Mitral-Tricuspid Regurgitation Change After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Its Effect on Mortality and Hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) are present in approximately 20-60% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). This study aims to evaluate the impact of TAVI on MR and TR, pulmonary hypertension, and reverse cardiac remodeling in these patients.  Methods: Out of 240 patients who underwent TAVI, 79 who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed. RESULTS: In our study, 46.8% (n = 37) of the patients were male. Nineteen (24.1%) patients died within two years. Before TAVI, 34 (43%) patients had moderate-to-severe MR, which decreased to 18 (22.7%) after the procedure (P < 0.05). Similarly, the number of patients with moderate-to-severe TR decreased from 26 (32.9%) before TAVI to 12 (15%) after the procedure (P < 0.05). Of the patients, 50.6% (n = 40) did not require hospitalization after the procedure, while 25 were hospitalized once, 12 twice, and 2 three times. The mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) values of the patients decreased from 44.30 ± 14.42 mmHg before the procedure to 39.09 ± 11.77 mmHg after the procedure (Z=-3.506, P < 0.001). No correlation was found between changes in MR and TR grades after TAVI and mortality or hospitalization during follow-up. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), free wall annular S' velocity, left atrial volume (LAV), or LAV index (LAVI) before and after TAVI.  Conclusion: There was a significant decrease in moderate-to-severe MR and TR after TAVI; however, this did not impact hospitalization or mortality rates. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in right ventricular systolic function or in LAV and LAVI before and after TAVI.

Post transcatheter aortic valve replacement ejection fraction response is predictor of survival among patients with whole range of systolic dysfunction.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to assess the prognostic effects of T ranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on the patients with different degrees of left ventricular systolic (LVS) function and severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Also examines the prognostic association of LV remodelling after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients stratified into four subgroups with respect to baseline LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (LVEF > 25%, LVEF 25%-40%, LVEF 41%-49% and LVEF ≥ 50%). We compared the baseline characteristics and temporal changes in echocardiographic parameters of the patients after TAVR, and determined all-cause mortality (ACM) in a follow-up period of mean 20.7 ± 15.8 months (up to 84). There were 495 patients at 8 centres. ACM was similar in all groups (28.1%, 29.5%, 22.5% and 24.1% respectively; p = .44). Immediately after TAVR, there was an improvement in LVEF (from 38.7 ± 9.4 to 44.9% ± 10.9%, p < .001). The percent change in LVEF (pDelta-EF) immediately after TAVR was more prominent in the patients with LVEF < 25% (48.1 ± 49.6, 21.9 ± 29.6), (8.4% ± 15.2%) and (2.1 ± 7)) (p < .01). Importantly, a 12% increase in absolute Delta-EF was observed in patients with LVEF< 25% with 100% sensitivity and 42.5% specificity for the prediction of ACM. CONCLUSION: This study shows that TAVR is beneficial in the whole range of LVS function, irrespective of the baseline EF. Early recovery in LVEF after TAVR is critical for survival, however, it seems to be more eye catching in the patients with advanced heart failure with reduced EF.