The Ending Self-Stigma for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (ESS-P) Program: Results of a Pilot Randomized Trial.

Experiences of and concerns about encountering stigma are common among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). One common and serious consequence is self-stigma, which is when an individual comes to believe that common negative stereotypes and assumptions about PTSD are true of oneself. The current study was a pilot randomized trial that evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary outcomes of the Ending Self-Stigma for PTSD (ESS-P) program, a nine-session group intervention that aims to assist veterans with PTSD learn tools and strategies to address stigma and self-stigma. Veterans (N = 57) with a diagnosis of PTSD who were receiving treatment in U.S. Veterans Health Administration outpatient mental health programs were recruited. Participants were randomized to either ESS-P or minimally enhanced treatment as usual and assessed at baseline and after treatment on clinical symptoms, self-stigma, self-efficacy, recovery, and sense of belonging. Information on mental health treatment utilization for the 3 months before and after group treatment was also collected. Compared to controls, there was a significant decrease in self-stigma, d = -0.77, and symptoms of depression, d = -0.76, along with significant increases in general and social self-efficacy, ds = 0.73 and 0.60, respectively, and psychological experience of belonging, d = 0.46, among ESS-P participants. There were no differences regarding recovery status or changes in treatment utilization. The results of the pilot study suggest that participation in ESS-P may help reduce self-stigma and improve self-efficacy and a sense of belonging in veterans with PTSD.

Giving Back to Families: Evidence and Predictors of Persons with Serious Mental Illness Contributing Help and Support to Families.

Persons with serious mental illness (SMI) often rely on family for significant assistance and support, but the contributions made by persons with SMI to their families have been overlooked. This study assessed the extent to which persons with SMI contribute help or support to their families and identified significant predictors of contribution using an analysis of 1 year of clinicians' electronic health record (EHR) notes. EHR notes with reference to families of 226 Veterans with SMI were extracted and classified as suggesting help being given to and/or received from families. Forty-one percent of the sample contributed to family in a variety of ways. More frequent contact with family and being female were significant predictors of contribution. This study underlines the potential for reciprocal relationships within families of individuals with SMI. Clinicians can help clients and families maximize the support they provide to one another and possibly improve outcomes.

Personal Recovery as a Protective Factor Against Suicide Ideation in Individuals With Schizophrenia.

Suicide rates are elevated in individuals with schizophrenia, yet evidence is mixed regarding the roles of positive and negative symptoms as risk factors for suicide in this population, suggesting that there may be other influential variables. One such variable may be personal recovery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that personal recovery would moderate the relationship between symptoms of schizophrenia and suicide ideation. This hypothesis was tested in a sample of 169 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder using a Poisson regression model. Results suggested that there was no significant interaction between recovery and symptoms of schizophrenia. However, recovery was a significant predictor of suicide ideation after controlling for psychiatric symptoms. These findings indicate that recovery is associated with lower suicide ideation and thus may protect against it. Thus, recovery should be assessed, and potentially intervened upon, to reduce suicide risk in individuals with schizophrenia.

Even mild internalized stigma merits attention among adults with serious mental illness.

Internalized or self-stigma can be damaging to psychological and social functioning and recovery, especially for people with serious mental illness. Most studies have focused on the effects of high self-stigma, which has included both moderate and high self-stigma, versus low levels of self-stigma which has included no, minimal, or mild self-stigma. Therefore, little is known about the variation within these categories (e.g., minimal versus mild self-stigma) and its impact on recovery. This article examines differences in the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables associated with different levels of self-stigma severity. Baseline data (N = 515) from two concurrent randomized controlled trials of a psychosocial intervention aimed at reducing internalized stigma, and its effects among adults with serious mental illnesses were examined. We found that participants with greater psychological sense of belonging, and greater perceived recovery were significantly less likely to have mild or moderate/high internalized stigma than minimal stigma. Those reporting a greater frequency of stigma experiences, however, were more likely to have mild or moderate/high internalized stigma than minimal stigma. Our findings further underscore the multifaceted nature and impact of self-stigma, particularly in interpersonal relationships and interactions, and demonstrate the importance of attending to even mild levels of self-stigma endorsement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Self-Stigma and PTSD: Conceptualization and Implications for Research and Treatment.

Preliminary empirical evidence suggests that self-stigma may be a significant problem for those with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although research on self-stigma for persons with PTSD is limited, some PTSD symptoms, such as negative thoughts about oneself, feelings of shame, and avoidance-particularly of social interactions-may be conceptually related to self-stigma, potentially explaining the co-occurrence and relevance of self-stigma in PTSD. This Open Forum reviews how the social cognitive model may explain the co-occurrence of self-stigma and PTSD, considers how this model may inform treatment approaches for self-stigma in PTSD, and identifies next steps to empirically test the proposed theory.

Social functioning mediates the relationship between psychiatric symptoms and recovery among veteran and community service users with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: Previous research has established the impact of psychiatric symptoms on social functioning, while there is a paucity of research examining how social functioning relates to personal recovery, an individual's self-assessment of their mental health recovery. This study examined the mediating effect of social engagement, interpersonal communication, and satisfaction with support in the relationship between distinct psychiatric symptom clusters and perceived mental health recovery. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, both patient self-report and provider assessment data were collected for 250 patients with serious mental illness (SMI) across four mental health service sites. Parallel mediation analytic models were used. RESULTS: Interpersonal communication partially mediated the relationship between positive and negative symptom clusters and personal recovery. Satisfaction with social supports partially mediated the relationship between excited symptoms and personal recovery. Both interpersonal communication and satisfaction with social supports partially mediated the relationship between general psychological distress and depressive symptoms and personal recovery. Collectively, social functioning mediators explained nearly half of the relationship between general psychological distress and excited symptoms and personal recovery and nearly all of the relationship between positive symptoms and personal recovery. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinical providers working with persons with SMI should regularly assess social functioning in addition to assessing psychiatric symptoms and personal recovery factors and should incorporate social skills education into SMI group and individual treatments. Social functioning as a target of treatment may be especially beneficial for patients who are dissatisfied with other interventions or feel they have experienced the maximum benefit from treatment and are seeking additional methods to support personal recovery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Gender differences in substance use, consequences, motivation to change, and treatment seeking in people with serious mental illness.

Gender differences in patterns and consequences of substance use, treatment-seeking, and motivation to change were examined in two samples of people with serious mental illness (SMI) and comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs): a community sample not currently seeking substance abuse treatment (N = 175) and a treatment-seeking sample (N = 137). In both groups, women and men demonstrated more similarities in the pattern and severity of their substance use than differences. However, treatment-seeking women showed greater readiness to change their substance use. Mental health problems and traumatic experiences may prompt people with SMI and SUD to enter substance abuse treatment, regardless of gender.

Ending self-stigma: pilot evaluation of a new intervention to reduce internalized stigma among people with mental illnesses.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated "Ending Self-Stigma" (ESS), a structured 9-session group intervention to help people with serious mental illnesses reduce internalized stigma. METHODS: Participants from two Veterans Administration mental health sites were assessed before and after the intervention regarding their levels of internalized stigma, empowerment, recovery orientation, perceived social support, and beliefs about societal stigma. RESULTS: Internalized stigma significantly decreased, and perceived social support and recovery orientation significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: "Ending Self-Stigma" is the first of its kind and may be a valuable intervention for reducing internalized stigma among people with serious mental illnesses, suitable for both professionally-delivered psychiatric rehabilitation programs and consumer-led programs and services.

Outcomes of Ending Self-Stigma, a Group Intervention to Reduce Internalized Stigma, Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

OBJECTIVE: Ending Self-Stigma is a nine-session group intervention designed to teach individuals experiencing mental illness a set of tools and strategies to effectively deal with self-stigma and its effects. The authors examined the efficacy of Ending Self-Stigma with an active comparison group focused on general health and wellness education (the Health and Wellness intervention) in a cohort of veterans. METHODS: Veterans with serious mental illness (N=248) were randomly assigned to either the Ending Self-Stigma or the Health and Wellness intervention. Participants completed assessments of symptoms, internalized stigma, recovery, sense of belonging, and other aspects of psychosocial functioning at baseline, posttreatment, and 6-month follow-up. Repeated-measures, mixed-effects models were used to examine the effects of group × time interactions on outcomes. RESULTS: Individuals in both groups experienced significant but modest reductions in self-stigma and increases in psychological sense of belonging after the treatments. The Ending Self-Stigma and Health and Wellness interventions did not significantly differ in primary (self-stigma) or secondary (self-efficacy, sense of belonging, or recovery) outcomes at posttreatment. Significant psychotic symptoms moderated treatment effects on self-stigma, such that among individuals with significant psychotic symptoms at baseline, those who participated in Ending Self-Stigma had a significantly greater reduction in internalized stigma than those in the Health and Wellness intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions directly targeting self-stigma and those that may address it more indirectly may be helpful in reducing internalized stigma. Individuals experiencing psychotic symptoms may be more likely to benefit from interventions that specifically target self-stigma.

Support for the social-cognitive model of internalized stigma in serious mental illness.

One prominent social-cognitive model of internalized stigma by Corrigan and his colleagues (2012; 2002) proposes that individuals are exposed to societal stereotypes about mental illness, at least tacitly agree with them, and may apply them to oneself, engendering harmful self-beliefs. There is limited empirical support for this model in serious mental illness. Moreover, it is not clearly established how internalized stigma and its associated factors impact recovery in this population. The current study uses structural equation modeling (SEM) to assess the social-cognitive model's goodness of fit in a sample of Veterans with serious mental illness (Veteran sample, n = 248), and then validates the model in a second and independent sample of individuals receiving community-based psychiatric rehabilitation services (community sample, n = 267). Participants completed the Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (SSMIS; Corrigan et al., 2006) and measures of self-esteem, self-efficacy, and recovery attitudes. Consistent with Corrigan and colleagues' formulation of internalized stigma, SEM analyses showed a significant indirect pathway from stereotype awareness, to stereotype agreement, to application to self, to self-esteem decrement, to poorer recovery attitudes. Additionally, there was a significant direct effect from stereotype awareness to self-esteem. This study shows that individuals with serious mental illness experience psychological harm from stigma in two ways: (1) through perceived public prejudice and bias, and (2) through internalizing these negative messages. In particular, stigma harms individuals' self-esteem, which then reduces their recovery attitudes.

Internalized stigma, sense of belonging, and suicidal ideation among veterans with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: There is emerging evidence that internalized stigma increases risk for suicide among individuals with serious mental illness. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate whether sense of belonging moderates the relationship between internalized stigma and suicidal ideation. METHOD: Two hundred forty-two veterans with serious mental illness completed measures of internalized stigma, belongingness, and depression. Moderation analysis was used to determine whether sense of belonging interacts with internalized stigma to predict suicidal ideation when accounting for individual differences in depression and relevant demographic variables. RESULTS: Consistent with our hypothesis, sense of belonging significantly moderated the relationship between internalized stigma and suicidal ideation. Specifically, the relationship between internalized stigma and suicidal ideation was strongest when sense of belonging was low. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Internalized stigma and belongingness interact to increase risk for suicide. Both constructs should be assessed and included in interventions to reduce suicide risk among veterans with serious mental illness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Stigma and discrimination as correlates of mental health treatment engagement among adults with serious mental illness.

OBJECTIVE: The negative impacts of stigma on mental health treatment initiation are well established, but the relationship of stigma to proactive engagement in mental health treatment (e.g., actively working toward therapy goals) is largely unexamined. This study examined the relationship between mental health treatment engagement and stigma experiences, discrimination experiences, and internalized stigma among adults with serious mental illness. Age, race, gender, and education were tested as moderators of the relationships between stigma-related variables and treatment engagement. METHOD: Data were collected from 167 adults with serious mental illnesses who were receiving services at 5 psychosocial rehabilitation programs. Treatment engagement was assessed by participants' primary mental health care providers, using the Service Engagement Scale. The relationship between treatment engagement, stigma, and discrimination as well as potential demographic moderators were tested with Pearson's correlations and multiple linear regressions. RESULTS: Treatment engagement was not correlated with experiences of stigma, experiences of discrimination, or application of stigmatizing beliefs to self. Gender, race, and age were not significant moderators but education was. Experiences of stigma were associated with greater treatment engagement in those with a higher level of education (p = .007), whereas application of stigma to one's self was associated with poorer treatment engagement in those with a higher level of education (p = .005). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Among individuals with higher levels of education, efforts to prevent internalization of public stigma may be crucial to promote proactive mental health treatment. Replication studies are needed to confirm these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The influence of experiences of stigma on recovery: Mediating roles of internalized stigma, self-esteem, and self-efficacy.

OBJECTIVE: Experiencing stigmatization regarding mental illness has harmful effects on recovery from serious mental illness (SMI). Stigma experiences can also lead to internalized stigma, the cognitive and emotional internalization of negative stereotypes, and application of those stereotypes to one's self. Internalized stigma may lead to additional harms, including decrements in self-esteem and self-efficacy. Therefore, this study examined the effects of stigmatization experiences on recovery-related outcomes through internalized stigma, self-esteem, and self-efficacy in a single comprehensive model. METHODS: Adults with SMI (n = 516) completed standardized measures assessing the variables of interest during baseline assessments for 2 randomized controlled trials. In a secondary analysis of the trial data, separate serial mediation models were tested for recovery orientation, perceived quality of life, and social withdrawal as outcomes, with experiences of stigma as the predictor variable and internalized stigma, self-esteem, and self-efficacy as serial mediators in that order. Alternate order and parallel mediation models were also tested to evaluate directionality. RESULTS: The serial mediation model was the best fit, although self-efficacy was not found to be a critical mediator. Experiences of stigma led to internalized stigma, which influenced self-esteem and recovery-related outcomes, consistent with the social-cognitive model of internalized stigma. CONCLUSION: This indicates that internalized stigma is an essential target for reducing the negative impact of stigmatization on recovery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Gender differences in jail inmates' symptoms of mental illness, treatment history and treatment seeking.

BACKGROUND: Rates of mental illness among prisoners are substantial, but little is known about the unique mental health needs of women in jail, those under pre-trial custodial remand or serving short sentences. AIMS: To compare male and female jail inmates along a wide range of symptoms of mental illness using identical assessment methods, and to examine gender differences in treatment seeking before and during incarceration. METHODS: Soon after incarceration in a county jail, 360 male and 154 female pre-trial and post-trial inmates completed the Personality Assessment Inventory, a wide-ranging measure of psychiatric symptoms. Treatment seeking information was taken from official jail records. RESULTS: Women were more likely to report clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, borderline personality features, somatic concerns and trauma-related symptoms; however, trauma-related symptoms and borderline features were also common among male inmates. Although both men and women reported high rates of drug-related problems, alcohol-related problems were twice as prevalent among male inmates. Female inmates were more likely to seek and be enrolled in jail-based treatment; there were no differences in reported help seeking prior to incarceration. CONCLUSIONS: Female jail inmates are especially in need of mental health services. Effective interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder are needed in jail settings for both male and female inmates during incarceration and upon release.

Public understanding of different kinds of voice-hearing experiences: Causal beliefs, perceptions of mental illness, and stigma.

OBJECTIVE: Voice-hearers tend to face a high degree of stigma that can impact subjective well-being and social functioning. However, researchers have hypothesized that the content of the voice-hearing experience and its cultural context are relevant to stigma responses. This study experimentally tested how perceptions of voice-hearing experiences change as a function of the voice's content and the perceiver's characteristics. METHOD: In total, 143 nonclinical participants were presented with vignettes describing people who heard voices that were attributed to either "God" or "Abraham Lincoln" and were described as either complimentary/encouraging or insulting/threatening. For each vignette, participants were asked about the likelihood that the voice-hearer had schizophrenia or mental illness. The Causal Beliefs Questionnaire was also delivered, with two new subscales added to test for belief in positive and negative religious causes for the voices. Stigma was measured by perceived dangerousness and desire for social distance. RESULTS: Voice-hearing experiences elicited greater stigma from participants who endorsed greater likelihood that the voice-hearer was mentally ill, greater belief in biological causes of the voice-hearing, negative religious causes, psychosocial causes, socialization causes, and causes related to personal responsibility. Endorsing positive religious causes was associated with lower stigma. Participants who were more religious were more likely to attribute voice-hearing experiences to negative religious causes (possession, lack of/misguided faith), except when the target was described as hearing the voice of God saying positive things. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The stigma of voice-hearing experiences depends upon what the voice is saying and perceptions about the cause of the voice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Unmet needs of families of adults with mental illness and preferences regarding family services.

OBJECTIVE: This study used a survey to assess the information and educational needs of family members of adults with mental illness and their preferences regarding how to address those needs. METHODS: Recruitment was attempted through two sources: local mental health treatment facilities and the Maryland chapter of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). Inadequate contact information and low response rate produced only 16 responses from family members of consumers recruited through local mental health facilities. Thus results are reported for a family needs assessment survey mailed to NAMI members (308 of 962 possible responses). Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to summarize relationships between characteristics of the family member, characteristics of the ill relative, experience of stigma by the family member, and information needs of the family members. RESULTS: On average, family members reported a substantial number of unmet needs (mean+/-SD of 7.09+/-4.71 needs; possible number of needs ranges from 0 to 16), often despite prior receipt of information. Family members' experiences of stigma and having an ill relative with a more recently occurring condition (for example, a younger relative or a shorter length of illness) or with a disabling condition (for example, recent hospitalization) were significantly associated with a greater number of unmet needs. Family members preferred that a mental health provider (63%) address their needs on an as-needed basis (58%). CONCLUSIONS: The needs and preferences of family members of adults with mental illness are diverse and varied. Consequently, these families may benefit from ongoing provision of information and support tailored to meet the families' individual needs. Continued efforts should be made to understand and address consumer and family needs, potential barriers to participation in family services, and the relationship between stigma and family need.

Family member engagement with early psychosis specialty care.

BACKGROUND: Family members of individuals with early psychosis (EP) play critical roles in their engagement with EP services, but family member experiences of those roles are insufficiently understood. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 18 family members of individuals enrolled in EP services during the Recovery After an Initial Schizophrenia Episode-Implementation Evaluation Study (RAISE-IES study), to better understand their experiences engaging with EP specialty care and their roles in client engagement in services. RESULTS: Family members described diverse experiences with the interplay among distress regarding their loved one's illness, uncertainty engaging with programme staff and highly valued facets of the clinical programme. These included ongoing family outreach and support, frequent communication from staff, programme flexibility and individualization of care. They also described varied and stressful complexities involved in providing practical assistance and encouragement to support their loved one's engagement in care. Competing responsibilities, time and resource limitations, and the intricacy of providing support while fostering autonomy impacted their roles and experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Given key family roles for most EP clients, understanding family members' highly individual experiences and responding to them in tailored ways is necessary to best support families in helping their loved ones engage in care and recovery as well as navigate their own worry and stress. Recommendations for engaging and supporting family members are highlighted.

Person-Oriented Recovery of Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses: A Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Findings.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is significant literature examining changes over time in the functional recovery of people with serious mental illnesses, relatively little is known about the longitudinal nature of person-oriented recovery. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to synthesize findings pertaining to the study of person-oriented recovery constructs over time and concomitants of change. METHODS: Systematic searches up to February 2017 were conducted and were supplemented by hand-searching of reference lists and by contacting study authors. Twenty-three independent studies that included a sample of individuals with serious mental illnesses and that quantitatively measured person-oriented recovery, empowerment, or hope over at least two time points were included in the review. Of these, seven were randomized controlled trials that were included in the meta-analysis. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. Aggregate effect sizes for person-oriented recovery outcomes were calculated, and individual, intervention, and methodological characteristics served as moderators in meta-regression analyses. RESULTS: The meta-analysis (N=1,739 participants) demonstrated that consumers experience greater (and sustained) improvement in person-oriented recovery outcomes when they are involved in recovery-oriented mental health treatment versus usual care or other types of treatment. Only type of intervention provider was a significant moderator; a study of an intervention that was delivered by both mental health professionals and peer providers demonstrated the greatest differences between treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery-focused interventions, especially those that involve collaborations between mental health professionals and peer providers, may serve to foster increased recovery, hope, and empowerment among individuals with serious mental illnesses.

Family Involvement in the Clinical Care of Clients With First-Episode Psychosis in the RAISE Connection Program.

OBJECTIVE: This study described how families were involved in the RAISE Connection Program for clients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and examined factors that predicted family involvement. METHODS: Presence of family members at clinical visits for 65 clients with FEP was described. Multiple regressions were conducted to determine whether demographic characteristics, clinical factors, or client-provider discussions regarding family predicted family involvement during the first six months of the program. RESULTS: Most participants (95%) had at least one family member attend a clinical visit during program involvement. Age of the client with FEP, psychiatric symptoms, and substance use predicted the number of days family members attended visits during the first six months of program participation; client-provider discussions about family did not. CONCLUSIONS: Family involvement in the ongoing care of clients with FEP is common when efforts are made to engage clients with FEP and their families.

Differences in suicide and death ideation among veterans and nonveterans with serious mental illness.

Individuals with serious mental illness and veterans are two populations at elevated risk for suicide; however, research has not examined whether veterans with serious mental illness may be at higher suicide risk than nonveterans with serious mental illness. Additionally, overlapping risk factors for suicide in these populations may account for differences in suicide-related outcomes between these groups. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify differences in death ideation and suicide ideation among veterans and nonveterans with serious mental illness. We also aimed to explore these effects after adjusting for potentially shared risk factors. We found that veterans with serious mental illness reported death ideation and suicide ideation more than twice as often as nonveterans with serious mental illness. After adjusting for demographic, psychiatric, and theory-driven risk factors, the effect of veteran status on death ideation remained significant, though the effect on suicide ideation was no longer significant. Depressive and psychotic symptoms were significant predictors of death ideation; depressive symptoms and hostility were significant predictors of suicide ideation. Clinicians should particularly monitor death ideation and suicide ideation in veterans with serious mental illness, as well as associated clinical risk factors such as depression, psychotic symptoms, and hostility. (PsycINFO Database Record