Long-term clinical outcomes and prognostic indicators for focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation: A single-center observational study.

BACKGROUND: Electrophysiologists have developed a computational mapping approach to localize sources that may perpetuate persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided ablation of these sources have produced variable results. The current study further assesses single-procedure success rates of FIRM-guided ablation for preventing AF or atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence and analyzes different baseline characteristics as prognostic indicators for individuals experiencing these undesired outcomes. METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive patients (mean age 64.58 ± 9.05 years and 36.6% female) with drug-refractory persistent AF with and without prior history of pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) underwent FIRM-guided ablation. Patients without prior history of PVAI underwent FIRM-guided ablation in addition to de novo PVAI. Patients with prior history of PVAI had the pulmonary veins reassessed at the time of FIRM-guided ablation for reconnection as well as re-isolation, when necessary. These patients were then prospectively followed for AF and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: FIRM analysis revealed rotors in the right atrium in 66.2% (1.77 ± 1.53 mean rotors per patient) and in the left atrium in 85.9% (2.65 ± 1.52 mean rotors per patient) of patients analyzed in the current study. After a single FIRM-guided ablation procedure, AF and atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was demonstrated in 21.1% (15/71) and 33.8% (24/71) of patients, respectively. The entire cohort of patients were followed for a mean duration of 23.20 ± 8.38 months with the mean time to AF recurrence found to be 12.35 ± 10.44 months. Furthermore, valvular heart disease (i.e. moderate mitral or tricuspid regurgitation) was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor for AF recurrence following FIRM-guided ablation (p = .033). CONCLUSIONS: FIRM-guided ablation in combination with PVAI is a suitable and effective approach for symptomatic individuals with drug-refractory persistent AF with and without prior history of PVAI. Randomized controlled studies are warranted.

Ultrafiltration versus intravenous loop diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Background Intravenous loop diuretics are the first-line therapy for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) but many patients are discharged with unresolved congestion resulting in higher re-hospitalization and mortality rates. Ultrafiltration (UF) is a promising intervention for ADHF. However, studies comparing UF to diuretics have been inconsistent in their clinical outcomes. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed. Trials were included if they met the following criteria: (1) randomization with a control group, (2) comparison of UF with a loop diuretic, and (3) a diagnosis of ADHF. Results When compared to diuretics, UF was associated with a reduced risk of clinical worsening (odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.86, P-value 0.007), increased likelihood for clinical decongestion (OR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.09-4.91, P-value 0.03) with greater weight (0.97 Kg, 95% CI: 0.52-1.42, P-value <0.0001) and volume reduction (1.11 L, 95% CI: 0.68-1.54, P-value <0.0001). The overall risk of re-hospitalization (OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62-1.38, P-value 0.70), return to emergency department (OR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.44-1.08, P-value 0.10) and mortality (OR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.60-1.62, P-value 0.97) were not significantly improved by UF treatment. Conclusions UF is associated with significant improvements in clinical decongestion but not in rates of re-hospitalization or mortality.

Thromboembolic Outcomes of Different Anticoagulation Strategies for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in the Setting of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data is available assessing the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulation (AC) strategies for prevention of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In this systematic review, we conducted a literature search to examine the possible association between different AC strategies and prevention of these adverse outcomes. METHODS: Scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus) were searched using relevant medical subject headings and keywords to retrieve studies published through September of 2019. Studies assessing the outcomes of interest in patients with HCM and AF receiving AC, no AC as well as direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were selected. RESULTS: This review identified 14 observational studies evaluating thromboembolic events by AC strategies in 8,479 participants with concomitant HCM and AF. The use of AC was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of total thromboembolic events at 9.5% (112 events in 1,175 patients) compared to 22.1% with no AC (108 events in 489 patients). In addition, the use of DOACs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of thromboembolic events at 4.7% (169 events in 3,576 patients) compared to 8.7% with VKAs (281 events in 3,239 patients). Furthermore, the use of DOACs compared to VKAs was associated with a lower pooled incidence rate of major bleeding and all-cause mortality at 3.8% (136 events in 3,576 patients) versus 6.8% (220 events in 3,239 patients) and 4.1% (124 events in 3,008 patients) versus 16.1% (384 events in 2,380 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AC of patients with concomitant HCM and AF was associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events when compared to antiplatelet therapy or no treatment. Treatment with DOACs was also associated with a lower incidence of thromboembolic events, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality when compared to VKAs.