Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 127(3): 616-22.e1, 2011 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21251701

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with birch pollen allergy often develop allergic reactions to plant foods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, main symptoms, and triggers of birch pollen-related food allergy and the role of food-specific IgG(4) antibodies in food tolerance. METHODS: Food-induced symptoms were evaluated in 225 individuals with birch pollen allergy by using a standardized questionnaire. IgE and IgG(4) levels specific for the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and birch profilin Bet v 2 and the Bet v 1 homologs in apple (Mal d 1) and hazelnut (Cor a 1) were quantified by ImmunoCAP. Mock-treated and IgG-depleted sera from patients tolerating hazelnuts in food challenges were compared for their inhibitory activity for binding of Cor a 1-IgE complexes to B cells. RESULTS: In total, 73% of the study population experienced food allergy, which was perennial in 86% of the affected individuals. The oral allergy syndrome was the main clinical manifestation. However, more than 58% of the patients also experienced food-induced rhinoconjunctivitis. Apples and hazelnuts were identified as the most frequent triggers. Food allergy correlated with IgE reactivity to Bet v 1 but not to Bet v 2. Mal d 1-specific and Cor a 1-specific IgG(4)/IgE ratios were significantly higher in food-tolerant individuals than individuals with food allergy. Sera from IgG(4)-positive food-tolerant patients possessed IgG-dependent IgE-inhibitory activity. CONCLUSION: Birch pollen-related food allergy is highly prevalent and often perennial. High food allergen-specific IgG(4)/IgE ratios seem associated with food tolerance, potentially because specific IgG(4) blocks IgE binding to food allergens. Thus, the presence of food allergen-specific IgG(4) antibodies is no diagnostic marker for birch pollen-related food allergy.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Plantas/inmunología , Betula/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Polen/inmunología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos de Plantas/clasificación , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 126(1): 105-11.e5, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20542320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe side effects during venom immunotherapy (VIT) are associated with a variety of risk factors. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC) and of other parameters, which are routinely recorded during patient evaluation, with the frequency of severe reactions requiring an emergency intervention during the buildup phase of VIT. METHODS: In this observational prospective multicenter study, we enrolled 680 patients with established honeybee or vespid venom allergy who underwent VIT. Data were collected on tryptase concentration, age, sex, culprit insect, cardiovascular medication, degree of preceding sting reaction, preventive antiallergic medication before therapy, time between last preceding sting reaction and VIT, venom specific IgE concentration, and type of buildup procedure. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (8.4%) required an emergency intervention during buildup because of a severe systemic reaction. The frequency of interventions increased significantly with higher BTC (log-linear association; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15-2.11; P < .005). The predictive power of BTC was markedly greater when VIT was performed for vespid venom allergy than for bee venom (for bee VIT, no significant association; for vespid VIT, log-linear association; adjusted odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.28-4.26; P = .005). The most important other factor significantly associated with severe reactions during the buildup phase of VIT was bee venom allergy. CONCLUSION: Before vespid VIT, measurement of baseline serum tryptase concentration should be used to identify patients with a high risk for side effects. Patients with bee venom allergy require a particularly high degree of surveillance during VIT.


Asunto(s)
Venenos de Artrópodos/inmunología , Desensibilización Inmunológica/efectos adversos , Himenópteros/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/terapia , Triptasas/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Animales , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo
5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 124(5): 1047-54, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19895993

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Severe anaphylaxis to honeybee or vespid stings is associated with a variety of risk factors, which are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentrations and other variables routinely recorded during patient evaluation with the frequency of past severe anaphylaxis after a field sting. METHODS: In this observational multicenter study, we enrolled 962 patients with established bee or vespid venom allergy who had a systemic reaction after a field sting. Data were collected on tryptase concentration, age, sex, culprit insect, cardiovascular medication, and the number of preceding minor systemic reactions before the index field sting. A severe reaction was defined as anaphylactic shock, loss of consciousness, or cardiopulmonary arrest. The index sting was defined as the hitherto first, most severe systemic field-sting reaction. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models. RESULTS: Two hundred six (21.4%) patients had a severe anaphylactic reaction after a field sting. The frequency of this event increased significantly with higher tryptase concentrations (nonlinear association). Other factors significantly associated with severe reactions after a field sting were vespid venom allergy, older age, male sex, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication, and 1 or more preceding field stings with a less severe systemic reaction. CONCLUSION: In patients with honeybee or vespid venom allergy, baseline serum tryptase concentrations are associated with the risk for severe anaphylactic reactions. Preventive measures should include substitution of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Venenos de Abeja/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad/inmunología , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/inmunología , Triptasas/sangre , Avispas/inmunología , Adulto , Anafilaxia/sangre , Anafilaxia/enzimología , Animales , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos
7.
PLoS One ; 10(2): e0114991, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25705889

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergen exposure via the respiratory tract and in particular via the nasal mucosa boosts systemic allergen-specific IgE production. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) represent a first line treatment of allergic rhinitis but their effects on this boost of allergen-specific IgE production are unclear. AIM: Here we aimed to determine in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study whether therapeutic doses of an INCS preparation, i.e., nasal fluticasone propionate, have effects on boosts of allergen-specific IgE following nasal allergen exposure. METHODS: Subjects (n = 48) suffering from grass and birch pollen allergy were treated with daily fluticasone propionate or placebo nasal spray for four weeks. After two weeks of treatment, subjects underwent nasal provocation with either birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 or grass pollen allergen Phl p 5. Bet v 1 and Phl p 5-specific IgE, IgG1-4, IgM and IgA levels were measured in serum samples obtained at the time of provocation and one, two, four, six and eight weeks thereafter. RESULTS: Nasal allergen provocation induced a median increase to 141.1% of serum IgE levels to allergens used for provocation but not to control allergens 4 weeks after provocation. There were no significant differences regarding the boosts of allergen-specific IgE between INCS- and placebo-treated subjects. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the application of fluticasone propionate had no significant effects on the boosts of systemic allergen-specific IgE production following nasal allergen exposure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov/NCT00755066.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/inmunología , Antialérgicos/inmunología , Fluticasona/inmunología , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Rinitis Alérgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Fluticasona/efectos adversos , Fluticasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rinitis Alérgica/inmunología
8.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 123(19-20): 585-91, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21901272

RESUMEN

Nowadays, clinical and evidence based guidelines are considered one of the major efforts to improve patient care in medical practices as well as hospital settings. In the literature, clinical guidelines have been defined as "systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances", which promote both clinically effective standards and cost-effective care. Despite controversial discussion about the clinical impact of guidelines, they may provide workable recommendations that may thus be important for improving the individual patient's care. Adverse drug reactions (drug allergies, drug hypersensitivities) often represent a major hazard for the affected patient, and a definite diagnosis is important for further drug therapies in most cases. In this context, any diagnostic procedure must be preceded by an individual risk-benefit assessment. Drug provocation testing is regarded as the gold standard, but this kind of testing should be performed in accordance with established criteria and, in the vast majority of cases, in a hospital setting. In this paper we present a clinical guideline for drug provocation testing in Austria.


Asunto(s)
Alergia e Inmunología/normas , Dermatología/normas , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Pruebas Cutáneas/normas , Austria , Humanos
9.
J Immunol ; 179(8): 5309-16, 2007 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17911617

RESUMEN

Previously, we have constructed recombinant derivatives of the major birch pollen allergen, Bet v 1, with a more than 100-fold reduced ability to induce IgE-mediated allergic reactions. These derivatives differed from each other because the two recombinant Bet v 1 fragments represented unfolded molecules whereas the recombinant trimer resembled most of the structural fold of the Bet v 1 allergen. In this study, we analyzed the Ab (IgE, IgG subclass, IgA, IgM) response to Bet v 1, recombinant and synthetic Bet v 1-derived peptides in birch pollen allergic patients who had been vaccinated with the derivatives or adjuvant alone. Furthermore, we studied the induction of IgE-mediated skin responses in these patients using Bet v 1 and Bet v 1 fragments. Both types of vaccines induced a comparable IgG1 and IgG4 response against new sequential epitopes which overlap with the conformational IgE epitopes of Bet v 1. This response was 4- to 5-fold higher than that induced by immunotherapy with birch pollen extract. Trimer more than fragments induced also IgE responses against new epitopes and a transient increase in skin sensitivity to the fragments at the beginning of therapy. However, skin reactions to Bet v 1 tended to decrease one year after treatment in both actively treated groups. We demonstrate that vaccination with folded and unfolded recombinant allergen derivatives induces IgG Abs against new epitopes. These data may be important for the development of therapeutic as well as prophylactic vaccines based on recombinant allergens.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/administración & dosificación , Alérgenos/inmunología , Betula/inmunología , Epítopos/administración & dosificación , Epítopos/inmunología , Pliegue de Proteína , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/inmunología , Alérgenos/química , Alérgenos/genética , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Betula/genética , Método Doble Ciego , Epítopos/genética , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina A/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina E/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina G/biosíntesis , Inmunoglobulina M/biosíntesis , Pruebas Intradérmicas , Fragmentos de Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos de Péptidos/química , Fragmentos de Péptidos/genética , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Polen/química , Polen/genética , Polen/inmunología , Ingeniería de Proteínas , Vacunas Sintéticas/química
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA