Rational design of a new antibiotic class for drug-resistant infections.

The development of new antibiotics to treat infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens is of paramount importance as antibiotic resistance continues to increase worldwide1. Here we describe a strategy for the rational design of diazabicyclooctane inhibitors of penicillin-binding proteins from Gram-negative bacteria to overcome multiple mechanisms of resistance, including ß-lactamase enzymes, stringent response and outer membrane permeation. Diazabicyclooctane inhibitors retain activity in the presence of ß-lactamases, the primary resistance mechanism associated with ß-lactam therapy in Gram-negative bacteria2,3. Although the target spectrum of an initial lead was successfully re-engineered to gain in vivo efficacy, its ability to permeate across bacterial outer membranes was insufficient for further development. Notably, the features that enhanced target potency were found to preclude compound uptake. An improved optimization strategy leveraged porin permeation properties concomitant with biochemical potency in the lead-optimization stage. This resulted in ETX0462, which has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa plus all other Gram-negative ESKAPE pathogens, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and biothreat pathogens. These attributes, along with a favourable preclinical safety profile, hold promise for the successful clinical development of the first novel Gram-negative chemotype to treat life-threatening antibiotic-resistant infections in more than 25 years.

FDA, CDC, and NIH Co-sponsored Public Workshop Summary-Development Considerations of Antimicrobial Drugs for the Treatment of Gonorrhea.

There is an unmet need for developing drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea, due to rapidly evolving resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae against antimicrobial drugs used for empiric therapy, an increase in globally reported multidrug resistant cases, and the limited available therapeutic options. Furthermore, few drugs are under development. Development of antimicrobials is hampered by challenges in clinical trial design, limitations of available diagnostics, changes in and varying standards of care, lack of robust animal models, and clinically relevant pharmacodynamic targets. On April 23, 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health co-sponsored a workshop with stakeholders from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies to discuss the challenges and strategies, including potential collaborations and incentives, to facilitate the development of drugs for the treatment of gonorrhea. This article provides a summary of the workshop.

Population pharmacokinetics and humanized dosage regimens matching the peak, area, trough, and range of amikacin plasma concentrations in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models.

Amikacin is an FDA-approved aminoglycoside antibiotic that is commonly used. However, validated dosage regimens that achieve clinically relevant exposure profiles in mice are lacking. We aimed to design and validate humanized dosage regimens for amikacin in immune-competent murine bloodstream and lung infection models of Acinetobacter baumannii. Plasma and lung epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations after single subcutaneous doses of 1.37, 13.7, and 137 mg/kg of body weight were simultaneously modeled via population pharmacokinetics. Then, humanized amikacin dosage regimens in mice were designed and prospectively validated to match the peak, area, trough, and range of plasma concentration profiles in critically ill patients (clinical dose: 25-30 mg/kg of body weight). The pharmacokinetics of amikacin were linear, with a clearance of 9.93 mL/h in both infection models after a single dose. However, the volume of distribution differed between models, resulting in an elimination half-life of 48 min for the bloodstream and 36 min for the lung model. The drug exposure in ELF was 72.7% compared to that in plasma. After multiple q6h dosing, clearance decreased by ~80% from the first (7.35 mL/h) to the last two dosing intervals (~1.50 mL/h) in the bloodstream model. Likewise, clearance decreased by 41% from 7.44 to 4.39 mL/h in the lung model. The humanized dosage regimens were 117 mg/kg of body weight/day in mice [administered in four fractions 6 h apart (q6h): 61.9%, 18.6%, 11.3%, and 8.21% of total dose] for the bloodstream and 96.7 mg/kg of body weight/day (given q6h as 65.1%, 16.9%, 10.5%, and 7.41%) for the lung model. These validated humanized dosage regimens and population pharmacokinetic models support translational studies with clinically relevant amikacin exposure profiles.

Individual Components of Polymyxin B Modeled via Population Pharmacokinetics to Design Humanized Dosage Regimens for a Bloodstream and Lung Infection Model in Immune-Competent Mice.

Polymyxin B is a "last-line-of-defense" antibiotic approved in the 1960s. However, the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of its four main components has not been reported in infected mice. We aimed to determine the PK of polymyxin B1, B1-Ile, B2, and B3 in a murine bloodstream and lung infection model of Acinetobacter baumannii and develop humanized dosage regimens. A linear 1-compartment model, plus an epithelial lining fluid (ELF) compartment for the lung model, best described the PK. Clearance and volume of distribution were similar among the four components. The bioavailability fractions were 72.6% for polymyxin B1, 12.0% for B1-Ile, 11.5% for B2, and 3.81% for B3 for the lung model and were similar for the bloodstream model. While the volume of distribution was comparable between both models (17.3 mL for the lung and ~27 mL for the bloodstream model), clearance was considerably smaller for the lung (2.85 mL/h) compared to that of the bloodstream model (5.59 mL/h). The total drug exposure (AUC) in ELF was high due to the saturable binding of polymyxin B presumably to bacterial lipopolysaccharides. However, the modeled unbound AUC in ELF was ~16.7% compared to the total drug AUC in plasma. The long elimination half-life (~4 h) of polymyxin B enabled humanized dosage regimens with every 12 h dosing in mice. Daily doses that optimally matched the range of drug concentrations observed in patients were 21 mg/kg for the bloodstream and 13 mg/kg for the lung model. These dosage regimens and population PK models support translational studies for polymyxin B at clinically relevant drug exposures.

Combination Therapy to Kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Its Nonreplicating Persister Phenotype.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) exists in various metabolic states, including a nonreplicating persister (NRP) phenotype which may affect response to therapy. We have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate discovery of effective Mtb treatment regimens and previously found pretomanid (PMD), moxifloxacin (MXF), and bedaquiline (BDQ) to readily kill logarithmic- and acid-phase Mtb. Here, we studied multiple concentrations of each drug in flask-based, time-kill studies against NRP Mtb in single-, two- and three-drug combinations, including the active M2 metabolite of BDQ. We used nonparametric population algorithms in the Pmetrics package for R to model the data and to simulate the 95% confidence interval of bacterial population decline due to the two-drug combination regimen of PMD + MXF and compared this to observed declines with three-drug regimens. PMD + MXF at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated Mtb. Unlike other states for Mtb, we observed no sustained emergence of less susceptible isolates for any regimen. The addition of BDQ as a third drug significantly (P < 0.05) shortened time to total bacterial suppression by 3 days compared to the two-drug regimen, similar to our findings for Mtb in logarithmic or acid growth phases.

Building Optimal Three-Drug Combination Chemotherapy Regimens To Eradicate Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Its Slow-Growth Acid Phase.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis metabolic state affects the response to therapy. Quantifying the effect of antimicrobials in the acid and nonreplicating metabolic phases of M. tuberculosis growth will help to optimize therapy for tuberculosis. As a brute-force approach to all possible drug combinations against M. tuberculosis in all different metabolic states is impossible, we have adopted a model-informed strategy to accelerate the discovery. Using multiple concentrations of each drug in time-kill studies, we examined single drugs and two- and three-drug combinations of pretomanid, moxifloxacin, and bedaquiline plus its active metabolite against M. tuberculosis in its acid-phase metabolic state. We used a nonparametric modeling approach to generate full distributions of interaction terms between pretomanid and moxifloxacin for susceptible and less susceptible populations. From the model, we could predict the 95% confidence interval of the simulated total bacterial population decline due to the 2-drug combination regimen of pretomanid and moxifloxacin and compare this to observed declines with 3-drug regimens. We found that the combination of pretomanid and moxifloxacin at concentrations equivalent to average or peak human concentrations effectively eradicated M. tuberculosis in its acid growth phase and prevented emergence of less susceptible isolates. The addition of bedaquiline as a third drug shortened time to total and less susceptible bacterial suppression by 8 days compared to the 2-drug regimen, which was significantly faster than the 2-drug kill.

Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Interpretive Breakpoints: Recommendations from the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST).

The polymyxins are important agents for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B are that isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacteriaceae are considered susceptible at MIC values of ≤2 mg/liter. These recommendations are contingent upon dosing and testing strategies that are described in this commentary. Importantly, these recommendations are not applicable to lower respiratory tract infections, for which we recommend no breakpoints. Furthermore, there is no breakpoint recommendation for polymyxin B for lower urinary tract infections.

First Penicillin-Binding Protein Occupancy Patterns for 15 ß-Lactams and ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Mycobacterium abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus causes serious infections that often require over 18 months of antibiotic combination therapy. There is no standard regimen for the treatment of M. abscessus infections, and the multitude of combinations that have been used clinically have had low success rates and high rates of toxicities. With ß-lactam antibiotics being safe, double ß-lactam and ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations are of interest for improving the treatment of M. abscessus infections and minimizing toxicity. However, a mechanistic approach for building these combinations is lacking since little is known about which penicillin-binding protein (PBP) target receptors are inactivated by different ß-lactams in M. abscessus We determined the preferred PBP targets of 13 ß-lactams and 2 ß-lactamase inhibitors in two M. abscessus strains and identified PBP sequences by proteomics. The Bocillin FL binding assay was used to determine the ß-lactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited Bocillin binding (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50s]). Principal component analysis identified four clusters of PBP occupancy patterns. Carbapenems inactivated all PBPs at low concentrations (0.016 to 0.5 mg/liter) (cluster 1). Cephalosporins (cluster 2) inactivated PonA2, PonA1, and PbpA at low (0.031 to 1 mg/liter) (ceftriaxone and cefotaxime) or intermediate (0.35 to 16 mg/liter) (ceftazidime and cefoxitin) concentrations. Sulbactam, aztreonam, carumonam, mecillinam, and avibactam (cluster 3) inactivated the same PBPs as cephalosporins but required higher concentrations. Other penicillins (cluster 4) specifically targeted PbpA at 2 to 16 mg/liter. Carbapenems, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime were the most promising ß-lactams since they inactivated most or all PBPs at clinically relevant concentrations. These first PBP occupancy patterns in M. abscessus provide a mechanistic foundation for selecting and optimizing safe and effective combination therapies with ß-lactams.

Methodological features of clinical pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of antibacterials and antifungals: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) indices relate measures of drug exposure to antibacterial effect. Clinical PK-PD studies aim to correlate PK-PD indices with outcomes in patients. Optimization of dosing based on pre-clinical studies means that PK-PD relationships are difficult to establish; therefore studies need to be designed and reported carefully to validate pre-clinical findings. OBJECTIVES: To describe the methodological features of clinical antibacterial and antifungal PK-PD studies that reported the relationship between PK-PD indices and clinical or microbiological responses. METHODS: Studies published between 1980 and 2015 were identified through systematic searches. Methodological features of eligible studies were extracted. RESULTS: We identified 85 publications containing 97 PK-PD analyses. Most studies were small, with fewer than 100 patients. Around a quarter were performed on patients with infections due to a single specific pathogen. In approximately one-third of studies, patients received concurrent antibiotics/antifungals and in some other studies patients received other treatments that may confound the PK-PD-outcome relationship. Most studies measured antimicrobial concentrations in blood/serum and only four measured free concentrations. Most performed some form of regression, time-to-event analysis or used the Hill/Emax equation to examine the association between PK-PD index and outcome. Target values of PK-PD indices that predict outcomes were investigated in 52% of studies. Target identification was most commonly done using recursive partitioning or logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS: Given the variability in conduct and reporting, we suggest that an agreed set of standards for the conduct and reporting of studies should be developed.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination With Fosfomycin: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy Against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Previously, by targeting penicillin-binding protein 3, Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC), and MurA with ceftazidime-avibactam-fosfomycin, antimicrobial susceptibility was restored among multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Herein, ceftazidime-avibactam-fosfomycin combination therapy against MDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolate CL232 was further evaluated. Checkerboard susceptibility analysis revealed synergy between ceftazidime-avibactam and fosfomycin. Accordingly, the resistance elements present and expressed in P. aeruginosa were analyzed using whole-genome sequencing and transcriptome profiling. Mutations in genes that are known to contribute to ß-lactam resistance were identified. Moreover, expression of blaPDC, the mexAB-oprM efflux pump, and murA were upregulated. When fosfomycin was administered alone, the frequency of mutations conferring resistance was high; however, coadministration of fosfomycin with ceftazidime-avibactam yielded a lower frequency of resistance mutations. In a murine infection model using a high bacterial burden, ceftazidime-avibactam-fosfomycin significantly reduced the P. aeruginosa colony-forming units (CFUs), by approximately 2 and 5 logs, compared with stasis and in the vehicle-treated control, respectively. Administration of ceftazidime-avibactam and fosfomycin separately significantly increased CFUs, by approximately 3 logs and 1 log, respectively, compared with the number at stasis, and only reduced CFUs by approximately 1 log and 2 logs, respectively, compared with the number in the vehicle-treated control. Thus, the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam-fosfomycin was superior to either drug alone. By employing a "mechanism-based approach" to combination chemotherapy, we show that ceftazidime-avibactam-fosfomycin has the potential to offer infected patients with high bacterial burdens a therapeutic hope against infection with MDR P. aeruginosa that lack metallo-ß-lactamases.

Effect of Moxifloxacin plus Pretomanid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Log Phase, Acid Phase, and Nonreplicating-Persister Phase in an In Vitro Assay.

Combination therapy is a successful approach to treat tuberculosis in patients with susceptible strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis However, the emergence of resistant strains requires identification of new, effective therapies. Pretomanid (PA824) and moxifloxacin (MXF) are promising options currently under evaluation in clinical trials for the treatment of susceptible and resistant mycobacteria. We applied our recently described screening strategy to characterize the interaction between PA824 and MXF toward the killing of M. tuberculosis in logarithmic growth phase (log phase), acid phase, and nonreplicating-persister (NRP) phase. Respective in vitro data generated for the H37Rv and 18b strains were evaluated in a microdilution plate system containing both drugs in combination. The Universal Response Surface Approach model from Greco et al. (W. R. Greco, G. Bravo, and J. C. Parsons, Pharmacol Rev 47:331-385, 1995) was used to characterize the nature of the interaction between both drugs; synergistic or additive combinations would prompt additional evaluation in the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM) and in animal studies. The interaction between MXF and PA824 was additive against M. tuberculosis organisms in acid phase (interaction parameter [α] = 5.56e-8 [95% confidence interval {CI} = -0.278 to 0.278] and α = 0.408 [95% CI = 0.105 to 0.711], respectively), NRP phase (α = 0.625 [95% CI = -0.556 to 1.81] and α = 2.92 [95% CI = 0.215 to 5.63], respectively), and log phase (α = 1.57e-6 [95% CI = -0.930 to 0.930] and α = 1.83e-6 [95% CI = -0.929 and 0.929], respectively), prompting further testing of this promising combination for the treatment of tuberculosis in the HFIM and in animal studies.

Generating Robust and Informative Nonclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Bacterial Infection Model Efficacy Data To Support Translation to Humans.

In June 2017, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, organized a workshop entitled "Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) for Development of Therapeutics against Bacterial Pathogens." The aims were to discuss details of various PK/PD models and identify sound practices for deriving and utilizing PK/PD relationships to design optimal dosage regimens for patients. Workshop participants encompassed individuals from academia, industry, and government, including the United States Food and Drug Administration. This and the accompanying review on clinical PK/PD summarize the workshop discussions and recommendations. Nonclinical PK/PD models play a critical role in designing human dosage regimens and are essential tools for drug development. These include in vitro and in vivo efficacy models that provide valuable and complementary information for dose selection and translation from the laboratory to human. It is crucial that studies be designed, conducted, and interpreted appropriately. For antibacterial PK/PD, extensive published data and expertise are available. These have been leveraged to develop recommendations, identify common pitfalls, and describe the applications, strengths, and limitations of various nonclinical infection models and translational approaches. Despite these robust tools and published guidance, characterizing nonclinical PK/PD relationships may not be straightforward, especially for a new drug or new class. Antimicrobial PK/PD is an evolving discipline that needs to adapt to future research and development needs. Open communication between academia, pharmaceutical industry, government, and regulatory bodies is essential to share perspectives and collectively solve future challenges.

GC-072: A Novel Therapeutic Candidate for Oral Treatment of Melioidosis and Infections Caused by Select Biothreat Pathogens.

Burkholderia pseudomallei (B. pseudomallei), the etiological agent of melioidosis, is a Gram-negative bacterium with additional concern as a biothreat pathogen. The mortality rate from B. pseudomallei varies depending on the type of infection and extent of available health care, but in the case of septicemia left untreated it can range from 50 - 90%. Current therapy for melioidosis is biphasic, consisting of parenteral acute-phase treatment for two weeks or longer, followed by oral eradication-phase treatment lasting several months. An effective oral therapeutic for outpatient treatment of acute-phase melioidosis is needed. GC-072 is a potent, 4-oxoquinolizine antibiotic with selective inhibitory activity against bacterial topoisomerases. GC-072 has demonstrated in vitro potency against susceptible and drug-resistant strains of B. pseudomallei and is also active against Burkholderia mallei, Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, and Francisella tularensis GC-072 is bactericidal both extra- and intracellularly, with rapid killing noted within a few hours and reduced development of resistance compared to ceftazidime. GC-072, delivered intragastrically to mimic oral administration, promoted dose-dependent survival in mice using lethal inhalational models of B. pseudomallei infection following exposure to a 24 or 339 LD50 challenge with B. pseudomallei strain 1026b. Overall, GC-072 appears to be a strong candidate for first-line, oral treatment of melioidosis.

Comparable Efficacy and Better Safety of Double ß-Lactam Combination Therapy versus ß­Lactam plus Aminoglycoside in Gram-Negative Bacteria in Randomized, Controlled Trials.

There is a great need for efficacious therapies against Gram-negative bacteria. Double ß-lactam combination(s) (DBL) are relatively safe, and preclinical data are promising; however, their clinical role has not been well defined. We conducted a metaanalysis of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of DBL compared to ß-lactam plus aminoglycoside combinations (BLAG). PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database were searched through July 2018. We included randomized controlled clinical trials that compared DBL with BLAG combinations. Clinical response was used as the primary outcome and microbiological response in Gram-negative bacteria as the secondary outcome; sensitivity analyses were performed for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella spp., and Escherichia coli Heterogeneity and risk of bias were assessed. Safety results were classified by systems and organs. Thirteen studies evaluated 2,771 cases for clinical response and 665 cases for microbiological response in various Gram-negative species. DBL achieved slightly, but not significantly, better clinical response (risk ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99 to 1.11) and microbiological response in Gram-negatives (risk ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.25) compared with BLAG. Sensitivity analyses by pathogen showed the same trend. No significant heterogeneity across studies was found. DBL was significantly safer than BLAG regarding renal toxicity (6.6% versus 8.8%, P = 0.0338) and ototoxicity (0.7 versus 3.1%, P = 0.0137). Other adverse events were largely comparable. Overall, empirically designed DBL showed comparable clinical and microbiological responses across different Gram-negative species, and were significantly safer than BLAG. Therefore, DBL should be rationally optimized via the latest translational approaches, leveraging mechanistic insights and newer ß-lactams for future evaluation in clinical trials.

Effect of Linezolid plus Bedaquiline against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Log Phase, Acid Phase, and Nonreplicating-Persister Phase in an In Vitro Assay.

Tuberculosis is the ninth-leading cause of death worldwide. Treatment success is approximately 80% for susceptible strains and decreases to 30% for extensively resistant strains. Shortening the therapy duration for Mycobacterium tuberculosis is a major goal, which can be attained with the use of combination therapy. However, the identification of the most promising combination is a challenge given the quantity of older and newer agents available. Our objective was to identify promising 2-drug combinations using an in vitro strategy to ultimately be tested in an in vitro hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) and in animal models. We studied the effect of the combination of linezolid (LZD) and bedaquiline (BDQ) on M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv in log- and acid-phase growth and M. tuberculosis strain 18b in log- and nonreplicating-persister-phase growth in a plate system containing a 9-by-8 matrix of concentrations of both drugs alone and in combinations. A characterization of the interaction as antagonistic, additive, or synergistic was performed using the Greco universal response surface approach (URSA) model. Our results indicate that the interaction between LZD and BDQ is additive for bacterial killing in both strains for both of the metabolic states tested. This prescreen strategy was suitable to identify LZD and BDQ as a promising combination to be further tested in the HFIM. The presence of nonoverlapping mechanisms of drug action suggests each drug in the combination will likely be effective in suppressing the emergence of resistance by M. tuberculosis to the companion drug, which holds promise in improving treatment outcomes for tuberculosis.

First Penicillin-Binding Protein Occupancy Patterns of ß-Lactams and ß-Lactamase Inhibitors in Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) are the high-affinity target sites of all ß-lactam antibiotics in bacteria. It is well known that each ß-lactam covalently binds to and thereby inactivates different PBPs with various affinities. Despite ß-lactams serving as the cornerstone of our therapeutic armamentarium against Klebsiella pneumoniae, PBP binding data are missing for this pathogen. We aimed to generate the first PBP binding data on 13 chemically diverse and clinically relevant ß-lactams and ß-lactamase inhibitors in K. pneumoniae PBP binding was determined using isolated membrane fractions from K. pneumoniae strains ATCC 43816 and ATCC 13883. Binding reactions were conducted using ß-lactam concentrations from 0.0075 to 256 mg/liter (or 128 mg/liter). After ß-lactam exposure, unbound PBPs were labeled by Bocillin FL. Binding affinities (50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50]) were reported as the ß-lactam concentrations that half-maximally inhibited Bocillin FL binding. PBP occupancy patterns by ß-lactams were consistent across both strains. Carbapenems bound to all PBPs, with PBP2 and PBP4 as the highest-affinity targets (IC50, <0.0075 mg/liter). Preferential PBP2 binding was observed by mecillinam (amdinocillin; IC50, <0.0075 mg/liter) and avibactam (IC50, 2 mg/liter). Aztreonam showed high affinity for PBP3 (IC50, 0.06 to 0.12 mg/liter). Ceftazidime bound PBP3 at low concentrations (IC50, 0.06 to 0.25 mg/liter) and PBP1a/b at higher concentrations (4 mg/liter), whereas cefepime bound PBPs 1 to 4 at more even concentrations (IC50, 0.015 to 2 mg/liter). These PBP binding data on a comprehensive set of 13 clinically relevant ß-lactams and ß-lactamase inhibitors in K. pneumoniae enable, for the first time, the rational design and optimization of double ß-lactam and ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Dilution Factor of Quantitative Bacterial Cultures Obtained by Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Patients with Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia.

Ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) is a difficult therapeutic problem. Considerable controversy exists regarding the optimal chemotherapy for this entity. The recent guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society recommend a 7-day therapeutic course for VABP based on the balance of no negative impact on all-cause mortality, less resistance emergence, and fewer antibiotic treatment days, counterbalanced with a higher relapse rate for patients whose pathogen is a nonfermenter. The bacterial burden causing an infection has a substantial impact on treatment outcome and resistance selection. We describe the baseline bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid burden of organisms in suspected VABP patients screened for inclusion in a clinical trial. We measured the urea concentrations in plasma and BAL fluid to provide an index of the dilution of the bacterial and drug concentrations in the lung epithelial lining fluid introduced by the BAL procedure. We were then able to calculate the true bacterial burden as the diluted colony count times the dilution factor. The median dilution factor was 28.7, with the interquartile range (IQR) being 11.9 to 53.2. Median dilution factor-corrected colony counts were 6.18 log10(CFU/ml) [IQR, 5.43 to 6.46 log10(CFU/ml)]. In a subset of patients, repeat BAL on day 5 showed a good stability of the dilution factor. We previously showed that large bacterial burdens reduce or stop bacterial killing by granulocytes. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01570192.).

Chikungunya Virus: In Vitro Response to Combination Therapy With Ribavirin and Interferon Alfa 2a.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the antiviral activities of ribavirin (RBV) and interferon (IFN) alfa as monotherapy and combination therapy against chikungunya virus (CHIKV). METHODS: Vero cells were infected with CHIKV in the presence of RBV and/or IFN alfa, and viral production was quantified by plaque assay. A mathematical model was fit to the data to identify drug interactions for effect. We ran simulations using the best-fit model parameters to predict the antiviral activity associated with clinically relevant regimens of RBV and IFN alfa as combination therapy. The model predictions were validated using the hollow fiber infection model (HFIM) system. RESULTS: RBV and IFN alfa were effective against CHIKV as monotherapy at supraphysiological concentrations. However, RBV and IFN alfa were highly synergistic for antiviral effect when administered as combination therapy. Simulations with our mathematical model predicted that a standard clinical regimen of RBV plus IFN alfa would inhibit CHIKV burden by 2.5 log10 following 24 hours of treatment. In the HFIM system, RBV plus IFN alfa at clinical exposures resulted in a 2.1-log10 decrease in the CHIKV burden following 24 hours of therapy. These findings validate the prediction made by the mathematical model. CONCLUSIONS: These studies illustrate the promise of RBV plus IFN alfa as a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of CHIKV infections.

Pharmacodynamics for antifungal drug development: an approach for acceleration, risk minimization and demonstration of causality.

The treatment of invasive fungal diseases constitutes a significant unmet medical need. There are relatively few antifungal agents in clinical development and a paucity of novel targets. Morbidity and mortality remain high and clinical outcomes are compromised by submaximal efficacy, emergence of drug resistance and drug-related toxicity. Thus, new antifungal agents are urgently required. A deep understanding of exposure-response relationships underpins the development of safe and effective clinical regimens of any therapeutic agent. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) is increasingly recognized as a vital tool in the development of new antimicrobial agents and maximizes the probability that the right dose will be studied the first time. There is currently no information or agreement as to what constitutes an adequate PK/PD package for the development of a new antifungal agent. This review provides a summary of the achievements of antifungal PK/PD for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis and cryptococcal meningoencephalitis, and outlines the necessary components of a PK/PD package for a new antifungal agent. Such information is critical for the accelerated and efficient development of new agents and enables improved clinical outcomes to be secured.

Combination treatment with meropenem plus levofloxacin is synergistic against Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in a murine model of pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem plus levofloxacin treatment was shown to be a promising combination in our in vitro hollow fiber infection model. We strove to validate this finding in a murine Pseudomonas pneumonia model. METHODS: A dose-ranging study with meropenem and levofloxacin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa was performed in a granulocytopenic murine pneumonia model. Meropenem and levofloxacin were administered to partially humanize their pharmacokinetic profiles in mouse serum. Total and resistant bacterial populations were estimated after 24 hours of therapy. Pharmacokinetic profiling of both drugs was performed in plasma and epithelial lining fluid, using a population model. RESULTS: Meropenem and levofloxacin penetrations into epithelial lining fluid were 39.3% and 64.3%, respectively. Both monotherapies demonstrated good exposure responses. An innovative combination-therapy analytic approach demonstrated that the combination was statistically significantly synergistic (α = 2.475), as was shown in the hollow fiber infection model. Bacterial resistant to levofloxacin and meropenem was seen in the control arm. Levofloxacin monotherapy selected for resistance to itself. No resistant subpopulations were observed in any combination therapy arm. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of meropenem plus levofloxacin was synergistic, producing good bacterial kill and resistance suppression. Given the track record of safety of each agent, this combination may be worthy of clinical trial.