Feasibility of 3.5 mm C2 pedicle screws in children: A computerized tomography analysis.

There have been no studies with large sample sizes on growth of the pedicle of C2 in children. In the present study we measured the pedicle of C2 through computed tomography (CT) imaging in children aged less than 14 years and evaluated the suitability of the 3.5-mm screw for the pedicle in such children. The study was conducted on CT morphometric images of 420 children in our hospital between June 2018 and June 2020. The width (D1), length (D2), height (D3), inclination angle (α), and tail angle (ß) of the C2 pedicle were measured. One-way analysis of variance and Student's t test were used for statistical analyses. The least-square method was used to analyze the curve fitting the trend of anatomical change in the pedicle. The largest degree of goodness of fit determined the best-fitting curve. The size of the pedicle of C2 increased with age. The median ranges of D1, D2, D3, α, and ß were 3.312-5.431 mm, 11.732-23.645 mm, 3.597-8.038 mm, 32.583°-36.640°, and 24.867°-31.567°, respectively. The curves fitting the trends of D1 and D3 were power functions, whereas D2 was fitted by a logarithmic curve. However, no curve fitted α or ß. A 3.5-mm screw can be placed in the pedicle of C2 in children aged more than 1 year. The growth and development trend of this pedicle can provide an anatomical reference for deciding on posterior cervical surgery and for selecting and designing pedicle screws for children.

Analysis of odontoid parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with different curve types.

Introduction: Odontoid incidence (OI) is an important parameter that has recently been developed. However, there are currently no studies on OI in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. We aimed to examine the significance of OI in describing cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients, explore the differences in cervical sagittal parameters among these patients with different curve types, and investigate the correlations between coronal deformity and cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients. Methods: The whole-spine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs of AIS patients were retrospectively analyzed. The parameters, including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope, cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), and others, were measured. The AIS patients were grouped based on different curve types. Measurement parameters were compared between different groups. Pearson correlation analysis was performed for cervical sagittal parameters and Cobb angle. Results: Ninety AIS patients were included, consisting of 14 males and 76 females. The main thoracic curve group exhibited a smaller OI compared to the main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve group (P < 0.05). In the AIS patients with a main thoracic curve, there was a significant correlation between Cobb angle and OI (r = -0.371, p < 0.01). The odontoid parameters exhibited significant correlations with several classic cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients with different curve types. The validation of the formula CL = 0.36 × OI-0.67 × OT-0.69 × T1S showed a significant correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.917) between the actual measurements and the predicted values, with a determination coefficient of 0.842. Conclusion: There may be a difference in OI between AIS patients with a main thoracic curve and those with a main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Odontoid parameters could be used to describe cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients with different curve types.

Variation of Odontoid Incidence According to Age in Asymptomatic Children.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of age and sex on odontoid parameters and their relationships with cervical sagittal alignment in children. METHODS: A total of 155 Chinese children without cervical symptoms were divided into groups by age: 3-12 years (87 participants), 13-18 years (68 participants), and sex: male (91 participants) and female (64 participants). Lateral plain radiographs of the whole spine were analyzed for (1) odontoid parameters: odontoid incidence (OI), odontoid tilt, and C2 slope (C2S); and (2) cervical sagittal parameters: C0-2, C2-3, C2-4, C2-5, C2-6, and C2-7 angles (cervical lordosis [CL]), T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL). Student's t-tests, linear regression analyses, and Pearson's correlation coefficient analyses were performed. RESULTS: OI showed a significant difference between the 3-12 and 13-18 year groups (13.35°±4.32° vs. 17.21°±4.26°, P<0.001), and significant differences were also observed in odontoid tilt (P=0.001) and C2S (P<0.001) between different sexes. Positive correlations were found between age and OI in the 3-12 and 13-18 year groups (adjusted R2=0.104 and 0.048, respectively). OI and C2S were positively correlated with the C0-2 angle in all age and sex groups. CONCLUSIONS: Age emerged as a critical determinant of OI, which increased with age among pediatric populations. Clinicians should carefully consider the disparity in OI during the assessment and restoration of cervical sagittal balance in children.

Anatomical study of the C6 pedicle and lateral mass in children aged 0-14 years based on CT imaging.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the anatomical structure of the C6 pedicle and lateral mass in children aged 0-14 years using CT imaging, providing detailed insights into their growth and development. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive measurement of C6. Measurements included width, length, and height of the pedicles, as well as the length, width, and thickness of the lateral masses, and several angular metrics. Regression analysis was performed to understand the growth trends, and statistical analyses were carried out to identify differences between age groups, genders, and sides. RESULTS: In children younger than four years, the pedicle width exceeds its height, influencing the diameter of the pedicle screws. By age two to three, the pedicle height and lateral mass thickness reaches 3.0 mm, allowing for the use of 3.0 mm diameter screws. The pedicle transverse angle remains stable. Most parameters showed no significant differences between the left and right sides. Size parameters exhibited significant larger in males than females at ages 0-1, 3-7, and 10-12 years. Regression analysis revealed that the growth trends of size parameters follow cubic or polynomial curves. Most angular metrics follow cubic fitting curves without a clear trend of change with age. CONCLUSION: This study provides a detailed analysis of the anatomical development of the C6 pedicle and lateral masses in children, offering valuable insights for pediatric cervical spine surgeries. The findings highlight the importance of considering age-specific anatomical variations when planning posterior surgical fixation, specifically at C6. It is necessary for us to perform thin-layer CT scans on children and carefully measure various indicators before surgery.