Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 71(5): 957-980, 2024 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39343504

RESUMEN

The recent advent of highly effective anti-obesity medications (AOM) provides pediatric clinicians a powerful tool to augment the treatment of obesity and improve outcomes. The 2023 American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines state clinicians "should offer adolescents 12 years and older with obesity weight loss pharmacotherapy, according to medication indications, risks, and benefits, as an adjunct to health behavior and lifestyle treatment". This article will provide an update on the integration of AOM into practice, emphasizing clinical pearls and practical tips.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Antiobesidad , Obesidad Infantil , Humanos , Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Obesidad Infantil/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Adolescente , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pérdida de Peso/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol ; 19(3): 524-541, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34511864

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We sought to critically evaluate the recent literature published over the past 3 years on the topic of weight regain after bariatric surgery in children, adolescents, and adults, with an emphasis on clinically- relevant information for pharmacologic treatment of weight regain after metabolic and bariatric surgery. FINDINGS: There are multiple pharmacotherapeutic agents available to treat obesity in children, adolescents, and adults; these agents have varying efficacy and indications for use and have been studied in a variety of clinical and research scenarios. We present an overview of these findings. SUMMARY: This review represents a comprehensive compilation of the recently published data on efficacy of anti-obesity pharmacotherapy in the treatment of weight regain after bariatric surgery for children, adolescents, and adults.

3.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 78(2): 224-9; discussion 229-30, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25757105

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Definitions of massive transfusion (MT), 10 or more units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) in 24 hours, focus on static volumes over fixed times. This arbitrary volume definition promotes survivor bias and fails to identify the "massively" transfused patient. In previous work, the critical administration threshold (CAT) was created to incorporate both rate and volume of transfusion. CAT proved a superior predictor of mortality compared with traditional MT. The purpose of this study was to prospectively validate CAT in a larger trauma population. METHODS: Patients receiving at least 1 U of PRBCs within the first day of admission were identified prospectively. Administration time of each unit of PRBCs was recorded in minutes. CAT status, defined as receipt of at least 3 U of blood in a 60-minute period, was identified for the first 24 hours. CAT+ patients were quantified by the number of times CAT+ was reached, that is, once (CAT1), twice (CAT2), three times (CAT3), or 4 or more times (CAT4). A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model with a time-varying covariate was used to quantify a patient's risk of death with increasing CAT status. RESULTS: A total of 316 met inclusion criteria, 161 of whom were CAT+. Seventy-six percent were male, mean age was 38 years, and median Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 15. CAT+ was associated with a twofold increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.809; 95% confidence interval, 1.020-3.209). Ninety-one patients were CAT+ and received less than 10 U of blood, thereby MT- (CAT+/MT-). CAT+/MT- had significant injury patterns, with a median ISS of 14, 43% penetrating injury, and 10% mortality. CONCLUSION: CAT allows early identification of injured patients at greatest risk of death. Encompassing both rate and volume of transfusion, CAT is a tool more sensitive than common MT definitions. Studies examining large-volume blood transfusions should use CAT to identify patients, to accurately identify cohorts of interest. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic tests, level II.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/métodos , Hemorragia/terapia , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Adulto , Femenino , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tennessee/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA