Mental health outcomes after major trauma in Ontario: a population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Major injury continues to be a common source of morbidity and mortality; improving the functional recovery of survivors of major trauma requires a better understanding of the mental health outcomes that may occur in this population. We assessed the association between major trauma and the development of a new mental health diagnosis or death by suicide. METHODS: We completed a population-based, self-controlled, longitudinal cohort analysis using linked administrative data on patients treated for major trauma in Ontario between 2005 and 2010. All survivors were included and composite rates of mental health diagnoses during inpatient admissions were compared between the 5 years after injury and the 5 years before injury, using Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations. The incidence of suicide was calculated for the 5 years after injury. Risk factors for suicide were calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. RESULTS: The analysis included 19 338 patients, predominantly men (70.7%) from urban areas (82.6%), with unintentional (89%), blunt injuries (93.4%). Overall, trauma was associated with a 40% increase in the postinjury rate of mental health diagnoses (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.4, 95% [confidence interval] CI 1.1 to 1.8). The suicide rate was 70 per 100 000 patients per year, substantially higher than the population average. Risk factors for completing suicide were prior inpatient diagnosis of mood disorder (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, 95% CI 2.1 to 8.8) and self-inflicted injury (HR 7.8, 95% CI 3.9 to 15.4). INTERPRETATION: Survivors of major trauma are at a heightened risk of developing mental health conditions or death by suicide in the years after their injury. Patients with pre-existing mental health disorders or who are recovering from a self-inflicted injury are at particularly high risk.

Health service use in major trauma survivors: a population-based cohort study from Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how major trauma survivors access health services in the years following their injury. Our study sought to characterize patterns of health services use in trauma survivors following discharge from a provincial trauma centre and to identify sociodemographic factors associated with service utilization. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective case-control study using linked administrative data on trauma survivors' population-based controls between April 1, 2011, to March 31, 2021. For each major trauma survivor, we matched four cases based on age and sex. The primary outcome was the composite rate (sum) of health service use episodes including outpatient visits to family physicians and specialists, emergency department (ED) visits, and acute care hospital admissions during the five-year period following discharge from the trauma centre. We used multivariate regression to compute rate ratios comparing the rates of health service use in trauma survivors versus controls and to assess for associations between sociodemographic variables and health services use. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of a total of 273,406 individuals: 55,060 trauma survivors and 218,346 controls. Trauma survivors were predominately males (71%) with a median age of 46 years (IQR: 26-65 years). Health service use in trauma survivors peaked within a year of hospital discharge but remained increased throughout the follow up period. Trauma survivorship was associated with a 56% increase in overall health services use (Adjusted Rate Ratio 1.56, 95% CI: 1.55-1.57), including an 88% increase in hospital admissions (Adjusted Rate Ratio 1.88, 95% CI: 1.85-1.92). Male sex and rural residence were associated with a reduced overall use of health services but greater use of ED services. CONCLUSION: Major trauma survivors have long-term health services needs that persist for years after discharge from the trauma centre. Future research should focus on the understanding why trauma survivors have prolonged health services requirements and ensure care needs are aligned with service delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective cohort study, Level IV.

Longer-term rates of survival and reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt aortic injury: a retrospective population-based cohort study from Ontario, Canada.

Objectives: Blunt aortic injury (BAI) is associated with a high rate of mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has emerged as the preferred treatment option for patients with BAI. In this study, we compare the longer-term outcomes of patients receiving TEVAR with other treatment options for BAI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative health data on patients with BAI in Ontario, Canada between 2009 and 2020. Patients with BAI and who survived at least 24 hours after hospital admission were identified using diagnostic codes. We classified patients as having received TEVAR, open surgical, hybrid repair, or medical management as their initial treatment approach based on procedure codes. The primary outcome was survival to maximum follow-up. Secondary outcomes included aorta-related mortality or aortic reintervention. Cox's proportional hazards models were used to estimate the effect of TEVAR on survival. Results: 427 patients with BAI were followed for a median of 3 years (IQR: 1-6 years), with 348 patients (81.5%) surviving. Survival to maximum follow-up did not differ between treatment groups: TEVAR: 79%, surgical repair: 63.6%, hybrid repair: 85.7%, medical management: 83.3% (p=0.10). In adjusted analyses, TEVAR was not associated with improved survival compared with surgical repair (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.6), hybrid repair (HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.5 to 3.6), or medical management (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 0.8 to 2.6). Aortic reinterventions were required in only 2.6% of surviving patients but were significantly more common in the TEVAR group (p<0.01). Conclusions: The longer-term survival from BAI appears highly favorable with low rates of reintervention and death in the years after injury, regardless of the initial treatment approach. Level of evidence: IV, Therapeutic study.

Emergency department return visits and hospital admissions in trauma team assessed patients initially discharged from the emergency department: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Many injured patients are transported directly to trauma centers, found to be minimally injured, and discharged directly home from the emergency department (ED). Our objectives were to characterize the short-term outcomes in this discharged patient population and to identify patient factors predictive of ED return visits. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative data sets involving patients assessed at trauma centers in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2009, and March 31, 2020. Patients who were assessed by a trauma team and discharged directly home from ED were included. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with an ED return visit within 14 days. We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify patient characteristics predictive of at least one ED return visit. RESULTS: There were 5,550 patients included in the study. A total of 1,004 (18.1%) of patients had at least one ED return visit, but only 100 patients (1.8%) were admitted to hospital following initial discharge. Common reasons for ED return visits included wound care concerns (17.2%), head injury complaints (15.6%), and substance misuse (6.8%). Rural residence (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.45-2.29), history of anxiety disorder (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.54-2.73), high baseline ED usage (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.03-3.28), penetrating injury (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.20-1.68), and extremity fracture (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.24-1.88) predicted return visits. CONCLUSION: Patients discharged directly have high rates of ED return visits but low rates of hospital admission or delayed surgical intervention. Trauma services should expand quality assurance initiatives to capture return visits, understand any gaps in clinical service provision, and aim to minimize unnecessary ED return visits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic/Epidemiological; Level IV.

Injury-related deaths in the Ontario provincial trauma system: a retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although Ontario has an established trauma system, it experiences a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality from injury. Our objective was to describe patterns of fatal injury in Ontario, with a focus on location of death (out of hospital, trauma or non-trauma centre) and receipt of surgical intervention before death. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked administrative data on fatal injuries in children and adults (no age restrictions) in Ontario between 2000 and 2016. We identified injury-related deaths in the Ontario Registrar General Death database. We developed descriptive statistics for injury characteristics and causes of death. We calculated the fatal injury incidence rate for each year of the study. The primary outcome was cause of death; the secondary outcome was receipt of surgical intervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 19 408 people. The mean annual incidence of fatal injury averaged 8.7 (95% confidence interval 7.7-9.6) per 100 000. The most common mechanisms of injury were motor vehicle collisions (12 065, 62.2%), followed by gunshot wounds (3134, 16.1%) and falls (2387, 12.3%). Deaths frequently occurred out of hospital (72.6%), rather than at a trauma centre (14.2%) or non-trauma centre (13.2%). Patients treated at trauma centres were significantly more likely to receive a surgical intervention (standardized difference 0.6) than those treated at non-trauma centres. INTERPRETATION: Most injury deaths in Ontario occur in the out-of-hospital setting or are managed at non-trauma centres; many patients receive no surgical intervention before death. There are likely opportunities to improve access to specialized injury care in Ontario's trauma system.

Prehospital traumatic cardiac arrest: Management and outcomes from the resuscitation outcomes consortium epistry-trauma and PROPHET registries.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic arrests have historically had poor survival rates. Identifying salvageable patients and ideal management is challenging. We aimed to (1) describe the management and outcomes of prehospital traumatic arrests; (2) determine regional variation in survival; and (3) identify Advanced Life Support (ALS) procedures associated with survival. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of cases from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epistry-Trauma and Prospective Observational Prehospital and Hospital Registry for Trauma (PROPHET) registries. Patients were included if they had a blunt or penetrating injury and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between ALS procedures and survival. RESULTS: We included 2,300 patients who were predominately young (Epistry mean [SD], 39 [20] years; PROPHET mean [SD], 40 [19] years), males (79%), injured by blunt trauma (Epistry, 68%; PROPHET, 67%), and treated by ALS paramedics (Epistry, 93%; PROPHET, 98%). A total of 145 patients (6.3%) survived to hospital discharge. More patients with blunt (Epistry, 8.3%; PROPHET, 6.5%) vs. penetrating injuries (Epistry, 4.6%; PROPHET, 2.7%) survived. Most survivors (81%) had vitals on emergency medical services arrival. Rates of survival varied significantly between the 12 study sites (p = 0.048) in the Epistry but not PROPHET (p = 0.14) registries.Patients in the PROPHET registry who received a supraglottic airway insertion or intubation experienced decreased odds of survival (adjusted OR, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.93; and 0.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.78, respectively) compared to those receiving bag-mask ventilation. No other procedures were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival from traumatic arrest may be higher than expected, particularly in blunt trauma and patients with vitals on emergency medical services arrival. Although limited by confounding and statistical power, no ALS procedures were associated with increased odds of survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level IV.

Neonatal anesthesia for studies of hamster parental behavior when infanticidal aggression is a possibility.

Experiments involving investigation of the neuroendocrine basis for paternal care in rodents risk activation of aggressive behavior toward pups. To minimize pain and suffering during tests of parental responsiveness requiring retrieval of a displaced pup to its nest, a method of anesthetizing the pup was developed in Djungarian hamsters, Phodopus campbelli. A surgical plane of anesthesia, as measured by criteria, such as respiratory depression, loss of the pedal reflex, and failure to increase respiratory rate or to vocalize in response to handling, was achieved by use of intraperitoneal administration of a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Both parents (tested separately) expressed normal behavior toward anesthetized pups. In random order, a saline-injected or anesthetized pup was displaced from its nest in the home cage. There were no differences in pick-up or retrieval rates between saline and anesthetized pups for either parent. A third test using an unmanipulated pup confirmed that parental behavior was not reduced toward an anesthetized pup. However, if anesthetized pups were tested first among littermates, retrieval by males was less likely. This method will, therefore, underestimate retrieval behavior in males, but not females. Adult male hamsters that had never been parents also expressed expected behavior by attacking the pup in 45% of cases. This method provides an efficient and effective means of protecting pups while allowing adults to express a wide range of parental and infanticidal behaviors. It also has application in behavioral screening of transgenic strains toward unrelated young.

An inventory of Canadian trauma systems: opportunities for improving access to trauma care.

OBJECTIVE: Despite evidence that patients suffering major traumatic injuries have improved outcomes when cared for within an organized system, the extent of trauma system development in Canada is limited. We sought to compile a detailed inventory of trauma systems in Canada as a first step toward identifying opportunities for improving access to trauma care. METHODS: We distributed a nationwide online and mail survey to stakeholders intended to evaluate the extent of implementation of specific trauma system components. Targeted stakeholders included emergency physicians, trauma surgeons, trauma program medical directors and program managers, prehospital providers, and decision makers at the regional and provincial levels. A "snowball" approach was used to expand the sample base of the survey. Descriptive statistics were generated to quantify the nature and extent of trauma system development by region. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 38.7%, and all levels of stakeholders and all provinces/territories were represented. All provinces were found to have designated trauma centres; however, only 60% were found to have been accredited within the past 10 years. Components present in 50% or fewer provinces included an inclusive trauma system model, interfacility transfer agreements, and a mechanism to track bed availability within the system. CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the extent of trauma system development in Canada. Although all provinces have designated trauma centres, opportunities exist in many systems to implement additional components to improve the inclusiveness of care. In future work, we intend to quantify the strength of the relationship between different trauma system components and access to definitive trauma care.

Ontogeny of the transition from killer to caregiver in dwarf hamsters (Phodopus campbelli) with biparental care.

Biparental Phodopus campbelli and uniparental P. sungorus juvenile litters (2 males, 2 females) both consumed amniotic fluid and placenta during the birth of younger siblings. Three days later, P. campbelli juveniles were most responsive to a displaced younger sibling. Thus, P. campbelli are responsive to pups as juvenile alloparents and as new parents; however, at intervening ages, infanticidal attack (bite) was seen. At 5, 7, 9, 11, or 13 weeks of age, male and female P. campbelli were given a 5-min test with an unrelated, 3-day-old, anesthetized pup. Females attacked more often than males, yet pup-retrieval rates did not differ. Female aggression increased with age and was replaced by retrieval behavior 3 days after parturition. Male attack ceased after a birth, but parental behavior did not increase, remaining below the rate for new fathers tested with their own awake pup. Over repeated testing, behavior in one test did not predict behavior in another. Transitions from caregiving alloparent to infanticidal adult and back to parental care were clear in females, but less discrete with this stimulus paradigm in these highly paternal males.