RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess geometry changes of the ascending aorta after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending aortic dissection and identify potential risk factors for diameter and length change. METHODS: Between April 2009 and July 2021, 102 patients were treated for acute descending aortic dissections (type B and non-A non-B) with TEVAR and were included in this analysis. Computed tomography angiographic scans were transferred to a dedicated imaging software and detailed aortic measurements (including length, diameter and area) were taken in multiplanar reconstruction postoperatively, after 6 months and annually thereafter. RESULTS: Sixty-five (58%) patients were male, with a mean age of 66 (±11). Four (4%) patients were diagnosed with connective tissue disease. Before TEVAR, 79% of our patients were treated with a mean of 1.5 (±1.2) different classes of antihypertensive medications. This number rose to 98% after TEVAR and 2.7 (±1.0) different antihypertensive drugs. There was no significant change in length, diameter, cross-sectional area, or volume of the ascending aorta during the follow-up of 3 years after TEVAR. Body height was a negative predictor for mean ascending aortic diameter (P value = -0.013; B = -8.890) and mean aortic diameter at the level of the brachiocephalic trunk (P value = 0.039; B = -14.763). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest no significant changes in the ascending aorta following TEVAR of the descending thoracic aorta during mid-term follow-up when under stringent blood pressure medication. Additionally, we did not find any modifiable risk factors for geometry parameter increase.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate if frozen elephant trunk (FET) implantation leads to negative cardiac remodeling in dissection and non-dissection patients and to determine whether there are differences when FET is implanted as an aortic redo procedure or initially. METHODS: Between March 2013 and April 2022, 148 patients received FET without any concomitant procedures and therefore formed our cohort. One hundred and four were treated for dissecting and 44 for non-dissecting pathologies. Eighty-four received FET initially and 64 as an aortic redo procedure. Data were collected retrospectively using our center's dedicated aortic database as well as transthoracic echocardiographic reports of our cardiologists. RESULTS: In the first weeks after FET implantation, dissection and non-dissection patients show a significant increase of mild valvular insufficiencies-a significant decrease of ejection fraction is only seen in dissection patients but these changes do not stay significant during later follow-up. Patients who receive FET as an aortic redo procedure tend to have significantly larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameters and higher LV masses, however, in longitudinal analysis, there were no long-term negative effects in patients who received FET initially or as aortic redo. CONCLUSION: In the first 2 years after implantation, FET has no echocardiographically measurable effect regarding negative cardiac remodeling in dissection and non-dissection patients, independent of the fact it is implanted initially or as an aortic redo procedure.
RESUMEN
Background and objectives: The treatment of pathologies of the aortic arch is a complex field of cardiovascular surgery that has witnessed enormous progress recently. Such treatment is mainly performed in high-volume centres, and surgeons gain great experience in mastering potential difficulties even under emergency circumstances, thereby ensuring the effective therapy of more complex pathologies with lower complication rates. As the numbers of patients rise, so does the need for well-trained surgeons in aortic arch surgery. But how is it possible to learn surgical procedures in a responsible way that, in addition to surgical techniques, also places particular demands on the overall surgical management such as perfusion strategy and neuro-protection? This is why a good training programme teaching young surgeons without increasing the risk for patients is indispensable. Our intention was to highlight the most challenging aspects of aortic arch surgery teaching and how young surgeons can master them. Materials and Methods: We analysed the literature to find out which methods are most suitable for such teaching goals and what result they reveal when serving as teaching procedures. Results: Several studies were found comparing the surgical outcome of young trainees with that of specialists. It was found that the results were comparable whether the procedure was performed by a specialist or by a trainee assisted by the specialist. Conclusions: We thus came to the conclusion that even for such a complex type of intervention, the responsible training of young surgeons by experienced specialists is possible. However, it requires a clear strategy and team approach to ensure a safe outcome for the patient.