The Association of Social Determinants of Health With Short Term Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Social determinants of health (SDH) have been found to be important contributors to postoperative outcomes, especially those related to procedures that require significant postoperative resources. The association between short-term gastrostomy tube (GT) outcomes and SDH in the pediatric population is unknown. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients less than 18 y old who received a GT between January 2018 and December 2020 at a single institution. Data including demographics, area deprivation index (ADI), and perioperative information were collected. Patient characteristics were compared in those that did and did not have an unexpected emergency department (ED) visit within 6 wk of discharge from GT placement. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon sum-rank, Chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test where applicable, and univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 541 children who underwent GT placement, 112 (20.7%) returned to the ED within 6 wk postdischarge. In univariable analysis, Black children had 1.64 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-2.60, P = 0.03). When controlling for ethnicity, primary language, insurance, ADI and comorbidities, Black children had 1.80 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children (95% CI 1.10-2.97, P = 0.02). Final model fit which added a race by ADI interaction term revealed Black children had 2.52 the odds of an unexpected ED visit compared to White children in the low (1-6) ADI group (95% CI 1.41-4.60, P = 0.002). Within advantaged neighborhoods (ADI 1-6), the probability of unplanned ED visits for White children was 17.3% (95%CI 8.9% - 31.1%), which was significantly lower than that for Black children (34.6%, 95% CI 18.8% - 54.7%; P value = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Race and neighborhood disadvantage can be associated with unexpected ED visits within 6 wk of discharge from GT placement in the pediatric population. For procedures that require significant postdischarge resources it is important to study the effect of SDH on return to the healthcare system as they can be an important driver of disparities in outcomes.

Management of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma: adult vs pediatric level 1 trauma centers.

PURPOSE: Management of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma can be complex. Studies suggest that variation exists at adult (ATC) vs pediatric trauma centers (PTC); however, there is limited granular comparative data. We sought to describe and compare the management and outcomes of complex pediatric and adolescent liver trauma between a level 1 ATC and two PTCs in a large metropolitan city. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric and adolescent (age < 21 years) patients with American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade 4 and 5 liver injuries managed at an ATC and PTCs between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were obtained at the ATC and PTCs. Primary outcomes included rates of operative management and use of interventional radiology (IR). Secondary outcomes included packed red blood cell (pRBC) utilization, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four patients were identified, seventy-five at the ATC and sixty-nine at the PTC. The cohort was predominantly black (65.5%) males (63.5%). Six injuries (8.7%) at the PTC and forty-five (60%) injuries at the ATC were penetrating trauma. Comparing only blunt trauma, ATC patients had higher Injury Severity Score (median 37 vs 26) and ages (20 years vs 9 years). ATC patients were more likely to undergo operative management (26.7% vs 11.0%, p = 0.016) and utilized IR more (51.9% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001) compared to the PTC. The patients managed at the ATC required higher rates of pRBC transfusions though not statistically significant (p = 0.06). There were no differences in mortality, ICU, or hospital LOS. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective review of high-grade pediatric and adolescent liver trauma demonstrated higher rates of IR and operating room use at the ATC compared to the PTC in the setting of higher Injury Severity Score and age. While the PTC successfully managed > 95% of Grade 4/5 liver injuries non-operatively, prospective data are needed to determine the optimal algorithm for management in the older adolescent population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Management of pediatric lower extremity vascular trauma: adult vs pediatric level I trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric lower extremity vascular injury (PLEVI) is uncommon and the availability of granular data is sparse. This study evaluated the surgical management of PLEVIs between a Level I adult (ATC) vs pediatric (PTC) trauma center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of PLEVIs (< 18 years) managed surgically between 01/2009-12/2022. Demographics and outcome data were obtained. Primary outcomes included amputation and fasciotomy rates. Secondary outcomes included type of vessel repair, mortality, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were identified, 41 at the ATC and 38 at the PTC, totaling 112 vessels injured. ATC patients were older (median years 16.0 vs 12.5) and almost exclusively (97.6% vs 29.0%) gunshot wounds. Vascular surgeons managed 50% of injuries at the ATC vs 73.7% at the PTC (p = 0.10). Amputations were uncommon and not significantly different between centers. Seventeen patients (44.7%) required fasciotomies at the PTC vs 21 (51.2%) at the ATC (p = 0.56). Rates of vessel repair, ligation, grafting, mortality, and hospital length of stay were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: PLEVI can be managed safely at ATCs and PTCs with acceptable outcomes. However, important nuances in patient triage and management need to be considered. Multi-institutional comprehensive datasets are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level III.

Comparison of preoperative and intraoperative surgeon diagnosis and pathologic findings in spontaneous intestinal perforation vs necrotizing enterocolitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the accuracy of preoperative and intraoperative diagnosis via comparison to pathologic diagnosis in spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) vs. necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of neonates <1500 g treated for pneumoperitoneum between 07/2004-09/2022 was conducted. Patients treated for NEC medically prior to diagnosis and those treated with drain only were excluded. Fleiss' Kappa analysis assessed agreement between all three diagnoses: preoperative, intraoperative, and pathologic. RESULT: Overall, 125 patients were included with mean birthweight 834.2 g (SD:259.2) and mean gestational age 25.8 weeks (SD:2.2). Preoperative and intraoperative diagnoses agreed in 90.3%, intraoperative and pathologic agreed in 71.1%, and preoperative and pathologic agreed in 75.2% of patients. Fleiss' Kappa was 0.55 (95% CI:0.43,0.68), indicating moderate agreement between the three diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Our study shows moderate agreement between preoperative, intraoperative, and pathologic diagnoses. Further studies investigating the clinical characteristics of SIP and NEC are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and management.

Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates.

PURPOSE: Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis. METHODS: A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only. RESULTS: 338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC. CONCLUSION: Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective Chart Review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.