Rapid, aggressive medical and surgical management led to a favorable outcome.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Infecciosa , Fascitis Necrotizante , Onygenales , Artritis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Artritis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Infecciosa/microbiología , Francia , Humanos
10.
Lancet ; 397(10280): 1195-1203, 2021 03 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33773631

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia should help reduce antibiotic consumption and thus bacterial resistance, adverse events, and related costs. We aimed to assess the need for an additional 5-day course of ß-lactam therapy among patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were stable after 3 days of treatment. METHODS: We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial (the Pneumonia Short Treatment [PTC]) in 16 centres in France. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (defined as patients admitted to a non-critical care unit) and who met prespecified clinical stability criteria after 3 days of treatment with ß-lactam therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ß-lactam therapy (oral amoxicillin 1 g plus clavulanate 125 mg three times a day) or matched placebo for 5 extra days. Randomisation was done using a web-based system with permuted blocks with random sizes and stratified by randomisation site and Pneumonia Severity Index score. Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cure 15 days after first antibiotic intake, defined by apyrexia (temperature ≤37·8°C), resolution or improvement of respiratory symptoms, and no additional antibiotic treatment for any cause. A non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points was chosen. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received any treatment (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) and in all patients who received their assigned treatment (per-protocol population). Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01963442, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Dec 19, 2013, and Feb 1, 2018, 706 patients were assessed for eligibility, and after 3 days of ß-lactam treatment, 310 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n=157) or ß-lactam treatment (n=153). Seven patients withdrew consent before taking any study drug, five in the placebo group and two in the ß-lactam group. In the ITT population, median age was 73·0 years (IQR 57·0-84·0) and 123 (41%) of 303 participants were female. In the ITT analysis, cure at day 15 occurred in 117 (77%) of 152 participants in the placebo group and 102 (68%) of 151 participants in the ß-lactam group (between-group difference of 9·42%, 95% CI -0·38 to 20·04), indicating non-inferiority. In the per-protocol analysis, 113 (78%) of 145 participants in the placebo treatment group and 100 (68%) of 146 participants in the ß-lactam treatment group were cured at day 15 (difference of 9·44% [95% CI -0·15 to 20·34]), indicating non-inferiority. Incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups (22 [14%] of 152 in the placebo group and 29 [19%] of 151 in the ß-lactam group). The most common adverse events were digestive disorders, reported in 17 (11%) of 152 patients in the placebo group and 28 (19%) of 151 patients in the ß-lactam group. By day 30, three (2%) patients had died in the placebo group (one due to bacteraemia due to Staphylococcus aureus, one due to cardiogenic shock after acute pulmonary oedema, and one due to heart failure associated with acute renal failure) and two (1%) in the ß-lactam group (due to pneumonia recurrence and possible acute pulmonary oedema). INTERPRETATION: Among patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia who met clinical stability criteria, discontinuing ß-lactam treatment after 3 days was non-inferior to 8 days of treatment. These findings could allow substantial reduction of antibiotic consumption. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/economía , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Costos de los Medicamentos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Estudios de Equivalencia como Asunto , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/economía
11.
Occup Environ Med ; 2022 Sep 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126974

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light a new occupational health threat. We aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19 infection and work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 assessed by a job-exposure matrix (JEM), in a large population cohort. We also estimated the population-attributable fraction among exposed subjects. METHODS: We used the SAPRIS-SERO sample of the CONSTANCES cohort, limited to subjects actively working, and with a job code available and a questionnaire on extra work activities. The following outcomes were assessed: COVID-19 diagnosis was made by a physician; a seropositivity to the ELISA-S test ('serology strict') and ELISA-S test intermediate with positive ELISA-NP or a positive neutralising antibodies SN ('serology large'). Job exposure was assessed using Mat-O-Covid, an expert-based JEM with an Index used as a continuous variable and a threshold at 13/1000. RESULTS: The sample included 18 999 subjects with 389 different jobs, 47.7% were men with a mean age of 46.2 years (±9.2 years). The Mat-O-Covid index taken as a continuous variable or with a threshold greater than 13/1000 was associated with all the outcomes in bivariable and multivariable logistic models. ORs were between 1.30 and 1.58, and proportion of COVID-19 attributable to work among exposed participants was between 20% and 40%. DISCUSSION: Using the Mat-O-Covid JEM applied to a large population, we found a significant association between work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 infection, though the estimation of attributable fraction among exposed people remained low to moderate. Further studies during other exposed periods and with other methods are necessary.

12.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(10): 2243-2248, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34255231

RESUMEN

In a large regional observational cohort study of adult (≥ 18 years), outpatients with COVID-19, prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of patients with rash and/or chilblain-like lesions (CLL), compared with population without cutaneous features, were studied. In total, 28,957 outpatients were included; the prevalence of rash and CCL were 9.5% and 3.7%, respectively. Presence of rash was significantly associated with presence of asthenia, shivers or myalgia, respiratory and gastro-intestinal symptoms, and anosmia/ageusia. The presence of CCL was associated with chest pain, chest oppression, nausea/vomiting, and anosmia/ageusia. Patients with CCL were significantly less prone to an unfavourable outcome (hospitalization or death).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Eritema Pernio/etiología , Exantema/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Eritema Pernio/diagnóstico , Estudios de Cohortes , Exantema/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Pronóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología
13.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(8): 1665-1672, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33694038

RESUMEN

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) among older patients are frequent with high rate of mortality. Infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are associated with higher mortality than with susceptible microorganisms. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MDRO infection during BSI in older population and the factors associated with unfavorable outcome. This study is a retrospective cohort of all BSI episodes occurring among older patients (> 65yo), from April 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, in a French university hospital for geriatric medicine. A total of 255 BSI episodes were analyzed. Mean age was 86.3±6.5 years, and sex ratio (M/F) was 0.96. Main comorbidities were orthopedic device (26.7%), active neoplasia (24.3%), and diabetes mellitus (18.4%). Main primary sites of infection were urinary tract infections (56.9%), respiratory tract infections (10.6%), intra-abdominal infections (7.1%), and skin and soft tissue infections (4.7%). Main bacteria identified were Escherichia coli (45.1%), Staphylococcus aureus (14.1%), enterococci (10.7%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (5.5%), and streptococci (5.1%). MDROs were involved in 17.2% of BSI (gram-negative bacilli: 9.0%; CoNS: 4.3%; and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA): 3.9%). The main factor associated with MDRO BSI was colonization with MDRO (OR=6.29; 95%CI=2.9-14.32). Total mortality was 18.4% and significantly higher in case of initial severity (OR=3.83; 95%CI=1.75-8.38), healthcare-associated infection (OR=5.29; 95%CI=1.11-25.30), and MRSA BSI (OR=9.16; 95%CI=1.67-50.16). BSI due to MDRO is frequent in older population and is strongly associated with carriage of MDRO. Healthcare-associated BSI, severe episodes, and BSI due to MRSA are associated with unfavorable outcome. In these cases, a broad-spectrum antibiotic should be promptly initiated.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Sepsis/epidemiología , Sepsis/microbiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacterias/clasificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(8): e14282, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33915011

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of a care bundle including medication reconciliation at discharge by a pharmacist versus standard of care, on continuity of therapeutic changes between hospital and primary care and outcome of patients, within 1 month after discharge. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial in 120 adult patients with at least one chronic disease and three current medications before admission, hospitalised in an infectious disease department of a tertiary hospital and discharged home. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a discharge care bundle including medication reconciliation, counselling session and documentation transfer to primary care physician (PCP) (intervention group) or standard of care (control group). Primary outcome was the proportion of in-hospital prescription changes, not maintained by the PCP, 1 month after discharge. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients experiencing early PCP's consultation, hospital readmissions or adverse reactions within 1-month postdischarge and cost of discharge prescriptions. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. One month after discharge, the proportion of in-hospital prescription changes, not maintained by the PCP, was 11% in the intervention group versus 24% in the control group (P = .007). The median delay before PCP's consultation was longer in the intervention group (30.5 vs 19.5 days, P = .013), there were fewer patients readmitted to hospital (3.4% vs 20.7%, P = .009, odds ratio (OR) = 0.13 [0.02-0.53]) and fewer patients who suffered from adverse drug reaction (7.0% vs 22.8%, P = .04, OR = 0.26 [0.07-0.78]). CONCLUSION: This care bundle resulted in the reduction of treatment changes between hospital discharge and primary care.


Asunto(s)
Paquetes de Atención al Paciente , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Hospitales , Humanos , Conciliación de Medicamentos , Alta del Paciente
15.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(12): 3128-3135, 2020 12 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867616

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent urinary tract infections (R-UTIs) are the main cause of morbidity and hospitalizations in subjects with neurogenic bladder (NB) due to spinal cord injury (SCI). We evaluated the efficacy of weekly oral cyclic antibiotic (WOCA) prophylaxis (ie, the alternate weekly administration of 2 antibiotics) in preventing R-UTIs. METHODS: Randomized (1:1), open-label, superiority-controlled trial compared WOCA prophylaxis to no prophylaxis (control) for 6 months in patients with NB due to SCI, using clean intermittent self-catheterization, and suffering from R-UTIs. Primary outcome was incidence of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTIs. Secondary outcomes were number of febrile UTIs, number of hospitalizations, WOCA tolerance, antibiotic consumption, number of negative urine cultures, and emergence of bacterial resistance in urinary, intestinal, and nasal microbiota. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were either allocated to the WOCA group (n = 23) or the control group (n = 22). Median (IQR) incidence of symptomatic antibiotic-treated UTIs was 1.0 (0.5-2.5) in the WOCA group versus 2.5 (1.2-4.0) (P = .0241) in the control group. No febrile UTIs were recorded in the WOCA group versus 9 (45.0%) (P < .001) in the control group. The median number of additional antibiotic treatment was 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.0) versus 3.0 (2.0-5.0) (P = .004) in the WOCA and control groups, respectively. Only few adverse events were reported. No impact on emergence of bacterial resistance was observed. CONCLUSIONS: WOCA is efficient and well tolerated in preventing R-UTIs in SCI patients. In our study, we did not observe any emergence of antibiotic resistance in digestive and nasal microbiological cultures. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01388413.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica , Infecciones Urinarias , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/complicaciones , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
16.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(2): 379-380, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31961313

RESUMEN

Mycetoma is a chronic infection that is slow to develop and heal. It can be caused by fungi (eumycetoma) or bacteria (actinomycetoma). We describe a case of actinomycetoma caused by Actinomadura mexicana in the Caribbean region.


Asunto(s)
Actinomadura/aislamiento & purificación , Dermatosis del Pie/diagnóstico , Micetoma/diagnóstico , Actinomadura/genética , Adulto , Región del Caribe , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Dermatosis del Pie/microbiología , Humanos , Micetoma/microbiología
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 512, 2020 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32677896

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to identify the predictive factors for microbiological diagnosis through disco-vertebral biopsy (DVB) in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO) and negative blood cultures, and compare the performance of DVB under fluoroscopic versus scanographic guidance. METHODS: We performed a cohort study comparing positive and negative DVB among patients with PVO. All cases of PVO undergoing a DVB for microbiological diagnosis in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Infections due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, infections on foreign device, and non-septic diseases were excluded. Anamnestic, clinical, biological, microbiological, as well as radiological data were collected from medical charts thanks to a standardized data set. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were screened; 88 patients were included. Microbiological cultures were positive in 53/88 (60.2%) patients. A thickening of the paravertebral tissue ≥10 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in axial MR scans was a predictive factor of DVB microbiological positivity (52.4% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.006; OR = 5.4). Overall, 51 DVB were performed under fluoroscopic guidance and 37 under scanographic guidance. Considering lumbar DVB, 25/36 (69.4%) of cases yielded positive results under fluoroscopic guidance versus 5/15 (33.3%) under scanographic guidance (p = 0.02; OR = 4.4). No adverse event linked to DVB was notified. CONCLUSION: Every patient with PVO and negative blood cultures should undergo a DVB. A thickening of the paravertebral tissue ≥10 mm on MRI is associated with a higher rate of positive DVB culture. A lumbar DVB under fluoroscopic guidance is more sensitive than under scanographic guidance to identify the micro-organism involved.


Asunto(s)
Disco Intervertebral/patología , Vértebras Lumbares/patología , Osteomielitis/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Absceso Epidural/diagnóstico , Absceso Epidural/patología , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Disco Intervertebral/microbiología , Vértebras Lumbares/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteomielitis/microbiología , Osteomielitis/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/microbiología , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto Joven
18.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(11): e22924, 2020 11 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33147165

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We developed a self-triage web application for COVID-19 symptoms, which was launched in France in March 2020, when French health authorities recommended all patients with suspected COVID-19 call an emergency phone number. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine if a self-triage tool could reduce the burden on emergency call centers and help predict increasing burden on hospitals. METHODS: Users were asked questions about their underlying conditions, sociodemographic status, postal code, and main COVID-19 symptoms. Participants were advised to call an emergency call center if they reported dyspnea or complete loss of appetite for over 24 hours. Data on COVID-19-related calls were collected from 6 emergency call centers and data on COVID-19 hospitalizations were collected from Santé Publique France and the French Ministry of Health. We examined the change in the number of emergency calls before and after the launch of the web application. RESULTS: From March 17 to April 2, 2020, 735,419 questionnaires were registered in the study area. Of these, 121,370 (16.5%) led to a recommendation to call an emergency center. The peak number of overall questionnaires and of questionnaires leading to a recommendation to call an emergency center were observed on March 22, 2020. In the 17 days preceding the launch of the web application, emergency call centers in the study area registered 66,925 COVID-19-related calls and local hospitals admitted 639 patients for COVID-19; the ratio of emergency calls to hospitalizations for COVID-19 was 104.7 to 1. In the 17 days following the launch of the web application, there were 82,347 emergency calls and 6009 new hospitalizations for COVID-19, a ratio of 13.7 calls to 1 hospitalization (chi-square test: P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The self-triage web application launch was followed by a nearly 10-fold increase in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with only a 23% increase in emergency calls. The peak of questionnaire completions preceded the peak of COVID-19-related hospitalizations by 5 days. Although the design of this study does not allow us to conclude that the self-triage tool alone contributed to the alleviation of calls to the emergency call centers, it does suggest that it played a role, and may be used for predicting increasing burden on hospitals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04331171; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04331171.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos , Programas Informáticos , Teléfono/estadística & datos numéricos , Triaje/métodos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(6): e19855, 2020 06 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32496206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We developed a self-assessment and participatory surveillance web application for coronavirus disease (COVID-19), which was launched in France in March 2020. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine if self-reported symptoms could help monitor the dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak in France. METHODS: Users were asked questions about underlying conditions, sociodemographic status, zip code, and COVID-19 symptoms. Depending on the symptoms reported and the presence of coexisting disorders, users were told to either stay at home, contact a general practitioner (GP), or call an emergency phone number. Data regarding COVID-19-related hospitalizations were retrieved from the Ministry of Health. RESULTS: As of March 29, 2020, the application was opened 4,126,789 times; 3,799,535 electronic questionnaires were filled out; and 2,477,174 users had at least one symptom. In total, 34.8% (n=1,322,361) reported no symptoms. The remaining users were directed to self-monitoring (n=858,878, 22.6%), GP visit or teleconsultation (n=1,033,922, 27.2%), or an emergency phone call (n=584,374, 15.4%). Emergency warning signs were reported by 39.1% of participants with anosmia, a loss of the sense of smell (n=127,586) versus 22.7% of participants without anosmia (n=1,597,289). Anosmia and fever and/or cough were correlated with hospitalizations for COVID-19 (Spearman correlation coefficients=0.87 and 0.82, respectively; P<.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that anosmia may be strongly associated with COVID-19 and its severity. Despite a lack of medical assessment and virological confirmation, self-checking application data could be a relevant tool to monitor outbreak trends. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04331171; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04331171.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/virología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Joven
20.
J Med Internet Res ; 22(10): e20748, 2020 10 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33006938

RESUMEN

In a matter of months, COVID-19 has escalated from a cluster of cases in Wuhan, China, to a global pandemic. As the number of patients with COVID-19 grew, solutions for the home monitoring of infected patients became critical. This viewpoint presents a telesurveillance solution-Covidom-deployed in the greater Paris area to monitor patients with COVID-19 in their homes. The system was rapidly developed and is being used on a large scale with more than 65,000 registered patients to date. The Covidom solution combines an easy-to-use and free web application for patients (through which patients fill out short questionnaires on their health status) with a regional control center that monitors and manages alerts (triggered by questionnaire responses) from patients whose health may be deteriorating. This innovative solution could alleviate the burden of health care professionals and systems while allowing for rapid response when patients trigger an alert.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Telemedicina/métodos , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Paris/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA