The dormancy-specific regulator, SutA, is intrinsically disordered and modulates transcription initiation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Though most bacteria in nature are nutritionally limited and grow slowly, our understanding of core processes like transcription comes largely from studies in model organisms doubling rapidly. We previously identified a small protein of unknown function, SutA, in a screen of proteins synthesized in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during dormancy. SutA binds RNA polymerase (RNAP), causing widespread changes in gene expression, including upregulation of the ribosomal RNA genes. Here, using biochemical and structural methods, we examine how SutA interacts with RNAP and the functional consequences of these interactions. We show that SutA comprises a central α-helix with unstructured N- and C-terminal tails, and binds to the ß1 domain of RNAP. It activates transcription from the rrn promoter by both the housekeeping sigma factor holoenzyme (Eσ70 ) and the stress sigma factor holoenzyme (EσS ) in vitro, but has a greater impact on EσS . In both cases, SutA appears to affect intermediates in the open complex formation and its N-terminal tail is required for activation. The small magnitudes of in vitro effects are consistent with a role in maintaining activity required for homeostasis during dormancy. Our results add SutA to a growing list of transcription regulators that use their intrinsically disordered regions to remodel transcription complexes.

Nano volume fractionation strategy for dilute-and-shoot injections in off-line loss-less proteomic workflows for extensive protein identifications of ultra-low sample amounts.

A proteomic workflow for a simple loss-less manual nano-fractionation (300 nL/fraction) for low µg sample amounts which avoids the need to dry down or transfer fractions to autosampler vials is shown to be feasible. It is demonstrated that the conventional procedure of drying samples down followed by reconstitution negatively affects the number of protein and peptide identifications. Furthermore, these losses seem to disproportionately affect hydrophobic peptides from the drying down and reconstitution step. By collecting and concatenating the fractions while the outlet of the column is submerged in a small predefined volume of 0.2% formic acid, the content of acetonitrile in the collecting vials was lowered such that it was compatible with direct injection for the online analysis. This additionally resulted in a time gain of approx. an hour for the total fractionation time. Acetonitrile concentrations up to 7.5% do not seem to compromise the chromatographic performance in the online analysis. Using as little as 2 µg digested HeLa lysate, approx. 7000 protein groups could be easily identified with 2 or more unique peptides. This was the case when fractionation was performed at pH 10 as well as at pH 5.5.