Association between tissue loss type and amputation risk among Medicare patients with concomitant diabetes and peripheral arterial disease.

OBJECTIVE: Prior studies have described risk factors associated with amputation in patients with concomitant diabetes and peripheral arterial disease(DM/PAD). However, the association between the severity and extent of tissue loss type and amputation risk remains less well-described. We aimed to quantify the role of different tissue loss types in amputation risk among patients with DM/PAD, in the context of demographic, preventive, and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Applying ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes to Medicare claims data(2007-2019), we identified all patients with continuous fee-for-service Medicare coverage diagnosed with DM/PAD. Eight tissue loss categories were established using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis codes, ranging from lymphadenitis(least severe) to gangrene(most severe). We created a Cox proportional hazards model to quantify associations between tissue loss type and one- and five-year amputation risk, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, sex, rurality, income, comorbidities, and preventive factors. Regional variation in DM/PAD rates and risk-adjusted amputation rates was examined at the hospital referral region(HRR) level. RESULTS: We identified 12,257,174 patients with DM/PAD(48% male, 76% White, 10% prior myocardial infarction, 30% chronic kidney disease). While 2.2 million patients(18%) had some form of tissue loss, 10.0 million patients(82%) did not. The one-year crude amputation rate(major and minor) was 6.4% in patients with tissue loss, and 0.4% in patients without tissue loss. Among patients with tissue loss, one-year any amputation rate varied from 0.89% for patients with lymphadenitis to 26% for patients with gangrene. One-year amputation risk varied from two-fold for patients with lymphadenitis(aHR 1.96, 95%CI 1.43-2.69) to 29-fold for patients with gangrene(aHR 28.7, 95%CI 28.1-29.3), compared to patients without tissue loss. No other demographic variable including age, sex, race, or region incurred a hazard ratio for one- or five-year amputation risk higher than the least severe tissue loss category. Results were similar across minor and major amputation, and one- and five-year amputation outcomes. At a regional level, higher DM/PAD rates were inversely correlated with risk-adjusted five-year amputation rates(R2=0.43). CONCLUSION: Among 12 million patients with DM/PAD, the most significant predictor of amputation was presence and extent of tissue loss, with an association greater in effect size than any other factor studied. Tissue loss could be used in awareness campaigns as a simple marker of high-risk patients. Patients with any type of tissue loss require expedited wound care, revascularization as appropriate, and infection management to avoid amputation. Establishing systems of care to provide these interventions in regions with high amputation rates may prove beneficial for these populations.

Factors Contributing to Patient Satisfaction Among VA Medical Center and Non-VA Medical Center Hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Veteran satisfaction of care within the Veterans Affairs is typically very high. Yet recommendation ratings of VA medical center (VA) hospitals as measured by Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems are generally lower than non-VA hospitals.Therefore, it was our objective to assess Veteran satisfaction and recommendation scores and then examine whether satisfaction correlates to recommendation. METHODS: We identified all acute care VAs as our primary analytic cohort. As a comparator group, we also included all acute care academic hospitals (non-VAs), as designated by the Centers for Medicare Services. Using data from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model, we collated patient satisfaction scores, as well as markers of surgical safety from Hospital Compare. We then analyzed the correlation within VAs and non-VAs, primarily focusing the relationship between the "would you recommend Hospital Rating" and subdomains of the "Overall Hospital Rating," as well as a composite score of patient safety. RESULTS: A total of 133 VAs and 1116 non-VAs were identified. Among VAs, the "Would you Recommend" hospital rating was significantly and positively correlated with markers of patient satisfaction including care transitions (Pearson's r = 0.59, P = 0.03), Nursing communication (Pearson's R 0.79, P = 0.001), and percent of primary care provider wait times less than 30 min (Pearson's r = 0.25, P = 0.01). VA-recommended scores were negatively correlated with factors such as time to emergency department discharge, and the "leaving the emergency department before being evaluated." When looking at non-VAs, correlation directions were similar, albeit with stronger associations at almost every metric. While recommended scores correlated strongly to overall hospital ratings for both groups, VAs had no significant correlation between "would you recommend" and patient safety. However, there was a slight negative correlation between patient safety and "recommend" among non-VAs. CONCLUSIONS: Although satisfiers and dissatisfiers of care appear similar between VAs and non-VAs, "would you recommend" is a far weaker marker of patient perceptions of safety and quality. These seemingly empathetic markers such as "would you recommend" should be used with caution as they may not address the fundamental question being asked.

The global burden of peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous efforts to characterize the burden of peripheral artery disease (PAD) have focused on national populations. A need for a more detailed analysis of how PAD impacts the global population has been identified. Our objective was to study in greater detail the global burden of PAD, including its impact on mortality, over the past three decades. METHODS: Using data and models from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study, we estimated the prevalence, years of life lost, years lived with disability and disability-adjusted life-years (a measure accounting for incurred morbidity and mortality), attributable to PAD. We analyzed results over time and stratified by sex, age, and sociodemographic index (SDI) group. We compared PAD with other atherosclerosis-related conditions and assessed the contribution of risk factors to PAD disability-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: We observed a 72% increase in the global prevalence of PAD from an estimated 65,764,499 persons in 1990 to 113,443,016 in 2019. Prevalence per 100,000 persons increased 13% and the prevalence per 100,000 age-standardized decreased 22%. Similar patterns were seen for years of live lost, mortality, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years. The prevalence and disability were higher among women, whereas mortality and years of life lost were higher among men. Disease burden increased with increasing SDI. These increases in PAD were in contrast with global trends for the overall burden of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke, which had decreasing prevalence and disease-related mortality over the same time frame. Overall, only approximately 55% of PAD disease burden could be attributed to identified risk factors, with tobacco use, diabetes, and hypertension being the three major contributors in all SDI groups. CONCLUSIONS: The global prevalence and mortality associated with PAD has increased substantially, in contrast with other forms of ischemic cardiovascular disease. Globally, there is a growing need for vascular surgical resources to manage PAD, as well as public health efforts to address risk factors for this increasing health threat.

Surgical Providers' Perceptions of the Patient Portal: Before and After the 21st Century Cures Act.

INTRODUCTION: In April 2021, the Information Blocking Rule (IBR) of the 21st Century Cures Act went into effect giving patients immediate access to notes, radiology reports, lab results, and surgical pathology. We aimed to examine changes in surgical providers' perceptions of patient portal usage before and after its implementation. METHODS: We administered a 37-question survey prior to the implementation of the IBR and a 39-question follow-up survey 3 mo later. The survey was sent to all surgeons, advanced practice providers, and clinic nurses in our surgical department. RESULTS: The response rate to pre surveys and post surveys was 33.7% and 30.7%, respectively. Providers' preference for communication via the patient portal (compared to phone or in person) regarding lab, radiology, or pathology results remained similar. While there was an increase in messages received from patients, there was no difference in the self-reported time spent on the electronic health record (EHR). Prior to the implementation of the blocking rule, 75.8% of providers believed that the portal increased workload which decreased to 57.4% on our follow-up survey. About one-third of providers screened positive for burnout before (32%) which decreased slightly (27.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Although 43.9% of providers reported the Cures Act had changed their practice, there was no difference in self-reported EHR usage, preferred method of interaction with patients, overall workload, or burnout. Initial concerns regarding the IBR's effect on job satisfaction, patient anxiety, and quality of care had lessened. Further exploration into how patients having immediate access to their EHRs has changed surgical practice is needed.

Does Long-Term Bowel Function Change After Colectomy for Colon Malignancy?

INTRODUCTION: Current understanding of bowel function after colectomy for colon cancer is informed by conflicting data, making preoperative patient counseling difficult. Our previous work demonstrates bowel movement frequency increases by postoperative follow-up, while overall function does not change. Long-term changes are unknown. We aimed to evaluate changes to patient-reported bowel function after colectomy for colon malignancy. METHODS: This is an observational study of patients that underwent colectomy for colon malignancy and completed the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at preoperative and 30-d postoperative clinic visits. Long-term bowel function was assessed using the same questionnaire via telephone or surveillance clinic visit. Mean domain and Total COREFO scores were compared baseline to long-term using paired t-tests. Quality of life analysis was obtained using the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 Global Health questionnaire for patients who completed this measure at surveillance visits or via telephone. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Median time between baseline and long-term questionnaire completion was 16 mo (interquartile range 11-30). Stool-related aspects (pain and bleeding with bowel movements, anal skin irritation) improved significantly from baseline to long-term. There were no other differences in any domain or Total COREFO score. Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-10 scores demonstrated quality of life equivalent to the general US population. CONCLUSIONS: Over the long-term, after colectomy for colon cancer, patients report improvements in stool-related aspects (pain and bleeding with bowel movements, anal skin irritation). Evidence-based preoperative patient counseling should include these findings.

Extreme Elevation of Baseline Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Measurements: Should Usual Protocols Apply?

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring is routinely used to facilitate minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Many IOPTH protocols exist for predicting biochemical cure. Some patients are found to have extremely high baseline IOPTH levels (defined in this study as >500 pg/mL), which may affect the likelihood of satisfying certain final IOPTH criteria. We aimed to discover whether clinically significant differences exist in patients with extremely high baseline IOPTH and which IOPTH protocols are most appropriately applied to these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 237 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy with IOPTH monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) from 2016 to 2020. Baseline IOPTH levels, drawn prior to manipulation of parathyroid glands, were grouped into categories labeled "elevated" (>65-500 pg/mL) and "extremely elevated" (>500 pg/mL). Final IOPTH levels were analyzed to determine whether there was a >50% decrease from baseline and whether a normal IOPTH value was achieved. 6-wk postoperative calcium levels were also examined. RESULTS: Of the patients in this cohort, 76% were in the elevated group and 24% in the extremely elevated group. Male sex and higher preoperative PTH levels were correlated with higher baseline IOPTH levels. Patients with extremely elevated baseline IOPTH were less likely to have IOPTH fall into normal range at the conclusion of the case (P = 0.019), and final IOPTH levels were higher (P < 0.001), but the IOPTH was equally likely to decrease >50% from baseline. There was no difference in the mean postoperative calcium levels between the two groups at 6-wk or at longer term follow-up (mean 525 d). CONCLUSIONS: Detection of baseline IOPTH levels >500 pg/mL during parathyroidectomy performed for pHPT is not uncommon. IOPTH in patients with extremely elevated baseline levels were less likely to fall into normal range, but follow-up calcium levels were equal, suggesting that applying more stringent IOPTH criteria for predicting biochemical cure may not be appropriate for this population.

Factors associated with preference of choice of aortic aneurysm repair in the PReference for Open Versus Endovascular repair of AAA (PROVE-AAA) study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients can choose between open repair and endovascular repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, the factors associated with patient preference for one repair type over another are not well-characterized. Here we assess the factors associated with preference of choice for open or endovascular AAA repair among veterans exposed to a decision aid to help with choosing surgical treatment. METHODS: Across 12 Veterans Affairs hospitals, veterans received a decision aid covering domains including patient information sources and understanding preference. Veterans were then given a series of surveys at different timepoints examining their preferences for open versus endovascular AAA repair. Questions from the preference survey were used in analyses of patient preference. Results were analyzed using χ2 tests. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with preference for open repair or preference for EVAR. RESULTS: A total of 126 veterans received a decision aid informing them of their treatment choices, after which 121 completed all preference survey questions; five veterans completed only part of the instruments. Overall, veterans who preferred open repair were typically younger (70 years vs 73 years; P = .02), with similar rates of common comorbidities (coronary disease 16% vs 28%; P = .21), and similar aneurysms compared with those who preferred EVAR (6.0 cm vs 5.7 cm; P = .50). Veterans in both preference categories (28% of veterans preferring EVAR, 48% of veterans preferring open repair) reported taking their doctor's advice as the top box response for the single most important factor influencing their decision. When comparing the tradeoff between less invasive surgery and higher risk of long-term complications, more than one-half of veterans preferring EVAR reported invasiveness as more important compared with approximately 1 in 10 of those preferring open repair (53% vs 12%; P < .001). Shorter recovery was an important factor for the EVAR group (74%) and not important in the open repair group (76%) (P = .5). In multivariable analyses, valuing a short hospital stay (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-135.70) and valuing a shorter recovery (odds ratio, 15.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-240.20) were associated with a greater odds of preference for EVAR, whereas finding these characteristics not important was associated with a greater odds of preference for open repair. CONCLUSIONS: When faced with the decision of open repair versus EVAR, veterans who valued a shorter hospital stay and a shorter recovery were more likely to prefer EVAR, whereas those more concerned about long-term complications preferred an open repair. Veterans typically value the advice of their surgeon over their own beliefs and preferences. These findings need to be considered by surgeons as they guide their patients to a shared decision.

Reducing New Ileostomy Readmissions in a Rural Health Care Setting: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Readmission after ileostomy creation continues to be a major cause of morbidity with rates ranging from 15% to 30% due to dehydration and obstruction. Rural environments pose an added risk of readmission due to larger travel distances and lack of consistent home health services. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to reduce ileostomy-related readmission rates in a rural academic medical center. DESIGN: This is a rapid cycle quality improvement study. SETTING: This single-center study was conducted in a rural academic medical center. PATIENTS: Colorectal surgery patients receiving a new ileostomy were included in this study. INTERVENTIONS: Improvement initiatives were identified through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles (enhanced team continuity, standardized rehydration, nursing/staff education). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day readmission, average length of stay, and average time to readmission served as main outcome measures. RESULTS: Roughly equal rates of ileostomy were created in each time point, consistent with a tertiary care colorectal practice. The preimplementation readmission rate was 29%. Over the course of the entire quality improvement initiative, re-admission rates decreased by more than 50% (29% to 14%). PDSA cycle 1, which involved integrating a service-specific physician assistant to the team, allowed for greater continuity of care and had the most dramatic effect, decreasing rates by 27.5% (29% to 21%). Standardization of oral rehydration therapy and the implementation of a patient-directed intake/output sheet during PDSA cycle 2 resulted in further improvement in readmission rates (21% to 15%). Finally, implementation of nurse and physician assistant (PA)-driven patient education on fiber supplementation resulted in an additional yet nominal decrease in readmissions (15% to 14%). Latency to readmission also significantly increased throughout the study period. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its small sample size in a single-center study. CONCLUSION: Implementation of initiatives targeting enhanced team continuity, the standardization of rehydration therapies, and improved patient education decreased readmission rates in patients with new ileostomies. Rural centers, where outpatient resources are not as readily available or accessible, stand to benefit the most from these types of targeted interventions to decrease readmission rates. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B771. REDUCCIN EN LAS READMISIONES POR ILEOSTOMAS NE MEDIOS DE ATENCIN MDICA RURAL INICIATIVA DE MEJORA EN LA CALIDAD: ANTECEDENTES:La readmisión después de la creación de una ileostomía sigue siendo una de las principales causas de morbilidad con tasas que oscilan entre el 15% y el 30% debido a la deshidratación y la oclusión. Un entorno rurale presenta un riesgo adicional de readmisión debido a las mayores distancias de viaje y la falta de servicios de salud domiciliarios adecuados.OBJETIVO:Reducir las tasas de reingreso por ileostomía en un centro médico académico rural.DISEÑO:Estudio de mejoría de la calidad de ciclo rápido.AJUSTE:Estudio unicéntrico en una unidad de servicio médico académico rural.PACIENTES:Pacientes de cirugía colorrectal a quienes se les confeccionó una ileostomía.INTERVENCIONES:Iniciativas de mejoría identificadas a través de los ciclos Planificar-Hacer-Estudiar-Actuar (Continuidad del equipo mejorada, rehidratación estandarizada, educación de enfermería / personal).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:30 días de readmisión, duración media de la estadía hospitalaria, tiempo medio de reingreso.RESULTADOS:Se crearon tasas aproximadamente iguales de ileostomías un momento dado de tiempo, subsecuentes en la práctica colorrectal de atención terciaria. La tasa de readmisión previa a la implementación del estudio fue del 29%. En el transcurso de toda la iniciativa de mejoría en la calidad, las tasas de readmisión disminuyeron en más del 50% (29% a 14%). El ciclo 1 de PDSA, que implicó la integración en el equipo de un asistente médico específico, lo que permitió una mayor continuidad en la atención y tuvo el mayor efecto disminuyendo las tasas en un 27,5% (29% a 21%). La estandarización de una terapia de rehidratación oral y la implementación de una hoja de ingresos / perdidas dirigida al paciente durante el ciclo 2 de PDSA resultó en una mejoría adicional en las tasas de readmisión (21% a 15%). Finalmente, la implementación de la educación del paciente impulsada por enfermeras y AF sobre el consumo suplementario de dietas con fibra dio como resultado una disminución adicional, aunque nominal, de las readmisiones (15% a 14%). La latencia hasta la readmisión también aumentó significativamente durante el período de estudio.LIMITACIONES:Estudio de un solo centro con un muestreo de pequeño tamaño.CONCLUSIONES:La implementación de iniciativas dirigidas a mejorar la continuidad en el equipo, la estandarización de las terapias de rehidratación y la mejoría en la información de los pacientes disminuyeron las tasas de readmisión en todos aquellas personas con nuevas ileostomías. Los centros rurales, donde los recursos para pacientes ambulatorios no están tan fácilmente disponibles o accesibles, son los que más beneficiaron de este tipo de intervenciones específicas para reducir las tasas de readmisión. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B771. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Minimally Invasive Surgery Approach is Not Associated With Differences in Long-Term Bowel Function Patient-Reported Outcomes After Elective Sigmoid Colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bowel function is a common concern for patients undergoing a sigmoidectomy. We have previously demonstrated that patients with symptomatic bowel function preoperatively have substantial improvement at long-term follow-up. However, the effect of the operative approach on patient-reported bowel function is largely unknown. We aimed to evaluate the differences in long-term patient-reported bowel function after robotic or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies for benign and malignant disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected institutional database from July 2015 to July 2020. Patients included underwent a sigmoid colectomy for benign or malignant disease and completed the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at preoperative presentation, postoperatively, and long-term follow-up. Differences between preoperative and postoperative scores, as well as differences between the robotic and laparoscopic cohorts, were compared using paired t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients met inclusion criteria with a median age of 61 y, and 55% of the patients underwent robotic sigmoid colectomy, with the most common diagnosis being diverticular disease (62%). There was no significant difference between the presentation, short-term, or long-term follow-up total COREFO scores or subdomains based on the surgical technique. Patients that present asymptomatic remain asymptomatic, while those that are symptomatic demonstrate improvements for both the robotic and laparoscopic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported long-term global bowel function does not appear to differ between patients who underwent elective robotic or laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for benign or malignant disease. Patients that present asymptomatic remain asymptomatic, while those that are symptomatic demonstrate improvements, regardless of surgical technique.

The Impact of Work Status and Age in Choosing Type of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

INTRODUCTION: The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial aimed to determine the efficacy of a validated decision aid to enable better alignment between patient preference and their ultimate repair. We sought to determine the key factors influencing the decision-making of veterans for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). METHODS: A total of 235 veterans in the PROVE-AAA trial were asked their information sources regarding repairs, employment status, and preferred intervention. Answers were coded and analyzed using conventional content analysis to generate nonoverlapping themes, then stratified by employment status. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (17.8% of enrollees) provided their source of information for OSR prior to using a decision aid. 81% of retired veterans were greater than 70 y old, while 58% of nonretired veterans were greater than 70 (P = 0.003). The most common information source was from a vascular surgeon/professional or unspecified MD/other health professionals (51.4%), while sources from outside this group made up the remaining 48.5%. The most preferred procedure was EVAR. However, nonretired individuals were more likely to prefer OSR. These data on information source and preferred procedure were similar in patients who provided their source for EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans in the PROVE-AAA study were more likely to be retired and more likely to rely on information from an unspecified MD/other health professionals for EVAR. Although both retired and nonretired veterans preferred EVAR the most, nonretired veterans were more likely to prefer OSR despite being younger.

Using a cohort study of diabetes and peripheral artery disease to compare logistic regression and machine learning via random forest modeling.

BACKGROUND: This study illustrates the use of logistic regression and machine learning methods, specifically random forest models, in health services research by analyzing outcomes for a cohort of patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries in 2015 who were newly diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus. Exposure variables include whether patients received preventive measures in the 6 months following their index date: HbA1c test, foot exam, or vascular imaging study. Outcomes include any reintervention, lower extremity amputation, and death. We fit both logistic regression models as well as random forest models. RESULTS: There were 88,898 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and diabetes mellitus in our cohort. The rate of preventative treatments in the first six months following diagnosis were 52% (n = 45,971) with foot exams, 43% (n = 38,393) had vascular imaging, and 50% (n = 44,181) had an HbA1c test. The directionality of the influence for all covariates considered matched those results found with the random forest and logistic regression models. The most predictive covariate in each approach differs as determined by the t-statistics from logistic regression and variable importance (VI) in the random forest model. For amputation we see age 85 + (t = 53.17) urban-residing (VI = 83.42), and for death (t = 65.84, VI = 88.76) and reintervention (t = 34.40, VI = 81.22) both models indicate age is most predictive. CONCLUSIONS: The use of random forest models to analyze data and provide predictions for patients holds great potential in identifying modifiable patient-level and health-system factors and cohorts for increased surveillance and intervention to improve outcomes for patients. Random forests are incredibly high performing models with difficult interpretation most ideally suited for times when accurate prediction is most desirable and can be used in tandem with more common approaches to provide a more thorough analysis of observational data.

Physicians perceive that ostomates have decreased quality of life but not overall health: An international survey of physicians.

AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate physicians' perceptions of ostomates' quality of life (QoL) and comfort of care among an international sample of physicians caring for ostomates. METHOD: This was a cross-sectional survey study. We conducted a survey of primary care physicians (PCP), gastroenterologists (GI), and general surgeons (GS) from three continents using the SERMO online physician platform. We piloted the survey for content, clarity and domain development using a pilot sample of physicians from each speciality before use. We summarized responses to questions related to physician comfort of ostomate care with descriptive statistics. We conducted multiple logistic regression with the primary outcome of physician perception of ostomate QoL. RESULTS: A total of 617 physicians (PCP 264, GI 176, GS 177) completed the survey representing North America, Europe and Australia similarly. The average age was 46 years and 21% were women. Ninety per cent of physicians care for an ostomate at least once per month. Eighty eight per cent had access to enterostomal nurses. Eighty two per cent of physicians believed that ostomates have decreased QoL. Forty seven per cent believed that ostomates have decreased overall health. Almost half of respondents answered incorrectly to a 'bogus question' citing fake clinical evidence supporting a negative impact of ostomies on social relationships. Increased physician comfort in ostomy care (OR 1.30, p = 0.04) and US-based physicians (OR 1.75, p = 0.01) were associated with increased odds of answering that ostomates have no decreased QoL. CONCLUSION: Among a diverse international sample, most physicians believe that ostomates have decreased QoL but not overall health. Physician implicit bias, physician comfort and geographical variability account for these findings. Targeted efforts to increase physician comfort in ostomate care and establish universal best practices is needed.

Comparison of Social Media Utilization Among Vascular Surgeons, Interventional Cardiologists, and Interventional Radiologists at Academic Training Institutions.

BACKGROUND: Social media platforms, especially Twitter, are increasingly utilized across medical practice, education, and research. However, little is known about differences in social media use among physicians of varying specialties and its impact on recruitment of trainees. Our objective was to describe differences in social media use among vascular interventional proceduralists at academic training institutions. METHODS: We identified institutions with training programs in vascular surgery (VS), interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was used to identify non-anonymous social media profiles on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter in September 2019. Influencers were defined as physicians with more than 1,000 Twitter followers. Follow ratio was defined as the number of followers divided by the number of accounts followed. Between-specialty differences were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n=451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. Across all physicians, a minority of providers utilize social media (Facebook: 24.9%, n = 331; Instagram: 10.8%, n = 143; Twitter: 18.0%, n = 240). VS were significantly more likely to use Instagram (P = 0.001) but there was not a significant difference in utilization of Facebook and Twitter. Among Twitter users, VS had fewer followers on average (median 178, inter-quartile range [IQR] 39-555) than IR (median 272, IQR 50-793, P = 0.26) and IC (median 286, IQR 71-1257, P = 0.052). IC were most likely to be influencers (30.9%, n = 25) followed by IR (17.9%, n = 15) and VS (10.7%, n = 8, P = 0.006). On average, interventional cardiologists had the highest follow ratio (mean 4.9 ± 7.1) compared to interventional radiologists (mean 3.2 ± 5.5) and vascular surgeons (mean 2.5 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A minority of academic vascular interventional proceduralists utilize social media in a non-anonymous manner. On Twitter, interventional cardiologists are most likely to be influencers based on number of followers and, on average, have the highest follow ratio. Vascular surgeons could potentially benefit from pursuing greater influence and visibility on social media as a means to recruit trainees.

Does Bowel Function Change After Colectomy for Colon Malignancy?

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer patients often ask how surgery will affect bowel function. Current understanding is informed by conflicting data, making preoperative patient counseling difficult. We aimed to evaluate patient-reported bowel function changes after colectomy for colon malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected institutional database from July 2015 to June 2019. The included patients underwent colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon, and completed the Colorectal Functional Outcome (COREFO) questionnaire at preoperative presentation and postoperative followup. Preoperative and postoperative scores were compared using paired t-tests. Multivariable analysis was performed using domains demonstrating statistical significance on bivariate analysis, assessing the factors that were associated with symptomatic bowel function. RESULTS: We identified 117 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 13 y. The median time between preoperative and postoperative questionnaire completion was 52 d (interquartile range 45-70). Bowel movement frequency increased significantly from a mean preoperative score of 9.72 to a mean postoperative score of 14.2 (P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the remaining four domains of bowel function or global function. Multivariable analysis demonstrated higher likelihood of symptomatic postoperative frequency scores in male patients (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.44-11.11, P = 0.007) and patients with symptomatic preoperative frequency (OR 5.56, 95% CI 1.62-19.02, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported bowel movement frequency worsens at postoperative follow-up after colectomy for colon cancer, while overall bowel function does not change. Men and patients with preoperative symptomatic frequency have an increased likelihood of reporting symptomatic postoperative frequency. These findings should guide more personalized and evidence-based preoperative patient counseling.

Epidemiology and Risk of Amputation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Artery Disease.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) stems from atherosclerosis of lower extremity arteries with resultant arterial narrowing or occlusion. The most severe form of PAD is termed chronic limb-threatening ischemia and carries a significant risk of limb loss and cardiovascular mortality. Diabetes mellitus is known to increase the incidence of PAD, accelerate disease progression, and increase disease severity. Patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus and PAD are at high risk for major complications, such as amputation. Despite a decrease in the overall number of amputations performed annually in the United States, amputation rates among those with both diabetes mellitus and PAD have remained stable or even increased in high-risk subgroups. Within this cohort, there is significant regional, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic variation in amputation risk. Specifically, residents of rural areas, African-American and Native American patients, and those of low socioeconomic status carry the highest risk of amputation. The burden of amputation is severe, with 5-year mortality rates exceeding those of many malignancies. Furthermore, caring for patients with PAD and diabetes mellitus imposes a significant cost to the healthcare system-estimated to range from $84 billion to $380 billion annually. Efforts to improve the quality of care for those with PAD and diabetes mellitus must focus on the subgroups at high risk for amputation and the disparities they face in the receipt of both preventive and interventional cardiovascular care. Better understanding of these social, economic, and structural barriers will prove to be crucial for cardiovascular physicians striving to better care for patients facing this challenging combination of chronic diseases.

Long-term bowel function patient-reported outcomes after successful chemoradiation for carcinoma of the anal canal.

AIM: We aimed to evaluate long-term changes in patient-reported bowel function from presentation of anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) successfully treated with the modified Nigro protocol using a patient-reported outcome measure for bowel function. METHOD: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected patient-reported outcomes for bowel function. We included patients that were successfully treated with the modified Nigro protocol for anal SCC and had completed the Colorectal Functional Outcomes (COREFO) questionnaire at presentation, following the modified Nigro treatment (post-Nigro), and at subsequent surveillance visits (medium and long term). We compared the differences in mean domain and total COREFO scores using a paired t test for each paired time point. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Time from completion of the modified Nigro was post-Nigro at 3-6 months, medium-length follow-up at 8-12 months and long-term follow-up at 12-18 months. There was significant improvement in the stool-related aspects domain (pain, bleeding and anal skin irritation) from presentation to our short- and medium-length follow-up (42.5 to 23.7, P = 0.01). There was worsening in the frequency domain in the medium term (7.23 to 14.5, P = 0.02). There were no differences in any other domain or time point. CONCLUSION: Global bowel function does not appear to change following successful treatment of anal canal SCC with the modified Nigro protocol in the long term. There are some improvements in stool-related aspects and worsening in bowel movement frequency at medium-length follow-up. These findings should help surgeons counsel patients with regard to bowel function expectations for those with anal canal SCC in the long term.

Online Ratings for Vascular Interventional Proceduralists Vary by Physician Specialty.

BACKGROUND: Multiple specialties offer vascular interventional care, creating potential competition for referrals and procedures. At the same time, patient/consumer ratings have become more impactful for physicians who perform vascular procedures. We hypothesized that there are differences in online ratings based on specialty. METHODS: We used official program lists from the Association for Graduate Medical Education to identify institutions with training programs in integrated vascular surgery (VS), integrated interventional radiology (IR), and interventional cardiology (IC). Faculty providers were identified in each specialty at these institutions. A standardized search was performed to collect online ratings from Vitals.com, Healthgrades.com, and Google.com as well as from online demographics. Between specialty differences were analyzed using chi-squared and analysis of variance tests as appropriate. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors associated with review volume and star rating. RESULTS: A total of 1,330 providers (n = 454 VS, n = 451 IR, n = 425 IC) were identified across 47 institutions in 27 states. VS (55.5%-69.4%) and IC (63.8%-71.1%) providers were significantly more likely to have reviews than IR (28.6%-48.8%) providers across all online platforms (P < 0.001 for all websites). Across all platforms, IC providers were rated significantly higher than VS and IR providers. Multivariable regression showed that provider specialty and additional time in practice were associated with higher review volume. In addition to specialty, review volume was associated with star rating as those physicians with more reviews tended to have a higher rating. CONCLUSIONS: On average, vascular surgeons have more reviews and are more highly rated than interventional radiologists but tend to have fewer reviews and lower ratings than interventional cardiologists. VS providers may benefit from encouraging patients to file online reviews, especially in competitive markets.

A Comparison of Surgical Quality and Patient Satisfaction Indicators Between VA Hospitals and Hospitals Near VA Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act established a community care program allowing veterans to receive care outside Veteran Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). We sought to compare patient safety and satisfaction indicators from VAMCs and surrounding non-VAMCs (non-VAs). METHODS: We identified VAMCs with at least one non-VA acute care hospital within 25 miles in three geographic regions (West/Southwest, New England, and Deep South). Children's, specialty, and critical access hospitals were excluded. Using publicly available Hospital Compare data, we analyzed VAMC and surrounding non-VA performance in postsurgical patient safety indicator (PSI) events and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction scores and hospital star ratings. RESULTS: The 34 VAMCs performed better than 319 surrounding non-VAs in rates of wound dehiscence, accidental lacerations, and perioperative hemorrhage/hematoma as well as composite PSI rating (P < 0.05). VAMCs performed significantly better than non-VAs (18.0 versus 51.4 events per 1000 patients, P < 0.001) in composite surgery-specific PSIs. When comparing mean linear Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems score star ratings (1-5 scale), VAMCs had similar performance in overall hospital rating compared with non-VAs (3.28 versus 3.38, P = 0.48) and summary rating of hospital stays (2.87 versus 2.92, P = 0.69). When compiled patient satisfaction star ratings were compared, there was no difference (2.96 versus 2.97, P = 0.9). VAMCs performed worse than non-VAs in "would recommend" ratings (2.7 versus 3.13, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Across disparate regions, VAMCs match or outperform neighboring non-VAs in surgical quality metrics and patient satisfaction ratings. Veterans receiving surgical care at VAMCs may receive equivalent or better care than at non-VAs.

Damage-associated molecular patterns in resuscitated hemorrhagic shock are mitigated by peritoneal fluid administration.

Conventional resuscitation (CR) of hemorrhagic shock (HS), a significant cause of trauma mortality, is intravenous blood and fluids. CR restores central hemodynamics, but vital organ flow can drop, causing hypoperfusion, hypoxia, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), and remote organ dysfunction (i.e., lung). CR plus direct peritoneal resuscitation (DPR) prevents intestinal and hepatic hypoperfusion. We hypothesized that DPR prevents lung injury in HS/CR by altering DAMPs. Anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to groups ( n = 8/group) in one of two sets: 1) sham (no HS, CR, or DPR), 2) HS/CR (HS = 40% mean arterial pressure (MAP) for 60 min, CR = shed blood + 2 volumes normal saline), or 3) HS/CR + DPR. The first set underwent whole lung blood flow by colorimetric microspheres. The second set underwent tissue collection for Luminex, ELISAs, and histopathology. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and DAMPs were measured in serum and/or lung, including cytokines, hyaluronic acid (HA), high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), myeloid differentiation primary response 88 protein (MYD88), and TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-ß (TRIF). Statistics were by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test with a priori P < 0.05. HS/CR increased serum LPS, HA, HMGB1, and some cytokines [interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-6, and interferon-γ]. Lung TLR4 and MYD88 were increased but not TRIF compared with Shams. HS/CR + DPR decreased LPS, HA, cytokines, HMGB1, TLR4, and MYD88 levels but did not alter TRIF compared with HS/CR. The data suggest that gut-derived DAMPs can be modulated by adjunctive DPR to prevent activation of lung TLR-4-mediated processes. Also, DPR improved lung blood flow and reduced lung tissue injury. Adjunctive DPR in HS/CR potentially improves morbidity and mortality by downregulating the systemic DAMP response.