Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance of Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Polymerase Chain Reaction in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia Within the Intensive Care Unit. A Retrospective Study.

Background: The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounts for 20% to 40% of all hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) cases with mortality rates up to 55%. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential, especially in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Nasal MRSA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) diagnostic utility evidence is conflicting in the literature for HAP due to a low number of HAP patients included in prior studies or due to the lack of high-yield gold standard cultures defined for comparisons. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a 65-bed medical ICU, and encompassing all adult patients admitted from January 2015 to March 2023 for HAP. Respiratory cultures included were those obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage or endotracheal suction within 7 days of nasal MRSA PCR testing. Results: The study included 412 patients; 56.8% were males and 65% were Whites. The mean age was 60.5 years. Most patients (82.5%) underwent MRSA-PCR before intubation, and the average time between MRSA-PCR and lower respiratory cultures was 2.15 days. The diagnostic performance of nasal MRSA PCR in diagnosing HAP in the ICU yielded a sensitivity (Sen) of 47.83%, specificity (Sp) of 92.29%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 26.83%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.77%. For nonventilator HAP (nv-HAP) cases sensitivity was at 50%, specificity 92.83%, PPV 28.57%, and NPV at 97.00%. In ventilator-acquired pneumonia (VAP-HAP), the corresponding values were 42.86%, 90.91%, 23.08%, and 96.15%, respectively. Conclusion: The nasal MRSA PCR shows a high NPV and low false negative rate, suggesting it is a reliable tool for ruling out MRSA HAP in ICU patients. Care should be taken into account for disease prevalence and clinical context, as these factors may influence test performance. Further validation through prospective large-sample studies utilizing high-yield lower respiratory tract cultures is necessary to confirm our findings.

Effect of Rapid Response Order Panels on Resident and Nurse Satisfaction.

Background: Hospitals are required to have rapid response (RR) systems in place to respond to acute changes in a patient's condition. In high-stress situations like RR, medical residents face decision-making challenges due to time constraints and perceived pressure. Instituting order panels (OPs) can facilitate clinical decision making and improve residents' and nurses' satisfaction and patient safety. Objective: This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to create and institute standardized OPs for common RR clinical scenarios to improve satisfaction of internal medicine residents and nurses with the RR process. Methods: This was a single tertiary care center QI project that developed OPs for 10 common RR scenarios. Resident and nursing satisfaction with RR was assessed before and after OP implementation via survey and qualitative data collection. Results: Residents and nurses expressed high levels of satisfaction across various aspects of the RR process before and after OP implementation in both quantitative and qualitative analysis. Increased satisfaction was observed among residents regarding time spent placing orders (94%; P = 0.02) and time spent correcting wrong orders (87%; P = 0.03) after OP implementation. The nurses' survey revealed no statistically significant differences in satisfaction before and after the implementation of OPs regarding communication, collaboration, efficiency, and organization of the team. Conclusion: The introduction of standardized OPs for RRs resulted in increased satisfaction among internal medicine residents in terms of order placement and correcting wrong orders. Nurse satisfaction based on survey responses remained neutral. Qualitative data from both groups demonstrated a positive impact on communication, efficiency, and teamwork.

Clinical perspectives in bronchiectasis management.

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammatory airway disease that results in permanent lung damage and can correlate with considerable clinical and economic burden. There are gaps in knowledge surrounding bronchiectasis, for which there are no published US-based treatment guidelines or FDA-approved therapies. Given the current challenges and gaps in care, the authors of this article convened for an AJMC® roundtable in March 2024. This publication summarizes the main findings of that roundtable and situates them in a scholarly context. Panelists agreed that patients with unexplained chronic cough or fatigue, purulent sputum production, hemoptysis, or repeated infection should undergo CT scanning to assess the presence of bronchiectasis, which has been estimated to affect approximately 364,000 to 558,000 individuals at least 18 years of age. They noted that disease symptoms and treatment burden can considerably diminish patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and that an exacerbation uniformly signifies deteriorating health and substantially impacts disease progression, hospitalization rates, and mortality. Absent an FDA-approved therapy, panelists' top management priorities were preventing or reducing exacerbations and maintaining or improving HRQOL. Panelists concluded that providers are ill-equipped to change the course of this heterogenous disease and that there is a real need for options to manage symptoms, for US-based guidelines, and for more research into epidemiology, etiology, and treatment.

Admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict mortality in burn patients: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) proves to be a convenient and cost-effective marker with studies showing that a high NLR can serve as a mortality indicator in burn cases. We conducted a meta-analysis aiming to explore whether on-admission NLR values could serve as predictors of mortality in burn patients. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase were searched from inception until January 2024. We included all studies investigating burn patients that contain information on the NLR value at the time of hospital admission and mortality outcomes. The studies were critically appraised using the NIH Quality Assessment Tool. RESULTS: Nine studies fulfilled our criteria with a total population of 1837 participants, including 1526 survivor Burn patients and 311 non-survivor Burn patients. The overall mean difference measured by random model showed a significant increase in NLR by 5.06 (95% CI 3.42, 6.68) p ≤ 0.001 for the non-survivor group over the survivors group with heterogeneity I2 = 67.33%, p ≤ 0.001. A meta-regression was done to investigate the potential source of heterogeneity among studies. The results showed that age (p = 0.394), gender (p = 0.164), and sample size (p = 0.099) did not contribute to the source of heterogeneity, however, the burn surface area contributed significantly (p = 0.002). A leave-one-out meta-analysis was done, showing that omitting Le Qui et al., leads to significantly decrease the heterogeneity to be I2 = 2.73%. Meta-regression repeated to assess the burn surface area again to be found noncontributing (p = 0.404). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that elevated NLR values can serve as a mortality indicator in burn cases. This will have a great clinical impact by aiding in stratifying the burn patients on admission.